The use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis in COMFORT-II: an open-label, phase 3 study assessing efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in the treatment of myelofibrosis

BACKGROUND: Anemia is considered a negative prognostic risk factor for survival in patients with myelofibrosis. Most patients with myelofibrosis are anemic, and 35-54 % present with anemia at diagnosis. Ruxolitinib, a potent inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and JAK2, was associated with an overall survival benefit and improvements in splenomegaly and patient-reported outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis in the two phase 3 COMFORT studies. Consistent with the ruxolitinib mechanism of action, anemia was a frequently reported adverse event. In clinical practice, anemia is sometimes managed with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). This post hoc analysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of concomitant ruxolitinib and ESA administration in patients enrolled in COMFORT-II, an open-label, phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib with best available therapy for treatment of myelofibrosis. Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive ruxolitinib 15 or 20 mg twice daily or best available therapy. Spleen volume was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography scan.

RESULTS: Thirteen of 146 ruxolitinib-treated patients had concomitant ESA administration (+ESA). The median exposure to ruxolitinib was 114 weeks in the +ESA group and 111 weeks in the overall ruxolitinib arm; the median ruxolitinib dose intensity was 33 mg/day for each group. Six weeks before the first ESA administration, 10 of the 13 patients had grade 3/4 hemoglobin abnormalities. These had improved to grade 2 in 7 of the 13 patients by 6 weeks after the first ESA administration. The rate of packed red blood cell transfusions per month within 12 weeks before and after first ESA administration remained the same in 1 patient, decreased in 2 patients, and increased in 3 patients; 7 patients remained transfusion independent. Reductions in splenomegaly were observed in 69 % of evaluable patients (9/13) following first ESA administration.

CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant use of an ESA with ruxolitinib was well tolerated and did not affect the efficacy of ruxolitinib. Further investigations evaluating the effects of ESAs to alleviate anemia in ruxolitinib-treated patients are warranted (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT00934544; July 6, 2009).

Unraveling the molecular underpinnings of Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms: implications for future therapeutic strategies

The present thesis encompasses the two researches projects I conducted during my PhD program in Molecular Biology and Pathology. The common thread is represented by the analysis of the signaling pathways implicated in the pathophysiology of the two most aggressive Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms, namely, atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). In the last decade, since the description of the JAK2V617F mutation in 2005, the field of the molecular characterization of Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms has experienced an astonishing implementation that led to the discovery of 16 new mutations involving signal transduction, epigenetic modifiers, cell cycle regulators. Nevertheless, their pathogenetic relevance and whether they could represent good “druggable” candidates have to be proved yet. In the first section I provide the first report of the signaling cascade down-stream the rare cytogenetic lesion t(8;9)(p22;p24)/PCM1-JAK2 associated with aCML, finding that it selectively activates the ERK1/2 signaling without affecting JAK/STAT phosphorylation. In the second part, I investigated the implication of the ε isoform of novel Protein kinase Cs (PKCs) in the pathophysiology of the aberrant megakaryocytopoiesis in PMF, concluding that the over-expression of PKCε detains a crucial relevance in the aberrant behavior of PMF megakaryocytes and its inhibition is capable to restore their normal differentiation and abrogate the anti-apoptotic signaling. Both results are discussed in the view of their therapeutic implications. In case PCM1/JAK2-related hematologic neoplasms, ERK-inhibitors rather than JAK-inhibitors (i.e. ruxolitinib) should be considered as a “tailored” drugs. In case of PMF, PKCε-inhibitors (i.e. εV1-2 peptide) configure as an appealing strategy to re-direct the megakaryocytic neoplastic clone.