995 resultados para Subjective process


Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Perceptual voice analysis is a subjective process. However, despite reports of varying degrees of intrajudge and interjudge reliability, it is widely used in clinical voice evaluation. One of the ways to improve the reliability of this procedure is to provide judges with signals as external standards so that comparison can be made in relation to these anchor signals. The present study used a Klatt speech synthesizer to create a set of speech signals with varying degree of three different voice qualities based on a Cantonese sentence. The primary objective of the study was to determine whether different abnormal voice qualities could be synthesized using the built-in synthesis parameters using a perceptual study. The second objective was to determine the relationship between acoustic characteristics of the synthesized signals and perceptual judgment. Twenty Cantonese-speaking speech pathologists with at least three years of clinical experience in perceptual voice evaluation were asked to undertake two tasks. The first was to decide whether the voice quality of the synthesized signals was normal or not. The second was to decide whether the abnormal signals should be described as rough, breathy, or vocal fry. The results showed that signals generated with a small degree of aspiration noise were perceived as breathiness while signals with a small degree of flutter or double pulsing were perceived as roughness. When the flutter or double pulsing increased further, tremor and vocal fry, rather than roughness, were perceived. Furthermore, the amount of aspiration noise, flutter, or double pulsing required for male voice stimuli was different from that required for the female voice stimuli with a similar level of perceptual breathiness and roughness. These findings showed that changes in perceived vocal quality could be achieved by systematic modifications of synthesis parameters. This opens up the possibility of using synthesized voice signals as external standards or anchors to improve the reliability of clinical perceptual voice evaluation. (C) 2002 Acoustical Society of America.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Malgré les progrès de la médecine moderne et l’avancement des connaissances, le soulagement de la douleur demeure un domaine peu étudié et peu compris. Les enfants avec un diagnostic de paralysie cérébrale et une incapacité de communiquer verbalement font partie des populations vulnérables à risque de ne pas être compris. Il est maintenant prouvé que ces enfants peuvent ressentir des douleurs provenant de diverses sources. Le but de cette étude exploratoire de type qualitative est de tenter de déterminer les enjeux éthiques qui sont rencontrés par les intervenants d’un milieu d’hébergement, lorsque l’on veut évaluer et soulager la douleur chez cette population d’enfants. L’information a été recueillie à partir d’entrevues semi-structurées avec des familles, des gardiens et des intervenants. Les données ont ensuite été comparées à ce qui est retrouvé dans la littérature. Selon les parents et les gardiens, l’ensemble du personnel régulier du milieu d’hébergement et répit démontre une plus grande compréhension des besoins de leur enfant que les intervenants qu’ils ont rencontrés dans le milieu de soins aigus. Les intervenants évaluent les comportements observés sur une base subjective ce qui entraîne une prise en charge inégale. Ils expriment également que la principale difficulté de travailler auprès de ces enfants est l’incertitude d’avoir bien interprété le comportement et d’avoir posé le bon geste. En conclusion, malgré les recherches et la possibilité d’utiliser des outils validés, la pratique clinique ne répond pas au standard de pratique auquel ces enfants ont droit dans tous les milieux où ils reçoivent des soins.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The planning and organization of audio-visual instruction media are placed within a communication theoretical reference frame which begins where audio-visual media cease to function for daily instruction. Media-bound disorders however, are only seen as the surface conflict between opposing communication paradigms. The decisive task of the teacher is to remove audio-visual media from a communication context which is contradictory to instruction. This is successful when the objectification performance of audio-visual media is used to serve the subjective process of cognition. As order to support the teacher in this complex task of planning, a taxonomy is presented which operationalizes the essential problems when using media.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The complexity of learning implies that learning seldom is about just one thing. It can be said that learning processes are interdisciplinary. Within educational contexts, learning is not limited to constructed school subjects. In drama education, learning is simultaneously about drama as aesthetic expression and content because drama always is about something. The mainly focus can be on form, content or social aspects. The different aspects are always present, but may be more or less foreground or the background depending on the purpose of education. How do development concerning understanding of form, content, and social interaction, interact in a learning process in drama? My research is based on the view that learning at the same time takes place as an individual, internal process and a socially situated, inter-subjective process. Can learning in drama imply learning that can be transferred between different situations, a transformative learning and if so, how? Transformative learning includes cognitive, affective and corporal and social action aspects and means that the individual's frames of reference are transformed, evolved, to become more insightful and flexible which implies a change of personality. It leads to an integrated knowledge that can be applied in different contexts.   In the paper that will be presented at the conference, theories about how we learn in drama will be discussed in relation to my empirical research concerning drama and learning.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Violence is a complex and multifarious phenomenon that has convoked the government to think about strategies to face the question. This work is about one of these strategies proposed by brazilian Health Minister: the Individual notification/investigation Card - Domestic Violence, Sexual and/or others Interpersonal Violences . This instrument is a notification protocol which is been implanted in all of the country. This process is in course in Natal/RN. This work is a report of one research realized in five units of basic health care network of Natal/RN concerning this process about the implementation of the violence notification card. The study aims to cartography all the process of card implantation, discussing the used strategies, the drawn course, difficulties and possibilities as well as how the researcher intended to map subjective process involved at health professional acting at violence case and the propose to use the card. Meetings were held at each unit and a daily fieldwork report was used as research instrument. In this investigation it was observed that notifying violence involves a complexity that is not present in other kinds of notification as consequence of the phenomenon characteristic and health workers are invited to act in different perspective that knowledge and instruments of traditional health fieldwork available does not work. It was observed that the notification card, as a possible instrument of intervention, are considered important detectors from process of work at health basic care and health policies. Depending the way the instrument is used, it may incentive different discussions and manners to offer health care or in other way it can reproduce control and vigilance logics. Consequently it is necessary to consider some factors pointed out at this experience, implanting instruments like this, thinking about these limits and possibilities

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

OBJETIVO: Verificar se professores de canto de diferentes gêneros musicais utilizam expressões metafóricas (imagens) como ferramenta didática para trabalhar a ressonância vocal, se existe correspondência fisiológica pretendida para cada metáfora empregada e os motivos para utilização de tal linguagem. MÉTODOS: A amostra foi composta por 20 professores de canto, com experiência profissional mínima de cinco anos, atuantes em quatro abordagens do ensino de canto, sendo cinco professores por abordagem. Os professores responderam um questionário baseado em pesquisas já concluídas na área. As questões abordaram o histórico na docência de canto e a utilização ou não de metáforas. Aos professores que responderam afirmativamente foi solicitada a citação de três imagens correntemente utilizadas no ensino da ressonância bem como a explicação dos eventuais objetivos fisiológicos e musicais associados. As entrevistas foram gravadas em aparelho digital, transcritas na íntegra, analisadas e categorizadas. RESULTADOS: Dos professores entrevistados, 90% utilizavam imagens no trabalho com ressonância por motivos didáticos técnicos e musicais; 88,8% dos professores que afirmaram utilizar tal linguagem e que disseram ter objetivos fisiológicos associados não os descreveram de forma objetiva ou não os distinguiram de objetivos musicais e proprioceptivos. CONCLUSÃO: A maioria dos professores pesquisados utiliza metáforas como ferramenta didática, por acreditar que elas estimulam a propriocepção e a musicalidade, e que a instrução por meio de linguagem fisiológica é muito complexa. Tal achado pode estar associado ao fato de que esses profissionais tendem a não separar o processo fisiológico de produção da voz do processo subjetivo da criação artística.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Pós-graduação em Educação - IBRC

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Pós-graduação em Relações Internacionais (UNESP - UNICAMP - PUC-SP) - FFC

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Placing the management of childhood forms considered at risk, we discuss the operation of a welfare institution and its effects on the subjective process. Created to manage the virtues of the poor behavior of children, makes visible to the way technology features disciplinary policies: surveillance is evident of cameras, high walls, electric fences and in the eyes of educators, the penalty stands normalizing practices corrective aimed at standardization bodies, educational meetings are compared to the examination, as they produce dossiers of individual behavior, emphasizing characteristics that are considered dangerous anticipates the administration and production of docile individuals, useful, productive, applying identity models. Following the lines of knowledge and power relations that constitute this space, we used the genealogy in the analysis of discursive practices that cross society in its historical construction, the genealogy allows us to achieve these movements in the consolidation process of the government of life, and also, the deconstruction of hegemonic practices. In an attempt to escape the set, we propose the realization of artistic and cultural activities within a process of collective construction as a strategy of resistance and confrontation with the dominant logic, consolidating practices that favor the enhancement of life in its manifold possibilities.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Esta tesis estudia el papel de la metáfora como instrumento arquitectónico en el debate y las propuestas para superar la ortodoxia de la arquitectura moderna a partir de mediados del siglo XX. En arquitectura, la utilización del procedimiento que constituye la metáfora se apoya en una consideración semántica de la arquitectura y se ha usado constantemente a lo largo de la historia para desarrollar nuevas propuestas, basándose en la comparación con modelos conocidos. En este trabajo se examina la notable presencia que adquirió este instrumento en las propuestas críticas a la arquitectura moderna ortodoxa, debido a la importancia que tuvieron los aspectos semánticos en el debate sobre la continuidad y vigencia de los postulados de la arquitectura moderna. Con este estudio se ha indagado sobre las razones y la frecuencia con las que aquellos arquitectos que adoptaron una actitud crítica hacia la arquitectura moderna se refirieron a las relaciones metafóricas en sus propuestas alternativas. Para mostrar cómo las metáforas formaron parte de los mecanismos de cambio de la arquitectura en este periodo, recuperando un mayor potencial creativo para abordar los proyectos arquitectónicos, se han estudiado una serie de ejemplos pertinentes y relevantes. En cada uno de los capítulos se han analizado las objeciones más importantes que fueron planteadas frente a la arquitectura moderna por un arquitecto o grupo de arquitectos, seleccionados entre aquéllos que tomaron parte en este debate, y se estudia la inclusión de la metáfora en las alternativas que propusieron en cada caso. Además de una actitud crítica con la arquitectura moderna, todos los arquitectos seleccionados comparten una consideración semántica de la arquitectura y han expuesto sus ideas y posturas tanto en obras proyectadas y construidas, como en escritos o comentarios sobre su manera de entender y proyectar arquitectura. Esta doble producción ha permitido analizar, comparativamente, el papel de la metáfora en sus enfoques y propuestas críticas y en la realización de sus obras como alternativas a las mismas. Al mismo tiempo, la investigación profundiza en el conocimiento de la utilización de la metáfora como herramienta arquitectónica. A través del recorrido por las distintas maneras de entender este instrumento que pueden observarse en algunos de los arquitectos de la segunda mitad del siglo XX, se exponen tanto las posibilidades como los aspectos más críticos de la utilización de la metáfora en arquitectura. La variada utilización de la noción de metáfora en arquitectura se ve reflejada en las diversas consideraciones que hacen de la misma los arquitectos estudiados. La tesis se ha ocupado de distinguir cada uno de estos enfoques, haciéndose eco de la pluralidad con la que puede abordarse el concepto de metáfora de manera general y en arquitectura en particular. Así, algunos arquitectos del Team 10, la utilizan como un instrumento de ampliación y renovación semántica de la arquitectura moderna, que propone una síntesis de lo viejo y lo nuevo. Para Robert Venturi, se trata de un recurso con capacidad de persuadir y recrear, renovando semánticamente la arquitectura. Charles Jencks considera que es un procedimiento semántico esencial de la arquitectura, olvidado por los arquitectos modernos, cuya recuperación supone un rasgo diferencial de la arquitectura posmoderna respecto a la moderna. Para Aldo Rossi, es una manera de materializar las relaciones analógicas que constituyen su propuesta para proyectar una arquitectura de racionalismo exaltado frente a un racionalismo convencional. Peter Eisenman la valora porque inventa otras arquitecturas diferentes a las preconcebidas anteriormente, a pesar de que rechaza su capacidad representativa y expresiva. Rafael Moneo la utiliza para contraponerse al determinismo, como instrumento de innovación de la forma arquitectónica que construye una dinámica entre la contingencia y la necesidad. Finalmente, para Frank Gehry supone un procedimiento creativo y subjetivo con el que enfrentarse tanto a la arquitectura moderna como a la posmoderna con una arquitectura nueva y abierta a referencias inusuales. De esta manera, a través de los distintos capítulos, el estudio pretende componer un mosaico de posturas que manifieste los vínculos y las diferencias existentes entre estos arquitectos con relación a los temas estudiados: crítica y alternativas a la arquitectura moderna, semántica de la arquitectura, metáfora y otros conceptos relacionados. A su vez, la aparición continuada de la metáfora en los diferentes capítulos, y de los temas con los que está relacionada, manifiesta el protagonismo de esta herramienta arquitectónica en las propuestas de evolución y cambio de la arquitectura del periodo estudiado. ABSTRACT This thesis studies the role of the metaphor as an architectural tool in the debate and proposals to overcome the orthodoxy of modern architecture that took place since the middle part of the Twentieth Century. In architecture, the usage of the process which the metaphor constitutes is based in a semantic consideration of architecture and historically it has been used many times to develop new proposals, always based in the comparison with known models. This work examines the significant presence that this tool acquired in the proposals critical with orthodox modern architecture, due to the importance that the semantic aspects had in the debate on the continuity and validity of modern architecture’s postulates. This study also looks into the motives and frequency that those architects which adopted a critical attitude towards modern architecture alluded to the metaphorical relations in their alternative proposals. To demonstrate how during that period metaphors were imbued in the mechanisms of change of architecture, recovering a higher creative potential to approach architectural projects, a series of pertinent and relevant examples are studied. Each chapter examines the most important objections on modern architecture made by an architect or group of architects, selected among those who participated in this debate, and studies the inclusion of metaphor in the alternatives proposed in each case. Besides a critical attitude towards modern architecture, all the selected architects share a semantic consideration of architecture and have exposed their ideas and postures through projected and finalized works as in writings or commentaries on their way of understanding and projecting architecture. This double production allowed to analyse, in a comparatively manner, the role of metaphor in their approaches and critical proposals as in the execution of their works. At the same time, the research conducted further analyses the body of knowledge on the usage of metaphor as an architectural tool. By looking over the different ways some of the architects of the second half of the Twentieth Century understood this tool, both the possibilities and the most critical aspects of the usage of the metaphor in architecture can be exposed. The various usages of the notion of metaphor in architecture are reflected in the multiple considerations done about it by the selected architects. This thesis differentiates each one of those approaches, echoing the plurality with which the concept of metaphor can be addressed both in broader terms and more particularly in architecture. In this sense, some architects of Team 10 used it as a mean of semantic extension and renewal of modern architecture, proposing a synthesis between the old and the new. For Robert Venturi it is a resource with the capacity to persuade and recreate, semantically renewing architecture. Charles Jencks considers it an essential semantic procedure of architecture, forgotten by the modern architects, and which recovery represents a differential trait of post-modern architecture in relation to modern architecture. For Aldo Rossi, is a way of materializing the analogical relations which represent his proposal to project architecture of exalted rationalism as opposed to a more conventional rationalism. Peter Eisenman values it because it invents other architectures different from the preconceived before, even if he refuses its representational and expressive capacity. Rafael Moneo uses it to counter determinism, as an innovation tool of the architectonical form which generates dynamics between contingency and necessity. Finally, for Frank Gehry it supposes a creative and subjective process to face both modern architecture and post-modern architecture with a new architecture open to unusual references. As such, through its different chapters, this study aims to compose a mosaic of postures which expresses the links and the differences between those architects in relation to the topics examined: criticism and alternatives to modern architecture, semantics of architecture, metaphor and other related concepts. At the same time, the continuous presence of the metaphor in the different chapters, and of the issues it relates to, shows the importance of this tool in the proposals of evolution and change of architecture in the period considered.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Assessments for assigning the conservation status of threatened species that are based purely on subjective judgements become problematic because assessments can be influenced by hidden assumptions, personal biases and perceptions of risks, making the assessment process difficult to repeat. This can result in inconsistent assessments and misclassifications, which can lead to a lack of confidence in species assessments. It is almost impossible to Understand an expert's logic or visualise the underlying reasoning behind the many hidden assumptions used throughout the assessment process. In this paper, we formalise the decision making process of experts, by capturing their logical ordering of information, their assumptions and reasoning, and transferring them into a set of decisions rules. We illustrate this through the process used to evaluate the conservation status of species under the NatureServe system (Master, 1991). NatureServe status assessments have been used for over two decades to set conservation priorities for threatened species throughout North America. We develop a conditional point-scoring method, to reflect the current subjective process. In two test comparisons, 77% of species' assessments using the explicit NatureServe method matched the qualitative assessments done subjectively by NatureServe staff. Of those that differed, no rank varied by more than one rank level under the two methods. In general, the explicit NatureServe method tended to be more precautionary than the subjective assessments. The rank differences that emerged from the comparisons may be due, at least in part, to the flexibility of the qualitative system, which allows different factors to be weighted on a species-by-species basis according to expert judgement. The method outlined in this study is the first documented attempt to explicitly define a transparent process for weighting and combining factors under the NatureServe system. The process of eliciting expert knowledge identifies how information is combined and highlights any inconsistent logic that may not be obvious in Subjective decisions. The method provides a repeatable, transparent, and explicit benchmark for feedback, further development, and improvement. (C) 2004 Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Translation training in the university context needs to train students in the processes, in order to enhance and optimise the product as outcome of these processes. Evaluation of a target text as product has often been accused of being a subjective process, which does not easily lend itself to the type of feedback that could enable students to apply criteria more widely. For students, it often seems as though they make different inappropriate or incorrect choices every time they translate a new text, and the learning process appears unpredictable and haphazard. Within functionalist approaches to translation, with their focus on the target text in terms of functional adequacy to the intended purpose, as stipulated in the translation brief, there are guidelines for text production that can help to develop a more systematic approach not only to text production, but also to translation evaluation. In the context of a focus on user knowledge needs, target language conventions and acceptability, the use of corpora is an indispensable tool for the trainee translator. Evaluation can take place against the student's own reasoned selection process, based on hard evidence, against criteria which currently obtain in the TL and the TL culture. When trainee and evaluator work within the same guidelines, there is more scope for constructive learning and feedback.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Ecological interface design (EID) is proving to be a promising approach to the design of interfaces for complex dynamic systems. Although the principles of EID and examples of its effective use are widely available, few readily available examples exist of how the individual displays that constitute an ecological interface are developed. This paper presents the semantic mapping process within EID in the context of prior theoretical work in this area. The semantic mapping process that was used in developing an ecological interface for the Pasteurizer II microworld is outlined, and the results of an evaluation of the ecological interface against a more conventional interface are briefly presented. Subjective reports indicate features of the ecological interface that made it particularly valuable for participants. Finally, we outline the steps of an analytic process for using EID. The findings presented here can be applied in the design of ecological interfaces or of configural displays for dynamic processes.