Translation, adaptation and validation of the Roland-Morris questionnaire - Brazil Roland-Morris

The purpose of the present study was to translate the Roland-Morris (RM) questionnaire into Brazilian-Portuguese and adapt and validate it. First 3 English teachers independently translated the original questionnaire into Brazilian-Portuguese and a consensus version was generated. Later, 3 other translators, blind to the original questionnaire, performed a back translation. This version was then compared with the original English questionnaire. Discrepancies were discussed and solved by a panel of 3 rheumatologists and the final Brazilian version was established (Brazil-RM). This version was then pretested on 30 chronic low back pain patients consecutively selected from the spine disorders outpatient clinic. In addition to the traditional clinical outcome measures, the Brazil-RM, a 6-point pain scale (from no pain to unbearable pain), and its numerical pain rating scale (PS) (0 to 5) and a visual analog scale (VAS) (0 to 10) were administered twice by one interviewer (1 week apart) and once by one independent interviewer. Spearman's correlation coefficient (SCC) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were computed to assess test-retest and interobserver reliability. Cross-sectional construct validity was evaluated using the SCC. In the pretesting session, all questions were well understood by the patients. The mean time of questionnaire administration was 4 min and 53 s. The SCC and ICC were 0.88 (P<0.01) and 0.94, respectively, for the test-retest reliability and 0.86 (P<0.01) and 0.95, respectively, for interobserver reliability. The correlation coefficient was 0.80 (P<0.01) between the PS and Brazil-RM score and 0.79 (P<0.01) between the VAS and Brazil-RM score. We conclude that the Brazil-RM was successfully translated and adapted for application to Brazilian patients, with satisfactory reliability and cross-sectional construct validity.

Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for the treatment of non-specific acute low back pain: a randomised controlled multicentre trial protocol [ISRCTN65814467]

BACKGROUND Low back pain and its associated incapacitating effects constitute an important healthcare and socioeconomic problem, as well as being one of the main causes of disability among adults of working age. The prevalence of non-specific low back pain is very high among the general population, and 60-70% of adults are believed to have suffered this problem at some time. Nevertheless, few randomised clinical trials have been made of the efficacy and efficiency of acupuncture with respect to acute low back pain. The present study is intended to assess the efficacy of acupuncture for acute low back pain in terms of the improvement reported on the Roland Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) on low back pain incapacity, to estimate the specific and non-specific effects produced by the technique, and to carry out a cost-effectiveness analysis. METHODS/DESIGN Randomised four-branch controlled multicentre prospective study made to compare semi-standardised real acupuncture, sham acupuncture (acupuncture at non-specific points), placebo acupuncture and conventional treatment. The patients are blinded to the real, sham and placebo acupuncture treatments. Patients in the sample present symptoms of non specific acute low back pain, with a case history of 2 weeks or less, and will be selected from working-age patients, whether in paid employment or not, referred by General Practitioners from Primary Healthcare Clinics to the four clinics participating in this study. In order to assess the primary and secondary result measures, the patients will be requested to fill in a questionnaire before the randomisation and again at 3, 12 and 48 weeks after starting the treatment. The primary result measure will be the clinical relevant improvement (CRI) at 3 weeks after randomisation. We define CRI as a reduction of 35% or more in the RMQ results. DISCUSSION This study is intended to obtain further evidence on the effectiveness of acupuncture on acute low back pain and to isolate the specific and non-specific effects of the treatment.

Comparação entre três tratamentos de fisioterapia em indivíduos com lombalgia

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the chronic pain grade

To verify the reliability and validity of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the chronic pain grade (CPG-Br). Cultural adaptation was made in accordance with established guidelines, with modifications aiming at improving this process. Adaptations were made based on interviews with 45 chronic pain patients from So Paulo city. Validation was studied by concurrent application of the short-form-36 health survey (SF-36) and other questionnaires to 283 participants with chronic pain from the general population. Temporal stability was verified by a second application to 131 individuals. Factor analysis resulted in a two-factor solution with factors named characteristic pain intensity and activity limitation due to pain. Alpha coefficients of 0.78 and 0.70 and intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.76 and 0.72 for each factor indicated good internal consistency and temporal stability. Significant correlations between CPG-Br and SF-36, Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and neck disability index scores were noted. A consistent linear trend was also observed between pain grades and SF-36 scores. Frequency of use of pain medications and of pain-related medical visits increased with pain grade. This Brazilian Portuguese version of the chronic pain grade, tested on a sample of the Brazilian population, demonstrated good reliability and validity.

Combined physiotherapy and education is efficacious for chronic low back pain

Manual therapy, exercise and education target distinct aspects of chronic low back pain and probably have distinct effects, This study aimed to determine the efficacy of a combined physiotherapy treatment that comprised all of these strategies. By concealed randomisation, 57 chronic low back pain patients were allocated to either the four-week physiotherapy program or management as directed by their general practitioners, The dependent variables of interest were pain and disability. Assessors were blind to treatment group. Outcome data from 49 subjects (86%) showed a significant treatment effect. The physiotherapy program reduced pain and disability by a mean of 1.5/10 points on a numerical rating scale (95% CI 0.7 to 2.3) and 3.9 points on the 18-point Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (95% CI 2 to 5.8), respectively. The number needed to treat in order to gain a clinically meaningful change was 3 (95% CI 3 to 8) for pain, and 2 (95% CI 2 to 5) for disability. A treatment effect was maintained at one-year follow-up. The findings support the efficacy of combined physiotherapy treatment in producing symptomatic and functional change in moderately disabled chronic low back pain patients.

Efeito da manipulação lombar em pacientes com dor lombar aguda

Introdução: A manipulação vertebral é um procedimento de terapia manual realizada em alta velocidade, pequena amplitude e normalmente no final de movimento. Estudos recentes sugerem a manipulação da coluna lombar com efeitos directos nos mecanismos neurofisiológicos da dor assim como na funcionalidade. Objectivo: Avaliar os efeitos, na dor e na funcionalidade, da manipulação lombar, em pacientes com dor lombar aguda de origem mecânica, no dia seguinte à manipulação. Materiais e Métodos: Participaram neste estudo três pacientes de ambos os sexos, com idades compreendidas entre os 31 e 35 anos, com queixas de dor lombar há menos de oito dias e que apresentavam restrição e dor nos movimentos de flexão lombar. Foi utilizado o teste de Mitchell para identificar as vértebras lombares disfuncionais. Os instrumentos utilizados foram a escala numérica da dor (END) para avaliar a dor e o questionário de incapacidade lombar Roland Morris (QIRM) para avaliar a funcionalidade. Os utentes foram avaliados antes da manipulação e no dia seguinte à sua aplicação. Em cada paciente foi realizada apenas uma manipulação lombar. Resultados: No dia seguinte à intervenção os pacientes apresentaram diminuição da dor (6/10 vs 0/10; 5/10 vs 3/10; 4/10vs 1/10) e melhoria da funcionalidade (7/24 vs 1/24; 16/24 vs 9/24; 8/24 vs3/24). Conclusão: Com base nos resultados obtidos pode concluir-se que, nestes três casos, a manipulação lombar utilizada, teve efeitos positivos na redução da dor e no aumento da funcionalidade.

Relatório de estágio: intervenção em fisioterapia na sindrome da cirurgia lombar falhada

Introdução: A síndrome da cirurgia lombar falhada (SCLF) caracteriza-se pela persistência ou recidiva da dor ou aparecimento de novos sintomas após discectomia, descompressão de canal estreito ou artrodese lombares. Objectivos: O objectivo deste estudo foi descrever a abordagem em fisioterapia de um caso com Síndrome da Cirurgia Lombar Falhada e avaliar os seus efeitos na funcionalidade e sintomatologia dolorosa neste indivíduo. Metodologia: A amostra foi constituída por um sujeito com 41 anos, trabalhador da construção civil, apresentando dor lombar com irradiação para o membro inferior, após ter sido submetido a discectomia lombar e artrodese, que realizou sessões de fisioterapia convencional antes e depois da cirurgia, e que apresentava sinais compatíveis com compressão radicular. A intensidade da dor foi medida através da escala visual analógica (EVA), as amplitudes com o goniómetro universal, a funcionalidade foi avaliada utilizando o Questionário de Incapacidade Roland-Morris (RMDQ), o estado psicológico foi avaliado através da “Escala de Desânimo Associado à Dor” e do “Inventário de Convicções e Percepções Relacionadas com a Dor”. Resultados: A dor era inicialmente em média de 5,5/10 EVA, sendo de 3,4/10 EVA no final do tratamento. Quanto à funcionalidade (RMDQ) esta variou de 14/24 no início para 17/24 no final. De uma forma geral, após a aplicação de técnicas para diminuir a tensão do piriforme, técnicas neuurodinâmicas e um programa de exercícios para melhoria do controlo motor, o paciente apresentou alívio das queixas de dor na nádega esquerda e anca, aumento da amplitude de rotação medial da coxo-femoral, ausência das parestesias na face plantar do pé esquerdo e melhoria das queixas de dor na face anterior e lateral da coxa. Verificamos que houve diminuição dos índices de dor e melhorias dos níveis de funcionalidade. Conclusão: Neste estudo de caso, foi salientado o processo de raciocínio clínico desenvolvido pelo fisioterapeuta: a interpretação dos dados da história e levantamento das primeiras hipóteses e a realização dos testes no exame objectivo, permitiram estabelecer um diagnóstico funcional e elaborar um plano de intervenção através do qual o utente recuperou parcialmente a sua funcionalidade e diminuiu os seus índices de dor.

Efeitos de dois programas de exercício na endurance de tronco, controlo lombo-pélvico, perceção de dor lombar e fadiga, funcionalidade e qualidade de vida: Pilates Clínico vs Exercícios segundo McGill

Introdução: A lombalgia crónica assume uma elevada prevalência e graves repercussões a nível socioeconómico, sendo inúmeras as abordagens terapêuticas para o seu tratamento e prevenção. Existindo forte evidência da eficácia dos exercícios terapêuticos no seu tratamento, importa saber quais os mais efetivos. Objectivos: Comparar a efetividade de dois programas de exercício terapêutico na endurance do tronco, no controlo lombo-pélvico, na perceção de dor lombar e fadiga, na funcionalidade e na qualidade de vida em mulheres com lombalgia crónica não especifica, cuidadoras de idosos. Métodos: 24 mulheres foram divididas aleatoriamente em três grupos de 8. Durante 6 semanas, um grupo serviu de controlo (GC) e os outros dois grupos realizaram um programa de exercícios: Pilates Clínico (GP) ou exercícios segundo McGill (GM), com os outcomes medidos em ternos de endurance de tronco pelos testes de McGill, controlo lombo-pélvico pelos testes Active Straight Leg Raise e teste de controlo lombo-pélvico segundo McGill, dor lombar pela Numerical Rating Scale, fadiga pela escala de Borg, funcionalidade através do Questionário de Incapacidade de Roland Morris e qualidade de vida através do Questionário de Estado de Saúde (SF36-V2). Resultados: Relativamente à endurance, verificaram-se diferenças entre grupos no rácio flexores/extensores (p=0,005), e no rácio lateroflexores à esquerda/extensores (p=0,027), sendo que o GP apresentou um rácio estatisticamente inferior ao GC em ambos. Não existiram diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre os 3 grupos no controlo lombo-pélvico, perceção de dor, fadiga e funcionalidade, apesar das melhorias observadas intra-grupos. Relativamente à qualidade de vida, a dimensão saúde em geral aumentou significativamente no GP (p=0,020) e a função social no GM (p=0,045). Conclusão: A implementação dos programas de exercício Pilates Clínico e Exercícios segundo McGill numa amostra de cuidadoras de idosos com lombalgia crónica não especifica, parece ter um efeito positivo quando comparados com os do grupo de controlo sobre a endurance do tronco, controlo lombo-pélvico, perceção de dor lombar e fadiga, funcionalidade e qualidade de vida.

Dor crónica lombar : incapacidade auto-reportada em trabalhadores das IPSS de Arronches e sua relação com factores psicossociais e intensidade da dor

RESUMO: Vários estudos realizados sugerem que os factores psicossociais (nível de satisfação laboral; nível educacional; a catastrofização da dor e crenças de medoevitamento)têm um importante papel como factores associados ao desenvolvimento de cronicidade da DL (Krismer & van Tulder, 2007; Kwon et al., 2006; Leclerc et al., 2009; Pincus, Santos, Breen, Burton e Underwood., 2008.) Objectivo: Analisar a associação entre as variáveis catastrofização da dor, crenças de medo-evitamento da dor e intensidade da dor com a incapacidade funcional auto-reportada, numa amostra de indivíduos com DCL. Metodologia: A população alvo foi constituída por 160 funcionários da Santa Casa da Misericórdia e Centro de Bem Estar Social de Arronches. Integraram a amostra 133 funcionários que se disponibilizaram a responder aos diferentes instrumentos de avaliação utilizados (“Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire”(RMQ); “ Questionário de Caracterização e Levantamento de Factores de Risco e Impacto associado à DCL”; “Pain Catastrophing Scale” (PCS) e o “Fear- Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire” (FABQ). A recolha de dados realizou-se entre Agosto e Novembro de 2010. Resultados: Neste estudo, verificou-se que 39,1 % dos indivíduos referiam DCL não específica. Relativamente à incapacidade funcional autoreportada, obteve-se um score médio 5,87 no RMQ. Obteve-se um valor de rs=0,425,p<0,01, para a associação entre a catastrofização da dor e incapacidade. Relativamente à associação entre crenças de medo-evitamento, sub-escala actividade física e incapacidade, foi obtido o valor de rs= 0,074 e para a associação entre as crenças de medo-evitamento, sub-escala trabalho e incapacidade, verificou-se rs=0,422, p<0,01. No que respeita à associação entre percepção da intensidade dor actual e a incapacidade, obteve-se um valor rs= 0,177 e a associação entre a dor percepcionada em 2009 e incapacidade, aferiu um resultado de rs=0,291, p<0,05. Conclusão: Concluímos que existe uma associação moderada entre catastrofização da dor e a incapacidade funcional auto-reportada, e também entre crenças de medo-evitamento relativamente ao trabalho e a incapacidade funcional auto-reportada. Relativamente à associação entre a dor percepcionada em 2009 e a incapacidade funcional auto-reportada a associação é baixa. Não sendo encontrada associação entre crenças de medo-evitamento relativamente à actividade física e a incapacidade funcional auto-reportada, nem para a associação entre percepção da intensidade da dor actual e a incapacidade. Esta pesquisa contribuiu assim, para dar a conhecer factores relevantes avaliar em indivíduos com DCL, podendo a sua modificação contribuir para a prevenir maiores níveis de incapacidade funcional ou melhorar a efectividade do tratamento utilizado. --------------------ABSTRACT: Several studies suggest that psychosocial factors (level of job satisfaction, education level, and the pain catastrophizing and fear-avoidance beliefs) have an important role as factors associated with development of chronicity LBP (Krisma & van Tulder, 2007 ; Kwon et al., 2006, Leclerc et al. 2009; Pincus, Santos, Breen, Burton and Underwood., 2008.) Objective: To assess the association between the variables of pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance beliefs, pain, intensity pain and self-reported functional disability in a sample of people with chronic LBP. Methodology: The study consisted of 160 employees of the Santa Casa da Misericórdia and Centro de Bem Estar Social of Arronches. Integrated sample of 133 employees who agreed to respond to different assessment tools used (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ), "Questionnaire Survey of Characterization and Risk Factors and Impact associated with the DCL," "Pain Catastrophing Scale(PCS) and "Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Data collection took place between August and November 2010. Results: In this study, it was found that 39.1% of subjects reported no specific chronic LBP. For the self-reported functional disability, we obtained a medium score of 5.87 on the RMQ. We obtained a value of rs = 0.425, p <0.01, for the association between catastrophizing in pain and disability. Regarding the association between fear-avoidance beliefs, sub-scale physical activity and disability, was obtained a value of rs = 0.074 and for the association between fear-avoidance beliefs, sub-scale work and disability, there was rs = 0.422, p <0.01. Regarding the association between perceived pain intensity and pain disability present we obtained a value rs = 0.177 association between pain and perceived disability in 2009 and measured an outcome of rs = 0.291, p <0.05.Conclusion: That there is a moderate association between catastrophizing and pain self-reported functional disability, and also between fear-avoidance beliefs in relation to employment and self-reported functional disability. Regarding the association between pain and perceived disability in 2009 self-reported the association is low. Not being an association between earavoidance beliefs for physical activity and self-reported functional disability, or for the association between perception of current pain intensity and disability. This research contributed so, to disclose relevant factors evaluate in individuals with chronic LBP, its modification may help to prevent higher levels of functional disability or improve the effectiveness of treatment used.

Appropriateness criteria for surgery improve clinical outcomes in patients with low back pain and/or sciatica.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, observational outcome study using clinical, radiographic, and patient/physician-based questionnaire data, with patient outcomes at 12 months follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To validate appropriateness criteria for low back surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Most surgical treatment failures are attributed to poor patient selection, but no widely accepted consensus exists on detailed indications for appropriate surgery. METHODS: Appropriateness criteria for low back surgery have been developed by a multispecialty panel using the RAND appropriateness method. Based on panel criteria, a prospective study compared outcomes of patients appropriately and inappropriately treated at a single institution with 12 months follow-up assessment. Included were patients with low back pain and/or sciatica referred to the neurosurgical department. Information about symptoms, neurologic signs, the health-related quality of life (SF-36), disability status (Roland-Morris), and pain intensity (VAS) was assessed at baseline, at 6 months, and at 12 months follow-up. The appropriateness criteria were administered prospectively to each clinical situation and outside of the clinical setting, with the surgeon and patients blinded to the results of the panel decision. The patients were further stratified into 2 groups: appropriate treatment group (ATG) and inappropriate treatment group (ITG). RESULTS: Overall, 398 patients completed all forms at 12 months. Treatment was considered appropriate for 365 participants and inappropriate for 33 participants. The mean improvement in the SF-36 physical component score at 12 months was significantly higher in the ATG (mean: 12.3 points) than in the ITG (mean: 6.8 points) (P = 0.01), as well as the mean improvement in the SF-36 mental component score (ATG mean: 5.0 points; ITG mean: -0.5 points) (P = 0.02). Improvement was also significantly higher in the ATG for the mean VAS back pain (ATG mean: 2.3 points; ITG mean: 0.8 points; P = 0.02) and Roland-Morris disability score (ATG mean: 7.7 points; ITG mean: 4.2 points; P = 0.004). The ATG also had a higher improvement in mean VAS for sciatica (4.0 points) than the ITG (2.8 points), but the difference was not significant (P = 0.08). The SF-36 General Health score declined in both groups after 12 months, however, the decline was worse in the ITG (mean decline: 8.2 points) than in the ATG (mean decline: 1.2 points) (P = 0.04). Overall, in comparison to ITG patients, ATG patients had significantly higher improvement at 12 months, both statistically and clinically. CONCLUSION: In comparison to previously reported literature, our study is the first to assess the utility of appropriateness criteria for low back surgery at 1-year follow-up with multiple outcome dimensions. Our results confirm the hypothesis that application of appropriateness criteria can significantly improve patient outcomes.

Validation transculturelle de l'Oswestry disability index en français [Cross-cultural validation of the Oswestry disability index in French]

AIM: The aim of this study was to interpret and validate a French version of the Oswestry disability index (ODI), using a cross-cultural validation method. The validity and reliability of the questionnaire was assessed in order to ensure the psychometric characteristics. METHOD: The cross-cultural validation was carried out according to Beaton's methodology. The study was conducted with 41 patients suffering from low back pain. The correlation between the ODI and the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ), the medical outcome survey short form-36 (MOS SF-36) and a pain visual analogical scale (VAS) was assessed. RESULTS: The validity of the Oswestry questionnaire was studied using the Cronbach Alpha coefficient calculation: 0.87 (n=36). The significant correlation between the ODI and RMDQ was 0.8 (P<0.001, n=41) and 0.71 (P<0.001, n=36) for the pain VAS. The correlation between the ODI and certain subscales (physical functioning 0.7 (P<0.001, n=41), physical role 0.49 et bodily pain 0.73 (P<0.001, n=41)) of the MOS SF-36 were equally significant. The reproducibility of the ODI was calculated using the Wilcoxon matched pairs test: there was no significant difference for eight out of ten sections or for the final score. CONCLUSION: This French translation of the ODI should be considered as valid and reliable. It should be used for any future clinical studies carried out using French language patients. Complimentary studies must be completed in order to assess its sensitivity to change in the event of any modifications in the patients functional capacity.

Réhabilitation multidisciplinaire dans la lombalgie chronique : effets à long terne sur la capacité de travail

Introduction. - La lombalgie chronique reste une pathologie chère incluant les coûts directs et indirects. Les patients coûtant le plus sont ceux ayant un arrêt de travail de plus de 6 mois. Avec le temps, il devient de plus en plus difficile à remettre ces personnes au travail. Devant cette situation de nombreuses possibilités de traitement existent, mais plus que le temps court un programme de réhabilitation interdisciplinaire a les meilleures chances de fonctionner. Le but étant en traitant la personne déconditionnée, à la ramener au travail. Le but de cette étude a été d'étudier le retour au travail, en considérant les changements sur le plan psychologique et l'état de travail avant. Patients et Méthodes. - Nous avons étudié les résultats de 300 de nos patients ayant accompli un programme interdisciplinaire et qui ont été suivis sur 24 mois. Le programme consistait en entraînement physique, de work hardening le tout dans un contexte cognitivecomportemental. Nous avons analysé la relation entre la capacité de travail et sa corrélation avec différents questionnaires de la douleur (VAS, Oswestry ; Roland - Morris, Dallas pain questionnaire ; SF-36, HADS and FABQ). Résultats. - Le 1er facteur a été la capacité de travail, en le comparant avant le travail et à 24 mois après avoir accompli le programme. Il y avait une claire augmentation la faisant passer de 48 % à 80,4 % (p < 0,01). Associé à cette constatation, nous avons observé une réelle diminution dans les appréhensions et dans la douleur sur le plan fonctionnel. IL y avait aussi une relation entre une augmentation de la capacité de travail et une diminution dans les questionnaires fonctionnels, avec p. ex. Un Oswestry passant de 36 % à 14 % à 24 mois. Le retour au travail n'était pas lié à une amélioration des capacités physiques, mais dans une diminution de l'appréhension. Conclusion. - Dans le cadre de la lombalgie chronique, avec des absentéismes répétés, un programme de réhabilitation interdisciplinaire amenant un retour au travail de 72 % des patients avec un taux moyen à 80,4 %, doit être vu comme un moyen positif à traiter ses patients. La corrélation se retrouvait dans la partie psychologique, avec moins d'appréhension et une augmentation des valeurs de la SF 36. En fait, une amélioration de la confidence corporelle reste primordial dans les programmes de restauration fonctionnel, nettement mieux qu'en ciblant que la douleur.

Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in patients with low back pain.

PURPOSE: To conduct a cross-cultural adaptation of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) into French according to established guidelines. METHODS: Seventy outpatients with chronic low back pain were recruited from six spine centres in Switzerland and France. They completed the newly translated COMI, and the Roland Morris disability (RMQ), Dallas Pain (DPQ), adjectival pain rating scale, WHO Quality of Life, and EuroQoL-5D questionnaires. After ~14 days RMQ and COMI were completed again to assess reproducibility; a transition question (7-point Likert scale; "very much worse" through "no change" to "very much better") indicated any change in status since the first questionnaire. RESULTS: COMI whole scores displayed no floor effects and just 1.5% ceiling effects. The scores for the individual COMI items correlated with their corresponding full-length reference questionnaire with varying strengths of correlation (0.33-0.84, P < 0.05). COMI whole scores showed a very good correlation with the "multidimensional" DPQ global score (Rho = 0.71). 55 patients (79%) returned a second questionnaire with no/minimal change in their back status. The reproducibility of individual COMI 5-point items was good, with test-retest differences within one grade ranging from 89% for 'social/work disability' to 98% for 'symptom-specific well-being'. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the COMI whole score was 0.85 (95% CI 0.76-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the French version of this short, multidimensional questionnaire showed good psychometric properties, comparable to those reported for German and Spanish versions. The French COMI represents a valuable tool for future multicentre clinical studies and surgical registries (e.g. SSE Spine Tango) in French-speaking countries.

Sensibilidad del cuestionario anamnésico de síntomas de miembro superior y columna desarrollado por la unidad de investigación de ergonómica de postura y movimiento (EPM) desde la perspectiva de la fisioterapia en Colombia

El propósito de este estudio es evaluar la sensibilidad, especificidad y valores predictivos del Cuestionario Anamnésico de Síntomas de Miembro Superior y Columna (CASMSC) desarrollado por la Unidad de Investigación de Ergonomía de Postura y Movimiento (EPM). Se realizó un estudio descriptivo de tipo correlacional, mediante el análisis de datos secundarios de una base de datos con registros de trabajadores de la industria de alimentos (n=401) en el año 2013, a quienes se les había aplicado el CASMSC, así como una evaluación clínica fisioterapéutica enfocada en los mismos segmentos corporales; esta última utilizada como prueba de oro. Para analizar si existían diferencias estadísticas por edad, antigüedad y género se aplicó el análisis de varianza de una vía. La sensibilidad, especificidad y valores predictivos del CASMSC se informan con sus respectivos intervalos de confianza (95%). La prevalencia de umbral positivo para sospecha de Desorden Músculo Esquelético (DME) tanto de miembro superior como de columna se encontró muy por encima de la media nacional para el sector. La sensibilidad del CASMSC para miembro superior estuvo en el rango de un 80% a 94,57% y para columna cervical y lumbar fue de 36,4% y 43,4%, respectivamente. Para la región dorsal fue casi del doble de las otras dos regiones (85,7%). El CASMSC es recomendable en su apartado para miembro superior dado a su alto nivel de sensibilidad.