Évaluation de la performance du score de propension à hautes dimensions dans le cadre d’études observationnelles québécoises

Les scores de propension (PS) sont fréquemment utilisés dans l’ajustement pour des facteurs confondants liés au biais d’indication. Cependant, ils sont limités par le fait qu’ils permettent uniquement l’ajustement pour des facteurs confondants connus et mesurés. Les scores de propension à hautes dimensions (hdPS), une variante des PS, utilisent un algorithme standardisé afin de sélectionner les covariables pour lesquelles ils vont ajuster. L’utilisation de cet algorithme pourrait permettre l’ajustement de tous les types de facteurs confondants. Cette thèse a pour but d’évaluer la performance de l’hdPS vis-à-vis le biais d’indication dans le contexte d’une étude observationnelle examinant l’effet diabétogénique potentiel des statines. Dans un premier temps, nous avons examiné si l’exposition aux statines était associée au risque de diabète. Les résultats de ce premier article suggèrent que l’exposition aux statines est associée avec une augmentation du risque de diabète et que cette relation est dose-dépendante et réversible dans le temps. Suite à l’identification de cette association, nous avons examiné dans un deuxième article si l’hdPS permettait un meilleur ajustement pour le biais d’indication que le PS; cette évaluation fut entreprise grâce à deux approches: 1) en fonction des mesures d’association ajustées et 2) en fonction de la capacité du PS et de l’hdPS à sélectionner des sous-cohortes appariées de patients présentant des caractéristiques similaires vis-à-vis 19 caractéristiques lorsqu’ils sont utilisés comme critère d’appariement. Selon les résultats présentés dans le cadre du deuxième article, nous avons démontré que l’évaluation de la performance en fonction de la première approche était non concluante, mais que l’évaluation en fonction de la deuxième approche favorisait l’hdPS dans son ajustement pour le biais d’indication. Le dernier article de cette thèse a cherché à examiner la performance de l’hdPS lorsque des facteurs confondants connus et mesurés sont masqués à l’algorithme de sélection. Les résultats de ce dernier article indiquent que l’hdPS pourrait, au moins partiellement, ajuster pour des facteurs confondants masqués et qu’il pourrait donc potentiellement ajuster pour des facteurs confondants non mesurés. Ensemble ces résultats indiquent que l’hdPS serait supérieur au PS dans l’ajustement pour le biais d’indication et supportent son utilisation lors de futures études observationnelles basées sur des données médico-administratives.

Analyse de sensibilité de l’effet d’un programme de prévention avec randomisation : application de trois techniques d’appariement pour balancer les groupes contrôle et expérimental : distance de Mahanalobis, score de propension et algorithme génétique

Les analyses effectuées dans le cadre de ce mémoire ont été réalisées à l'aide du module MatchIt disponible sous l’environnent d'analyse statistique R. / Statistical analyzes of this thesis were performed using the MatchIt package available in the statistical analysis environment R.

Chirurgie mitrale minimalement invasive : évolution historique et bénéfices cliniques

Réalisé sous la co-direction des Drs Denis Bouchard et Michel Pellerin

Cost-effectiveness of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Leaflet Repair for the Treatment of Mitral Regurgitation in Heart Failure

Contexte: La régurgitation mitrale (RM) est une maladie valvulaire nécessitant une intervention dans les cas les plus grave. Une réparation percutanée de la valve mitrale avec le dispositif MitraClip est un traitement sécuritaire et efficace pour les patients à haut risque chirurgical. Nous voulons évaluer les résultats cliniques et l'impact économique de cette thérapie par rapport à la gestion médicale des patients en insuffisance cardiaque avec insuffisance mitrale symptomatique. Méthodes: L'étude a été composée de deux phases; une étude d'observation de patients souffrant d'insuffisance cardiaque et de régurgitation mitrale traitée avec une thérapie médicale ou le MitraClip, et un modèle économique. Les résultats de l'étude observationnelle ont été utilisés pour estimer les paramètres du modèle de décision, qui a estimé les coûts et les avantages d'une cohorte hypothétique de patients atteints d'insuffisance cardiaque et insuffisance mitrale sévère traitée avec soit un traitement médical standard ou MitraClip. Résultats: La cohorte de patients traités avec le système MitraClip était appariée par score de propension à une population de patients atteints d'insuffisance cardiaque, et leurs résultats ont été comparés. Avec un suivi moyen de 22 mois, la mortalité était de 21% dans la cohorte MitraClip et de 42% dans la cohorte de gestion médicale (p = 0,007). Le modèle de décision a démontré que MitraClip augmente l'espérance de vie de 1,87 à 3,60 années et des années de vie pondérées par la qualité (QALY) de 1,13 à 2,76 ans. Le coût marginal était 52.500 $ dollars canadiens, correspondant à un rapport coût-efficacité différentiel (RCED) de 32,300.00 $ par QALY gagné. Les résultats étaient sensibles à l'avantage de survie. Conclusion: Dans cette cohorte de patients atteints d'insuffisance cardiaque symptomatique et d insuffisance mitrale significative, la thérapie avec le MitraClip est associée à une survie supérieure et est rentable par rapport au traitement médical.

Association between various physical factors and acute thoracolumbar intervertebral disk extrusion or protrusion in Dachshunds.

OBJECTIVE To determine whether body weight, body condition score, or various body dimensions were associated with acute thoracolumbar intervertebral disk extrusion or protrusion and whether any of these factors were associated with severity of clinical signs in Dachshunds. DESIGN Cross-sectional clinical study. ANIMALS 75 Dachshunds with (n = 39) or without (36) acute thoracolumbar intervertebral disk extrusion or protrusion. PROCEDURES Signalment, various body measurements, body weight, body condition score, and spinal cord injury grade were recorded at the time of initial examination. RESULTS Mean T1-S1 distance and median tuber calcaneus-to-patellar tendon (TC-PT) distance were significantly shorter in affected than in unaffected dogs. A 1-cm decrease in T1-S1 distance was associated with a 2.1-times greater odds of being affected, and a 1-cm decrease in TC-PT distance was associated with an 11.1-times greater odds of being affected. Results of multivariable logistic regression also indicated that affected dogs were taller at the withers and had a larger pelvic circumference than unaffected dogs, after adjusting for other body measurements. Results of ordinal logistic regression indicated that longer T1-S1 distance, taller height at the withers, and smaller pelvic circumference were associated with more severe spinal cord injury. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results suggest that certain body dimensions may be associated with acute thoracolumbar intervertebral disk extrusion or protrusion in Dachshunds and, in affected dogs, with severity of neurologic dysfunction.

Übergangslösungen beim Eintritt in die Schweizer Berufsbildung: Brückenschlag oder Sackgasse?

In der Schweiz finden viele Jugendliche keinen direkten Zugang zu einer beruflichen Grundbildung; vielmehr durchlaufen sie zunächst eine so genannte Übergangslösung oder ein Brückenangebot wie z.B. ein zehntes Schuljahr. Wir beleuchten in diesem Beitrag zum einen, wie schulische, individuelle, familiäre und kontextuell-systemische Faktoren den Übertritt in solche Brückenangebote beeinflussen. Zum anderen gehen wir der Frage nach, wie sich ein verzögerter Einstieg via ein Brückenangebot auf die Chance auswirkt, einen Abschluss der Sekundarstufe II zu erwerben. Die empirische Analyse stützt sich auf die TREE-Studie, welche eine Kohorte von Schulentlassenen des Jahres 2000 längsschnittlich beobachtet. Wir modellieren dabei zunächst die interessierenden Übertrittsprozesse mittels einer multinomialen logistischen Regression, um dann mittels Propensity Score Matching deren Wirkung auf die nachobligatorischen Bildungschancen abzuschätzen.

Cost-effectiveness of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Leaflet Repair for the Treatment of Mitral Regurgitation in Heart Failure

Contexte: La régurgitation mitrale (RM) est une maladie valvulaire nécessitant une intervention dans les cas les plus grave. Une réparation percutanée de la valve mitrale avec le dispositif MitraClip est un traitement sécuritaire et efficace pour les patients à haut risque chirurgical. Nous voulons évaluer les résultats cliniques et l'impact économique de cette thérapie par rapport à la gestion médicale des patients en insuffisance cardiaque avec insuffisance mitrale symptomatique. Méthodes: L'étude a été composée de deux phases; une étude d'observation de patients souffrant d'insuffisance cardiaque et de régurgitation mitrale traitée avec une thérapie médicale ou le MitraClip, et un modèle économique. Les résultats de l'étude observationnelle ont été utilisés pour estimer les paramètres du modèle de décision, qui a estimé les coûts et les avantages d'une cohorte hypothétique de patients atteints d'insuffisance cardiaque et insuffisance mitrale sévère traitée avec soit un traitement médical standard ou MitraClip. Résultats: La cohorte de patients traités avec le système MitraClip était appariée par score de propension à une population de patients atteints d'insuffisance cardiaque, et leurs résultats ont été comparés. Avec un suivi moyen de 22 mois, la mortalité était de 21% dans la cohorte MitraClip et de 42% dans la cohorte de gestion médicale (p = 0,007). Le modèle de décision a démontré que MitraClip augmente l'espérance de vie de 1,87 à 3,60 années et des années de vie pondérées par la qualité (QALY) de 1,13 à 2,76 ans. Le coût marginal était 52.500 $ dollars canadiens, correspondant à un rapport coût-efficacité différentiel (RCED) de 32,300.00 $ par QALY gagné. Les résultats étaient sensibles à l'avantage de survie. Conclusion: Dans cette cohorte de patients atteints d'insuffisance cardiaque symptomatique et d insuffisance mitrale significative, la thérapie avec le MitraClip est associée à une survie supérieure et est rentable par rapport au traitement médical.

Caminhos para a avaliação da formação em odontologia: desenvolvimento, validação e aplicação de critérios

The need for universal access to health and the failure of the pedagogical model centered on the transmission of knowledge has led to changes in the training of health professionals. The objective of this study was to provide a new alternative for evaluating dental students through the development, validation and application of evaluation criteria based on the National Curriculum Guidelines (DCN in Brazil). Therefore, the study was conducted in three phases: development and validation of evaluation criteria of Dentistry courses based on the DCN; a pilot study to verify the applicability of the validated criteria and evaluation of the dentistry courses in the Northeast. In the first stage, a logical model was formulated, allowing for the construction of a criteria matrix, validated by a modified Delphi consensus technique. The validated matrix has the following dimensions: Profile of graduates, health care guidance, teaching and service integration, and pedagogical approach. The pilot study was conducted in five dental courses through a documentary study of the pedagogical project course (PPC), and application of validated questionnaires and interviews with course coordinators. The results of the pilot study indicate the possibility of being verified by means of validated criteria and using different methodological proposals, advances and curricular limitations facing the proposed reorientation of training recommended by DCN. The evaluation of Northeast Dentistry courses was carried out by applying a questionnaire validating a matrix of 30 course coordinators, including public and private institutions. The data were submitted to descriptive analysis, and also tested the difference between means and the correlation between the assessment of the coordinators in the dimensions and sub-dimensions with each other, among the general evaluation of courses and between the following variables: administrative category, time since last curriculum updating, participation in reorienting the training of health professionals programs, ENADE and CPC (Preliminary Concepts of the Course) scores in the year 2013. Positive correlation (p <0.01) was found between the means obtained by the perception of the coordinators in most dimensions, and also between them and the overall performance of the course. There were no significant differences between the coordinators’ perception about course performance and the administrative category (public / private). This difference is slightly higher when the average performance is compared with respect to time due to the last curriculum update, getting better performance in courses with the latest updated curriculum, even with there not 11 being this significant difference between dimensions. Better averages of performance were obtained in courses that do not participate in reorientation programs of professional training, with a significant difference (p<0.05) for the overall score and for all dimensions except the dimensions of teaching-service Integration (p = 0.064). There was no significant correlation between the assessment of coordinators in all dimensions, in the overall assessment or ENADE and CPC scores in 2013. The final instrument proposed in this study is a different alternative assessment for health training of both dentists and other professionals, considering that the DCN providing for the training and graduation of professionals is focused on the health needs of the population, integrated with the SUS (the National Brazilian Health System) and based on student-centered learning.

A Vinculação e a Auto-Estima em Jovens Não-Institucionalizados Vs. Institucionalizados

Introdução: Uma relação de vinculação segura implica a presença de um modelo representacional das figuras de vinculação como “disponíveis” e capazes de proporcionar protecção e que a qualidade dos cuidados parentais precoce é fundamental a determinar a saúde mental dos indivíduos. Se esta relação assume um enorme relevância para a saúde mental de qualquer ser humano, a institucionalização de crianças/jovens, envolvendo ameaças em termos da disponibilidade das figuras de vinculação constitui uma condição propícia para atrasos de desenvolvimento e aumento da probabilidade do desenvolvimento de sintomatologia psicopatológica. Os objectivos deste estudo passam, então, por analisar as diferenças na vinculação, mas também na auto-estima, de jovens institucionalizados vs nãoinstitucionalizados. Metodologia: A nossa amostra é constituída por 223 jovens nãoinstitucionalizados de duas escolas do Concelho de Coimbra (média de idades M=15.3; desvio-padrão, DP=1.97) e 47 jovens institucionalizados (M=15.5 DP=1.93). Tanto os jovens institucionalizados como não-institucionalizados preencheram um questionário com questões sóciodemográficas, relacionais, escolares, de saúde e bem-estar (com pequenas particularidades em algumas variáveis conforme a sub-amostra), o Inventory of Parent Attachment (IPPA) e a Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). A sub-amostra de jovens institucionalizados respondeu ainda a questões sobre a sua adaptação/vivência ao/no Lar. Resultados: Os rapazes da amostra não institucionalizada apresentam uma pontuação média mais elevada de auto-estima vs. raparigas. Nos jovens institucionalizados não foram encontradas diferenças de género a este nível. Não existem diferenças de género, em ambas as sub-amostras, na pontuação total do IPPA e suas dimensões. Os rapazes nãoinstitucionalizados vs. institucionalizados não divergem na pontuação média total de autoestima. O mesmo sucede com as raparigas. Ambas as sub-amostras não divergem na pontuação média total do IPPA e suas dimensões. Na amostra não-institucionalizada quer nos rapazes, quer nas raparigas não existem diferenças na pontuação total média na RSES, entre os jovens mais novos vs. mais velhos. Na amostra institucionalizada também não se verificam diferenças na pontuação total na RSES por idades. Nos jovens não institucionalizados foram encontradas diferenças na pontuação total média no IPPA (e suas dimensões, à excepção da Alienação), por idade, com os mais novos a apresentarem sempre valores médios mais elevados. Na amostra institucionalizada estas diferenças não se verificaram. Nos rapazes e raparigas da amostra não-institucionalizada verificaram-se associações significativas entre a pontuação na RSES e no IPPA e em todas as suas dimensões. O mesmo se verificou na subamostra institucionalizada. Não existe uma associação significativa entre a pertença a dada sub-amostra e a pertença ao grupo “pouco seguro” vs. “muito seguro”. Apesar de outras associações terem sido encontradas, importa reforçar as associações significativas entre a pontuação na auto-estima e na vinculação total e suas dimensões (quer nos rapazes e raparigas não-institucionalizados, como na amostra institucionalizada) e variáveis como a sintomatologia depressiva, a sintomatologia ansiosa e algumas variáveis relacionais. Discussão/Conclusão: De um modo geral parecem não existir diferenças entre jovens nãoinstitucionalizados vs. institucionalizados em termos de vinculação e de auto-estima. Porém, a uma vinculação insegura e uma menor auto-estima associam-se piores outcomes (e.g. sintomatologia depressiva) em ambas as amostras. Os profissionais trabalhando com adolescentes não-institucionalizados ou institucionalizados devem preocupar-se em avaliar a sua auto-estima e vinculação, procurando, eventualmente, nelas intervir terapeuticamente. / Introduction: It is well kown that a secure attachment relation implies the presence of representational model of the attachment figures as being available and able to provide protection and that the quality of earlier parental care is crucial in determining subjects mental health and there developmental trajectories. If this relation assumes such a big relevance to the mental health of any human being, the institutionalization of children/adolescents, even when truly needed, involving threats in terms of the availability of attachment figures constitutes a condition that might lead to developmental delays and might increase the probability of psychopathological sintomatology developing. The aims of this study are, then, to analyze if there are attachment differences and, also, in self-esteem, between a sub-sample of non-institutionalized and institutionalized adolescents. Methodology: Our sample comprises 223 adolescents non-institutionalized from two schools of Coimbra Council (mean age, M=15.3; standard deviation, SD=1.97) and 47 institutionalized adolescents (M=15.5 SD=1.93). Both sub-samples filled in a questionnaire with sociodemographic, relational, about school, health and well-being questions (with small particularities in some variables, regarding each sub-sample), the Inventory of Parent Attachment (IPPA) and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). Institutionalized adolescents also answered questions about the adaptation/life to/in the institution. Results: Boys from the non-institutionalized sub-sample present an higher self-esteem mean score vs. girls. We did not find significant gender differences in self-esteem mean score in the subsample of institutionalized adolescents. There are no gender differences, in both sub-samples, in IPPA (and all its dimensions) total score. Non-institutionalized boys vs. institutionalized boys do not differ in their self-esteem mean score. The same is valid for girls. Both subsamples do not differ in their IPPA (and all its dimensions) mean score. In the noninstitutionalized sample, either in boys, either in girls there are no differences regarding total RSES mean score, between younger (12-15 years old) and older (16-20 years old) adolescents. In the institutionalized sample there were also no differences regarding this score, by age groups. In the non-institutionalized sub-sample we found differences in IPPA total mean score (an in all its dimensions, with the exception of Alienation), by age, with younger adolescents presenting always higher mean scores. In the institutionalized sample there were no differences. Both in boys and girls from the non-institutionalized sample there were significant associations between RSES score and IPPA (and all its dimensions) score. The same result was found in the total institutionalized sample. Although other significant associations were found, we must reinforce the presence of significant associations between self-esteem score and IPPA total score (and of its dimensions) (either in boys and girls noninstitutionalized, either in the institutionalized sub-sample) and variables such as lifetime and depressive symptomatology in the last two weeks, anxious symptomatology in the last two weeks and some relational variables. Discussion/Conclusion: In general, we did not found significant differences between non-institutionalized vs. institutionalized adolescents in terms of attachment and self-esteem. However, a secure attachment and a lower self-esteem are associated with worst outcomes (e.g. depressive symptomatology) in both samples. Professionals working with adolescents, either or not institutionalized must assess their selfesteem and attachment and might, eventually, intervene on these aspects therapeutically.

The genetic association between personality and major depression or bipolar disorder. A polygenic score analysis using genome-wide association data

The relationship between major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD) remains controversial. Previous research has reported differences and similarities in risk factors for MDD and BD, such as predisposing personality traits. For example, high neuroticism is related to both disorders, whereas openness to experience is specific for BD. This study examined the genetic association between personality and MDD and BD by applying polygenic scores for neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness and conscientiousness to both disorders. Polygenic scores reflect the weighted sum of multiple single-nucleotide polymorphism alleles associated with the trait for an individual and were based on a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for personality traits including 13,835 subjects. Polygenic scores were tested for MDD in the combined Genetic Association Information Network (GAIN-MDD) and MDD2000+ samples (N=8921) and for BD in the combined Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder and Wellcome Trust Case-Control Consortium samples (N=6329) using logistic regression analyses. At the phenotypic level, personality dimensions were associated with MDD and BD. Polygenic neuroticism scores were significantly positively associated with MDD, whereas polygenic extraversion scores were significantly positively associated with BD. The explained variance of MDD and BD, approximately 0.1%, was highly comparable to the variance explained by the polygenic personality scores in the corresponding personality traits themselves (between 0.1 and 0.4%). This indicates that the proportions of variance explained in mood disorders are at the upper limit of what could have been expected. This study suggests shared genetic risk factors for neuroticism and MDD on the one hand and for extraversion and BD on the other.

Carga de trabalho de enfermeiros: uma análise do Nursing Activities Score (NAS)

Este estudo tem como objeto a carga de trabalho de enfermeiros que trabalham em unidades de cuidados semi-intensivos. Seu objetivo geral foi identificar e analisar a percepção dos enfermeiros de uma unidade semi-intensiva acerca do instrumento Nursing Activities Score - NAS, tendo como foco o conceito de carga de trabalho. Os objetivos específicos foram: identificar domínios do NAS considerados pelos enfermeiros como capazes de avaliar a carga de trabalho; identificar os itens que os enfermeiros consideram relevantes e manteriam no instrumento, os itens que excluiriam e os que acrescentariam; identificar itens que os enfermeiros consideram subdimensionados, para os quais aumentariam a pontuação, os superdimensionados, para os quais diminuiriam a pontuação; e, ao final, discutir implicações dessa avaliação para a organização do trabalho e seus impactos na saúde do trabalhador de enfermagem. Estudo de abordagem quantitativa do tipo descritivo exploratória, com breve aporte qualitativo, utilizando a triangulação metodológica. O local de estudo foi uma unidade de média complexidade com 35 leitos em um hospital privado do Rio de Janeiro. Participaram do estudo 28 enfermeiros e os dados foram coletados por meio de um questionário com perguntas fechadas e abertas no período de abril a maio de 2008. O tratamento dos dados foi realizado com apoio do software Excel, utilizando estatística descritiva. O material qualitativo foi organizado em categorias, usando elementos da Análise de Conteúdo Temática. Entre os domínios, verificou-se que os enfermeiros consideram o que mais avalia a carga real de trabalho o Suporte Ventilatório, com 89%, e o domínio que não avalia a carga de trabalho foi o Suporte Neurológico, com 25%. Os três domínios mais citados para serem acrescidos de atividades foram o Suporte Renal, com 25%, seguido Intervenção Especificas, com 21%, e Suporte Metabólico, respectivamente. Quanto à exclusão de atividades, só dois domínios foram mencionados: Suporte Ventilatório, com 25%, e Atividade Básica, com 21%. Os enfermeiros acham que 69% da pontuação era adequada aos itens e 31% acreditam não estar adequada. No grupo, 27% aumentariam a pontuação em alguns itens e 4% diminuiriam a pontuação. Sobre a mensuração da carga de trabalho, acreditam que essa colabora no processo de trabalho, 79%, e 57% acham que mensurar a carga de trabalho através do NAS pode auxiliar na preservação de sua saúde. Concluímos que esse instrumento mensura a carga de trabalho na opinião dos enfermeiros, mas precisa ser adaptado à realidade da unidade onde está sendo aplicada. Além disso, os enfermeiros alteraram mais os itens relacionados à carga física sem identificar a carga psíquica de trabalho como relevante, evidenciando que o trabalho de enfermagem precisa ser mais bem conhecido pelos enfermeiros no que se refere às dimensões de impacto na sua saúde.

Differential predictability of four dimensions of affect intensity.

Individual differences in affect intensity are typically assessed with the Affect Intensity Measure (AIM). Previous factor analyses suggest that the AIM is comprised of four weakly correlated factors: Positive Affectivity, Negative Reactivity, Negative Intensity and Positive Intensity or Serenity. However, little data exist to show whether its four factors relate to other measures differently enough to preclude use of the total scale score. The present study replicated the four-factor solution and found that subscales derived from the four factors correlated differently with criterion variables that assess personality domains, affective dispositions, and cognitive patterns that are associated with emotional reactions. The results show that use of the total AIM score can obscure relationships between specific features of affect intensity and other variables and suggest that researchers should examine the individual AIM subscales.

La propension des gestionnaires envers les évaluations participatives

Davantage d’évaluations de projets internationaux dans les pays en développement se réalisent pour informer les décisions sur la base de données probantes. L’utilisation des résultats d’évaluation est remise en cause et pour y remédier des évaluations participatives qui incluent à certaines étapes du processus évaluatif des acteurs non évaluateurs sont proposées. Parmi celles-ci, les évaluations participatives pratiques visent principalement à améliorer l’utilisation du processus et des résultats des évaluations. Ces évaluations participatives pratiques seraient obstruées par des attitudes individuelles négatives, ou résistance individuelle au changement, et favorisées par des attitudes individuelles positives, ou propension. Cette thèse propose d’étudier la propension individuelle des gestionnaires envers les évaluations participatives pratiques d’intervention (EPP), les éléments influençant cette propension, et de caractériser des niveaux de propension des individus envers les EPP. Tout d’abord une revue de littérature a proposé une définition multidimensionnelle de la propension envers les EPP comme étant une attitude favorable envers la pratique des EPP qui se décline à chaque étape d’une évaluation sous les volets affectif et cognitif. Les dimensions identifiées théoriquement étaient : apprentissage, travail en groupe, emploi de méthodes systématiques, usage de l’esprit critique. Ces dimensions ont servi de cadre pour la partie empirique de la thèse. Une étude de cas multiples avec les gestionnaires d’une institution de santé en Haïti a été menée pour contextualiser la propension et identifier les éléments d’influence. Les données ont été recueillies à l’aide d’entrevues semi-structurées et de sources documentaires. L’analyse des données concernant l’apprentissage a révélé une prédominance des formes d’apprentissage par l’action et par l’observation. Le travail en groupe se retrouve ancré dans la pratique des gestionnaires administratifs et des gestionnaires cliniques. Les méthodes systématiques se reflètent principalement dans la consultation de plusieurs acteurs ayant de l’intérêt pour la problématique immédiate à solutionner plutôt que par l’outillage méthodologique. L’emploi de méthodes systématiques prend généralement la forme de consultation élargie d’avis pour régler une situation ou prend la forme de tentative de validation des informations reçues. L’esprit critique se déclenche sous stimulation lorsque l’image individuelle, professionnelle, corporative ou organisationnelle est touchée ou lors de suggestions jugées constructives. En plus de contextualiser quatre composantes de la propension individuelle envers les EPP, les gestionnaires se sont positionnés par rapport à la propension de leurs collègues sur la base de la réactivité, plus ou moins réactif vis-à-vis des composantes de la propension individuelle. Ainsi, la propension étudiée empiriquement a laissé émerger deux axes : un axe formalisation et un axe réactivité. L’axe formalisation reprend la contextualisation des quatre composantes de la propension individuelle envers les EPP, soit la forme d’expression des composantes. L’axe réactivité reprend le niveau d’activité déployé dans chaque composante de la propension individuelle, de réactif à plus proactif. De plus, des profils d’individus ayant différents niveaux de propension envers les EPP ont été développés. Des influences favorables et défavorables au niveau de propension envers les EPP ont été identifiées. L’originalité de cette thèse tient dans le fait de se positionner dans un courant récent de réflexion autour de la résistance aux changements et aux évaluations avec un regard positif et d’avoir défini théoriquement et appliqué empiriquement le concept pluridimensionnel de propension individuelle aux EPP. Des profils de niveau de propension individuelle aux EPP et les éléments d’influence favorables et défavorables associés peuvent servir d’outil de diagnostic aux types d’évaluation possibles, servir d’ajustement à la mise en place d’évaluations selon les interlocuteurs, permettre le suivi des changements de niveaux de propension pendant une EPP et servir de sources d’informations pour ajuster les plans d’évaluations participatives.

Trajectoires développementales des dimensions du profil de dysrégulation (CBCL-DE) – agressivité, anxiété et inattention : éléments prédicteurs de diplomation au secondaire chez les garçons.

Ouvrage réalisé sous la supervision du comité de jury composé des membres suivants: Dre Leila Ben Amor, Dre Diane Sauriol, Daniel Fiset, PhD. & Éric Lacourse PhD.

Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: a short measure for children and adolescents' well-being and health-related quality of life

Background To assess the criterion and construct validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 well-being and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) score, a short version of the KIDSCREEN-52 and KIDSCREEN-27 instruments. Methods The child self-report and parent report versions of the KIDSCREEN-10 were tested in a sample of 22,830 European children and adolescents aged 8–18 and their parents (n = 16,237). Correlation with the KIDSCREEN-52 and associations with other generic HRQoL measures, physical and mental health, and socioeconomic status were examined. Score differences by age, gender, and country were investigated. Results Correlations between the 10-item KIDSCREEN score and KIDSCREEN-52 scales ranged from r = 0.24 to 0.72 (r = 0.27–0.72) for the self-report version (proxy-report version). Coefficients below r = 0.5 were observed for the KIDSCREEN-52 dimensions Financial Resources and Being Bullied only. Cronbach alpha was 0.82 (0.78), test–retest reliability was ICC = 0.70 (0.67) for the self- (proxy-)report version. Correlations between other children self-completed HRQoL questionnaires and KIDSCREEN-10 ranged from r = 0.43 to r = 0.63 for the KIDSCREEN children self-report and r = 0.22–0.40 for the KIDSCREEN parent proxy report. Known group differences in HRQoL between physically/mentally healthy and ill children were observed in the KIDSCREEN-10 self and proxy scores. Associations with self-reported psychosomatic complaints were r = −0.52 (−0.36) for the KIDSCREEN-10 self-report (proxy-report). Statistically significant differences in KIDSCREEN-10 self and proxy scores were found by socioeconomic status, age, and gender. Conclusions Our results indicate that the KIDSCREEN-10 provides a valid measure of a general HRQoL factor in children and adolescents, but the instrument does not represent well most of the single dimensions of the original KIDSCREEN-52. Test–retest reliability was slightly below a priori defined thresholds.