Sēfer derek hay-yāšār le-ʿôlām hab-bā : dizś sefer iz fer gmaini laaiṭn oich fr waibr un meidn ... ali dinim pif ṭaiṭš gišṭelṭ ...

... ham-meḥaber ... Jeḥiel Michel B.... Avraham Segel ... Epšṭain

Increased expression of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in murine myotubes by proteolysis-inducing factor (PIF) is associated with activation of the transcription factor NF-kappa B

Proteolysis-inducing factor (PIF), isolated from a cachexia-inducing murine tumour, has been shown to stimulate protein breakdown in C 2C12 myotubes. The effect was attenuated by the specific proteasome inhibitor lactacystin and there was an elevation of proteasome 'chymotrypsin-like' enzyme activity and expression of 205 proteasome α-subunits at concentrations of PIF between 2 and 16 nM. Higher concentrations of PIF had no effect. The action of PIF was attenuated by eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) (50 μM). At a concentration of 4 nM, PIF induced a transient decrease in IκBα levels after 30 min incubation, while no effect was seen at 20 nM PIF. The level of IκBα, an NF-κB inhibitory protein, returned to normal after 60 min. Depletion of IκBα from the cytosol was not seen in myotubes pretreated with EPA, suggesting that the NF-κB/IκB complex was stabilised. At concentrations between 2 and 8 nM, PIF stimulated an increased nuclear migration of NF-κB, which was not seen in myotubes pretreated with EPA. The PIF-induced increase in chymotrypsin-like enzyme activity was also attenuated by the NF-κB inhibitor peptide SN50, suggesting that NF-κB may be involved in the PIF-induced increase in proteasome expression. The results further suggest that EPA may attenuate protein degradation induced by PIF, at least partly, by preventing NF-κB accumulation in the nucleus. © 2003 Cancer Research UK.

Activation of ATP-ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis in skeletal muscle in vivo and murine myoblasts in vitro by a proteolysis-inducing factor (PIF)

Loss of skeletal muscle is a major factor in the poor survival of patients with cancer cachexia. This study examines the mechanism of catabolism of skeletal muscle by a tumour product, proteolysis-inducing factor (PIF). Intravenous administration of PIF to normal mice produced a rapid decrease in body weight (1.55 ± 0.12 g in 24 h) that was accompanied by increased mRNA levels for ubiquitin, the Mr 14 000 ubiquitin carrier-protein, E2, and the C9 proteasome subunit in gastrocnemius muscle. There was also increased protein levels of the 20S proteasome core and 19S regulatory subunit, detectable by immunoblotting, suggesting activation of the ATP-ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic pathway. An increased protein catabolism was also seen in C2C12 myoblasts within 24 h of PIF addition with a bell-shaped dose-response curve and a maximal effect at 2-4 nM. The enhanced protein degradation was attenuated by anti-PIF antibody and by the proteasome inhibitors MG115 and lactacystin. Glycerol gradient analysis of proteasomes from PIF-treated cells showed an elevation in chymotrypsin-like activity, while Western analysis showed a dose-related increase in expression of MSSI, an ATPase that is a regulatory subunit of the proteasome, with a dose-response curve similar to that for protein degradation. These results confirm that PIF acts directly to stimulate the proteasome pathway in muscle cells and may play a pivotal role in protein catabolism in cancer cachexia. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign.

Attenuation of muscle atrophy by an N-terminal peptide of the receptor for proteolysis-inducing factor (PIF)

Background: Atrophy of skeletal muscle in cancer cachexia has been attributed to a tumour-produced highly glycosylated peptide called proteolysis-inducing factor (PIF). The action of PIF is mediated through a high-affinity membrane receptor in muscle. This study investigates the ability of peptides derived from the 20 N-terminal amino acids of the receptor to neutralise PIF action both in vitro and in vivo. Methods: Proteolysis-inducing factor was purified from the MAC16 tumour using an initial pronase digestion, followed by binding on DEAE cellulose, and the pronase was inactivated by heating to 80°C, before purification of the PIF using affinity chromatography. In vitro studies were carried out using C2C12 murine myotubes, while in vivo studies employed mice bearing the cachexia-inducing MAC16 tumour. Results: The process resulted in almost a 23?000-fold purification of PIF, but with a recovery of only 0.004%. Both the D- and L-forms of the 20mer peptide attenuated PIF-induced protein degradation in vitro through the ubiquitin-proteosome proteolytic pathway and increased expression of myosin. In vivo studies showed that neither the D- nor the L-peptides significantly attenuated weight loss, although the D-peptide did show a tendency to increase lean body mass. Conclusion: These results suggest that the peptides may be too hydrophilic to be used as therapeutic agents, but confirm the importance of the receptor in the action of the PIF on muscle protein degradation.

Role of Ca2+ in proteolysis-inducing factor (PIF)-induced atrophy of skeletal muscle

Proteolysis-inducing factor (PIF) induces muscle loss in cancer cachexia through a high affinity membrane bound receptor. This study investigates the mechanism by which the PIF receptor communicates to intracellular signalling pathways. C2C12 murine myoblasts were used as a model using PIF purified from MAC16 tumours. Calcium imaging was determined using fura-4-acetoxymethyl ester (Fura-4-AM). PIF induced a rapid rise in Ca2 +i, which was completely attenuated by a anti-receptor antibody, or peptides representing 20 mers of the N-terminus of the PIF receptor. Other agents catabolic for skeletal muscle including angiotensin II (AngII) tumour necrosis factor-a (TNF-a) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) also induced a rise in Ca2 +i, but this was not attenuated by anti-PIF-receptor antibody. The rise in Ca2 +i induced by PIF and AngII was completely attenuated by the Zn2 + chelator D-myo-inositol-1,2,6-triphosphate, and this was reversed by administration of exogenous Zn2 +. The Ca2 +i rise induced by PIF was independent of the presence of extracellular Ca2 +, and attenuated by the Ca2 + pump inhibitor thapsigargin, suggesting that the Ca2 +i rise was due to release from intracellular stores. This rise in Ca2 +i induced by PIF was attenuated by both the phospholipase C inhibitor U73122 and 2-APB, an inhibitor of the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor, suggesting the involvement of a G-protein. Binding of the PIF to its receptor in skeletal muscle triggers a rise in Ca2 +i, which initiates a signalling cascade leading to a depression in protein synthesis, and an increase in protein degradation.

Novel transcription factors regulating the expression of the rice gene OsDREB1B

Dissertation presented to obtain the Ph.D degree in Biology

PIF3 is a repressor of chloroplast development.

The phytochrome-interacting factor PIF3 has been proposed to act as a positive regulator of chloroplast development. Here, we show that the pif3 mutant has a phenotype that is similar to the pif1 mutant, lacking the repressor of chloroplast development PIF1, and that a pif1pif3 double mutant has an additive phenotype in all respects. The pif mutants showed elevated protochlorophyllide levels in the dark, and etioplasts of pif mutants contained smaller prolamellar bodies and more prothylakoid membranes than corresponding wild-type seedlings, similar to previous reports of constitutive photomorphogenic mutants. Consistent with this observation, pif1, pif3, and pif1pif3 showed reduced hypocotyl elongation and increased cotyledon opening in the dark. Transfer of 4-d-old dark-grown seedlings to white light resulted in more chlorophyll synthesis in pif mutants over the first 2 h, and analysis of gene expression in dark-grown pif mutants indicated that key tetrapyrrole regulatory genes such as HEMA1 encoding the rate-limiting step in tetrapyrrole synthesis were already elevated 2 d after germination. Circadian regulation of HEMA1 in the dark also showed reduced amplitude and a shorter, variable period in the pif mutants, whereas expression of the core clock components TOC1, CCA1, and LHY was largely unaffected. Expression of both PIF1 and PIF3 was circadian regulated in dark-grown seedlings. PIF1 and PIF3 are proposed to be negative regulators that function to integrate light and circadian control in the regulation of chloroplast development.

Phytochrome interacting factors 4 and 5 redundantly limit seedling de-etiolation in continuous far-red light.

Phytochromes are red/far-red photosensors that regulate numerous developmental programs in plants. Among them, phytochrome A (phyA) is essential to enable seedling de-etiolation under continuous far-red (FR) light, a condition that mimics the environment under a dense canopy. The ecological relevance of this response is demonstrated by the high mortality rate of phyA mutant plants that germinate in deep vegetational shade. phyA signaling involves direct interaction of the photoreceptor with phytochrome-interacting factors PIF1 and PIF3, members of the bHLH transcription factor family. Here we investigated the involvement of PIF4 and PIF5 in phyA signaling, and found that they redundantly control de-etiolation in FR light. The pif4 pif5 double mutant is hypersensitive to low fluence rates of FR light. This phenotype is dependent on FR light perception by phyA, but does not rely on alterations in the phyA level. Our microarray analysis shows that PIF4 and PIF5 are part of an inhibitory mechanism that represses the expression of some light-responsive genes in the dark, and that they are also needed for full expression of several growth-related genes in the light. Unlike PIF1 and PIF3, PIF4 and PIF5 are not degraded in response to FR light, indicating that they are light-regulated by a different mechanism. Our genetic analysis suggests that this is achieved through sequestration of these PIFs by the closely related bHLH transcription factor HFR1 (long hypocotyl in FR light).

Verification at the protein level of the PIF4-mediated external coincidence model for the temperature-adaptive photoperiodic control of plant growth in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Plant circadian clock controls a wide variety of physiological and developmental events, which include the short-days (SDs)-specific promotion of the elongation of hypocotyls during de-etiolation and also the elongation of petioles during vegetative growth. In A. thaliana, the PIF4 gene encoding a phytochrome-interacting basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor plays crucial roles in this photoperiodic control of plant growth. According to the proposed external coincidence model, the PIF4 gene is transcribed precociously at the end of night specifically in SDs, under which conditions the protein product is stably accumulated, while PIF4 is expressed exclusively during the daytime in long days (LDs), under which conditions the protein product is degraded by the light-activated phyB and also the residual proteins are inactivated by the DELLA family of proteins. A number of previous reports provided solid evidence to support this coincidence model mainly at the transcriptional level of the PIF 4 and PIF4-traget genes. Nevertheless, the diurnal oscillation profiles of PIF4 proteins, which were postulated to be dependent on photoperiod and ambient temperature, have not yet been demonstrated. Here we present such crucial evidence on PIF4 protein level to further support the external coincidence model underlying the temperature-adaptive photoperiodic control of plant growth in A. thaliana.

Phytochrome-mediated inhibition of shade avoidance involves degradation of growth-promoting bHLH transcription factors

Plant growth and development are particularly sensitive to changes in the light environment and especially to vegetational shading. The shade-avoidance response is mainly controlled by the phytochrome photoreceptors. In Arabidopsis, recent studies have identified several related bHLH class transcription factors (PIF, for phytochrome-interacting factors) as important components in phytochrome signaling. In addition to a related bHLH domain, most of the PIFs contain an active phytochrome binding (APB) domain that mediates their interaction with light-activated phytochrome B (phyB). Here we show that PIF4 and PIF5 act early in the phytochrome signaling pathways to promote the shade-avoidance response. PIF4 and PIF5 accumulate to high levels in the dark, are selectively degraded in response to red light, and remain at high levels under shade-mimicking conditions. Degradation of these transcription factors is preceded by phosphorylation, requires the APB domain and is sensitive to inhibitors of the proteasome, suggesting that PIF4 and PIF5 are degraded upon interaction with light-activated phyB. Our data suggest that, in dense vegetation, which is rich in far-red light, shade avoidance is triggered, at least partially, as a consequence of reduced phytochrome-mediated degradation of transcription factors such as PIF4 and PIF5. Consistent with this idea, the constitutive shade-avoidance phenotype of phyB mutants partially reverts in the absence of PIF4 and PIF5

Mechanism of HFR1 function in adaptive growth responses in "Arabidopsis thaliana"

AbstractPlants are sessile organisms, which have evolved an astonishing ability to sense changes in their environment. Depending on the surrounding conditions, such as changes in light and temperature, plants modulate the activity of important transcriptional regulators. The shade avoidance syndrome (SAS) is one important mechanism for shade-intolerant plants to adapt their growth in high vegetative density. In shaded conditions plants sense a diminished red/far-red ratio via the phytochrome system and respond with morphological changes such as elongation growth of stems and petioles. The Phytochrome Interacting Factors 4 and 5 (PIF4 and PIF5) are positive regulators of the SAS and required for a full response (Lorrain et al, 2008). They regulate the SAS by inducing the expression of shade avoidance marker genes such as PIL1, ATHB2, XTR7 and HFR1 (Hornitschek et al, 2009; Lorrain et al, 2008).I investigated the molecular mechanism underlying the regulation of the SAS by HFR1 (long Hypocotyl in FR light). Although HFR1 is a PIF-related bHLH transcription factor, we discovered that HFR1 is a non-DNA binding protein. Moreover, we revealed that HFR1 inhibits an exaggerated SAS by forming non-DNA binding heterodimers with PIF4 and PIF5 (Hornitschek et al, 2009). This negative feedback loop is an important mechanism to limit elongation growth also in elevated temperatures. HFR1 accumulation and activity are highly temperature-dependent and the increased activity of HFR1 at warmer temperatures also provides an important restraint on PIF4-driven elongation growth (Foreman et al, 2011).Finally we performed a genome-wide analysis to determine how PIF4 and PIF5 regulate growth in response to shade. We identified potential PIF5- target genes, which represent many well-known shade-responsive genes. Our analysis of gene expression also revealed a role of PIF4 and PIF5 in simulated sun possibly via the regulation of auxin sensitivity.RésuméLes plantes sont des organismes sessiles ayant développé une capacité surprenante à détecter des changements dans leur environnement. En fonction des conditions extérieures, telles que les variations de lumière ou de température, elles adaptent l'activité d'importants régulateurs transcriptionnels. Le syndrome d'évitement de l'ombre (SAS), est un mécanisme important pour les plantes intolérantes à l'ombre leur permettant d'adapter leur croissance lorsqu'elles se développent dans des conditions de végétations très denses. Dans ces conditions, les plantes détectent une réduction de la quantité relative de lumière rouge par rapport à la lumière rouge-lointain (rapport R/FR). Ce changement, perçu via le système des phytochromes, induit des modifications morphologiques telle qu'une élongation des tiges et des pétioles. Les protéines PIF4 et PIF5 (Phytochrome Interacting Factors) sont des régulateurs positifs du SAS et sont nécessaires pour une réponse complète (Lorrain et al, 2008). Ces facteurs de transcription régulent le SAS en induisant l'expression de gènes marqueurs de cette réponse tels que PIL1, ATHB2, XTR7 et HFR1 (Hornitschek et al, 2009; Lorrain et al, 2008).J'ai étudié les mécanismes moléculaires sous-jacents à la régulation du SAS par HFR1 (long Hypocotyl in FR light). HFR1 est un facteur de transcription type bHLH de la famille des PIF, quoique nous ayons découvert que HFR1 est une protéine ne se liant pas à Γ ADN. Nous avons montré que HFR1 inhibe un SAS exagéré en formant des heterodimères avec PIF4 et PIF5 (Hornitschek et al, 2009). Nous avons également montré que cette boucle de régulation négative est également un mécanisme important pour limiter la croissance de l'élongation dans des conditions de fortes températures. De plus l'accumulation et l'activité de HFR1 augmentent avec la température ce qui permet d'inhiber plus fortement l'effet activateur de PIF4 sur la croissance.Enfin, nous avons effectué une analyse génomique à large échelle afin de déterminer comment PIF4 et PIF5 régulent la croissance en réponse à l'ombre. Nous avons identifié les gènes cibles potentiels de PIF5, correspondant en partie à des gènes connus dans la réponse de l'évitement de l'ombre. Notre analyse de l'expression des gènes a également révélé un rôle important de PIF4 et PIF5 dans des conditions de croissance en plein soleil, probablement via la régulation de la sensibilité à l'auxine.

Light intensity modulates the regulatory network of the shade avoidance response in Arabidopsis.

Plants such as Arabidopsis thaliana respond to foliar shade and neighbors who may become competitors for light resources by elongation growth to secure access to unfiltered sunlight. Challenges faced during this shade avoidance response (SAR) are different under a light-absorbing canopy and during neighbor detection where light remains abundant. In both situations, elongation growth depends on auxin and transcription factors of the phytochrome interacting factor (PIF) class. Using a computational modeling approach to study the SAR regulatory network, we identify and experimentally validate a previously unidentified role for long hypocotyl in far red 1, a negative regulator of the PIFs. Moreover, we find that during neighbor detection, growth is promoted primarily by the production of auxin. In contrast, in true shade, the system operates with less auxin but with an increased sensitivity to the hormonal signal. Our data suggest that this latter signal is less robust, which may reflect a cost-to-robustness tradeoff, a system trait long recognized by engineers and forming the basis of information theory.

Auxin-mediated plant architectural changes in response to shade and high temperature.

The remarkable plasticity of their architecture allows plants to adjust growth to the environment and to overcome adverse conditions. Two examples of environmental stresses that drastically affect shoot development are imminent shade and high temperature. Plants in crowded environments and plants in elevated ambient temperature display very similar phenotypic adaptations of elongated hypocotyls in seedlings and elevated and elongated leaves at later developmental stages. The comparable growth responses to shade and high temperature are partly regulated through shared signaling pathways, of which the phytohormone auxin and the phytochrome interacting factors (PIFs) are important components. During both shade- and temperature-induced elongation growth auxin biosynthesis and signaling are upregulated in a PIF-dependent manner. In this review we will discuss recent progress in our understanding of how auxin mediates architectural adaptations to shade and high temperature.