Minimal clinically meaningful differences for the eortc QLQ-C30 and eortc QLQ-Bn20 scales in brain cancer patients

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the smallest changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the EORTC Brain Cancer Module (QLQ-BN20), which could be considered as clinically meaningful in brain cancer patients. Methods: World Health Organization (WHO) performance status (PS) and the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) were used as clinical anchors to determine minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in HRQOL change scores (range 0 - 100) in the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20. Anchor-based MCID estimates less than 0.2SD (small effect) were not recommended for interpretation. Other selected distribution-based methods were also used for comparison purposes. Results: Based on WHO PS, our findings support the following whole number estimates of the MCID for improvement and deterioration respectively: physical functioning (6, 9), role functioning (14, 12), cognitive functioning (8, 8), global health status (7, 4*), fatigue (12, 9) and motor dysfunction (4*, 5). Anchoring with MMSE, cognitive functioning MCID estimates for improvement and deterioration were (11, 2*) and those for communication deficit were (9, 7). The estimates with asterisks were less that the set 0.2 SD threshold and are therefore not recommended for interpretation. Our MCID estimates therefore range from 5-14. Conclusion: These estimates can help clinicians to evaluate changes in HRQOL over time and, in conjunction with other measures of efficacy, help to assess the value of a health care intervention or to compare treatments. Furthermore, the estimates can be useful in determining sample sizes in the design of future clinical trials.

Minimal clinically meaningful differences for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BN20 scales in brain cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the smallest changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire core 30 and the Brain Cancer Module (QLQ-BN20), which could be considered as clinically meaningful in brain cancer patients. Materials and methods: World Health Organisation performance status (PS) and mini-mental state examination (MMSE) were used as clinical anchors appropriate to related subscales to determine the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) in HRQoL change scores (range 0-100) in the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20. A threshold of 0.2 standard deviation (SD) (small effect) was used to exclude anchor-based MCID estimates considered too small to inform interpretation. RESULTS: Based on PS, our findings support the following integer estimates of the MCID for improvement and deterioration, respectively: physical (6, 9), role (14, 12), and cognitive functioning (8, 8); global health status (7, 4*), fatigue (12, 9), and motor dysfunction (4*, 5). Anchoring with MMSE, cognitive functioning MCID estimates for improvement and deterioration were (11, 2*) and for communication deficit were (9, 7). Estimates with asterisks were <0.2 SD and were excluded from our MCID range of 5-14. CONCLUSION: These estimates can help clinicians evaluate changes in HRQoL over time, assess the value of a health care intervention and can be useful in determining sample sizes in designing future clinical trials.

An international validation study of the EORTC brain cancer module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) for assessing health-related quality of life and symptoms in brain cancer patients.

Aims: The psychometric properties of the EORTC QLQ-BN20, a brain cancer-specific HRQOL questionnaire, have been previously determined in an English-speaking sample of patients. This study examined the validity and reliability of the questionnaire in a multi-national, multi-lingual study. Methods: QLQ-BN20 data were selected from two completed phase III EORTC/NCIC clinical trials in brain cancer (N=891), including 12 languages. Experimental treatments were surgery followed by radiotherapy (RT) and adjuvant PCV chemotherapy or surgery followed by concomitant RT plus temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy and adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy. Standard treatment consisted of surgery and postoperative RT alone. The psychometrics of the QLQ-BN20 were examined by means of multi-trait scaling analyses, reliability estimation, known groups validity testing, and responsiveness analysis. Results: All QLQ-BN20 items correlated more strongly with their own scale (r>0.70) than with other QLQ-BN20 scales. Internal consistency reliability coefficients were high (all alpha0.70). Known-groups comparisons yielded positive results, with the QLQ-BN20 distinguishing between patients with differing levels of performance status and mental functioning. Responsiveness of the questionnaire to changes over time was acceptable. Conclusion: The QLQ-BN20 demonstrates adequate psychometric properties and can be recommended for use in conjunction with the QLQ-C30 in assessing the HRQOL of brain cancer patients in international studies.

Impact of cancer-related symptom synergisms on health-related quality of life and performance status

To identify the impact of multiple symptoms and their co-occurrence on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) dimensions and performance status (PS), 115 outpatients with cancer, who were not receiving active cancer treatment and were recruited from, a university hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Brief Pain Inventory. Karnofsky Performance Status scores also were completed. Application of TwoStep Cluster analysis resulted in two distinct patient subgroups based on 113 patient experiences with pain, depression, fatigue, insomnia, constipation, lack of appetite, dyspnea, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. One group had multiple and severe symptom subgroup and another had Less symptoms and with lower severity. Multiple and severe symptoms had worse PS, role functioning, and physical, emotional, cognitive, social, and overall HRQOL. Multiple and severe symptom subgroup was also six times as likely as lower severity to have poor role functioning;five times more likely to have poor emotional;four times more likely to have poor PS, physical, and overall HRQOL, and three times as likely to have poor cognitive and social HRQOL, independent of gender, age, level of education, and economic condition. Classification and Regression Tree analyses were undertaken to identify which co-occurring symptoms would best determine reduction in HRQOL and PS. Pain and fatigue were identified as indicators of reduction on physical HRQOL and PS. Fatigue and insomnia were associated with reduction in cognitive; depression and pain in social; and fatigue and constipation in role functioning. Only depression was associated with reduction in overall HRQOL. These data demonstrate that there is a synergic effect among distinct cancer symptoms that result in reduction in HRQOL dimensions and PS.

Validation of brief pain inventory to Brazilian patients with pain

To validate the Brazilian version of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-B) scale and to determine the optimal cutpoints for mild, moderate, and severe pain based on patients` rating of their worst pain. One hundred forty-three outpatients with cancer were recruited in Hospital das Clinicas-University of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed two underlying dimensions, pain severity, and pain interference, with Cronbach`s alpha of 0.91 and 0.87, respectively. Convergent validity was shown by the correlation observed between the BPI dimensions with the EORTC-QLQ-C30 pain scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. The BPI-B detected significant differences in the two dimensions by disease and performance status, supporting known-group validity. For the worst pain, the optimal cutpoints were 4 and 7 (1-4 = mild pain, 5-7 = moderate, and 8-10 = severe). Our data show that BPI-B is a brief, useful, and valid tool for assessing pain and its impact on patient`s life.

Influência do tratamento de radioterapia na qualidade de vida dos doentes com cancro de mama

RESUMO: Introdução – A evolução tecnológica permitiu uma deteção precoce do cancro e, consequentemente, uma abordagem terapêutica mais eficaz e efetiva, resultando no aumento da sobrevida dos doentes. Assim, pretende-se avaliar a influência da radioterapia na qualidade de vida dos doentes com cancro da mama. Metodologia – 47 participantes que efetuaram radioterapia no Centro Hospitalar Barreiro-Montijo preencheram os dois questionários, o EORTC QLQ-C30 e o QLQ-BR23, antes de iniciar radioterapia e no último dia do tratamento. Os resultados foram analisados através do programa informático SPSS, versão 19.0. Resultados – Observou-se um ligeiro decréscimo na qualidade da saúde global no segundo momento de avaliação. Verificou-se uma diminuição nas escalas sintomática e funcional no segundo momento de avaliação. Em relação ao questionário QLQ-BR23, na escala sintomática, observou-se uma diminuição nos efeitos secundários resultantes da radioterapia no último momento de avaliação. Discussão dos Resultados – Os resultados obtidos no questionário QLQ-C30 revelam que a avaliação global da saúde dos doentes não é influenciada pelo tratamento de radioterapia. Em relação ao questionário QLQ-BR23, os sintomas relacionados com a mama e o braço tiveram um aumento ligeiramente significativo no segundo momento de avaliação, sendo estes associados à radioterapia. De acordo com os resultados obtidos, a radioterapia não influencia a qualidade de vida em doentes com cancro da mama.

Programa de exercício e promoção da actividade física após cirurgia por cancro da mama

RESUMO: Objectivo: O exercício tem sido identificado como um factor de promoção da qualidade de vida em mulheres submetidas a cirurgia por cancro de mama. Mas os níveis de actividade física tendem a reduzir após o diagnóstico de cancro de mama e a manterem-se baixos após fim dos tratamentos. O objectivo deste estudo é verificar se um programa de exercício físico supervisionado, associado a estratégias motivacionais em mulheres submetidas a cirurgia por cancro da mama e que mantêm a intervenção usual praticada, é mais efectivo no aumento dos níveis de actividade física, na redução do índice de massa corporal e na melhoria da qualidade de vida, do que o tratamento usualmente praticado. Metodologia: Trata-se de um estudo piloto experimental, aleatorizado e controlado. Cumpriram os critérios de inclusão no estudo 37 utentes submetidas a cirurgia por cancro de mama no Hospital Fernando Fonseca, Amadora, e submetidos à intervenção usual da fisioterapia. Foram aleatoriamente distribuídas pelos grupos experimental (n=19) e de controlo (n=18). O contacto telefónico foi feito por um elemento externo, cego em relação à distribuição dos sujeitos. Alguns elementos desistiram ou não puderam participar no estudo. O número de sujeitos final foi de 11 para o grupo experimental e de 10 para o grupo de controlo, idênticos na média de idades. Todos os sujeitos mantiveram a intervenção usual da fisioterapia. Os sujeitos do grupo experimental foram ainda submetidos ao programa de exercício e promoção da actividade física. Todo o grupo foi avaliado no início do programa, no final do mesmo (12 semanas) e após 6 meses de follow-up, nos seguintes indicadores: nível de actividade física, pelo International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), índice de massa corporal e qualidade de vida, pelos questionários: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) e Supplementary Questionnaire Breast Cancer Module (QLQ-BR23). Resultados: O programa implementado demonstrou-se efectivo no aumento dos níveis de actividade física (p=0,017) e na qualidade de vida associada ao estado funcional (p=0,016) e ao estado de saúde global auto-percepcionado (p=0,030) no final do programa. Foi ainda possível identificar resultados positivos noutras variáveis estudadas, como por exemplo a fadiga auto-reportada, mas que não se demonstraram estatisticamente significativos, facto que pode atribuir-se à reduzida dimensão da amostra. Conclusões: Apesar de algumas limitações, este estudo é de grande a importância para a comunidade científica preocupada com crescente problemática do cancro de mama. Mais uma vez se demonstra que o exercício físico é uma estratégia importante para a melhoria do estado de saúde de pacientes confrontados com doença. Esta comprovação é de grande interesse para os profissionais de saúde e particularmente para os fisioterapeutas dedicados à promoção da saúde nesta população.---------------------ABSTRACT: Purpose: Exercise has been identified as a quality of life promoting factor, amongst women after breast cancer surgery. But the physical activity levels reduce significantly after a diagnosis of breast cancer and remain low after treatment is completed. The aim of this study is to determine whether a supervised group exercise program allied to motivating strategies in women after breast cancer surgery in conjunction with standard treatment, is more effective in improving physical activity levels, reducing body mass index and promoting quality of life, than standard treatment on its own. Methods: This is a pilot randomized controlled trial. Thirty-seven women, submitted to breast cancer surgery in the Hospital Fernando Fonseca, Amadora, and submitted to standard physiotherapy intervention, completed the inclusion criteria. They were randomly allocated into intervention group (n=19) and control group (n=18). The telephone contact was done by an external element, blind to the subjects’ allocation. Some elements declined or could not participate. The final intervention group was n=11 and the control n=10, similar in age. All subjects maintained the standard physiotherapy intervention. The experimental group was submitted to the exercise and health promotion program. The complete group was evaluated in the beginning of the program, at the final (after 12 weeks) and after 6 months follow-up, using as outcomes: physical activity index with the international Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), the body mass index and quality of life using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Supplementary Questionnaire Breast Cancer Module (QLQBR23). Results: The studied program demonstrated to be effective in improving the physical activity index (p=0,017) and quality of live related to physical functioning (p=0,016) and to global health status (p=0,030) at the end of the program. It was possible to find positive results in some other outcomes, such as fatigue, although the differences were not statistically significant. We believe that these results can be attributed to the small sample size. Conclusions: Although we can identify some methodological constrains, this is a very important study for scientific community working on the breast cancer subject. Once more, exercise was identified as an important strategy to improve global heath status in breast cancer patients. This represents an important contribution to the health professionals and mostly for physiotherapists working on health promotion subject.

Pisco-oncologia : Ansiedade, depressão e qualidade de vida nos doentes hemato-oncológicos

Dissertação de Mestrado apresentada ao ISPA - Instituto Universitário

Long-term follow-up of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation and response-adapted whole-brain radiotherapy for newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma: results of the multicenter Ostdeutsche Studiengruppe Hamato-Onkologie OSHO-53 phase II study

Introduction: We previously reported the results of a phase II study for patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) treated with autologous peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation (aPBSCT) and responseadapted whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). The purpose of this report is to update the initial results and provide long-term data regarding overall survival, prognostic factors, and the risk of treatment-related neurotoxicity.Methods: A long-term follow-up was conducted on surviving primary central nervous system lymphoma patients having been treated according to the ,,OSHO-53 study", which was initiated by the Ostdeutsche Studiengruppe Hamatologie-Onkologie. Between August 1999 and October 2004 twentythree patients with an average age of 55 and median Karnofsky performance score of 70% were enrolled and received high-dose mthotrexate (HD-MTX) on days 1 and 10. In case of at least a partial remission (PR), high-dose busulfan/ thiotepa (HD-BuTT) followed by aPBSCT was performed. Patients without response to induction or without complete remission (CR) after HD-BuTT received WBRT. All patients (n=8), who are alive in 2011, were contacted and Mini Mental State examination (MMSE) and the EORTC QLQ-C30 were performed.Results: Eight patients are still alive with a median follow-up of 116,9 months (79 - 141, range). One of them suffered from a late relapse eight and a half years after initial diagnosis of PCNSL, another one suffers from a gall bladder carcinoma. Both patients are alive, the one with the relapse of PCNSL has finished rescue therapy and is further observed, the one with gall baldder carcinoma is still under therapy. MMSE and QlQ-C30 showed impressive results in the patients, who were not irradiated. Only one of the irradiated patients is still alive with a clear neurologic deficit but acceptable quality of life.Conclusions: Long-term follow-up of our patients, who were included in the OSHO-53 study show an overall survival of 30 percent. If WBRT can be avoided no long-term neurotoxicity has been observed and the patients benefit from excellent Quality of Life. Induction chemotherapy with two cycles of HD-MTX should be intensified to improve the unsatisfactory OAS of 30 percent.

Family physician involvement in cancer care and lung cancer patient emotional distress and quality of life.

PURPOSE: This study aims to describe emotional distress and quality of life (QoL) of patients at different phases of their lung cancer and the association with their family physician (FP) involvement. METHODS: A prospective study on patients with lung cancer was conducted in three regions of Quebec, Canada. Patients completed, at baseline, several validated questionnaires regarding their psychosocial characteristics and their perceived level of FP involvement. Emotional distress [profile of mood states (POMS)] and QoL [European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)] were reassessed every 3-6 months, whether patients had metastasis or not, up to 18 months. Results were regrouped according to cancer phase. Mixed models with repeated measurements were performed to identify variation in distress and QoL. RESULTS: In this cohort of 395 patients, distress was low at diagnosis (0.79 ± 0.7 on a 0-4 scale), raising to 1.36 ± 0.8 at the advance phase (p < 0.0001). Patient's global QoL scores significantly decreased from the diagnosis to the advance phase (from 66 to 45 on a 0-100 scale; p < 0.0001). At all phases of cancer, FP involvement was significantly associated with patients' distress (p = 0.0004) and their global perception of QoL (p = 0.0080). These associations remained statistically significant even after controlling for age, gender, and presence of metastases. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new knowledge on patients' emotional distress and QoL with cancer evolution and, particularly, their association with FP involvement. Other studies should be conducted to further explore FP role in cancer supportive care.

Alexithymie et psychopathologie de patients atteints de cancer = Alexithymia and psychopathology of patients with cancer

Résumé Objectif : Décrire l'alexithymie chez des patientsnouvellement diagnostiqués de cancer.Méthode : Les données sociodémographiques, médicales etpsychométriques (HADS, SCL-90, EORTC-QLQ-C30 etTAS-20) ont été enregistrées chez des patients récemment(< 4 mois) pris en charge pour un cancer.Résultats : Chez 70% des 419 patients inclus dans l'étude, unscore qualifiant pour un diagnostic d'alexithymie (TAS > 56)a été observé avec une corrélation négative avec les symptômespsychiatriques, qui par ailleurs ne dépassaient pas lesseuils d'anxiété et de dépression mesurés avec le HADS,et une corrélation positive avec la qualité de vie.Conclusion : La haute prévalence de l'alexithymie, considéréecomme une protection, questionne la nécessité et letype d'éventuelles interventions psycho-oncologiques.Pour citer cette revue : Psycho-Oncol. 5 (2011).

Calidad de vida en pacientes intervenidas de cáncer de mama

El tractament quirúrgic pot unfluir en la qualitat de vida relacionada amb la salut (QVRS) de les dones amb cáncer de mama. Es descriuen les característiques de les paciente, l ´evolució de la seua QVRS i les diferències segons la intervenció quirúrgiaca. La QVRD s´ha mesurat mitjançant el EuroQol-5D, EORTC QLQ-C30 i EORTC QLQ-BR23. Es van incloure 205 pacients. Respecte al EuroQol, l´Escala Visual Analògica va millorar (P&0.0001), però, la tarifa no va mostrar canvis significatius (P=0.1323). En canvi, EORTC QLQ-C30 va millorar (p&0.0001). Hi ha beneficis del a cirurgia conservadora en QVRS, la qual va ser bona y va millorar amb el seguiment.

The prognostic value of health-related quality-of-life data in predicting survival in glioblastoma cancer patients: results from an international randomised phase III EORTC Brain Tumour and Radiation Oncology Groups, and NCIC Clinical Trials Group study.

This is one of the few studies that have explored the value of baseline symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in predicting survival in brain cancer patients. Baseline HRQOL scores (from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the Brain Cancer Module (BN 20)) were examined in 490 newly diagnosed glioblastoma cancer patients for the relationship with overall survival by using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Refined techniques as the bootstrap re-sampling procedure and the computation of C-indexes and R(2)-coefficients were used to try and validate the model. Classical analysis controlled for major clinical prognostic factors selected cognitive functioning (P=0.0001), global health status (P=0.0055) and social functioning (P<0.0001) as statistically significant prognostic factors of survival. However, several issues question the validity of these findings. C-indexes and R(2)-coefficients, which are measures of the predictive ability of the models, did not exhibit major improvements when adding selected or all HRQOL scores to clinical factors. While classical techniques lead to positive results, more refined analyses suggest that baseline HRQOL scores add relatively little to clinical factors to predict survival. These results may have implications for future use of HRQOL as a prognostic factor in cancer patients.

Avaliação da qualidade de vida de pacientes com câncer submetidos à quimioterapia

Estudo descritivo e transversal, desenvolvido com o objetivo de avaliar a Qualidade de Vida (QV) de pacientes com câncer, submetidos à quimioterapia. Para a coleta de dados, utilizou-se o instrumento European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). A amostra constitui-se de 30 pacientes que assinaram o consentimento informado. Os dados foram analisados pelo software SPSS. O QLQ-C30 mostrou que a pontuação média das funções física, cognitiva e social, e desempenho de papel, variou de 71,26 a 75,12, demonstrando um nível satisfatório. Na função emocional, a média foi baixa, de 55,46. Nas escalas de sintomas, houve o predomínio da insônia com uma média de 34,44, seguida de dor (23,33) e fadiga (22,31). A QV foi satisfatória em todos os domínios, exceto a função emocional, que foi baixa, demonstrando que os efeitos colaterais da quimioterapia influenciam negativamente a QV dos pacientes.

Assessment of needs, health-related quality of life, and satisfaction with care in breast cancer patients to better target supportive care.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed whether breast cancer (BC) patients express similar levels of needs for equivalent severity of symptoms, functioning difficulties, or degrees of satisfaction with care aspects. BC patients who did (or not) report needs in spite of similar difficulties were identified among their sociodemographic or clinical characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred and eighty-four (73% response rate) BC patients recruited in ambulatory or surgery hospital services completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30 quality of life [health-related quality of life (HRQOL)], the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 (in-patient) or OUT-PATSAT35 (out-patient) satisfaction with care, and the supportive care needs survey short form 34-item (SCNS-SF34) measures. RESULTS: HRQOL or satisfaction with care scale scores explained 41%, 45%, 40% and 22% of variance in, respectively, psychological, physical/daily living needs, information/health system, and care/support needs (P < 0.001). BC patients' education level, having children, hospital service attendance, and anxiety/depression levels significantly predicted differences in psychological needs relative to corresponding difficulties (adjusted R(2) = 0.11). Medical history and anxiety/depression levels significantly predicted differences in information/health system needs relative to degrees of satisfaction with doctors, nurses, or radiotherapy technicians and general satisfaction (adjusted R(2) = 0.12). Unmet needs were most prevalent in the psychological domains across hospital services. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of needs, HRQOL, and satisfaction with care highlights the subgroups of BC patients requiring better supportive care targeting.