7 resultados para PCA3
Resumo:
Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death and the most common non-skin cancer in men in the USA. Considerable advancements in the practice of medicine have allowed a significant improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease and, in recent years, both incidence and mortality rates have been slightly declining. However, it is still estimated that 1 man in 6 will be diagnosed with prostate cancer during his lifetime, and 1 man in 35 will die of the disease. In order to identify novel strategies and effective therapeutic approaches in the fight against prostate cancer, it is imperative to improve our understanding of its complex biology since many aspects of prostate cancer initiation and progression still remain elusive. The study of tumor biomarkers, due to their specific altered expression in tumor versus normal tissue, is a valid tool for elucidating key aspects of cancer biology, and may provide important insights into the molecular mechanisms underlining the tumorigenesis process of prostate cancer. PCA3, is considered the most specific prostate cancer biomarker, however its biological role, until now, remained unknown. PCA3 is a long non-coding RNA (ncRNA) expressed from chromosome 9q21 and its study led us to the discovery of a novel human gene, PC-TSGC, transcribed from the opposite strand and in an antisense orientation to PCA3. With the work presented in this thesis, we demonstrate that PCA3 exerts a negative regulatory role over PC-TSGC, and we propose PC-TSGC to be a new tumor suppressor gene that contrasts the transformation of prostate cells by inhibiting Rho-GTPases signaling pathways. Our findings provide a biological role for PCA3 in prostate cancer and suggest a new mechanism of tumor suppressor gene inactivation mediated by non-coding RNA. Also, the characterization of PCA3 and PC-TSGC led us to propose a new molecular pathway involving both genes in the transformation process of the prostate, thus providing a new piece of the jigsaw puzzle representing the complex biology of prostate cancer.
Resumo:
Melanoma is a highly aggressive and therapy resistant tumor for which the identification of specific markers and therapeutic targets is highly desirable. We describe here the development and use of a bioinformatic pipeline tool, made publicly available under the name of EST2TSE, for the in silico detection of candidate genes with tissue-specific expression. Using this tool we mined the human EST (Expressed Sequence Tag) database for sequences derived exclusively from melanoma. We found 29 UniGene clusters of multiple ESTs with the potential to predict novel genes with melanoma-specific expression. Using a diverse panel of human tissues and cell lines, we validated the expression of a subset of three previously uncharacterized genes (clusters Hs.295012, Hs.518391, and Hs.559350) to be highly restricted to melanoma/melanocytes and named them RMEL1, 2 and 3, respectively. Expression analysis in nevi, primary melanomas, and metastatic melanomas revealed RMEL1 as a novel melanocytic lineage-specific gene up-regulated during melanoma development. RMEL2 expression was restricted to melanoma tissues and glioblastoma. RMEL3 showed strong up-regulation in nevi and was lost in metastatic tumors. Interestingly, we found correlations of RMEL2 and RMEL3 expression with improved patient outcome, suggesting tumor and/or metastasis suppressor functions for these genes. The three genes are composed of multiple exons and map to 2q12.2, 1q25.3, and 5q11.2, respectively. They are well conserved throughout primates, but not other genomes, and were predicted as having no coding potential, although primate-conserved and human-specific short ORFs could be found. Hairpin RNA secondary structures were also predicted. Concluding, this work offers new melanoma-specific genes for future validation as prognostic markers or as targets for the development of therapeutic strategies to treat melanoma.
Resumo:
According to recent results of a sub-group of 20,000 patients from the ERSPC study, prostate cancer screening significantly increases disease specific survival for men with a life expectancy of 15 years. However presently, only 20% of prostate biopsies lead to the diagnosis of cancer. This low yield may be increased by using new tools on their way to validation, such as the blood and urinary markers p2-PSA and PCA3, so as MRI and tridimensional computerized echography. Finally, the tumours detected must be managed with subtlety, since a third of them are not overtly aggressive clinically. Hence, a significant proportion of such tumours may not need immediate curative intent treatment, and can be followed up in an active surveillance protocol.
Resumo:
Prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease affecting an increasing number of men all over the world, but particularly in the countries with the Western lifestyle. The best biomarker assay currently available for the diagnosis of the disease, the measurement of prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels from blood, lacks specificity, and even when combined with invasive tests such as digital rectal exam and prostate tissue biopsies, these methods can both miss cancers, and lead to overdiagnosis and subsequent overtreatment of cancers. Moreover, they cannot provide an accurate prognosis for the disease. Due to the high prevalence of indolent prostate cancers, the majority of men affected by prostate cancer would be able to live without any medical intervention. Their latent prostate tumors would not cause any clinical symptoms during their lifetime, but few are willing to take the risk, as currently there are no methods or biomarkers to reliably differentiate the indolent cancers from the aggressive, lethal cases that really are in need of immediate medical treatment. This doctoral work concentrated on validating 12 novel candidate genes for use as biomarkers for prostate cancer by measuring their mRNA expression levels in prostate tissue and peripheral blood of men with cancer as well as unaffected individuals. The panel of genes included the most prominent markers in the current literature: PCA3 and the fusion gene TMPRSS2-ERG, in addition to BMP-6, FGF-8b, MSMB, PSCA, SPINK1, and TRPM8; and the kallikrein-related peptidase genes 2, 3, 4, and 15. Truly quantitative reverse-transcription PCR assays were developed for each of the genes for the purpose, time-resolved fluorometry was applied in the real-time detection of the amplification products, and the gene expression data were normalized by using artificial internal RNA standards. Cancer-related, statistically significant differences in gene transcript levels were found for TMPRSS2-ERG, PCA3, and in a more modest scale, for KLK15, PSCA, and SPINK1. PCA3 RNA was found in the blood of men with metastatic prostate cancer, but not in localized cases of cancer, suggesting limitations for using this method for early cancer detection in blood. TMPRSS2-ERG mRNA transcripts were found more frequently in cancerous than in benign prostate tissues, but they were present also in 51% of the histologically benign prostate tissues of men with prostate cancer, while being absent in specimens from men without any signs of prostate cancer. PCA3 was shown to be 5.8 times overexpressed in cancerous tissue, but similarly to the fusion gene mRNA, its levels were upregulated also in the histologically benign regions of the tissue if the corresponding prostate was harboring carcinoma. These results indicate a possibility to utilize these molecular assays to assist in prostate cancer risk evaluation especially in men with initially histologically negative biopsies.
Resumo:
Prostate cancer (PCa) has emerged as the most commonly diagnosed lethal cancer in European men. PCa is a heterogeneous cancer that in the majority of the cases is slow growing: consequently, these patients would not need any medical treatment. Currently, the measurement of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) from blood by immunoassay followed by digital rectal examination and a pathological examination of prostate tissue biopsies are the most widely used methods in the diagnosis of PCa. These methods suffer from a lack of sensitivity and specificity that may cause either missed cancers or overtreatment as a consequence of over-diagnosis. Therefore, more reliable biomarkers are needed for a better discrimination between indolent and potentially aggressive cancers. The aim of this thesis was the identification and validation of novel biomarkers for PCa. The mRNA expression level of 14 genes including AMACR, AR, PCA3, SPINK1, TMPRSS2-ERG, KLK3, ACSM1, CACNA1D, DLX1, LMNB1, PLA2G7, RHOU, SPON2, and TDRD1 was measured by a truly quantitative reverse transcription PCR in different prostate tissue samples from men with and without PCa. For the last eight genes the function of the genes in PCa progression was studied by a specific siRNA knockdown in PC-3 and VCaP cells. The results from radical prostatectomy and cystoprostatectomy samples showed statistically significant overexpression for all the target genes, except for KLK3 in men with PCa compared with men without PCa. Statistically significant difference was also observed in low versus high Gleason grade tumors (for PLA2G7), PSA relapse versus no relapse (for SPON2), and low versus high TNM stages (for CACNA1D and DLX1). Functional studies and siRNA silencing results revealed a cytotoxicity effect for the knock-down of DLX1, PLA2G7, and RHOU, and altered tumor cell invasion for PLA2G7, RHOU, ACSM1, and CACNA1D knock-down in 3D conditions. In addition, effects on tumor cell motility were observed after silencing PLA2G7 and RHOU in 2D monolayer cultures. Altogether, these findings indicate the possibility of utilizing these new markers as diagnostic and prognostic markers, and they may also represent therapeutic targets for PCa.
Resumo:
The identification of biomarkers capable of providing a reliable molecular diagnostic test for prostate cancer (PCa) is highly desirabie clinically. We describe here 4 biomarkers, UDP-N-Acetyl-alpha-D-galactosamine transferase (GalNAc-T3; not previously associated with PCa), PSMA, Hepsin and DD3/PCA3, which, in combination, distinguish prostate cancer from benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). GalNAc-T3 was identified as overexpressed in PCa tissues by microarray analysis, confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR and shown immunohistochemically to be localised to prostate epithelial cells with higher expression in malignant cells. Real-time quantitative PCR analysis across 21 PCa and 34 BPH tissues showed 4.6-fold overexpression of GalNAc-T3 (p = 0.005). The noncoding mRNA (DD3/PCA3) was overexpressed 140-fold (p = 0.007) in the cancer samples compared to BPH tissues. Hepsin was overexpressed 21-fold (p = 0.049, whereas the overexpression for PSMA was 66-fold (p = 0.047). When the gene expression data for these 4 biomarkers was combined in a logistic regression model, a predictive index was obtained that distinguished 100% of the PCa samples from all of the BPH samples. Therefore, combining these genes in a real-time PCR assay represents a powerful new approach to diagnosing PCa by molecular profiling. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Resumo:
Avec l’ère industrielle sont venus les polluants environnementaux. Ils sont de plus en plus pointés du doigt pour une variété d’effets indésirables en particulier pour leur potentiel à affecter la santé humaine. Les pesticides font partie de ces polluants et leurs usages ne font que croître depuis une vingtaine d’années. Ces produits qui servent à améliorer la production agricole en éliminant les pestes qui ravagent les récoltes sont souvent peu étudiés à long terme avant d’être homologués. L’effet perturbateur au niveau cellulaire et les effets à long terme de ces pesticides sont peu connus. Pour ce projet de maîtrise, nous avons observé l’effet de deux pesticides, l’imidaclopride et l’acide 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic (MCPA), sur les voies de signalisation du récepteur à la dioxine (AhR) et du récepteur aux androgènes (AR). L’imidaclopride est un insecticide de la famille des néonicotinoïdes, une classe de plus en plus utilisée. Ce pesticide est surtout connu pour être en lien avec le déclin des colonies d’abeilles depuis une décennie. Le MCPA est un des herbicides les plus utilisés au Québec, il est persistant et souvent retrouvé dans les eaux de la province. Nous avons traité des cellules du cancer du sein et des cellules du cancer de la prostate avec ces pesticides et nous avons vérifié si leur présence perturbait les deux voies de signalisation cellulaire à l’étude. Le récepteur AhR est un facteur de transcription activé par un ligand. Le TCDD, une dioxine, est le meilleur ligand exogène connu à ce jour de ce récepteur. Par contre, ses ligands naturels, des dérivés du tryptophane ou des facteurs de virulence de bactéries, l’activent de façon beaucoup moins forte. Lors de l’activation de la voie AhR, les gènes CYP1A1 et CYP1B1 sont transcrits et codent pour des enzymes du cytochrome P450 qui transforment les ligands en produits plus facilement éliminables. Dans un contexte où de l’œstradiol (E2) est présent dans les cellules, il y a une interaction croisée entre le récepteur à l’œstrogène (ER) et le récepteur AhR, qui fait en sorte que l’expression de CYP1A1 est réprimée. Cela se traduit en un ratio d’enzyme CYP1A1 à CYP1B1 différent qui pourrait augmenter la possibilité d’une accumulation de métabolites génotoxiques. En effet, CYP1B1 hydroxyle le ligand d’AhR mais aussi l’œstradiol en 4-hydroxyœstradiol (4-OHE), dont l’accumulation peut amener des mutations dans l’ADN alors que l’enzyme CYP1A1 l’hydroxyle en 2-hydroxyœstradiol (2-OHE), qui n’as aucun effet néfaste répertorié sur la cellule. Dans les cellules du cancer du sein, le MCPA appliqué en champs induisait fortement l’expression de CYP1B1 comparable à l’échantillon traité au témoin positif (TCDD), alors que CYP1A1 l’était que très légèrement par rapport au témoin non-traité. Au niveau protéique, CYP1A1 n’était qu’exprimée dans le témoin positif (TCDD) et ce, en quantité moindre lorsqu’il y avait présence d’œstradiol. CYP1B1 était fortement exprimée dans l’échantillon de TCDD, ce qui était attendu, mais aussi dans tous les échantillons traités au MCPA de NuFarm. Ces effets ne sont pas notés avec l’ingrédient actif du MCPA. La présence d’un ou plusieurs autres produits ajoutés dans le MCPA de la compagnie NuFarm en combinaison avec l’ingrédient actif pourrait activer la voie de signalisation d’AhR et causer ce débalancement dans l’expression des gènes CYP1A1 et CYP1B1. Nos résultats indiquent que plusieurs concentrations de l’ingrédient actif de l’imidaclopride ne perturbe pas les voies cellulaires d’AhR ni AR, alors que, le MCPA perturbe ces deux voies cellulaires. Par contre, c’est seulement celui produit par la compagnie NuFarm qui est utilisé en champs. Cette formulation appliquée en terrain agricole inclut l’ingrédient actif ainsi que les antigels, les surfactants et les adjuvants qui permettent au produit d’être plus efficace. L’ingrédient actif du MCPA seul n’affectait pas les deux voies. Le récepteur aux androgènes (AR) est aussi un facteur de transcription qui se lie à l’ADN afin de réguler l’expression des gènes et il est particulièrement important pour le développement et le maintien du phénotype masculin. Depuis une vingtaine d’années, des problèmes de baisse de libido et de fertilité s’accentuent dans notre société et semblent être reliés à la baisse de testostérone des hommes (Travison et al. 2007). Cette molécule est d’ailleurs un des deux ligands du récepteur AR, le deuxième étant la 5-dihydrotestostérone (DHT). Le facteur environnemental plutôt que le mode de vie semble être un facteur déterminant dans l’étude qui portait sur ce déclin. Les pesticides ont déjà été soupçonnés pour avoir un potentiel anti-androgénique, mais aucune étude ne fait un lien de causalité direct. Dans le projet de maitrise présenté dans ce document, l’expression des gènes marqueurs PSA (antigène spécifique de la prostate) et PCA3 (antigène du cancer de la prostate) a été quantifiée pour savoir si les pesticides ont un effet perturbateur sur la voie du récepteur AR. Dans les cellules du cancer de la prostate, l’expression de PSA et PCA3 était semblable au non-traité dans l’échantillon traité au MCPA (NuFarm), et ce, même après l’ajout de DHT, qui active l’expression de ces deux gènes. Cette fois-ci, l’ingrédient actif seul faisait en sorte que les deux gènes marqueurs étaient moins exprimés lors de l’ajout de la DHT, par rapport au témoin. Il semblerait que l’ingrédient actif est à la base de ce changement d’expression de nos gènes marqueurs. Donc, le MCPA pourrait avoir un effet anti-androgénique dans les cellules du cancer de la prostate. Donc, le MCPA est un pesticide qui affecte les voies de signalisation cellulaires AhR et AR. Il est particulier de noter que le pesticide appliqué en champ perturbe nettement plus les voies cellulaires. Il sera important de continuer à étudier les effets des pesticides sur l’homme au niveau cellulaire et de comprendre comment ils pourraient contribuer au développement du cancer.