U.S. strategic forces and START [microform] : hearings before the Defense Policy Panel of the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, second session, hearings held May 16 and 17, 1988.

"H.A.S.C. no. 100-98."

Modernizing U.S. strategic offensive forces : the administration's program and alternatives.

Mode of access: Internet.

NATO-Warsaw Pact : issues related to implementation of a Conventional Forces Treaty : report to Congressional Committees /

"B-230546"--p. 1.

Department of Defense authorization for appropriations for fiscal year 2007 : hearings before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Ninth Congress, second session, on S. 2766, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2007 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe personnel strengths for such fiscal year for the armed forces, and for other purposes.

"March 7, 29, April 4, 6, 2006"--Pt. 7.

An analysis of administration strategic arms reduction and modernization proposals.

Item 1005-C

Budgetary and military effects of a treaty limiting conventional forces in Europe.

Item 1005-C

Department of Defense authorization for appropriations for fiscal year 2010 : hearing before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, first session, on S. 1390, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2010 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes.

"May 20 and June 3, 2009"--Pt. 6-7.

Department of Defense authorization for appropriations for fiscal year 2013 and the Future Years Defense Program : hearings before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, second session, on S. 3254, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2013 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes.

Shipping list no.: 2013-0201-P (pt.1), 2013-0185-P (pt. 2), 2013-0213-P (pt. 3), 2013-0212-P (pt. 4), 2013-0140-P (pt. 5), 2013-0148-P (pt. 6), 2013-0209-P (pt. 7).

The START Treaty : hearings before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, One Hundred Second Congress, second session.

"June 23, 25, 26, and 30, 1992"--Pt. 2.

Department of Defense authorization for appropriations for fiscal year 1998 and the future years defense program : hearings before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifth Congress, first session, on S. 939

Shipping list no.: 98-0089-P (pt. 4), 98-0052-P (pt. 5), 98-0029-P (pt. 6).

Department of Defense authorization for appropriations for fiscal years 1990 and 1991 : hearings before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred First Congress, first session, on S. 1085 ...

Item 1034-A, 1034-B (MF).

Strategic Insurance: The Future of the Belgian Armed Forces. IES Policy Brief Issue 2014/04/May 2014

Summary. Belgium is on the cusp of its next defence reform. While the security landscape throughout Europe’s neighbourhood and beyond deteriorates, the armed forces face numerous challenges. Most importantly, the next defence plan needs to recalibrate the force structure in function of political ambitions and budgetary realities. This Policy Brief argues that Belgium must embrace a nimble but broad-spectrum force. Any future structure must encompass agile land forces as well as a modern combat air force, without neglecting the need to safeguard a sizeable navy and invest in cyber capabilities. European cooperation should be pursued wherever possible while recognising that this necessitates budgetary convergence. For Belgium this means the investment budget needs to grow significantly in order to acquire interoperable but self-owned assets. Such a choice can be justified on the recognition that defence is not just about expeditionary operations, but also economic stimulus, intergenerational solidarity and strategic insurance: maintaining the ability to respond to whatever the future may bring.