7 resultados para QS21
Resumo:
The Apical Membrane Antigen 1 (AMA-1) is considered a promising candidate for development of a malaria vaccine against asexual stages of Plasmodium. We recently identified domain II (DII) of Plasmodium vivax AMA-1 (PvAMA-1) as a highly immunogenic region recognised by IgG antibodies present in many individuals during patent infection with P. vivax. The present study was designed to evaluate the immunogenic properties of a bacterial recombinant protein containing PvAMA-1 DII. To accomplish this, the recombinant protein was administered to mice in the presence of each of the following six adjuvants: Complete/Incomplete Freund`s Adjuvant (CFA/IFA), aluminium hydroxide (Alum), Quil A, QS21 saponin, CpG-ODN 1826 and TiterMax. We found that recombinant DII was highly immunogenic in BALB/c mice when administered in the presence of any of the tested adjuvants. Importantly, we show that DII-specific antibodies recognised the native AMA-1 protein expressed on the surface of P. vivax merozoites isolated from the blood of infected patients. These results demonstrate that a recombinant protein containing PvAMA-1 DII is immunogenic when administered in different adjuvant formulations, and indicate that this region of the AMA-1 protein should continue to be evaluated as part of a subunit vaccine against vivax malaria. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Resumo:
A saponina QS21 é uma saponina natural extraída da casca das árvores endémicas da América do Sul conhecida por desempenhar um papel importante como adjuvante de vacinas. O objectivo deste estudo foi determinar se os análogos sintéticos mais simples da QS-21 podem induzir respostas imunes com igual vantagem. Para isso, foram desenhados e sintetizados os ácidos 3-ß -O-(ß -D-xilopiranosil)-(1? 3)-[(ß -D-galactopiranosil)-(1? 2)]-6-ß -Dglucurónicos derivados de colestanol e amirina 1 e 2, respectivamente, ligando primeiro resíduos glucósidos ao terpeno e estendendo depois a cadeia de açúcar. A sua actividade adjuvante foi avaliada in vitro através da secreção de mediadores pró-inflamatórios de células IL-6 e IL-1, TNF-a e NO e os níveis de IgG no soro depois da estimulação in vivo das células apresentadoras de antigénio (APCs) . Os compostos 1 e 2 foram bastante mais citotóxicos para as células tumorais J744A.1 de murino do que a QS21 e mostraram menos actividade hemolítica indesejada nos glóbulos vermelhos do que a QS-21, mas não induziram respostas citotóxicas CD8 fortes após uma única injecção, o que aconteceu no processo de imunização com ovalbumina e QS-21. Apesar de os análogos 1 e 2 apresentarem boa actividade adjuvante in vitro, a ausência do grupo aldeído e da cadeia acilo é provavelmente o que afecta negativamente as propriedades das saponinas simplificadas para induzir células T citotóxicas activas em ratinhos.
Resumo:
The purpose of this study was to test melanoma vaccines consisting of peptides and immunological adjuvants for optimal immunogenicity and to evaluate laboratory immune monitoring for in vivo relevance. Forty-nine HLA-A2 positive patients with Melan-A positive melanoma were repeatedly vaccinated with Melan-A peptide, with or without immune adjuvant AS02B (QS21 and MPL) or IFA. Peptide-specific CD8 T cells in PBLs were analyzed ex vivo using fluorescent HLA-A2/Melan-A multimers and IFN-gamma ELISPOT assays. The vaccines were well tolerated. In vivo expansion of Melan-A-specific CD8 T cells was observed in 13 patients (1/12 after vaccination with peptide in AS02B and 12/17 after vaccination with peptide in IFA). The T cells produced IFN-gamma and downregulated CD45RA and CD28. T-cell responses correlated with inflammatory skin reactions at vaccine injection sites (P < 0.001) and with DTH reaction to Melan-A peptide (P < 0.01). Twenty-six of 32 evaluable patients showed progressive disease, whereas 4 patients had stable disease. The two patients with the strongest Melan-A-specific T-cell responses experienced regression of metastases in skin, lymph nodes, and lung. We conclude that repeated vaccination with Melan-A peptide in IFA frequently leads to sustained responses of specific CD8 T cells that are detectable ex vivo and correlate with inflammatory skin reactions.
Resumo:
The design of therapeutic cancer vaccines is aimed at inducing high numbers and potent T cells that are able to target and eradicate malignant cells. This calls for close collaboration between cells of the innate immune system, in particular dendritic cells (DCs), and cells of the adaptive immune system, notably CD4+ helper T cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells. Therapeutic vaccines are aided by adjuvants, which can be, for example, Toll¬like Receptor agonists or agents promoting the cytosolic delivery of antigens, among others. Vaccination with long synthetic peptides (LSPs) is a promising strategy, as the requirement for their intracellular processing will mainly target LSPs to professional antigen presenting cells (APCs), hence avoiding the immune tolerance elicited by the presentation of antigens by non-professional APCs. The unique property of antigen cross-processing and cross-presentation activity by DCs plays an important role in eliciting antitumour immunity given that antigens from engulfed dead tumour cells require this distinct biological process to be processed and presented to CD8+T cells in the context of MHC class I molecules. DCs expressing the XCR1 chemokine receptor are characterised by their superior capability of antigen cross- presentation and priming of highly cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses. Recently, XCR1 was found to be also expressed in tissue-residents DCs in humans, with a simitar transcriptional profile to that of cross- presenting murine DCs. This shed light into the value of harnessing this subtype of XCR1+ cross-presenting DCs for therapeutic vaccination of cancer. In this study, we explored ways of adjuvanting and optimising LSP therapeutic vaccinations by the use, in Part I, of the XCLl chemokine that selectively binds to the XCR1 receptor, as a mean to target antigen to the cross-presenting XCR1+ DCs; and in Part II, by the inclusion of Q.S21 in the LSP vaccine formulation, a saponin with adjuvant activity, as well as the ability to promote cytosolic delivery of LSP antigens due to its intrinsic cell membrane insertion activity. In Part I, we designed and produced XCLl-(OVA LSP)-Fc fusion proteins, and showed that their binding to XCR1+ DCs mediate their chemoattraction. In addition, therapeutic vaccinations adjuvanted with XCLl-(OVA LSP)-Fc fusion proteins significantly enhanced the OVA-specific CD8+ T cell response, and led to complete tumour regression in the EL4-OVA model, and significant control of tumour growth in the B16.0VA tumour model. With the aim to optimise the co-delivery of LSP antigen and XCLl to skin-draining lymph nodes we also tested immunisations using nanoparticle (NP)-conjugated OVA LSP in the presence or absence of XCLl chemokine. The NP-mediated delivery of LSP potentiated the CTL response seen in the blood of vaccinated mice, and NP-OVA LSP vaccine in the presence of XCLl led to higher blood frequencies of OVA-specific memory-precursor effector cells. Nevertheless, in these settings, the addition XCLl to NP-OVA LSP vaccine formulation did not increase its antitumour therapeutic effect. In the Part II, we assessed in HLA-A2/DR1 mice the immunogenicity of the Melan-AA27L LSP or the Melan-A26. 35 AA27l short synthetic peptide (SSP) used in conjunction with the saponin adjuvant QS21, aiming to identify a potent adjuvant formulation that elicits a quantitatively and qualitatively strong immune response to tumour antigens. We showed a high CTL immune response elicited by the use of Melan-A LSP or SSP with QS21, which both exerted similar killing capacity upon in vivo transfer of target cells expressing the Melan-A peptide in the context of HLA-A2 molecules. However, the response generated by the LSP immunisation comprised higher percentages of CD8+T cells of the central memory phenotype (CD44hl CD62L+ and CCR7+ CD62L+) than those of SSP immunisation, and most importantly, the strong LSP+QS21 response was strictly CD4+T cell-dependent, as shown upon CD4 T cell depletion. Altogether, these results suggest that both XCLl and QS21 may enhance the ability of LSP to prime CD8 specific T cell responses, and promote a long-term memory response. Therefore, these observations may have important implications for the design of protein or LSP-based cancer vaccines for specific immunotherapy of cancer -- Les vacans thérapeutiques contre le cancer visent à induire une forte et durable réponse immunitaire contre des cellules cancéreuses résiduelles. Cette réponse requiert la collaboration entre le système immunitaire inné, en particulier les cellules dendrites (DCs), et le système immunitaire adaptatif, en l'occurrence les lymphocytes TCD4 hdper et CD8 cytotoxiques. La mise au point d'adjuvants et de molécules mimant un agent pathogène tels les ligands TLRs ou d'autres agents facilitant l'internalisation d'antigènes, est essentielle pour casser la tolérance du système immunitaire contre les cellules cancéreuses afin de générer une réponse effectrice et mémoire contre la tumeur. L'utilisation de longs peptides synthétiques (LSPs) est une approche prometteuse du fait que leur présentation en tant qu'antigénes requiert leur internalisation et leur transformation par les cellules dendrites (DCs, qui sont les mieux à même d'éviter la tolérance immunitaire. Récemment une sous-population de DCs exprimant le récepteur XCR1 a été décrite comme ayant une capacité supérieure dans la cross-présentation d'antigènes, d'où un intérêt à développer des vaccins ciblant les DCs exprimant le XCR1. Durant ma thèse de doctorat, j'ai exploré différentes approches pour optimiser les vaccins avec LSPs. La première partie visait à cibler les XCR1-DCs à l'aide de la chemokine XCL1 spécifique du récepteur XCR1, soit sou s la forme de protéine de fusion XCL1-OVA LSP-Fc, soit associée à des nanoparticules. La deuxième partie a consisté à tester l'association des LSPs avec I adjuvant QS21 dérivant d'une saponine dans le but d'optimiser l'internalisation cytosolique des longs peptides. Les protéines de fusion XCLl-OVA-Fc développées dans la première partie de mon travail, ont démontré leur capacité de liaison spécifique sur les XCRl-DCs associée à leur capacité de chemo-attractio. Lorsque inclues dans une mmunisation de souris porteuse de tumeurs établies, ces protéines de fusion XCL1-0VA LSP-Fc et XCLl-Fc plus OVA LSP ont induites une forte réponse CDS OVA spécifique permettant la complète régression des tumeurs de modèle EL4- 0VA et un retard de croissance significatif de tumeurs de type B16-0VA. Dans le but d'optimiser le drainage des LSPs vers es noyaux lymphatiques, nous avons également testé les LSPs fixés de manière covalente à des nanoparticules co- injectees ou non avec la chemokine XCL1. Cette formulation a également permis une forte réponse CD8 accompagnée d'un effet thérapeutique significatif, mais l'addition de la chemokine XCL1 n'a pas ajouté d'effet anti-tumeur supplémentaire. Dans la deuxième partie de ma thèse, j'ai comparé l'immunogénicité de l'antigène humain Melan A soit sous la forme d un LSP incluant un épitope CD4 et CD8 ou sous la forme d'un peptide ne contenant que l'épitope CD8 (SSP) Les peptides ont été formulés avec l'adjuvant QS21 et testés dans un modèle de souris transgéniques pour les MHC let II humains, respectivement le HLA-A2 et DR1. Les deux peptides LSP et SSP ont généré une forte réponse CD8 similaire assoc.ee a une capacité cytotoxique équivalente lors du transfert in vivo de cellules cibles présentant le peptide SSP' Cependant les souris immunisées avec le Melan A LSP présentaient un pourcentage plus élevé de CD8 ayant un Phénotype «centra, memory» (CD44h' CD62L+ and CCR7+ CD62L+) que les souris immunisées avec le SSP, même dix mois après I'immunisation. Par ailleurs, la réponse CD8 au Melan A LSP était strictement dépendante des lymphocytes CD4, contrairement à l'immunisation par le Melan A SSP qui n'était pas affectée. Dans l'ensemble ces résultats suggèrent que la chemokine XCL1 et l'adjuvant QS21 améliorent la réponse CD8 à un long peptide synthétique, favorisant ainsi le développement d'une réponse anti-tumeur mémoire durable. Ces observations pourraient être utiles au développement de nouveau vaccins thérapeutiques contre les tumeurs.
Resumo:
In order to assess the immunotherapeutic potential on canine visceral leishmaniasis of the Leishmune (R) vaccine, formulated with an increased adjuvant concentration (1 mg of saponin rather than 0.5 mg), 24 mongrel dogs were infected with Leishmania (L.) chagasi. The enriched-Leishmune (R) vaccine was injected on month 6, 7 and 8 after infection, when animals were seropositive and symptomatic. The control group were injected with a saline solution. Leishmune (R)-treated dogs showed significantly higher levels of anti-FML IgG antibodies (ANOVA; p < 0.0001), a higher and stable IgG2 and a decreasing IgG I response, pointing to a TH1 T cell mediated response. The vaccine had the following effects: it led to more positive delayed type hypersensitivity reactions against Leishmania lysate in vaccinated dogs (75%) than in controls (50%), to a decreased average of CD4+ Leishmania-specific lymphocytes in saline controls (32.13%) that fell outside the 95% confidence interval of the vaccinees (41.62%, CI95% 43.93-49.80) and an increased average of the clinical scores from the saline controls (17.83) that falls outside the 95% confidence interval for the Leishmune (R) immumotherapy-treated dogs (15.75, CI95% 13.97-17.53). All dogs that received the vaccine were clustered, and showed lower clinical scores and normal CD4+ counts, whereas 42% of the untreated dogs showed very diminished CD4+ and higher clinical score. The increase in clinical signs of the saline treated group was correlated with an increase in anti-FML antibodies (p < 0.0001), the parasitological evidence (p = 0.038) and a decrease in Leishinania-specific CD4+ lymphocyte proportions (p = 0.035). These results confirm the immunotherapeutic potential of the enriched-Leishmune (R) vaccine. The vaccine reduced the clinical symptoms and evidence of parasite, modulating the outcome of the infection and the dog's potential infectiosity to phlebotomines. The enriched-Leishmune (R) vaccine was subjected to a safety analysis and found to be well tolerated and safe. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Saponins, IL12 and BCG adjuvant in the FML-vaccine formulation against murine visceral leishmaniasis
Resumo:
The FML antigen of Leishmania donovani, in combination with either Riedel de Haen (R), QuilA, QS21 saponins, IL12 or BCG, was used in vaccination of an outbred murine model against visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Significant and specific increases in anti-FML IgG and IgM responses were detected for all adjuvants, and in anti-FML IgG1, IgG2a and IgG2b and delayed type of hypersensitivity to L. donovani lysate (DTH), only for all saponins and IL12. The QS21-FML and QuilA-FML groups achieved the highest IgG2a response. QuilA-FML developed the strongest DTH and QS21-FML animals showed the highest serum IFN-gamma concentrations. The reduction of parasitic load in the liver in response to each FML-vaccine formulation was: 52% (P < 0.025) for BCG-FML, 73% (P < 0.005) for R-FML, 93% (P < 0.005) for QuilA-FML and 79.2% (P < 0.025) for QS21-FML treated animals, respectively. Protection was specific for R-FML and QS21-FML while the QuilA saponin treatment itself induced 69% of LDU reduction. The FML-saponin vaccines promote significant, specific and strong protective effects against murine visceral leishmaniasis. BCG-FML induced minor and non-specific protection while IL 12-FML, although enhancing the specific antibody and IDR response, failed to reduce the parasitic load of infected animals. (C) 2002 Elsevier B.V. Ltd. All rights reserved.
Resumo:
Helicobacter pylori, which colonizes the stomach and causes the most common chronic infection in man, is associated with peptic ulceration, gastric carcinoma and gastric lymphoma. Studies in animals demonstrated that mucosal immunization could induce immune response against H. pylori and prevent H. pylori infection only if powerful mucosal adjuvants such as cholera toxin (CT) or heat-labile toxin of E. coli (LT) were used along with an H. pylori protein antigen. Adjuvants such as CT or LT cannot be used for humans because of their toxicity. Finding non-toxic alternative adjuvants/immunomodulators or immunization strategies that eliminates the use of adjuvants is critical for the development of efficacious human Helicobacter vaccines. We investigated whether several new adjuvants such as Muramyl Tripeptide Phosphatidylethonolamine (MTP-PE), QS21 (a Quil A derivative), Monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) or heat shock proteins (HSP) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis could be feasible to develop a safe and effective mucosal vaccine against H. pylori using a murine model. C57/BL6 mice were immunized with liposomes incorporating each adjuvant along with urease, a major antigenic protein of H. pylori, to test their mucosal effectiveness. Since DNA vaccination eliminates both the use of adjuvants and antigens we also investigated whether immunization with plasmid DNA encoding urease could induce protective immunity to H. pylori infection in the same murine model. We found that oral vaccination with liposomal MTP-PE (6.7 m g) and urease, (100 m g) induced antigen-specific systemic and mucosal immune response and protected mice against H. pylori challenge when compared to control groups. Parenteral and mucosal immunizations with as little as 20 m g naked or formulated DNA encoding urease induced systemic and mucosal immune response against urease and partially protected mice against H. pylori infection. DNA vaccination provided long-lasting immunity and serum anti-urease IgG antibodies were elevated for up to 12 months. No toxicity was detected after immunizations with either liposomal MTP-PE and urease or plasmid DNA and both were well tolerated. We conclude that immunization liposomes containing MTP-PE and urease is a promising strategy deserving further investigation and may be considered for humans. DNA vaccination could be used to prime immune response prior to oral protein vaccination and may reduce the dose of protein and adjuvant needed to achieve protective immunity. ^