986 resultados para Royal Albert Hall (Londres)
Resumo:
Référence bibliographique : Rol, 60155
Resumo:
Référence bibliographique : Rol, 60156
Resumo:
Référence bibliographique : Rol, 60159
Resumo:
Référence bibliographique : Rol, 60157
Resumo:
Référence bibliographique : Rol, 60158
Resumo:
Référence bibliographique : Rol, 60160
Resumo:
Référence bibliographique : Rol, 60162
Resumo:
Référence bibliographique : Rol, 60161
Resumo:
Heinrich Graetz
[Lettre autographe signée de Ferdinand Albert Décombe, dit Albert, à Leborne, Londres, 14 mars 1844]
Resumo:
Au sujet de problèmes avec le Théâtre de Bordeaux
Resumo:
Signatur des Originals: S 36/G00781
Resumo:
Written for the 2016 BBC Proms to mark the 50th Anniversary of the Ulster Orchestra. Premiered by Ulster Orchestra/Rafael Payare on 21st August 2016 at Royal Albert Hall, London, with BBC Radio 3 broadcast and repeat. NI Premiere: 31st March 2017, Ulster Orchestra/Rafael Payare, Ulster Hall, Belfast
Resumo:
Architects and engineers depend on copyright law to protect their original works. Copyright protection is automatic once a tangible medium of expression in any form of an innovative material, conforming the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988, is created. In terms of architectural works, they are protected as literary works (design drawings and plans) and as artistic works (the building or model of the building). The case law on the concept of “originality” however discloses that it may be difficult for certain artistic works of architecture to achieve copyright protection. Although copyright law provides automatic protection to all original architectural plans, the limitation is that it only protects the expression of ideas but not the ideas themselves. The purpose of this research is to explore how effective the UK’s copyright law regime is for protecting the rights and interests of architects in their works. In addition, the United States system of copyright law will be analysed to determine whether it provides more effective protection for architects and engineers with regard to architectural works. The key objective in carrying out this comparison is to compare and contrast the extent to which the two systems protect the rights and interests of architects against copyright infringement. This comparative analysis concludes by considering the possibility of copyright law reform in the UK.