998 resultados para Osborne


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

When I arrived in Queensland's capital in 1996, Brisbane was commonly referred to as an 'overgrown country town'. This might have been an acceptable description in the 1990s, but it cannot be applied any longer. Brisbane, affectionaly referred to by the locals as Bris-Vegas, has now come of age. Following Sydney and Melbourne, Brisbane is the third most populous city in Australia with a population of approximately two million. Interestingly, the 2006 Census showed that 22 per cent of Brisbane's population was born overseas, the three main countries of birth being the UK, New Zealand and South Africa. Brisbane City is centred on its most dominant environmental element, the Brisbane River, which effectively carves Brisbane into two areas - the Northside and the Southside. The 2001 addition of Cox Rayner's Goodwill Pedestrian and Cycle Bridge signified Brisbane's acceptance and affectionate embrace of its River resulting in a long overdue linage between Brisbane's North and South. It connects the City's key precincts - the Northside CBD through Queensland University of Technology (QUT), across Brisbane River, to the recreational precinct of the Southside Southbank Parklands. The Southside cultural precinct of Southbank is the home to Queensland's Art Gallery, Performing Arts Complex, State Library and Museum -each of which were designed by Brisbane Stalwart Architect Robin Gibson, in the 1970s and '80s. The CBD component of the Brisbane River is flanked by a number of Institutional Facilities, including the campuses of QUT, Griffith University and the Southbank Education and Training Precinct (SETP), which combine to form a cross-river educational precinct. The past decade has born witness to a city which has keenly supported emerging architects in addition to the more entrenched stalwarts of the profession, resulting in a youthful, relaxed and unpretentious sub-tropical city. Viva Bris-Vegas!

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Estimate for A. Cook of work done on marsh lands main drain including work done by Mr. Clancy and Rose Osborne. This is signed by Fred Holmes, March 1857.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Time on marsh lands for the months of January, February, March and April for Fred Holmes, Joseph Simpson, Duncan Davidson, Rose Osborne, Henry Wilson and William Baird. This is signed by Fred Holmes, April 28, 1857.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Estimate for A. Cook for the excavation of the marsh lands main drain during the month of July for A. Cook and Rose Osborne. This was sent to S.D. Woodruff by Fred Holmes, July 27, 1857.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Estimate for A. Cook for marsh lands main drain for the month of Sept. Also included is a list of labourers’ time for the month of September for A. Cook and Rose Osborne. This is signed by Fred Holmes, Sept. 26, 1857.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Estimate for A. Cook for marsh lands main drain for the month of Sept. Also included is a list of labourers’ time for the month of October for A. Cook’s men and Rose Osborne. This is signed by Fred Holmes, Oct. 27, 1857.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Engineer services in marsh lands drainage for the months of July, August and September, 1856 to Fred Holmes, Joseph Simpson, Thomas Baird and Rose Osborne. This is signed by S.D. Woodruff, Oct. 1, 1856.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Engineering services in marsh lands drainage for the months of January, February, March and April for Fred Holmes, Joseph Simpson, D. Davidson, Rose Osborne, Henry Wilson and William Baird. This is signed by S.D. Woodruff, May 1, 1857.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

It has been more than lOO years since the leading case on mutual wills was handed down in Dufour v Pereira. Despite the passage of time. there continues to be a comparative dearth of modern authority), on this type of will. This area of the law was. however. recently considered by the Victorian Court of Appeal in Osborne. This case note evaluates Osborne in light of the relevant grounds of appeal. It is ultimately concluded that Osborne was very much a lost opportunity. The grounds of appeal raised many key issues pertaining to both the substantive law and evidential aspects of mutual wills. However the Court of Appeal did not take the opportunity to articulate clearly its views of the relevant law.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Signatur des Originals: S 36/F05038

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Signatur des Originals: S 36/F09001

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Signatur des Originals: S 36/F09002