967 resultados para Stomach Neoplasms - pathology
Resumo:
RESUMO A constatação de que o carcinoma gástrico continua a ser a segunda causa de morte por doença oncológica no mundo em geral e em particular em Portugal, assim como a verificação da elevada incidência e letalidade no nosso país, justifica uma particular atenção a esta doença. Apesar de avanços recentes na acção adjuvante e neo-adjuvante de terapêuticas não cirúrgicas, com algumas referências a melhorias na sobrevivência, estas terapêuticas não têm eficácia curativa. Sendo assim, a cirurgia continua a constituir a única esperança de cura no carcinoma gástrico. Em consequência, a correcta selecção da técnica a aplicar, assim como a sua correcta execução, vão ter influência marcante na sobrevivência do doente. Os estudos dos centros oncológicos diferenciados em várias zonas geográficas demonstram que a cirurgia radical, com adequada extensão da gastrectomia e com linfadenectomia alargada permite obter as melhores sobrevivências. O tipo de cirurgia mais praticado nos referidos centros oncológicos diferenciados é a gastrectomia com linfadenectomia D2, ou seja, com excisão da segunda estação ganglionar. Este tipo de cirurgia não aumenta a mortalidade, mas aumenta a morbilidade. No entanto, verifica-se que muitos doentes não desenvolvem metastização que atinja a estação ganglionar de nível 2 e, por outro lado, muitos outros ultrapassam esta estação ganglionar. Ou seja, a linfadenectomia D2 é exagerada para alguns doentes, é necessária e suficiente para muitos, mas pelo contrário, é insuficiente para outros. A questão radica na necessidade de equilíbrio em oferecer a cada doente a cirurgia necessária para obter a melhor sobrevivência, ainda que à custa de maior morbilidade e, por outro lado, conseguir identificar os factores que determinam que alguns doentes não necessitem de ser submetidos a uma terapêutica tão agressiva. Se a primeira questão é eminentemente fisiopatológica e consiste em compreender os mecanismos da metastização ganglionar no carcinoma gástrico, de modo a poder prever a incidência e extensão da metastização ganglionar em cada doente em particular e, assim, adequar a terapêutica. No estudo de 50 doentes, que elaborámos, a interpretação fisiopatológica apoia-se na avaliação de parâmetros aceites como convencionais e de parâmetros oncológicos. Dentro dos parâmetros convencionais estudámos a localização do tumor, a sua dimensão, a classificação de Borrmann, as alterações metabólicas, a gastrina sérica, a citologia peritoneal, a infecção pelo Helicobacter pylori (Hp), a metaplasia intestinal, a classificação de Ming, a classificação de Lauren, a invasão em profundidade da parede gástrica (T), a metastização no “early gastric câncer”, a classificação TNM, o CEA 19.9 e o CA 72.4 séricos. Para identificar quais os marcadores oncobiológicos mais adequados, efectuámos uma revisão da literatura relativamente a: Ki-67, p53, caderina-E, ERBB2, Instabilidade de Microssatélites, MUC 1, Sialil Tn e Sialil Lewis X. De acordo com os resultados referidos na literatura, seleccionámos para estudo os seguintes marcadores: Ki-67, p53, caderina-E, ERBB2 e Instabilidade de Microssatélites. Relacionámos todos estes parâmetros com a metastização ganglionar, nos aspectos de frequência da metastização, número de gânglios metastizados (classificação N da UICC) e metastização das cadeias ganglionares distais (classificação N japonesa). No que se refere à execução do programa cirúrgico, foram obtidos níveis de radicalidade semelhantes ou superiores aos referidos na literatura internacional, com frequência de complicações ao nível da referida na literatura europeia. No que se refere ao estudo dos factores de metastização ganglionar verificámos que os parâmetros que apresentam maior relação com a frequência da metastização são: a dimensão ≥ 5 cm; a profundidade de invasão da parede (T) atingindo as camadas profundas; o tipo infiltrativo na classificação de Borrmann; a expressão de Ki-67 > 75%; a expressão de p53 positiva; a expressão de caderina-E anormal; a associação de Ki-67 ≥ 50% + caderina-E anormal + p53 positiva; a associação de dimensão ≥ 5 cm + p53 positiva; a associação de T3/T4 + p53 positiva; a presença de marcadores tumorais elevados. A ausência de metastização ganglionar ou metastização limitada à primeira estação ganglionar, em que é suficiente uma cirurgia conservadora de tipo D1, relaciona-se com a dimensão < 5 cm; a invasão em profundidade da parede (T) limitada às camadas superficiais; a ausência de expressão de p53; a ausência de níveis elevados de marcadores tumorais. Recorrendo ao estudo dos quatro parâmetros que podem ser determinados no pré-operatório – dimensão, invasão em profundidade, expressão de p53 e marcadores tumorais convencionais foi possível identificar 75% dos tumores N0 e 50% do conjunto dos tumores N0 + N1, ou seja, os tumores que não carecem de linfadenectomia alargada. Estudando a dimensão, a presença de Hp, a invasão em profundidade, os níveis elevados de marcadores tumorais, a expressão de p53, Ki-67, de Caderina-E e de Instabilidade de Microssatélites foi possível caracterizar os tumores que envolvem maior risco de invadir as cadeias ganglionares distais e que, portanto, carecem de linfadenectomia alargada. Verifica-se assim que, com esta metodologia, é possível identificar uma percentagem significativa dos casos que não carecem de linfadenectomia alargada assim como daqueles que necessitam deste tipo de cirurgia.
Resumo:
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial evaluated two docetaxel-based regimens to see which would be most promising according to overall response rate (ORR) for comparison in a phase III trial with epirubicin-cisplatin-fluorouracil (ECF) as first-line advanced gastric cancer therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with measurable unresectable and/or metastatic gastric carcinoma, a performance status <or= 1, and adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function randomly received <or= eight 3-weekly cycles of ECF (epirubicin 50 mg/m(2) on day 1, cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1, and fluorouracil [FU] 200 mg/m(2)/d on days 1 to 21), TC (docetaxel initially 85 mg/m(2) on day 1 [later reduced to 75 mg/m(2) as a result of toxicity] and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1), or TCF (TC plus FU 300 mg/m(2)/d on days 1 to 14). Study objectives included response (primary), survival, toxicity, and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: ORR was 25.0% (95% CI, 13% to 41%) for ECF, 18.5% (95% CI, 9% to 34%) for TC, and 36.6% (95% CI, 23% to 53%) for TCF (n = 119). Median overall survival times were 8.3, 11.0, and 10.4 months for ECF, TC, and TCF, respectively. Toxicity was acceptable, with one toxic death (TC arm). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in more treatment cycles with docetaxel (TC, 49%; TCF, 57%; ECF, 34%). Global health status/QOL substantially improved with ECF and remained similar to baseline with both docetaxel regimens. CONCLUSION: Time to response and ORR favor TCF over TC for further evaluation, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting. A trend towards increased myelosuppression and infectious complications with TCF versus TC or ECF was observed.
Resumo:
DNA ploidy has been shown to be a predictive parameter for prognosis in various solid tumours. The prognostic value of DNA-ploidy in gastric cancers is still a matter of controversy. A possible explanation for the discrepant results reported in the literature could be sampling error in tumours with multiple stemlines differing in DNA-ploidy. In order to determine whether or not such heterogeneity exists in early gastric carcinoma, we have performed DNA cytophotometry on multiple samples of a group of 17 early gastric carcinomas, of which 8 were pure intramucosal and 9 were infiltrating into the submucosa. We found an aneuploid DNA-stemline in 8 (47%) early gastric cancers, more often in tumours invading into the submucosa (5/9) than in purely mucosal tumours (3/8). Multiple DNA-stemlines were found more frequently in submucosally infiltrating tumours (4/5). These results confirm the presence of DNA-aneuploid early gastric carcinoma which are frequently heterogeneous and suggest that heterogeneity occurs more frequently in tumours invading the submucosa. This heterogeneity is best detected by analysing multiple samples of tumours for DNA-ploidy.
Resumo:
Colorectal and gastric cancers are the fourth and third leading causes of cancer death world-wide. Unfortunately, gastric cancer is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage after becoming metastatic in distant sites, so that palliative therapy is the mainstay of treatment. Major progress in the understanding of the biology, the development of valid biomarkers and molecular targeted drugs have improved the treatment options and prognosis of both cancers significantly in the last years. Here, we review the current standards of care for patients with advanced and metastatic colorectal and gastric cancer and outline the perspectives for the future.
Resumo:
Pericardial and cardiac fistulae secondary to esophageal or gastric tumors are considered exceptional. They have never been the object of a literature review. We reviewed the medical literature between 1881 and 2001, searching for all published cases of pericardial or cardiac fistulae developed from esophageal and gastric tumors or favored by the applied therapy to these tumors. The cases of metastasization, tumor spread, and neoplasic pericardial effusion without fistula were excluded. Fifty patients were identified, with one original case. More than half the cases (56%) occurred in the last 25 years. Substernal pain is the main symptom. The majority of patients present at least one condition favoring fistula formation. The auscultation of a water-wheel murmur may suggest a pneumopericardium and therefore a pericardial fistula, as does a purulent pericarditis. Arrhythmias, signs of ischemia, and hematemesis point toward a ventricular fistula. Neurological and hemostasis disorders may be suspect of an atrial lesion. Diagnosis should be made by the association of a scanner and a transit. Prognosis is bad: 76% of the patients die in the first month. Pericardial or cardiac fistulae are part of the differential diagnosis of thoracic pain in patients with esophageal or gastric tumors and in patients who were treated for these pathologies. The diagnosis must be as quick as possible. An operation (patients with a good prognosis) or the placement of a stent (patients with a bad prognosis) is the only chance of survival
Resumo:
INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic involvement by plasma cell neoplasms is an extremely rare event, with only 50 cases described in the literature. They can present as a primary solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma or plasmacytoma secondary to a plasma cell myeloma. Clinical manifestations are due to the presence of a pancreatic mass usually in the pancreas head, which causes extra-biliary obstruction and abdominal pain. METHODS: Abdominal imaging including CT scan or endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration tissue sampling is essential for the initial diagnostic procedure. However, immunohistochemical analysis of the biopsy specimen or flow cytometry of the aspirated material is crucial to prove the monoclonality and the final diagnosis of a plasma cell neoplasm. DISCUSSION: Management of these situations include radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery or combined therapy. Novel medications including the immunomodulatory drugs or the proteasome inhibitors followed by consolidation with intensive chemotherapy and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation are nowadays used as upfront treatment in the cases associated to a plasma cell myeloma. CONCLUSION: Despite the rarity, plasma cell neoplasms should be considered in the differential diagnosis of obstructive jaundice and pancreatic neoplasms since they are potentially treatable situations.
Resumo:
The 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus conference in Boston made recommendations regarding the standardization of pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. Issues relating to the substaging of pT2 prostate cancers according to the TNM 2002/2010 system, reporting of tumor size/volume and zonal location of prostate cancers were coordinated by working group 2. A survey circulated before the consensus conference demonstrated that 74% of the 157 participants considered pT2 substaging of prostate cancer to be of clinical and/or academic relevance. The survey also revealed a considerable variation in the frequency of reporting of pT2b substage prostate cancer, which was likely a consequence of the variable methodologies used to distinguish pT2a from pT2b tumors. Overview of the literature indicates that current pT2 substaging criteria lack clinical relevance and the majority (65.5%) of conference attendees wished to discontinue pT2 substaging. Therefore, the consensus was that reporting of pT2 substages should, at present, be optional. Several studies have shown that prostate cancer volume is significantly correlated with other clinicopathological features, including Gleason score and extraprostatic extension of tumor; however, most studies fail to demonstrate this to have prognostic significance on multivariate analysis. Consensus was reached with regard to the reporting of some quantitative measure of the volume of tumor in a prostatectomy specimen, without prescribing a specific methodology. Incorporation of the zonal and/or anterior location of the dominant/index tumor in the pathology report was accepted by most participants, but a formal definition of the identifying features of the dominant/index tumor remained undecided.
Resumo:
The 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference in Boston made recommendations regarding the standardization of pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. Issues relating to the handling and processing of radical prostatectomy specimens were coordinated by working group 1. Most uropathologists followed similar procedures for fixation of radical prostatectomy specimens, with 51% of respondents transporting tissue in formalin. There was also consensus that the prostate weight without the seminal vesicles should be recorded. There was consensus that the surface of the prostate should be painted. It was agreed that both the prostate apex and base should be examined by the cone method with sagittal sectioning of the tissue sample. There was consensus that the gland should be fully fixed before sectioning. Both partial and complete embedding of prostates was considered to be acceptable as long as the method of partial embedding is stated. No consensus was determined regarding the necessity of weighing and measuring the length of the seminal vesicles, the preparation of whole mounts rather than standardized blocks and the methodology for sampling of fresh tissue for research purposes, and it was agreed that these should be left to the discretion of the working pathologist.
Resumo:
The 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference in Boston, made recommendations regarding the standardization of pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. Issues relating to surgical margin assessment were coordinated by working group 5. Pathologists agreed that tumor extending close to the 'capsular' margin, yet not to it, should be reported as a negative margin, and that locations of positive margins should be indicated as either posterior, posterolateral, lateral, anterior at the prostatic apex, mid-prostate or base. Other items of consensus included specifying the extent of any positive margin as millimeters of involvement; tumor in skeletal muscle at the apical perpendicular margin section, in the absence of accompanying benign glands, to be considered organ confined; and that proximal and distal margins be uniformly referred to as bladder neck and prostatic apex, respectively. Grading of tumor at positive margins was to be left to the discretion of the reporting pathologists. There was no consensus as to how the surgical margin should be regarded when tumor is present at the inked edge of the tissue, in the absence of transected benign glands at the apical margin. Pathologists also did not achieve agreement on the reporting approach to benign prostatic glands at an inked surgical margin in which no carcinoma is present.
Resumo:
The International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens in Boston made recommendations regarding the standardization of pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. Issues relating to extraprostatic extension (pT3a disease), bladder neck invasion, lymphovascular invasion and the definition of pT4 were coordinated by working group 3. It was agreed that prostate cancer can be categorized as pT3a in the absence of adipose tissue involvement when cancer bulges beyond the contour of the gland or beyond the condensed smooth muscle of the prostate at posterior and posterolateral sites. Extraprostatic extension can also be identified anteriorly. It was agreed that the location of extraprostatic extension should be reported. Although there was consensus that the amount of extraprostatic extension should be quantitated, there was no agreement as to which method of quantitation should be employed. There was overwhelming consensus that microscopic urinary bladder neck invasion by carcinoma should be reported as stage pT3a and that lymphovascular invasion by carcinoma should be reported. It is recommended that these elements are considered in the development of practice guidelines and in the daily practice of urological surgical pathology.
Resumo:
Gliomas are the most frequent primary brain tumours. The WHO classification is essentially based on histological and immunohistochemical criteria. More recently multiple cytogenetic and molecular alterations associated with initiation and progression have been shown and the genetic profiles of tumour entities have been incorporated in the WHO classifiacation. Molecular testing of the MGMT promotor methylation in glioblastoma, predictive for the response to combined radio-/chimiothérapie, and the LOH 1p/19q in oligodendroglial tumours, as prognostic factor supplements the histopathological diagnosis. In the near futur array-based profiling techniques will contribute to a refinement of glioma classification and identify targets for more individualized glioma therapies.
Resumo:
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a morphologically heterogeneous tumor type with a median survival of only 15 months in clinical trial populations. However, survival varies greatly among patients. As part of a central pathology review, we addressed the question if patients with GBM displaying distinct morphologic features respond differently to combined chemo-radiotherapy with temozolomide. Morphologic features were systematically recorded for 360 cases with particular focus on the presence of an oligodendroglioma-like component and respective correlations with outcome and relevant molecular markers. GBM with an oligodendroglioma-like component (GBM-O) represented 15% of all confirmed GBM (52/339) and was not associated with a more favorable outcome. GBM-O encompassed a pathogenetically heterogeneous group, significantly enriched for IDH1 mutations (19 vs. 3%, p = 0.003) and EGFR amplifications (71 vs. 48%, p = 0.04) compared with other GBM, while co-deletion of 1p/19q was found in only one case and the MGMT methylation frequency was alike (47 vs. 46%). Expression profiles classified most of the GBM-O into two subtypes, 36% (5/14 evaluable) as proneural and 43% as classical GBM. The detection of pseudo-palisading necrosis (PPN) was associated with benefit from chemotherapy (p = 0.0002), while no such effect was present in the absence of PPN (p = 0.86). In the adjusted interaction model including clinical prognostic factors and MGMT status, PPN was borderline nonsignificant (p = 0.063). Taken together, recognition of an oligodendroglioma-like component in an otherwise classic GBM identifies a pathogenetically mixed group without prognostic significance. However, the presence of PPN may indicate biological features of clinical relevance for further improvement of therapy.
Resumo:
PURPOSE: The Gastro-Intestinal Working Party of the EORTC Radiation Oncology Group (GIWP-ROG) developed guidelines for target volume definition in neoadjuvant radiation of adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and the stomach. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Guidelines about the definition of the clinical target volume (CTV) are based on a systematic literature review of the location and frequency of local recurrences and lymph node involvement in adenocarcinomas of the GEJ and the stomach. Therefore, MEDLINE was searched up to August 2008. Guidelines concerning prescription, planning and treatment delivery are based on a consensus between the members of the GIWP-ROG. RESULTS: In order to support a curative resection of GEJ and gastric cancer, an individualized preoperative treatment volume based on tumour location has to include the primary tumour and the draining regional lymph nodes area. Therefore we recommend to use the 2nd English Edition of the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association which developed the concept of assigning tumours of the GEJ and the stomach to anatomically defined sub-sites corresponding respectively to a distinct lymphatic spread pattern. CONCLUSION: The GIWP-ROG defined guidelines for preoperative irradiation of adenocarcinomas of the GEJ and the stomach to reduce variability in the framework of future clinical trials.
Resumo:
Gastric cancer affects about one million people per year worldwide, being the second leading cause of cancer mortality. The study of its etiology remains therefore a global issue as it may allow the identification of major targets, besides eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection, for primary prevention. It has however received little attention, given its comparatively low incidence in most high-income countries. We introduce a consortium of epidemiological investigations named the 'Stomach cancer Pooling (StoP) Project'. Twenty-two studies agreed to participate, for a total of over 9000 cases and 23 000 controls. Twenty studies have already shared the original data set. Of the patients, 40% are from Asia, 43% from Europe, and 17% from North America; 34% are women and 66% men; the median age is 61 years; 56% are from population-based case-control studies, 41% from hospital-based ones, and 3% from nested case-control studies derived from cohort investigations. Biological samples are available from 12 studies. The aim of the StoP Project is to analyze the role of lifestyle and genetic determinants in the etiology of gastric cancer through pooled analyses of individual-level data. The uniquely large data set will allow us to define and quantify the main effects of each risk factor of interest, including a number of infrequent habits, and to adequately address associations in subgroups of the population, as well as interaction within and between environmental and genetic factors. Further, we will carry out separate analyses according to different histotypes and subsites of gastric cancer, to identify potential different risk patterns and etiological characteristics.