Justiça restaurativa no sistema penal e processual penal como forma de concretização do estado democrático constitucional

Diante do atual modelo penal e processual penal não atender aos reclamos das partes interessadas, gerando um descrédito na Justiça de um modo geral, surge a Justiça Restaurativa como uma alternativa para solucionar tais problemas e como elemento de concretização do Estado Democrático Constitucional. A Constituição Federal de 1988 representa o símbolo maior do processo de democratização e de constitucionalização nacional. O Princípio da Dignidade da Pessoa contida no texto constitucional consiste num dos principais fundamentos da República Federativa do Brasil, funcionando como respaldo aos direitos e garantias fundamentais do cidadão, sobretudo na seara criminal. A partir do processo de constitucionalização nacional, ocorre uma releitura das legislações infra-constitucionais, que passam a ser interpretadas de acordo com o texto constitucional. Atualmente, a conjuntura jurídico-penal pátria está associada à ideia de garantismo, ligada ao conceito de Estado Democrático Constitucional. Apresenta-se a Justiça Restaurativa como um novo modelo de Justiça Penal, mais flexível e humanizado, visando além da aplicação da pena imposta pelo Estado, superar uma situação de conflito, na busca por resultados positivos no combate e redução da criminalidade, a satisfação da vítima e a mudança da cultura de violência, compatível com as diretrizes do Estado Democrático Constitucional. A partir da análise do direito internacional e de projetos e legislações nacionais envolvendo a Justiça Restaurativa, percebe-se a eficácia das medidas restaurativas na solução de conflitos dentro do Processo Penal, além da satisfação da vítima, do infrator e de familiares na participação dos encontros restaurativos, constituindo ferramenta de satisfação da dignidade humana, dentro de uma perspectiva humanista e garantista

Restorative Justice and Political Forgiveness: A Comparative Study of Truth and Reconciliation Commissions

This research project involves a comparative, cross-national study of truth and reconciliation commissions (TRCs) in countries around the world that have used these extra-judicial institutions to pursue justice and promote national reconciliation during periods of democratic transition or following a civil conflict marked by intense violence and severe human rights abuses. An important objective of truth and reconciliation commissions involves instituting measures to address serious human rights abuses that have occurred as a result of discrimination, ethnocentrism and racism. In recent years, rather than solely utilizing traditional methods of conflict resolution and criminal prosecution, transitional governments have established truth and reconciliation commissions as part of efforts to foster psychological, social and political healing.

The primary objective of this research project is to determine why there has been a proliferation of truth and reconciliation commissions around the world in recent decades, and assess whether the perceived effectiveness of these commissions is real and substantial. In this work, using a multi-method approach that involves quantitative and qualitative analysis, I consider the institutional design and structural composition of truth and reconciliation commissions, as well as the roles that these commissions play in the democratic transformation of nations with a history of civil conflict and human rights violations.

In addition to a focus on institutional design of truth and reconciliation commissions, I use a group identity framework that is grounded in social identity theory to examine the historical background and sociopolitical context in which truth commissions have been adopted in countries around the world. This group identity framework serves as an invaluable lens through which questions related to truth and reconciliation commissions and other transitional justice mechanisms can be explored. I also present a unique theoretical framework, the reconciliatory democratization paradigm, that is especially useful for examining the complex interactions between the various political elements that directly affect the processes of democratic consolidation and reconciliation in countries in which truth and reconciliation commissions have been established. Finally, I tackle the question of whether successor regimes that institute truth and reconciliation commissions can effectively address the human rights violations that occurred in the past, and prevent the recurrence of these abuses.

Assessment of current anglo-saxon proposals about criminal justice and the justification of legal punishment: Moore, Duff and Finnis on retribution, and the challenging compatibility with the up-and-coming Restorative Justice

Pendent

Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System, June 30, 2002

Other Audit Reports

Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System, June 30, 2003

Other Audit Report - 28E Organization

Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System, Independent Auditor's Reports, Financial Statement and Required Supplementary Information, Schedule of Findings, June 30, 2005

Other Audit Reports - 28E Organization

Audit report on the Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System for the year ended June 30, 2006

Audit report on the Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System for the year ended June 30, 2006

Audit report on the Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System (CJIS) for the year ended June 30, 2007

Audit report on the Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System (CJIS) for the year ended June 30, 2007

Audit report on the Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System for the year ended June 30, 2008

Audit report on the Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System for the year ended June 30, 2008

Audit report on the Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System for the year ended June 30, 2009

Audit report on the Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System for the year ended June 30, 2009

Audit report on the Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System for the year ended June 30, 2010

Audit report on the Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System for the year ended June 30, 2010

Audit report on the Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System for the year ended June 30, 2011

Audit report on the Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System for the year ended June 30, 2011

Audit report on the Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System for the year ended June 30, 2012

Audit report on the Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System for the year ended June 30, 2012

Audit report on the Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System for the year ended June 30, 2013

Audit report on the Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System for the year ended June 30, 2013

Audit report on the Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System for the year ended June 30, 2014

Audit report on the Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System for the year ended June 30, 2014