Nurse-patient communication while performing home dialysis: The patients' perceptions

This study aimed at describing patients' perception of their communication with nurses when performing home dialysis. Data were collected from interviews guided by the question: What is communication like, between you and nurses, during home dialysis treatment? Results show participants' perception of treatment during home peritoneal dialysis [Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD)]; relationship with nurses and family and the effects of treatment on one's existence. Patients can be self-caring and they learn to value the autonomy in their own care. However, some are unable to assume the responsibility for self-care. It was discovered that the connotation of inspection that some participants attributed to the nurse's visits, led to an alienation from the education process in the CAPD education. Findings suggest that effective communication and the development of the relationship of a working partnership with patients is crucial. Improvement in the nurses' communication, aiming at adapting it to the characteristics, limitations and specific needs of each patient, is significant for achieving better outcomes. © 2010 European Dialysis and Transplant Nurses Association/European Renal Care Association.

Persuasive email messages for patient communication.

To improve health and reduce costs, we need to encourage patients to make better health care decisions. Since email is widely available, it may be useful for patient-directed interventions. However, we know little about how the contents of an email message can influence a health-related decision. We propose a model to understand how patients may process persuasive email messages.

Doctor-patient communication in the medical interaction: Context, implications, and practice

Effective communication; whether from an interpersonal, mass media, or global perspective, is a critical component in public health. It is an essential conduit in increasing public awareness of available health resources, potential health hazards and related disease prevention strategies, and in delivering better health care. Within this context, available literature asserts doctor-patient communication as central to healthcare delivery. It has been shown to affect patient health outcomes, satisfaction with care, adherence to treatment recommendations, and even understanding of medical information. While research supports the essential imperative of interventions aimed at teaching doctors and patients the communication skills necessary for a successful and meaningful medical interaction, most interventions to date, focus on teaching these communication skills to doctors and seem to rely, largely, on mass media for providing patients with the information needed to increase communication efficacy. This study sought to fill a significant gap in the doctor-patient communication literature by reviewing the context of the doctor-patient exchange in the medical interaction, the implications of this exchange in resulting care of the patient, and the potential improvements to practice through interventions aimed at improving the communication exchange. Closing with an evaluation of a patient-centered communication intervention, the “How to Talk to Your Doctor” (HTTTYD) program that combines previously identified optimal strategies for improving communication between doctors and patients, this study examined the patients’ perspective of their potential as better communicators in the medical interaction. ^ Specific Aims, Hypotheses or Questions (Aim I) To examine the context of health communication within a public health framework and its relation to health care delivery. (Aim II) To review doctor-patient communication as a central focus within health care delivery and the resulting implications to patient care. (Aim III) To assess the utility of interventions to improve doctor-patient communication. Specifically, to evaluate the effectiveness of a patient-centered community education intervention, the “How to Talk to Your Doctor” (HTTTYD) program, aimed at improving patient communication efficacy.^

Élaboration de critères de design pour un outil de communication médecin-patient

Le système de santé d'aujourd'hui fait appel à de nombreuses technologies de l'information nommées TIS (Technologies de l’Information en Santé). Celles-ci ont donné naissance à de nouvelles formes d’interaction médecin-patient et ont complexifié l'approche thérapeutique dite
« centrée sur le patient ». Les TIS promettent une plus grande efficacité et l’augmentation de la satisfaction des patients par le biais d’une meilleure compréhension de la maladie pour le patient. Or, elles peuvent également devenir des sources de conflit pour le professionnel de la santé, étant donné leur utilisation en dehors des rencontres cliniques ainsi que leur tendance à agir comme des barrières communicationnelles lors des consultations. Cette recherche vise a étudier les critères de design nécessaires à la conception d’un TIS pouvant améliorer la relation médecin-patient et donc, faciliter la communication et améliorer l’alliance thérapeutique. L’étude utilise une approche centrée sur l’utilisateur et vise donc à comprendre les besoins et les attentes des médecins et des patients. En étudiant les nouvelles approches en santé et les TIS, il a été possible de comprendre le contexte et les besoins des utilisateurs en terme de communication. Ces derniers sont primordiaux au processus dit centré sur l’utilisateur. Le faible taux de rétention du discours du médecin devient une barrière communicationnelle importante, tout comme le temps pressurisé. La recherche nous montre que l’ajout d’un outil virtuel de vulgarisation peut, à l’aide de média visuels (tel que des modélisations, des animations 3D et des dessins), grandement aider la relation médecin-patient.

Chemotherapy patient perception regarding communication with the healthcare staff

Purpose: To qualitatively explore the communication between healthcare professionals and oncology patients based on the perception of patients undergoing chemotherapy.Method: Qualitative and exploratory design. Participants were 14 adult patients undergoing chemotherapy at different stages of the disease. A socio-demographic and clinical data form was utilized along with semi-structured interviews. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and content analysis was performed. Two independent judges evaluated the interview content in regards to emerging categories and obtained a Kappa index of 0.834.Results: Three categories emerged from the data: 1) Technical communication without emotional support, in which the information provided is composed of strictly technical information regarding the diagnosis, treatment and/or prognosis; 2) Technical communication, in which the information provided is oriented towards the technical aspects of the patient’s physical condition, while also providing psychological support for the patients’ subjective needs; and 3) Insufficient technical communication, win which there are gaps in the information provided causing confusion and suffering to the patient.Conclusions: Communication with emotional support contributes to greater satisfaction of chemotherapy patients. Practical implications: the results provide elements for the training of healthcare professionals regarding the importance of the emotional support that can be offered to cancer patients during their treatment.

Communication skills training and clinicians' defenses in oncology: an exploratory, controlled study.

Objective: The underlying mechanisms modifying clinician's communication skills by means of communication skills training (CST) remain unknown. Defense mechanisms, defined as psychological processes protecting the individual against emotional stress, may be a mediating factor of skills improvement.Methods: Using an adapted version of the Defense Mechanism Rating Scale-Clinician, this study evaluated clinicians' defense mechanisms and their possible modification after CST. Interviews with simulated patients of oncology clinicians (N=57) participating in CST (pre-/post-CST with a 6-month interval) were compared WITH interviews with the same simulated patients of oncology clinicians (N=56) who did not undergo training (T1 and T2 with a 6-month interval).Results: Results showed (i) a high number (mean=16, SD=6) and variety of defenses triggered by the 15-min interviews, (ii) no evolution difference between groups, and (iii) an increase in mature defenses after CST for clinicians with an initial higher level of defensive functioning.Conclusions: This is the first study describing clinicians' defensive functioning; results indicate a possible mediating role of defenses in clinician-patient communication.

[The deaf patient--information for a barrier-free conversation with patients in dentistry]

There are about 650,000 people with hearing problems in Switzerland, 10,000 of whom use sign language. About 100,000 people are hard of hearing. Deaf patients require special treatment in the dental office as they have specific communication needs. This community, like many other minority groups, has a sign language and a culture of its own. To prevent misunderstandings it is therefore very important to provide solutions for an enhanced communication. However, guidelines for the communication with deaf dental patients are still missing. Successful communication between deaf patients and dentist is essential for effective care. This paper is concerned with providing background information and introducing recommendations for unrestricted dentist-patient communication. The aim of this article is to improve dentists' knowledge of the appropriate communication with this patient group.

The Patient Informatics Consult Service (PICS): an approach for a patient-centered service

The Patient Informatics Consult Service (PICS) at the Eskind Biomedical Library at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) provides patients with consumer-friendly information by using an information prescription mechanism. Clinicians refer patients to the PICS by completing the prescription and noting the patient's condition and any relevant factors. In response, PICS librarians critically appraise and summarize consumer-friendly materials into a targeted information report. Copies of the report are given to both patient and clinician, thus facilitating doctor-patient communication and closing the clinician-librarian feedback loop. Moreover, the prescription form also circumvents many of the usual barriers for patients in locating information, namely, patients' unfamiliarity with medical terminology and lack of knowledge of authoritative sources. PICS librarians capture the time and expertise put into these reports by creating Web-based pathfinders on prescription topics. Pathfinders contain librarian-created disease overviews and links to authoritative resources and seek to minimize the consumer's exposure to unreliable information. Pathfinders also adhere to strict guidelines that act as a model for locating, appraising, and summarizing information for consumers. These mechanisms—the information prescription, research reports, and pathfinders—serve as steps toward the long-term goal of full integration of consumer health information into patient care at VUMC.

Doctor-Patient Knowledge Transfer: Innovative Technologies and Policy Implications

The aim of this study was to empirically investigate the barriers in doctor-patient communication and knowledge transfer and the role of innovative technologies in overcoming these barriers. We applied qualitative research methods. Our results show that patients extensively use information sources, primarily the Internet before the visits. Patients regularly apply a self-diagnosis regarding their diseases. This implies several risks as many of them are not able to properly interpret the found information and at the same time the information might not be reliable. To overcome these risks efforts are required within the fields of technology developments for making web sites more reliable and improvement of the health culture of patients, as well. Our research identified the most significant barriers of doctor-patient communication including limited time, the patients’ distress, inadequate health culture and prior knowledge, as well as poor communication skills of some clinicians. Technology might help clinicians to use their limited time more effectively. In the long term, innovative technology solutions might take over some tasks of the health care personnel if they provide reliable health information adapted to the patient’s health, emotional and psychosocial status. Barriers of access to the new technology should be identified and addressed otherwise it would increase the already existing knowledge gap between patients and doctors.

Challenges and Recommendations for Placebo Controls in Randomized Trials in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine A Report of the International Placebo Symposium Working Group

Compared with other specialties, the field of physical and rehabilitation medicine has not received the deserved recognition from clinicians and researchers in the scientific community. One of the reasons is the lack of sound evidence to support the traditional physical and rehabilitation medicine treatments. The best way to change this disadvantage is through a well conducted clinical research, such as standard placebo- or sham-controlled randomized clinical trials. Therefore, having placebo groups in clinical trials is essential to improve the level of evidence-based practice in physical and rehabilitation medicine that ultimately translates to better clinical care. To address the challenges for the use of placebo in physical and rehabilitation medicine and randomized clinical trials and to create useful recommendations, we convened a working group during the inaugural International Symposium in Placebo (February 2009, in Sao Paulo, Brazil) in which the following topics were discussed: (1) current status of randomized clinical trials in physical and rehabilitation medicine, (2) challenges for the use of placebo in physical and rehabilitation medicine, (3) bioethics, (4) use of placebo in acupuncture trials and for the treatment of low-back pain, (5) mechanisms of placebo, and (6) insights from other specialties. The current article represents the consensus report from the working group.

A randomized control trial of nursing-based case management for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

This study assessed the impact of a randomized trial of nursing-based case management for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, their caregivers, and nursing and medical staff. Sixty-six patients were matched by FEV1 on admission to hospital, and randomized into an intervention or control group. Intervention group patients reported significantly less anxiety at 1 month postdischarge; however, this effect was not sustained. There was little difference between groups in terms of unplanned readmissions, depression, symptoms, support, and subjective well being. Interviews with patients and caregivers found that the case management improved access to resources and staff-patient communication. Interviews with nursing and medical staff found that case management improved communication between staff and enhanced patient care.

A literacia em saúde: investimento na promoção da saúde e na racionalização de custos

A Organização Mundial da Saúde define a literacia em saúde como o conjunto de competências cognitivas e sociais e a capacidade dos indivíduos para compreenderem e usarem informação para a promoção e manutenção da saúde. A transmissão de informação sobre saúde é mais eficaz quando os seus conteúdos são especificamente desenhados para uma pessoa ou para um grupo populacional e quando a mensagem é bem delimitada, realçando os benefícios (ganhos) e os custos (perdas) associados aos comportamentos e às tomadas de decisão. Analisa-se, neste estudo, o conceito de literacia em saúde e a associação da baixa literacia em saúde aos comportamentos em saúde e aos gastos em saúde. Apresenta-se uma análise da literatura científica publicada sobre a baixa literacia em saúde e a sua implicação nos custos na saúde usando, para este objectivo, uma base de dados das ciências da saúde (MEDLINE/PubMed) e quatro plataformas científicas (DOAJ, SCOPUS, SciELO e Web of Science). A literatura científica analisada evidencia que pessoas com baixa literacia em saúde apresentam uma menor capacidade de compreensão dos conteúdos de material informativo sobre alimentos, doenças crónicas ou sobre o uso de medicamentos, por exemplo, bem como maior dificuldade em pesquisar, seleccionar, ler e assimilar a informação em saúde disponível na Internet. A baixa literacia em saúde relaciona-se, então. com a dificuldade na prevenção e na gestão de problemas de saúde, bem como com comportamentos ineficazes de saúde, i.e., com o uso inadequado de medicamentos, com o recurso excessivo aos serviços de saúde (em especial, os de urgências) ou com a ineficácia em lidar com situações de emergência. A baixa literacia está também associada a taxas de hospitalização mais altas, mas também mais longas no tempo (o que implica mais custos associados a internamento prolongado, mais exames de diagnóstico e fraca adesão à terapêutica medicamentosa), a uma diminuição da utilização de medidas preventivas e a uma fraca adesão à prescrição terapêutica. A baixa literacia acaba por afectar igualmente a comunicação (e a relação) médico-doente. Apresentam-se, como complemento, sugestões de melhoria da literacia em saúde e da comunicação médico-doente para efeitos da promoção da saúde.

Relevância da assertividade na comunicação profissional de saúde-paciente

Actualmente existem evidências suficientes sobre os problemas de comunicação entre profissionais de saúde e pacientes e os benefícios de uma comunicação eficaz. Alguns autores chegam mesmo a considerar a comunicação como a ferramenta mais importante nos cuidados de saúde. Desde o início dos anos 90, as escolas médicas têm aumentado o interesse no ensino de competências comunicacionais; contudo, e não obstante este interesse crescente, a comunicação assertiva parece ser votada ao esquecimento. Na verdade, enquanto a assertividade tem recebido atenção crescente na literatura da Psicologia, os profissionais de saúde têm-se mostrado relutantes em aderir a esta área do saber, sendo os treinos assertivos para cuidadores ainda muito escassos. O objectivo deste trabalho é apresentar uma visão geral da assertividade e dos contributos desta para a comunicação eficaz dos profissionais de saúde com os pacientes e apontar seis temáticas específicas (por exemplo, lidar com reacções emocionais excessivas; elaborar pedidos) que devem integrar os treinos de comunicação para estudantes da área da saúde e profissionais de saúde.

Ensino de competências comunicacionais em estudantes e profissionais de saúde: situação atual e perspectivas

É hoje largamente aceite que a promoção da relação profissional de saúde-paciente conduz ao incremento na qualidade dos cuidados de saúde. A investigação sobre os benefícios da comunicação eficaz levou mesmo alguns autores a considerar a comunicação como a ferramenta mais importante na prestação de saúde. Como consequência, desde o início dos anos 90, as escolas médicas, principalmente do mundo ocidental, têm aumentado o interesse no ensino de competências comunicacionais. Este trabalho partiu da pesquisa bibliografia realizada através da B-on. As palavras-chave utilizadas foram: comunicação profissional de saúde-doente, treino de competências comunicacionais, estudantes e saúde. A análise dos diversos programas de treino de competências comunicacionais, destinados a estudantes e profissionais de saúde permitiu constatar que existe uma enorme variabilidade e falta de consistência nos vários programas de treino atualmente disponíveis. A maioria dos estudos incluía informação insuficiente sobre as competências comunicacionais a ensinar aos participantes. Face à situação atual, são apontadas algumas diretrizes para o futuro do ensino destas competências ao nível do ensino pré e pós-graduado na área da saúde.