Describing socioeconomic gradients in children's diets - does the socioeconomic indicators used matter?

Background: 

Social policies and socioeconomic indicators for transitional economies

Includes bibliography

The contribution of psychosocial factors to socioeconomic differences in food purchasing

In developed countries the relationship between socioeconomic position (SEP) and health is unequivocal. Those who are socioeconomically disadvantaged are known to experience higher morbidity and mortality from a range of chronic diet-related conditions compared to those of higher SEP. Socioeconomic inequalities in diet are well established. Compared to their more advantaged counterparts, those of low SEP are consistently found to consume diets less consistent with dietary guidelines (i.e. higher in fat, salt and sugar and lower in fibre, fruit and vegetables). Although the reasons for dietary inequalities remain unclear, understanding how such differences arise is important for the development of strategies to reduce health inequalities. Both environmental (e.g. proximity of supermarkets, price, and availability of foods) and psychosocial (e.g. taste preference, nutrition knowledge) influences are proposed to account for inequalities in food choices. Although in the United States (US), United Kingdom (UK), and parts of Australia, environmental factors are associated with socioeconomic differences in food choices, these factors do not completely account for the observed inequalities. Internationally, this context has prompted calls for further exploration of the role of psychological and social factors in relation to inequalities in food choices. It is this task that forms the primary goal of this PhD research. In the small body of research examining the contribution of psychosocial factors to inequalities in food choices, studies have focussed on food cost concerns, nutrition knowledge or health concerns. These factors are generally found to be influential. However, since a range of psychosocial factors are known determinants of food choices in the general population, it is likely that a range of factors also contribute to inequalities in food choices. Identification of additional psychosocial factors of relevance to inequalities in food choices would provide new opportunities for health promotion, including the adaption of existing strategies. The methodological features of previous research have also hindered the advancement of knowledge in this area and a lack of qualitative studies has resulted in a dearth of descriptive information on this topic. This PhD investigation extends previous research by assessing a range of psychosocial factors in relation to inequalities in food choices using both quantitative and qualitative techniques. Secondary data analyses were undertaken using data obtained from two Brisbane-based studies, the Brisbane Food Study (N=1003, conducted in 2000), and the Sixty Families Study (N=60, conducted in 1998). Both studies involved main household food purchasers completing an interviewer-administered survey within their own home. Data pertaining to food-purchasing, and psychosocial, socioeconomic and demographic characteristics were collected in each study. The mutual goals of both the qualitative and quantitative phases of this investigation were to assess socioeconomic differences in food purchasing and to identify psychosocial factors relevant to any observed differences. The quantitative methods then additionally considered whether the associations examined differed according to the socioeconomic indicator used (i.e. income or education). The qualitative analyses made a unique contribution to this project by generating detailed descriptions of socioeconomic differences in psychosocial factors. Those with lower levels of income and education were found to make food purchasing choices less consistent with dietary guidelines compared to those of high SEP. The psychosocial factors identified as relevant to food-purchasing inequalities were: taste preferences, health concerns, health beliefs, nutrition knowledge, nutrition concerns, weight concerns, nutrition label use, and several other values and beliefs unique to particular socioeconomic groups. Factors more tenuously or inconsistently related to socioeconomic differences in food purchasing were cost concerns, and perceived adequacy of the family diet. Evidence was displayed in both the quantitative and qualitative analyses to suggest that psychosocial factors contribute to inequalities in food purchasing in a collective manner. The quantitative analyses revealed that considerable overlap in the socioeconomic variation in food purchasing was accounted for by key psychosocial factors of importance, including taste preference, nutrition concerns, nutrition knowledge, and health concerns. Consistent with these findings, the qualitative transcripts demonstrated the interplay between such influential psychosocial factors in determining food-purchasing choices. The qualitative analyses found socioeconomic differences in the prioritisation of psychosocial factors in relation to food choices. This is suggestive of complex cultural factors that distinguish advantaged and disadvantaged groups and result in socioeconomically distinct schemas related to health and food choices. Compared to those of high SEP, those of lower SEP were less likely to indicate that health concerns, nutrition concerns, or food labels influenced food choices, and exhibited lower levels of nutrition knowledge. In the absence of health or nutrition-related concerns, taste preferences tended to dominate the food purchasing choices of those of low SEP. Overall, while cost concerns did not appear to be a main determinant of socioeconomic differences in food purchasing, this factor had a dominant influence on the food choices of some of the most disadvantaged respondents included in this research. The findings of this study have several implications for health promotion. The integrated operation of psychosocial factors on food purchasing inequalities indicates that multiple psychosocial factors may be appropriate to target in health promotion. It also seems possible that the inter-relatedness of psychosocial factors would allow health promotion targeting a single psychosocial factor to have a flow-on affect in terms of altering other influential psychosocial factors. This research also suggests that current mass marketing approaches to health promotion may not be effective across all socioeconomic groups due to differences in the priorities and main factors of influence in food purchasing decisions across groups. In addition to the practical recommendations for health promotion, this investigation, through the critique of previous research, and through the substantive study findings, has highlighted important methodological considerations for future research. Of particular note are the recommendations pertaining to the selection of socioeconomic indicators, measurement of relevant constructs, consideration of confounders, and development of an analytical approach. Addressing inequalities in health has been noted as a main objective by many health authorities and governments internationally. It is envisaged that the substantive and methodological findings of this thesis will make a useful contribution towards this important goal.

Socioeconomic differences in food choices : deficiencies in nutrition knowledge or simply too much on your plate?

Nutrition knowledge is associated with dietary choices in the general population and has been proposed to contribute to socioeconomic differences in food choices and corresponding socioeconomic gradients in mortality and morbidity for a number of diet-related illnesses. This paper explores current evidence regarding socioeconomic differences in nutrition knowledge, reviewing the components of nutrition knowledge that have been assessed, the dietary intake or food choice outcomes considered, and the socioeconomic indicators used. In addition, this paper considers how socioeconomic differences in nutrition knowledge may arise, and potential determinants of inequalities in the application of nutrition knowledge. It highlights issues to consider when developing strategies to improve nutrition knowledge and facilitate knowledge application among those of lower socioeconomic position.

Associations between individual socioeconomic position, neighbourhood disadvantage, and transport mode: Baseline results from the HABITAT multilevel study

Background Understanding how different socioeconomic indicators are associated with transport modes provide insight into which interventions might contribute to reducing socioeconomic inequalities in health. The purpose of this study was to examine associations between neighbourhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage, individual-level socioeconomic position (SEP) and usual transport mode. Methods This investigation included 11,036 residents from 200 neighbourhoods in Brisbane, Australia. Respondents self-reported their usual transport mode (car or motorbike, public transport, walking or cycling). Indicators for individual-level SEP were education, occupation, and household income; and neighbourhood disadvantage was measured using a census-derived index. Data were analysed using multilevel multinomial logistic regression. High SEP respondents and residents of the most advantaged neighbourhoods who used a private motor vehicle as their usual form of transport was the reference category. Results Compared with driving a motor vehicle, the odds of using public transport were higher for white collar employees (OR1.68, 95%CrI 1.41-2.01), members of lower income households (OR 1.71 95%CrI 1.25-2.30), and residents of more disadvantaged neighbourhoods (OR 1.93, 95%CrI 1.46-2.54); and lower for respondents with a certificate-level education (OR 0.60, 95%CrI 0.49-0.74) and blue collar workers (OR 0.63, 95%CrI 0.50-0.81). The odds of walking for transport were higher for the least educated (OR 1.58, 95%CrI 1.18-2.11), those not in the labour force (OR 1.94, 95%CrI 1.38-2.72), members of lower income households (OR 2.10, 95%CrI 1.23-3.64), and residents of more disadvantaged neighbourhoods (OR 2.73, 95%CrI 1.46-5.24). The odds of cycling were lower among less educated groups (OR 0.31, 95% CrI 0.19-0.48). Conclusion The relationships between socioeconomic characteristics and transport modes are complex, and provide challenges for those attempting to encourage active forms of transportation. Further work is required exploring the individual- and neighbourhood-level mechanisms behind transport mode choice, and what factors might influence individuals from different socioeconomic backgrounds to change to more active transport modes.

Socioeconomic variation in diet and activity-related behaviours of Australian children and adolescents aged 2–16 years

Background

Evidence for age-related variation in the relationship between obesity-related behaviours and socioeconomic position may assist in the targeting of dietary and physical activity interventions among children.
Objective

To investigate the relationship between different indicators of socioeconomic position and obesity-related behaviours across childhood and adolescence.
Methods

Data were from 4487 children aged 2 to 16 years participating in the cross-sectional 2007 Australian National Children's Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey. Socioeconomic position was defined by the highest education of the primary or secondary carer and parental income. Activity was assessed using recall methods with physical activity also assessed using pedometers. Intake of energy-dense drinks and snack foods, fruits and vegetables was assessed using 2 × 24-h dietary recalls.
Results

A socioeconomic gradient was evident for each dietary measure (although in age-specific analyses, not for energy-dense snacks in older children), as well as television viewing, but not physical activity. Whether each behaviour was most strongly related to parental income or education of the primary or secondary carer was age and sex dependent. The socioeconomic gradient was strongest for television viewing time and consumption of fruit and energy-dense drinks.
Conclusions

A strong socioeconomic gradient in eating behaviours and television viewing time was observed. Relationships for particular behaviours differed by age, sex and how socioeconomic position was defined. Socioeconomic indicators define different population groups and represent different components of socioeconomic position. These findings may provide insights into who should be targeted in preventive health efforts at different life stages.

Well-being and equity: analytic challenges and social indicators

Includes bibliography

Indicators for the assessment of social policies

Includes bibliography

Socioeconomic inequalities of cardiovascular risk factors among manufacturing employees in the Republic of Ireland: a cross-sectional study

Objectives: To explore socioeconomic differences in four cardiovascular disease risk factors (overweight/obesity, smoking, hypertension, height) among manufacturing employees in the Republic of Ireland (ROI). Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of 850 manufacturing employees aged 18–64 years. Education and job position served as socioeconomic indicators. Group-specific differences in prevalence were assessed with the Chi-squared test. Multivariate regression models were explored if education and job position were independent predictors of the CVD risk factors. Cochran–Armitage test for trend was used to assess the presence of a social gradient. Results: A social gradient was found across educational levels for smoking and height. Employees with the highest education were less likely to smoke compared to the least educated employees (OR 0.2, [95% CI 0.1–0.4]; p b 0.001). Lower educational attainment was associated with a reduction in mean height. Non-linear differences were found in both educational level and job position for obesity/overweight. Managers were more than twice as likely to be overweight or obese relative to those employees in the lowest job position (OR 2.4 [95% CI 1.3–4.6]; p = 0.008). Conclusion: Socioeconomic inequalities in height, smoking and overweight/obesity were highlighted within a sub-section of the working population in ROI.

Impacto socioeconômico dos royalties do petróleo nos municípios do estado do Rio de Janeiro

Os royalties de petróleo têm ganhado notoriedade nos últimos anos pelo crescimento das atividades petrolíferas no país, as mudanças nas leis, preços do petróleo e transferência e aplicação de recursos nos Municípios para seu desenvolvimento socioeconômico. Esta pesquisa busca identificar mudanças em indicadores socioeconômicos em Municípios do estado do Rio de Janeiro através de análise temporal de variáveis que indiquem uma relação da evolução socioeconômica dos Municípios com os royalties de petróleo. Para testar esta hipótese, foi feita uma análise de agrupamento dos Municípios do estado do Rio de Janeiro utilizando as variáveis IDH (Índice de Desenvolvimento Humano), PIB (Produto Interno Bruto) e população, sendo todas as variáveis apresentando valores do ano 2000. Com a determinação do número de grupos, foram escolhidos dois Municípios de cada grupo sob a condição de maior arrecadador de royalties e não arrecadador de royalties e analisados entre os anos 2003 e 2006 para verificar a possível mudança de indicadores socioeconômicos neste período e possível relação desta mudança com royalties de petróleo.

O orçamento público federal e a garantia de prioridade absoluta de crianças e adolescentes nas políticas públicas

Essa pesquisa objetiva verificar a garantia de prioridade absoluta de crianças e adolescentes nas políticas públicas do governo federal. Para tanto, resgata o processo de criação dos novos direitos de crianças e adolescentes, que se origina na Assembléia Nacional Constituinte (ANC) 1987-1988, perpassa a discussão da comunidade internacional para a criação da Convenção sobre os Direitos da Criança (CDC) e resulta em uma legislação nacional, o Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente (ECA), sob a égide da Doutrina da Proteção Integral. Essa legislação reflete os novos direitos de crianças e adolescentes brasileiros como cidadãos e cidadãs, titulares de direitos especiais por sua condição peculiar de desenvolvimento e compõe os critérios de garantia, defesa e promoção de seus direitos humanos. Esse estudo também traz informações sobre a desigualdade social brasileira para inferir que o investimento em políticas públicas para infância e adolescência é um dos mecanismos para promover desenvolvimento sustentável, construir bases para uma sociedade mais justa e igualitária e que, quando aliadas a políticas de transferências de renda, oportunizam condições sólidas para reduzir o grau de desigualdade social, com efetiva melhora da qualidade de vida da população. A prioridade absoluta foi estimada a partir de um método de apuração do Orçamento Criança e Adolescente (OCA) que filtra as políticas orçamentárias voltadas ao público infanto-adolescente, nos termos do ECA, por critérios de exclusividade e direcionamento. Os resultados indicam que, apesar das melhoras recentes em indicadores socioeconômicos e na qualidade de vida da população brasileira, ainda falta um longo caminho para o respeito ao princípio da prioridade absoluta de crianças e adolescentes nas políticas públicas do governo federal, pois os recursos públicos da União estão à mercê do pagamento dos juros, encargos e amortizações da dívida pública. Com isso, as políticas sociais ficam mantidas em segundo plano, e sua arrecadação tem caráter regressivo, baseada em tributos indiretos, no que o financiamento das políticas públicas é feito pela população mais pobre, majoritariamente, justamente a que mais demanda as políticas públicas sociais.

A gestão estadual do SUS em Minas Gerais e seu efeito na regionalização e em alguns resultados de saúde da população

Este estudo aborda a atuação da gestão estadual do Serviço Único de Saúde (SUS) sobre o quadro de desigualdades em saúde, analisando o caso do estado de Minas Gerais. A descentralização dos serviços de saúde, no âmbito do federalismo brasileiro, promoveu o ingresso de recursos em todos os municípios, permitindo a incorporação de cidadãos de todas as regiões do país ao sistema. Ao mesmo tempo, a pulverização dos recursos perpetuou as históricas desigualdades ao acesso a serviços de mais complexidade. Esse quadro exige a intervenção do nível estadual para ser alterado. Este é o tema deste trabalho, que analisou o processo de regionalização da assistência à saúde, no período de 2002 a 2009, sob a coordenação da gestão estadual do SUS em Minas Gerais, considerando o cenário federativo brasileiro, em que os municípios são entes autônomos. Os objetivos específicos foram: descrever o processo de regionalização proposto pela gestão estadual para alcançar a melhoria dos serviços públicos e a redução de desigualdades regionais; verificar a extensão da implementação da regionalização nas microrregiões, tomando como referência o gasto de recursos estaduais dirigidos a municípios e a implantação das Comissões Intergestores Bipartites Microrregionais e Macrorregionais; avaliar o efeito da regionalização na rede de serviços e na redução das desigualdades regionais, relativas a recursos, acesso a serviços e em algumas condições de saúde da população, consideradas sensíveis à regionalização. Revisou-se a literatura sobre federalismo, descentralização e relações intergovernamentais e documentos oficiais; utilizaram-se dados secundários sobre recursos e indicadores de saúde e de desenvolvimento. Verificou-se que o processo foi viabilizado por intensa aproximação entre governo estadual e municípios; por uma proposta consistente e pelo aporte de recursos. Constatou-se, ainda, que, no período, ampliou-se o acesso a leitos de Unidade de Terapia Intensiva (UTI) e a mamografias; houve desconcentração de recursos e equipamentos na direção de macrorregiões e microrregiões mais desprovidas; os recursos estaduais disciplinaram o gasto federal; e reduziram-se as desigualdades entre as microrregiões em relação a: indicadores socioeconômicos, recursos federais e estaduais, acesso a mamografias e mortalidade por doenças cardiovasculares.

Associação entre o nível de escolaridade e a idade da menopausa: uma revisão sistemática

O século XX foi marcado por significativa transformação social, que se refletiu em rápido aumento da expectativa de vida da população mundial. Nesse contexto, é cada vez mais significativa a parcela de mulheres que atingem a menopausa. Doenças cardiovasculares, que representam a principal causa de morte entre os adultos, e a osteoporose, apresentam uma relação nítida com a antecipação da menopausa, isto é, aquela que ocorre abaixo da média esperada para uma população. As pesquisas na área, antes praticamente relacionadas ao tratamento dos efeitos causados pelo climatério, se voltam cada vez mais para entender como os hábitos ou estilos de vida podem influenciar a fisiologia ovariana e, conseqüentemente, alterar o momento da menopausa. A relação com alguns destes hábitos, como o fumo, já apresenta forte embasamento na literatura. Entretanto, a correlação com o nível socioeconômico, seja pelas dificuldades de se medir adequadamente esse constructo, ou talvez pela quantidade insuficiente de trabalhos de qualidade, não se apresenta de forma tão evidente. O nível de escolaridade, considerado um dos melhores indicadores do nível socioeconômico, tanto pela maior facilidade de obtenção da informação, como pelo já demonstrado grau de associação com diversos desfechos em saúde, foi avaliado nesta revisão sistemática como fator de exposição para a antecipação da idade da menopausa. Este trabalho se alinha com a crescente tendência de se entender como os determinantes sociais podem influenciar nos desfechos em saúde, e de se buscar estratégias eficazes em prol da diminuição das desigualdades em saúde. A estratégia de busca eletrônica foi desenvolvida de forma específica para as diferentes bases (MEDLINE [PubMed] e LILACS) e através de consulta a referências cruzadas. Somente foram incluídos estudos observacionais pela natureza da questão, já que não seria possível, neste caso, a realização de estudos experimentais. Após a identificação inicial de 776 artigos, 40 deles foram selecionados para apreciação do texto completo. No final, esta revisão sistemática englobou 30 artigos, relatando resultados de 32 estudos. Como resultado, verificou-se que estudos que não demonstram associação significativa do nível de educação com a idade da menopausa formaram a maioria da amostra. A forma como nível de escolaridade foi medida e a metodologia para comparação entre os estratos se mostraram largamente heterogêneas. Não se encontraram evidências inequívocas sobre a existência de associação entre o nível de escolaridade e a idade da menopausa através desta revisão.