Management of prolactinomas in Brazil: an electronic survey

Dopamine agonists are the treatment of choice for prolactinomas. However, there are still controversies concerning dose, treatment duration and criteria for drug withdrawal in different clinical situations. The aim of this study was to assess diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to prolactinomas among members of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM). SBEM members answered a questionnaire sent by e-mail that included 18 questions related to controversial issues about the management of prolactinomas. Among SBEM members, 721 (approximately 24% of total) answered the questionnaire. Concerning the diagnosis, 38% of the respondents stated that prolactin levels < 100 ng/ml would exclude the presence of a prolactinoma. Most of them favored the screening for macroprolactin in asymptomatic individuals instead of a routine screening (74% vs. 26%). Regarding the treatment, 70% of the respondents chose cabergoline as the drug of choice to treat macroprolactinomas whereas similar proportions advised cabergoline or bromocriptine as the best treatment for microprolactinomas (52% vs. 48%). Only 20% and 34% of respondents favored treatment withdrawal 2-3 years after prolactin normalization in patients with macroprolactinomas and microprolactinomas, respectively. In case of pregnancy, only 58 and 70% of respondents advocated discontinuation of treatment with dopamine agonists in patients with macroprolactinomas and microprolactinomas, respectively. Finally, only 36% would allow breast-feeding without restriction, 44% would restrict it to patients with microprolactinomas and 20% would not recommend it for women with prolactinomas There are several points of disagreement among SBEM members regarding the management of prolactinomas.

Genes Differentially Expressed in Prolactinomas Responsive and Resistant to Dopamine Agonists

Background/Aims: Prolactin (PRL) secretion and its gene expression are inhibited by dopamine. Prolactinomas are the most common secreting pituitary adenomas, and dopamine agonists (DA) are the first choice for their treatment. However, a subset of patients is resistant to DA. As the mechanisms involved in DA resistance are not fully understood, the aim of this study was to obtain new insights regarding the molecular differences between the prolactinomas that are responsive to DA and those that are resistant. Methods: Tumor tissue samples were collected from 17 patients who harbored prolactinomas, which were classified as responsive or resistant according to their clinical and laboratorial reaction to DA. The expression of 6 genes was evaluated by real-time polymerase chain reaction: dopamine receptor type 2 (DRD 2), nerve growth factor-beta (NGFB) and its receptor (NGFR), estrogen receptor-alpha (ERA), estrogen receptor-beta (ERB) and the pituitary tumor transforming gene (PTTG). Results: Median DRD 2 and NGFR expression in responsive patients was significantly higher than in resistant ones (p = 0.029 and p = 0.020, respectively). Moreover, the expressions of DRD 2 and NGFR were positively correlated with PRL decrease during treatment (r = 0.66, p = 0.005 and r = 0.57, p = 0.044, respectively). Furthermore, ERB expression was positively correlated to PTTG expression (r = 0.68, p = 0.032) and negatively correlated to NGFB expression (r = -0.75, p = 0.02). Conclusions: DRD2 and NGFR expressions are related to the responsiveness of prolactinoma to DA. However, PTTG, ERB and ERA expressions are not. Also ERB, ERA and PTTG expressions did not present a clear correlation to tumor aggressiveness. Furthermore, the response of prolactinomas to DA should be viewed as a spectrum ranging from the most responsive to the most resistant ones. Copyright (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

PTTG expression in different experimental and human prolactinomas in relation to dopaminergic control of lactotropes

Abstract Background Pituitary tumor transforming gene (pttg) is a novel oncogene that is expressed at higher level in most of the tumors analyzed to date compared to normal tissues. Nevertheless, its expression in prolactinomas and its relation with the pituitary dopamine receptor 2 (D2R) are not well defined. We sought to determine the pituitary level of pttg in three different experimental models of prolactinomas with altered dopaminergic control of the pituitary: the dopaminergic D2R knockout female mouse, the estrogen-treated rat, and the senescent female rat. These three models shared the characteristics of increased pituitary weight, hyperprolactinemia, lactotrope hyperplasia and reduced or absent dopaminergic action at the pituitary level. We also studied samples from human macroprolactinomas, which were characterized as responsive or resistant to dopamine agonist therapy. Results When compared to female wild-type mice, pituitaries from female D2R knockout mice had decreased PTTG concentration, while no difference in pttg mRNA level was found. In senescent rats no difference in pituitary PTTG protein expression was found when compared to young rats. But, in young female rats treated with a synthetic estrogen (Diethylstylbestrol, 20 mg) PTTG protein expression was enhanced (P = 0.029). Therefore, in the three experimental models of prolactinomas, pituitary size was increased and there was hyperprolactinemia, but PTTG levels followed different patterns. Patients with macroprolactinomas were divided in those in which dopaminergic therapy normalized or failed to normalize prolactin levels (responsive and resistant, respectively). When pituitary pttg mRNA level was analyzed in these macroprolactinomas, no differences were found. We next analyzed estrogen action at the pituitary by measuring pituitary estrogen receptor α levels. The D2R knockout female mice have low estrogen levels and in accordance, pituitary estrogen receptors were increased (P = 0.047). On the other hand, in senescent rats estrogen levels were slightly though not significantly higher, and estrogen receptors were similar between groups. The estrogen-treated rats had high pharmacological levels of the synthetic estrogen, and estrogen receptors were markedly lower than in controls (P < 0.0001). Finally, in patients with dopamine resistant or responsive prolactinomas no significant differences in estrogen receptor α levels were found. Therefore, pituitary PTTG was increased only if estrogen action was increased, which correlated with a decrease in pituitary estrogen receptor level. Conclusion We conclude that PTTG does not correlate with prolactin levels or tumor size in animal models of prolactinoma, and its pituitary content is not related to a decrease in dopaminergic control of the lactotrope, but may be influenced by estrogen action at the pituitary level. Therefore it is increased only in prolactinomas generated by estrogen treatment, and not in prolactinomas arising from deficient dopamine control, or in dopamine resistant compared with dopamine responsive human prolactinomas. These results are important in the search for reliable prognostic indicators for patients with pituitary adenomas which will make tumor-specific therapy possible, and help to elucidate the poorly understood phenomenon of pituitary tumorigenesis.

Pituitary surgery for small prolactinomas as an alternative to treatment with dopamine agonists

Despite the fact that consensus guidelines recommend long-term dopamine agonist (DA) therapy as a first-line approach to the treatment of small prolactinoma, some patients continue to prefer a primary surgical approach. Concerns over potential adverse effects of long-term medical therapy and/or the desire to become pregnant and avoid long-term medication are often mentioned as reasons to pursue surgical removal. In this retrospective study, 34 consecutive patients (30 female, 4 male) preferably underwent primary pituitary surgery without prior DA treatment for small prolactinomas (microprolactinoma 1-10 mm, macroprolactinoma 11-20 mm) at the Department of Neurosurgery, University of Bern, Switzerland. At the time of diagnosis, 31 of 34 patients (91%) presented with symptoms. Patients with microprolactinomas had significantly lower preoperative prolactin (PRL) levels compared to patients with macroprolactinomas (median 143 μg/l vs. 340 μg/l). Ninety percent of symptomatic patients experienced significant improvement of their signs and symptoms upon surgery. The postoperative PRL levels (median 3.45 μg/l) returned to normal in 94% of patients with small prolactinomas. There was no mortality and no major morbidities. One patient suffered from hypogonadotropic hypogonadism after surgery despite postoperative normal PRL levels. Long-term remission was achieved in 22 of 24 patients (91%) with microprolactinomas, and in 8 of 10 patients (80%) with macroprolactinomas after a median follow-up period of 33.5 months. Patients with small prolactinomas can safely consider pituitary surgery in a specialized centre with good chance of long-term remission as an alternative to long-term DA therapy.

Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Resection Of Pituitary Adenomas: Preliminary Evaluation Of Consecutive Cases.

Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery has gained increasing acceptance by otolaryngologists and neurosurgeons. In many centers throughout the world, this technique is now routinely used for the same indications as conventional microsurgical technique for pituitary tumors. To present a surgical experience of consecutive endoscopic endonasal trans-sphenoidal resections of pituitary adenomas. In this study, consecutive patients with pituitary adenomas submitted to endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery were evaluated regarding the rate of residual tumor, functional remission, symptoms relief, complications, and tumor size. Forty-seven consecutive patients were evaluated; 17 had functioning adenomas, seven had GH producing tumors, five had Cushing's disease, and five had prolactinomas. Of the functioning adenomas, 12 were macroadenomas and five were microadenomas; 30 cases were non-functioning macroadenomas. Of the patients with functioning adenomas, 87% improved. 85% of the patients with visual deficits related to optic nerve compression progressed over time. Most of the patients with complaints of headaches improved (76%). Surgical complications occurred in 10% of patients, which included with two carotid lesions, two cerebrospinal fluid leaks, and one death of a patient with a previous history of complications. Endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery is a feasible technique, yielding good surgical and functional outcomes, and low morbidity.

Diagnosis and management of hyperprolactinemia: Results of a Brazilian multicenter study with 1234 patients

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate clinical and laboratorial features of 1234 patients with different etiologies of hyper-prolactinemia, as well as the response of 388 patients with prolactinomas to dopamine agonists. Design, setting, and patients: A total of 1234 hyperprolactinemic patients from 10 Brazilian endocrine centers were enrolled in this retrospective study. Main outcome measure: PRL measurement, thyroid function tests, and screening for macroprolactin were conducted. Results: Patients were subdivided as follows: 56.2% had prolactinomas, 14.5% drug-induced hyperprolactinemia, 9.3% macroprolactinemia, 6.6% non-functioning pituitary adenomas, 6.3% primary hypothyroidism, 3.6% idiopathic hyperprolactinemia, and 3.2% acromegaly. Clinical manifestations were similar irrespective of the etiology of the hyperprolactinemia. The highest PRL levels were observed in patients with prolactinomas but there was a great overlap in PRL values between all groups. However, PRL>500 ng/ml allowed a clear distinction between prolactinomas and the other etiologies. Cabergoline (CAB) was more effective than bromocriptine (BCR) in normalizing PRL levels (81.9% vs 67.1%, p<0.0001) and in inducing significant tumor shrinkage and complete disappearance of tumor mass. Drug resistance was observed in 10% of patients treated with CAB and in 18.4% of those that used BCR (p=0.0006). Side-effects and intolerance were also more common in BCR-treated patients. Conclusion: Prolactinomas, drug-induced hyperprolactinemia, and macroprolactinemia were the 3 most common causes of hyperprolactinemia. Although PRL levels could not reliably define the etiology of hyperprolactinemia, PRL values >500 ng/ml were exclusively seen in patients with prolactinomas. CAB was significantly more effective than BCR in terms of prolactin normalization, tumor shrinkage, and tolerability.

Mecanismos Celulares y Moleculares que regulan la Secreción, Proliferación y Muerte de Células Lactotropas. Cellular and molecular mechanisms that regulate secretion, proliferation and death of lactotroph cells.

El presente proyecto está dirigido a estudiar los mecanismos celulares y moleculares involucrados en la regulación de la población de lactotropas, como resultado del balance entre los procesos de proliferación y muerte celular correlacionados con la secreción de prolactina. Dentro de las vías de transducción de señales involucradas se determinará la activación de las diferentes isoformas de PKC utilizando inhibidores específicos y la participación de la vía MAPK-ERK1/2 en cultivos primarios adenohipofisarios y en la línea tumoral GH3B6. Además, se completará la caracterización morfológica y bioquímica de los diferentes procesos de muerte celular inducidos por bromocriptina en modelos de regresión de prolactinomas. Se incorporan al presente proyecto nuevas líneas de investigación dirigidas a estudiar la participación de receptores estrogénicos nucleares y de membrana sobre la actividad secretoria y proliferativa de células lactotropas. Se fija como objetivo la identificación de los mismos y su translocación intracelular en respuesta a estímulos específicos. Estas investigaciones se realizarán en cultivo primario de adenohipófisis, a nivel de microscopía electrónica y confocal. La participación de las isoformas alfa y beta de receptores estrogénicos intracelulares y de membrana en los efectos del estradiol sobre la proliferación y secreción de PRL se determinará mediante el uso de agonistas y antagonistas específicos en cultivo primario de adenohipófisis y de la línea GH3B6. Un tema de actualidad es el estudio de vías de señalización involucradas en las acciones del estrógeno en interacción con neuropéptidos o factores de crecimiento, estableciendo la interacción entre los receptores de membrana, además de posibles "crosstalk" entre diferentes rutas de transducción de señales. Como aporte a este tópico se propone estudiar los efectos genómicos y no genómicos del estradiol en interacción con TRH o FGF-2, modulando la actividad secretoria y proliferativa de las células lactotropas. Los datos obtenidos podrán contribuir al conocimiento de nuevas estrategias utilizadas para disminuir el crecimiento de tumores, inhibiendo moléculas claves como receptores de estrógenos, factores de crecimiento y algunas involucradas en las vías de señalización.

Interacciones inmuno-endócrinas: participación de tlr-4 y citoquinas pro-inflamatorias en la regulación de la proliferación de células lactotropas. Immuno-endocrine interactions: Contribution of tlr-4 and pro-inflammatory cytokines in the regulation of lactotroph cell proliferation.

El presente proyecto tiene como objetivo estudiar, a nivel celular y molecular, los mecanismos inmuno-endócrinos que participan en la proliferación de células lactotropas normales y tumorales frente a procesos inflamatorios inducidos experimentalmente. Una particular atención se pondrá al evaluar la contribución de IL-6 como citoquina intrahipofisaria durante el desarrollo tumoral y su rol como señal paracrina/autocrina en la senescencia hipofisaria. Debido a que agentes inflamatorios y anti-inflamatorios pueden inducir alteraciones en el crecimiento y la función hipofisaria, no se descartaría que, en el curso de una inflamación, como la inducida por el lipopolisacárido bacteriano LPS, puedan ocurrir modificaciones en el índice proliferativo de las células lactotropas y/o en la secreción de su producto hormonal, la prolactina. Dado el auge en las investigaciones referidas al campo de la modulación inmuno-endócrina, es que planteamos investigar la participación de TLR4, componente crucial del complejo proteico que inicia la señal LPS, en hipófisis normales y tumorales inducidas por estrógeno así como también en la línea celular somatolactotrópica GH3B6. Dentro de las vías de transducción de señales involucradas se determinará la participación de MAPK-ERK1/2 y de PI3K asi como la contribución de NF-kB en la regulación del crecimiento celular inducido por IL-6/LPS mediante el uso de inhibidores específicos. La microscopía electrónica y confocal, resultarán de fundamental importancia para valorar los procesos de translocación nuclear de NF-kB como así también para definir la localización ultraestructural de los mediadores mencionados. Además, se valorará el mecanismo de senescencia celular hipofisaria mediante parámetros morfológicos, bioquímicos y ultraestructurales durante el desarrollo de prolactinomas inducidos experimentalmente. Finalmente dilucidar las posibles vías de transducción de señales que se desencadenan frente a estímulos inflamatorios/proliferativos podría explicar algunos aspectos moleculares sobre la función de control del ciclo celular y las limitaciones de crecimiento en adenomas hipofisarios que subyacen en la falta de progresión de estos tumores a la malignidad. The aim of the present project is to study the immuno-endocrine mechanisms involved in the proliferation of normal and tumoral lactotrophs experimentally induced by inflammatory factors. Also, the contribution of IL-6 as a paracrine / autocrine signal in the pituitary senescence will be assessed along tumor development induced by estrogen treatment. Considering that both, inflammatory and anti-inflammatory agents can modify the pituitary function, it is possible that in the course of inflammation, as induced by bacterial lipopolysaccharide LPS, some alteration may occur in the proliferative index of lactotrophs and / or in the PRL secretion. Our main objective is to investigate the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved by the activation of TLR4, a crucial component of the protein complex initiated by LPS, in normal and pathological pituitaries induced by estrogen as well as in the GH3B6 cell line. The participation of MAPK-ERK1 / 2 and PI3K signaling pathway and the contribution of NF-kB in the proliferative responses triggered by IL-6/LPS will be analyzed by using specific inhibitors. Confocal microscopy analysis is essential to assess the process of nuclear translocation of NF-kB as well as the use of electron microscopy to define the ultrastructural localization of the above mentioned mediators. In addition, the mechanisms of pituitary cell senescence will be evaluated through morphological, biochemical and ultrastructural approaches during the development of experimental prolactinomas. Finally, the elucidation of possible signal transduction pathways which are triggered by inflammatory / proliferative stimuli, would explain some molecular aspects of cell cycle control and limitations in pituitary tumor growth that underlie the lack of progress in these pituitary tumors to malignancy.

Adjuvant or radical fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with pituitary functional and nonfunctional macroadenoma.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) for patients with pituitary macroadenoma (PMA).Methods and Materials: Between March 2000 and March 2009, 27 patients (male to female ratio, 1.25) with PMA underwent SFRT (median dose, 50.4 Gy). Mean age of the patients was 56.5 years (range, 20.3 - 77.4). In all but one patient, SFRT was administered for salvage treatment after surgical resection (transphenoidal resection in 23, transphenoidal resection followed by craniotomy in 2 and multiple transphenoidal resections in another patient). In 10 (37%) patients, the PMAs were functional (3 ACTH-secreting, 3 prolactinomas, 2 growth hormone-secreting and 2 multiple hormone-secretion). Three (11.1%) and 9 (33.3%) patients had PMA abutting and compressing the optic chiasm, respectively. Mean tumor volume was 2.9 +/- 4.6 cm(3). Eighteen (66.7%) patients had hypopituitarism prior to SFRT. The mean follow-up period after SFRT was 72.4 +/- 37.2 months.Results: Tumor size decreased for 6 (22.2%) patients and remained unchanged for 19 (70.4%) other patients. Two (7.4%) patients had tumor growth inside the prescribed treatment volume. The estimated 5-year tumor growth control was 95.5% after SFRT. Biochemical remission occurred in 3 (30%) patients with functional PMA. Two patients with normal anterior pituitary function before SFRT developed new deficits 25 and 65 months after treatment. The 5-year survival without new anterior pituitary deficit was thus 95.8%. Five patients with visual field defect had improved visual function and 1 patient with no visual defect prior to SFRT, but an optic chiasm abutting tumor, had a decline in visual function. The estimated 5-year vision and pituitary function preservation rates were 93.2% and 95.8%, respectively.Conclusions: SFRT is a safe and effective treatment for patients with PMA, although longer follow-up is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes. In this study, approximately 1 patient with visual field defect out of two had an improved visual.

Transformation of a microprolactinoma into a mixed growth hormone and prolactin-secreting pituitary adenoma.

Combined prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH) secretion by a single pituitary tumor can occur in approximately 5% of cases. However, in all previously reported patients, combined secretion of both hormones was present at the time of diagnosis. Here we describe a patient initially diagnosed with a pure prolactin-secreting microadenoma, who experienced the progressive apparition of symptomatic autonomous GH secretion while on intermittent long term dopamine agonist therapy. She was operated on, and immunohistochemical analysis of tumor tissue confirmed the diagnosis of pituitary adenoma with uniform co-staining of all cells for both GH and PRL. This patient represents the first documented occurrence of asynchronous development of combined GH and PRL secretion in a pituitary adenoma. Although pathogenic mechanisms implicated remain largely speculative, it emphasizes the need for long term hormonal follow up of patients harboring prolactinomas.

Microadenomas hipofisários: revisão de 95 casos

Procedemos a uma revisão de 95 casos de microadenomas hipofisários, evidenciados por ressonância magnética, nas instituições: Hospital Santa Cruz/Beneficência Portuguesa de Niterói e Clínica X-Labs/Rio de Janeiro. O objetivo foi verificar o tipo principal, incidência, proximidade à haste hipofisária, correlacionando-os com dados clínico-laboratoriais. Os equipamentos utilizados foram de 0,5 Tesla (Gyroscan T5 III da Philips e Vectra da GE) e 1,0 Tesla (Signa da GE), sendo realizadas seqüências rápidas, antes e após administração venosa do meio de contraste paramagnético (gadolínio). Predominaram pacientes do sexo feminino, com prolactinomas, sendo as queixas mais freqüentes: galactorréia, amenorréia e hiperprolactinemia. Em contraste à literatura corrente, observamos que mais freqüentemente a haste hipofisária encontrava-se centrada. Na detecção dos microadenomas é fundamental a injeção venosa do gadolínio o mais próximo possível da aquisição das imagens, sendo recomendável utilizar metade da dose do meio de contraste.

Macroprolactinoma resistente aos agonistas dopaminérgicos: relato de caso

Os macroprolactinomas são tumores benignos hipofisários, secretores de prolactina, manifestando-se com amenorréia, galactorréia e disfunção gonadal. O tratamento de primeira escolha é clínico, com agonistas dopaminérgicos. O tratamento cirúrgico é reservado para os raros casos que não respondem ao tratamento clínico, intolerância à medicação ou nos casos agudos quando ocorre a hemorragia intra-tumoral. Descrevemos o caso de uma paciente portadora de macroprolactinoma submetida a duas ressecções cirúrgicas e resistente ao tratamento clínico, com evolução não usual.

Regulation of pituitary hormones and cell proliferation by components of the extracellular matrix

The extracellular matrix is a three-dimensional network of proteins, glycosaminoglycans and other macromolecules. It has a structural support function as well as a role in cell adhesion, migration, proliferation, differentiation, and survival. The extracellular matrix conveys signals through membrane receptors called integrins and plays an important role in pituitary physiology and tumorigenesis. There is a differential expression of extracellular matrix components and integrins during the pituitary development in the embryo and during tumorigenesis in the adult. Different extracellular matrix components regulate adrenocorticotropin at the level of the proopiomelanocortin gene transcription. The extracellular matrix also controls the proliferation of adrenocorticotropin-secreting tumor cells. On the other hand, laminin regulates the production of prolactin. Laminin has a dynamic pattern of expression during prolactinoma development with lower levels in the early pituitary hyperplasia and a strong reduction in fully grown prolactinomas. Therefore, the expression of extracellular matrix components plays a role in pituitary tumorigenesis. On the other hand, the remodeling of the extracellular matrix affects pituitary cell proliferation. Matrix metalloproteinase activity is very high in all types of human pituitary adenomas. Matrix metalloproteinase secreted by pituitary cells can release growth factors from the extracellular matrix that, in turn, control pituitary cell proliferation and hormone secretion. In summary, the differential expression of extracellular matrix components, integrins and matrix metalloproteinase contributes to the control of pituitary hormone production and cell proliferation during tumorigenesis.

Macroprolactinemia numa coorte de mulheres com hiperprolactinemia : associações com variáveis clínicas, hormonais e exames de imagem da hipófise

A prolactina (PRL) é um hormônio peptídico sintetizado e secretado, principalmente, pelas células lactotróficas da glândula hipófise anterior, tendo como principal função a indução e manutenção da lactação. Existem três formas moleculares de PRL na circulação: PRL monomérica (little prolactin) com massa molecular de cerca de 23KDa, PRL dimérica (big prolactin) com 45 a 50KDa, e macroprolactina (big big prolactin) maior do que 150KDa. Esta última está geralmente ligada a imunoglobulinas G. Em condições normais, ou em pacientes com hiperprolactinemia sintomática, predomina em circulação a forma monomérica. A hiperprolactinemia é uma das disfunções endócrinas hipotálamo-hipofisárias mais comuns em mulheres em idade reprodutiva. Ocorre mais freqüentemente por adenomas hipofisários (prolactinomas) e secundária ao uso de drogas com ação central. Na ausência de causas conhecidas, a hiperprolactinemia é considerada como idiopática. Finalmente, pode estar associada ao predomínio de macroprolactina no soro, sendo denominada macroprolactinemia. A suspeita de macroprolactinemia ocorre quando um paciente com hiperprolactinemia não apresenta os sintomas típicos e/ou não tem evidências radiográficas de tumor na hipófise, embora a macroprolactinemia possa estar ocasionalmente associada a prolactinomas. Os objetivos deste trabalho foram: avaliar a freqüência de macroprolactinemia, através da precipitação com PEG, numa amostra de mulheres com hiperprolactinemia; descrever associações da macroprolactinemia com variáveis clínicas, hormonais e de imagem da hipófise; e caracterizar a evolução clínica e dos níveis de prolactina durante o seguimento desta coorte. Realizou-se um estudo descritivo, onde foi estudada uma coorte de pacientes do sexo feminino (n = 32), consultando no HCPA de 1989 a 2005, com diagnóstico de hiperprolactinemia (>26ng/mL) e seguimento com agonistas da dopamina. Após um período de 3 meses sem tratamento (washout), as pacientes dosaram prolactina para investigação dos níveis séricos e presença de macroprolactina, e foram classificadas como aquelas que normalizaram os níveis séricos de prolactina durante estes anos de seguimento (Grupo Hprl prévia) e as que continuaram hiperprolactinêmicas. Estas foram reclassificadas como grupo de hiperprolactinêmicas cuja forma circulante predominante é a prolactina monomérica (Grupo Hprl mono) e o grupo de hiperprolactinêmicas com predominância de macroprolactina (Grupo Hprl macro). O percentual de macroprolactina foi calculado através dos valores de PRL totais obtidos das amostras íntegras em comparação com os níveis de PRL encontrados nas amostras precipitadas com PEG. Recuperações de prolactina monomérica > 50% classificaram a amostra como tendo predomínio de formas monoméricas, o percentual de recuperação  40% foi considerado como predomínio de formas de alto peso molecular (macroprolactinemia), e recuperação entre 40 e 50% indicou indefinição da forma predominante de PRL. A freqüência de macroprolactina foi de 28,1% (n = 32). Pacientes hiperprolactinêmicas com macroprolactinemia são significativamente mais jovens do que as hiperprolactinêmicas com a forma monomérica. Como esperado, tanto as pacientes do grupo Hprl macro como Hprl mono apresentam níveis de prolactina significativamente mais elevados que as pacientes Hprl prévia. Através do método de precipitação com PEG, identificou-se a forma predominante de prolactina na circulação em 71,8% dos casos (n = 32). Verificamos ainda que as pacientes com predominância de macroprolactina não apresentam os sintomas da síndrome hiperprolactinêmica, e na maioria dos casos, possuem exames de imagem por TC normal.

Cabergoline versus bromocriptine in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)