Quantitative comparison of SensibleThings and Microsoft Azure IoT Hub

With the development of the Internet-of-Things, more and more IoT platforms come up with different structures and characteristics. Making balance of their advantages and disadvantages, we should choose the suitable platform in differ- ent scenarios. For this project, I make comparison of a cloud-based centralized platform, Microsoft Azure IoT hub and a fully distributed platform, Sensi- bleThings. Quantitative comparison is made for performance by 2 scenarios, messages sending speed adds up, devices lie in different location. General com- parison is made for security, utilization and the storage. Finally I draw the con- clusion that SensibleThings performs more stable when a lot of messages push- es to the platform. Microsoft Azure has better geographic expansion. For gener- al comparison, Microsoft Azure IoT hub has better security. The requirement of local device for Microsoft Azure IoT hub is lower than SensibleThings. The SensibleThings are open source and free while Microsoft Azure follow the con- cept “pay as you go” with many throttling limitations for different editions. Microsoft is more user-friendly.

Theoretical and Quantitative Comparison of SensibleThings and GSN

This project is aimed at making comparison between current existing Internet- of-Things (IoT) platforms, SensibleThings (ST) and Global Sensors Networks (GSN). Project can be served as a further work of platforms’ investigation. Comparing and learning from each other aim to contribute to the improvement of future platforms development. Detailed comparison is mainly with the respect of platform feature, communication and data present-frequency performance under stress, and platform node scalability performance on one limited device. Study is conducted through developing applications on each platform, and making measuring performance under the same condition in household network environment. So far, all these respects have had results and been concluded. Qualitatively comparing, GSN performs better in the facets of node’s swift development and deployment, data management, node subscription and connection retry mechanism. Whereas, ST is superior in respects of network package encryption, platform reliability, session initializing latency, and degree of developing freedom. In quantitative comparison, nodes on GSN has better data push pressure resistence while ST nodes works with lower session latency. In terms of data present-frequency, ST node can reach higher updating frequency than GSN node. In the aspect of node sclability on one limited device, ST nodes take the advantage in averagely lower latency than GSN node when nodes number is less than 15 on limited device. But due to sharing mechanism of GSN, on one limited device, it's nodes shows more scalable if platform nodes have similar job.

Comparison between SensibleThings and Kaa platform

With the Internet of Things becoming more and more popular, and a prediction that there will be more than 50 million devices connected to the Internet in 2020, the quantity of IoT platforms on the market is rapidly growing. Facing so many platforms to choose, the object of this thesis is to give some suggestions for reference by performing a quantitative comparison between two platforms: SensibleThings and Kaa. These two platforms have difference architectures so may suitable in different scenes. The comparison includes some measurement and evaluation under two designed scenarios and a general contrast in theory. Two scenarios cover cases of message delivery between two endpoints at different rates and multiple endpoints pushing log data continually. The result of measurement together with the theoretical analysis draw out the following conclusion. SensibleThings platform is more suitable for simple and small-scale message delivery between endpoints, like home environment with few devices. And Kaa platform is more suitable for large-scale and complicated application for data collection and processing, like meteorology field with huge amount of sensors and data.

Quantitative Comparison of SensibleThings and Dweet.io

The objective of this paper is to perform a quantitative comparison of Dweet.io and SensibleThings from different aspects. With the fast development of internet of things, the platforms for internet-of-things face bigger challenges. This paper will evaluate both systems in four parts. The first part shows the general comparison of input ways and output functions provided by the platforms. The second part shows the security comparison, which focuses on the protocol types of the packets and the stability during the communication. The third part shows the scalability comparison when the value becomes bigger. The fourth part shows the scalability comparison when speeding up the processes. After the comparisons, I concluded that Dweet.io is more easy to use on devices and supports more programming languages. Dweet.io realizes visualization and it can be shared. Dweet.io is safer and more stable than SensibleThings. SensibleThings provides more openness. SensibleThings has better scalability in handling big values and quick speed.

Integrating wireless sensor networks and internet of things: A coap-based approach

L'obiettivo su cui è stata basata questa Tesi di Laurea è stato quello di integrare la tecnologia delle Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) al contesto dell'Internet delle cose (IoT). Per poter raggiungere questo obiettivo, il primo passo è stato quello di approfondire il concetto dell'Internet delle cose, in modo tale da comprendere se effettivamente fosse stato possibile applicarlo anche alle WSNs. Quindi è stata analizzata l'architettura delle WSNs e successivamente è stata fatta una ricerca per capire quali fossero stati i vari tipi di sistemi operativi e protocolli di comunicazione supportati da queste reti. Infine sono state studiate alcune IoT software platforms. Il secondo passo è stato quindi di implementare uno stack software che abilitasse la comunicazione tra WSNs e una IoT platform. Come protocollo applicativo da utilizzare per la comunicazione con le WSNs è stato usato CoAP. Lo sviluppo di questo stack ha consentito di estendere la piattaforma SensibleThings e il linguaggio di programmazione utilizzato è stato Java. Come terzo passo è stata effettuata una ricerca per comprendere a quale scenario di applicazione reale, lo stack software progettato potesse essere applicato. Successivamente, al fine di testare il corretto funzionamento dello stack CoAP, è stata sviluppata una proof of concept application che simulasse un sistema per la rilevazione di incendi. Questo scenario era caratterizzato da due WSNs che inviavano la temperatura rilevata da sensori termici ad un terzo nodo che fungeva da control center, il cui compito era quello di capire se i valori ricevuti erano al di sopra di una certa soglia e quindi attivare un allarme. Infine, l'ultimo passo di questo lavoro di tesi è stato quello di valutare le performance del sistema sviluppato. I parametri usati per effettuare queste valutazioni sono stati: tempi di durata delle richieste CoAP, overhead introdotto dallo stack CoAP alla piattaforma Sensible Things e la scalabilità di un particolare componente dello stack. I risultati di questi test hanno mostrato che la soluzione sviluppata in questa tesi ha introdotto un overheadmolto limitato alla piattaforma preesistente e inoltre che non tutte le richieste hanno la stessa durata, in quanto essa dipende dal tipo della richiesta inviata verso una WSN. Tuttavia, le performance del sistema potrebbero essere ulteriormente migliorate, ad esempio sviluppando un algoritmo che consenta la gestione concorrente di richieste CoAP multiple inviate da uno stesso nodo. Inoltre, poichè in questo lavoro di tesi non è stato considerato il problema della sicurezza, una possibile estensione al lavoro svolto potrebbe essere quello di implementare delle politiche per una comunicazione sicura tra Sensible Things e le WSNs.