Quels nouveaux médicaments a l'horizon pour te traitement du cancer avancé de la prostate [New drugs at the horizon for men with prostate cancer]

Despite major progress in the understanding of biological mechanisms underlying metastatic prostate cancer, the treatment of men with advanced prostate cancer remains challenging. Several randomized controlled trials with promising or positive results are underway or just released. Here we discuss new treatments which might be used in clinic in the near future: hormonal treatments (Abiraterone and MDV3100), a new chemotherapy (Cabazitaxel), a cellular vaccine (Sipuleucel-T), anti-angiogenic drugs (Bevacizumab, Aflibercept), a new radioactive treatment (Alpharadin) and a new bone-protective agent (Deno-sumab).

Le blocage androgénique intermittent versus continu dans le traitement du cancer de la prostate

L’administration du blocage androgénique de façon intermittente pourrait offrir plusieurs avantages dans le traitement du cancer de la prostate. Toutefois, ce mode d’administration demeure controversé. Nous avons donc effectué une revue systématique et méta-analyse d’essais cliniques randomisés afin de comparer l’efficacité et la tolérabilité du blocage androgénique intermittent versus continu. Une analyse de non-infériorité a été effectuée pour la survie avec un seuil préétabli de 1,15 pour la borne supérieure de l’intervalle de confiance (IC). Au total, 15 études étaient éligibles. Le blocage androgénique intermittent était non inférieur au blocage androgénique continu avec un hazard ratio de 1,02 (IC à 95%: 0,93-1,11). Il y avait peu de différence entre les deux groupes pour la qualité de vie globale. Toutefois, plusieurs études ont rapporté une meilleure fonction physique et sexuelle avec le traitement intermittent. Le blocage androgénique intermittent est une alternative thérapeutique acceptable dans le cancer de la prostate.

Evaluating DNA damage response (DDR) activation in human prostate cancer

Introduction: Au Canada, le cancer de la prostate est le cancer le plus fréquemment diagnostiqué chez les hommes et le plus mortel après les cancers du poumon et du côlon. Il y a place à optimiser le traitement du cancer de la prostate de manière à mettre en œuvre une médecine personnalisée qui s’adapte aux caractéristiques de la maladie de chaque patient de façon individuelle. Dans ce mémoire, nous avons évalué la réponse aux dommages de l’ADN (RDA) comme biomarqueur potentiel du cancer de la prostate. Les lésions potentiellement oncogènes de l'ADN déclenche une cascade de signalisation favorisant la réparation de l'ADN et l’activation des points de contrôle du cycle cellulaire pour préserver l’intégrité du génome. La RDA est un mécanisme central de suppression tumorale chez l’homme. La RDA joue un rôle important dans l’arrêt de la prolifération des cellules dont les génomes sont compromis, et donc, prévient la progression du cancer en agissant comme une barrière. Cette réponse cellulaire détermine également comment les cellules normales et cancéreuses réagissent aux agents utilisés pour endommager l'ADN lors du traitement du cancer comme la radiothérapie ou la chimiothérapie, en plus la présence d,un certain niveau de RDA dans les cellules du cancer de la prostate peuvent également influer sur l'issue de ces traitements. L’activation des signaux de la RDA peut agir comme un frein au cancer dans plusieurs lésions pré-néoplasiques de l'homme, y compris le cancer de la prostate. Il a été démontré que la RDA est augmentée dans les cellules de néoplasie intra- épithéliale (PIN) comparativement aux cellules prostatiques normales. Toutefois, le devient de la RDA entre le PIN et l’adénocarcinome est encore mal documenté et aucune corrélation n'a été réalisée avec les données cliniques des patients. Notre hypothèse est que les niveaux d’activation de la RDA seront variables selon les différents grades et agressivité du cancer de la prostate. Ces niveaux pourront être corrélés et possiblement prédire les réponses cliniques aux traitements des patients et aider à définir une stratégie plus efficace et de nouveaux biomarqueurs pour prédire les résultats du traitement et personnaliser les traitements en conséquence. Nos objectifs sont de caractériser l'activation de la RDA dans le carcinome de la prostate et corréler ses données avec les résultats cliniques. Méthodes : Nous avons utilisé des micro-étalages de tissus (tissue microarrays- TMAs) de 300 patients ayant subi une prostatectomie radicale pour un cancer de la prostate et déterminé le niveau d’expression de protéines de RDA dans le compartiment stromal et épithélial des tissus normaux et cancéreux. Les niveaux d’expression de 53BP1, p-H2AX, p65 et p-CHK2 ont été quantifiés par immunofluorescence (IF) et par un logiciel automatisé. Ces marqueurs de RDA ont d’abord été validés sur des TMAs-cellule constitués de cellules de fibroblastes normales ou irradiées (pour induire une activation du RDA). Les données ont été quantifiées à l'aide de couches binaires couramment utilisées pour classer les pixels d'une image pour que l’analyse se fasse de manière indépendante permettant la détection de plusieurs régions morphologiques tels que le noyau, l'épithélium et le stroma. Des opérations arithmétiques ont ensuite été réalisées pour obtenir des valeurs correspondant à l'activation de la RDA qui ont ensuite été corrélées à la récidive biochimique et l'apparition de métastases osseuses. Résultats : De faibles niveaux d'expression de la protéine p65 dans le compartiment nucléaire épithélial du tissu normal de la prostate sont associés à un faible risque de récidive biochimique. Par ailleurs, nous avons aussi observé que de faibles niveaux d'expression de la protéine 53BP1 dans le compartiment nucléaire épithéliale du tissu prostatique normal et cancéreux ont été associés à une plus faible incidence de métastases osseuses. Conclusion: Ces résultats confirment que p65 a une valeur pronostique chez les patients présentant un adénocarcinome de la prostate. Ces résultats suggèrent également que le marqueur 53BP1 peut aussi avoir une valeur pronostique chez les patients avec le cancer de la prostate. La validation d'autres marqueurs de RDA pourront également être corrélés aux résultats cliniques. De plus, avec un suivi des patients plus long, il se peut que ces résultats se traduisent par une corrélation avec la survie. Les niveaux d'activité de la RDA pourront éventuellement être utilisés en clinique dans le cadre du profil du patient comme le sont actuellement l’antigène prostatique spécifique (APS) ou le Gleason afin de personnaliser le traitement.

Correlation Between Testosterone And Psa Kinetics In Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Diverse Chemical Castrations.

To assess total testosterone and prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics among diverse chemical castrations, advanced-stage prostate cancer patients were randomized into three groups of 20: Group 1, Leuprolide 3.75 mg; Group 2, Leuprolide 7.5 mg; and Group 3, Goserelin 3.6 mg. All groups were treated with monthly application of the respective drugs. The patients' levels of serum total testosterone and PSA were evaluated at two time periods: before the treatment and 3 months after the treatment. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was utilized to verify the hypothesis of linear correlation between total testosterone and PSA levels. At the beginning the patients' age, stage, grade, PSA, and total testosterone were similar within the three groups, with median age 72, 70, and 70 years in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Three months after the treatment, patients who received Leuprolide 7.5 mg presented significantly lower median total testosterone levels compared with Goserelin 3.6 mg and Leuprolide 3.75 mg (9.5 ng/dL vs. 20.0 ng/dL vs. 30.0 ng/dL, respectively; p = .0072), while those who received Goserelin 3.6 mg presented significantly lower PSA levels compared with Leuprolide 7.5 mg and Leuprolide 3.75 mg (0.67 vs. 1.86 vs. 2.57, respectively; p = .0067). There was no linear correlation between total testosterone and PSA levels. Overall, regarding castration levels of total testosterone, 28.77% of patients did not obtain levels ≤50 ng/dL and 47.80% did not obtain levels ≤20 ng/dL. There was no correlation between total testosterone and PSA kinetics and no equivalence among different pharmacological castrations.

Burden Of Focal Cryoablation Versus Brachytherapy Versus Active Surveillance In The Treatment Of Very Low-risk Prostate Cancer: A Preliminary Head-to-head Comprehensive Assessment.

Focal cryoablation (FC), brachytherapy (B) and active surveillance (AS) were offered to patients diagnosed with very low-risk prostate cancer (VLRPC) in an equal access protocol. Comprehensive validated self-report questionnaires accessed patients' erectile (IIEF-5) and voiding (IPSS) functions, Beck scales measured anxiety (BAI), hopelessness (BHS) and depression (BDI), SF-36 reflected patients' quality of life added to the emotional thermometers including five visual analogue scales (distress, anxiety, depression, anger and need for help). Kruskal-Wallis or ANOVA tests and Spearman's correlations were obtained among groups and studied variables. Thirty patients were included, median follow-up 18 months (15-21). Those on AS (n = 11) were older, presented higher hopelessness (BHS) and lower general health perceptions (SF-36) scores than patients opting for FC (n = 10) and B (n = 9), P = 0.0014, P = 0.0268 and P = 0.0168 respectively. Patients on B had higher IPSS scores compared to those under FC and AC, P = 0.0223. For all 30 included patients, Spearman's correlation (rs ) was very strong between BHS and general health perceptions (rs  = -0.800, P < 0.0001), and weak/moderate between age and BHS (rs  = 0.405, P = 0.026) and age and general health perceptions (rs  = -0.564, P = 0.001). The sample power was >60%. To be considered in patients' counselling and care, current study supports the hypothesis that even VLRPC when untreated undermines psychosocial domains.

Milk intake and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension and prostate cancer

Milk intake is widely recommended for a healthy diet. Recent evidences suggest that milk/dairy products are associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes and hypertension. On the other hand, high calcium intake has been associated with a higher risk of prostate cancer. The calcium and vitamin D content in dairy foods could have beneficial effects on glucose metabolism and renin/angiotensin system as well regulates body weight. The association between high dairy/calcium consumption and prostate cancer risk are related to the presence of estrogens and insulin like growth factor (IGF-I) in milk. Based on the current evidence, it is possible that milk/dairy products, when consumed in adequate amounts and mainly with reduced fat content, has a beneficial effect on the prevention of hypertension and diabetes. Its potential role in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer is not well supported and requires additional study.

Lineage relationship of prostate cancer cell types based on gene expression

Background: Prostate tumor heterogeneity is a major factor in disease management. Heterogeneity could be due to multiple cancer cell types with distinct gene expression. Of clinical importance is the so-called cancer stem cell type. Cell type-specific transcriptomes are used to examine lineage relationship among cancer cell types and their expression similarity to normal cell types including stem/progenitor cells. Methods: Transcriptomes were determined by Affymetrix DNA array analysis for the following cell types. Putative prostate progenitor cell populations were characterized and isolated by expression of the membrane transporter ABCG2. Stem cells were represented by embryonic stem and embryonal carcinoma cells. The cancer cell types were Gleason pattern 3 (glandular histomorphology) and pattern 4 (aglandular) sorted from primary tumors, cultured prostate cancer cell lines originally established from metastatic lesions, xenografts LuCaP 35 (adenocarcinoma phenotype) and LuCaP 49 (neuroendocrine/small cell carcinoma) grown in mice. No detectable gene expression differences were detected among serial passages of the LuCaP xenografts. Results: Based on transcriptomes, the different cancer cell types could be clustered into a luminal-like grouping and a non-luminal-like (also not basal-like) grouping. The non-luminal-like types showed expression more similar to that of stem/progenitor cells than the luminal-like types. However, none showed expression of stem cell genes known to maintain stemness. Conclusions: Non-luminal-like types are all representatives of aggressive disease, and this could be attributed to the similarity in overall gene expression to stem and progenitor cell types.

Gene expression relationship between prostate cancer cells of Gleason 3, 4 and normal epithelial cells as revealed by cell type-specific transcriptomes

Background: Prostate cancer cells in primary tumors have been typed CD10(-)/CD13(-)/CD24(hi)/CD26(+)/CD38(lo)/CD44(-)/CD104(-). This CD phenotype suggests a lineage relationship between cancer cells and luminal cells. The Gleason grade of tumors is a descriptive of tumor glandular differentiation. Higher Gleason scores are associated with treatment failure. Methods: CD26(+) cancer cells were isolated from Gleason 3+3 (G3) and Gleason 4+4 (G4) tumors by cell sorting, and their gene expression or transcriptome was determined by Affymetrix DNA array analysis. Dataset analysis was used to determine gene expression similarities and differences between G3 and G4 as well as to prostate cancer cell lines and histologically normal prostate luminal cells. Results: The G3 and G4 transcriptomes were compared to those of prostatic cell types of non-cancer, which included luminal, basal, stromal fibromuscular, and endothelial. A principal components analysis of the various transcriptome datasets indicated a closer relationship between luminal and G3 than luminal and G4. Dataset comparison also showed that the cancer transcriptomes differed substantially from those of prostate cancer cell lines. Conclusions: Genes differentially expressed in cancer are potential biomarkers for cancer detection, and those differentially expressed between G3 and G4 are potential biomarkers for disease stratification given that G4 cancer is associated with poor outcomes. Differentially expressed genes likely contribute to the prostate cancer phenotype and constitute the signatures of these particular cancer cell types.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study of Vandetanib Plus Docetaxel/Prednisolone in Patients with Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer

Vandetanib (ZACTIMA(TM)) is a once-daily oral anticancer drug that selectively inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor, and rearranged during transfection signaling. This randomized (1: 1), double-blind study evaluated vandetanib (100mg/day) or placebo in combination with docetaxel (D; 75mg/m(2) every 3 weeks) and prednisolone (P; 2 x 5 mg/day) in 86 patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (mHRPC). The primary assessment was prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (confirmed reduction of >= 50% from baseline) and a greater number of patients showed a PSA response with placebo + DP (67%) versus vandetanib + DP (40%); hazard ratio = 2.23 (one-sided 80% confidence limit = 2.90; one-sided p = 0.99). More patients experienced progression events (disease progression or death from any cause) with vandetanib + DP (65%) versus placebo + DP (60%); hazard ratio = 1.13 (one-sided 80% confidence limit = 1.44; one-sided p = 0.67). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups, although more patients experienced adverse events, leading to permanent discontinuation with vandetanib + DP (28%) versus placebo + DP (12%). However, the safety and tolerability profile for vandetanib was similar to that previously reported; adverse events that occurred more frequently in the vandetanib + DP arm were hypertension (14% vs. 2%), erythematous rash (14% vs. 2%), and exfoliative rash (12% vs. 2%). In this study of patients with mHRPC, vandetanib + DP did not demonstrate any efficacy benefit, compared with placebo + DP.

Inactive free : total prostate specific antigen ratios in ejaculate from men with suspected and known prostate cancer, compared with young control men

Objective To measure free:total prostate specific antigen (PSA) ratios in ejaculate from men with suspected and known prostate cancer, and in young control men, to determine if this ratio might be useful in discriminating benign from malignant prostatic conditions. Patients, subjects and methods Forty-seven men with prostate cancer (positive biopsies), 52 men with suspected prostate cancer but who had negative biopsies and 28 young men (< 30 years old) and with no family history of cancer, provided either a single ejaculate specimen (total 59) or multiple specimens (total 193) on subsequent occasions. Free and total PSA were measured using appropriate assays. All specimens were diluted in a PSA-negative female serum pool. Results The median free:total PSA ratios were 0.76-0.81 among the patient groups and control men, and there was no statistical difference between the groups. These data presumably only reflect the inactive component of free PSA, given that any alpha(2)-macroglobulin or alpha(1)-antichymotrypsin in the assay serum diluent was likely to have bound the active free PSA component in these samples. Similar results were obtained from those providing single and multiple samples, suggesting that a single specimen is sufficient to reflect the seminal plasma free:total PSA ratio over that period. There was no relationship between seminal plasma free:total PSA ratio and age for the controls or the positive biopsy group, although there was a negative relationship (i.e. a decline with age) that almost reached significance in those with negative biopsies (P = 0.058, R-2 = 0.07). Conclusions This is the first report of free:total PSA ratios in the ejaculate of men with suspected and known prostate cancer compared with young control men. Although no significant changes were detected in the free:total PSA ratios in ejaculate, these results may be confounded by differences in ratios with age, as is the case for serum PSA or different molecular forms of PSA. Indeed, these data suggest that a large proportion of free PSA in seminal plasma may be inactive. Further studies are needed to determine the potential utility of measuring free:total PSA, or other candidate markers, in ejaculate to better discriminate benign from malignant prostate disease.

Results of high dose-rate brachytherapy boost before 2D or 3D external beam irradiation for prostate cancer

Background and purpose: To evaluate biochemical control and treatment related toxicity of patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with high dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) combined with conventional 2D or 3D-conformal external beam irradiation (EBI). Material and methods: Four-hundred and three patients treated between December 2000 and March 2004. HDRB was delivered with three fractions of 5.5-7 Gy with a single implant, followed by 45 Gy delivered with 2D or 3D conformal EBI. Results: The median follow-up was 48.4 months. Biochemical failure (BF) occurred in 9.6% according to both ASTRO and Phoenix consensus criteria. Mean time to relapse was 13 and 26 months, respectively. The 5-year BF free survival using the ASTRO criteria was 94.3%, 86.9% and 86.6% for the low, intermediate and high risk groups, respectively; using Phoenix criteria, 92.4%, 88.0% and 85.3%, respectively. The only predictive factor of BF in the multivariate analysis by both ASTRO and Phoenix criteria was the presence of prostate nodules detected by digital palpation, and patients younger than 60 years presented a higher chance of failure using Phoenix criteria only. Conclusions: Treatment scheme is feasible and safe with good efficacy. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 98 (2011) 169-174