Endocytosis Of Tight Junctions Caveolin Nitrosylation Dependent Is Improved By Cocoa Via Opioid Receptor On Rpe Cells In Diabetic Conditions.

Retinal pigment epithelium cells, along with tight junction (TJ) proteins, constitute the outer blood retinal barrier (BRB). Contradictory findings suggest a role for the outer BRB in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy (DR). The aim of this study was to investigate whether the mechanisms involved in these alterations are sensitive to nitrosative stress, and if cocoa or epicatechin (EC) protects from this damage under diabetic (DM) milieu conditions. Cells of a human RPE line (ARPE-19) were exposed to high-glucose (HG) conditions for 24 hours in the presence or absence of cocoa powder containing 0.5% or 60.5% polyphenol (low-polyphenol cocoa [LPC] and high-polyphenol cocoa [HPC], respectively). Exposure to HG decreased claudin-1 and occludin TJ expressions and increased extracellular matrix accumulation (ECM), whereas levels of TNF-α and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) were upregulated, accompanied by increased nitric oxide levels. This nitrosative stress resulted in S-nitrosylation of caveolin-1 (CAV-1), which in turn increased CAV-1 traffic and its interactions with claudin-1 and occludin. This cascade was inhibited by treatment with HPC or EC through δ-opioid receptor (DOR) binding and stimulation, thereby decreasing TNF-α-induced iNOS upregulation and CAV-1 endocytosis. The TJ functions were restored, leading to prevention of paracellular permeability, restoration of resistance of the ARPE-19 monolayer, and decreased ECM accumulation. The detrimental effects on TJs in ARPE-19 cells exposed to DM milieu occur through a CAV-1 S-nitrosylation-dependent endocytosis mechanism. High-polyphenol cocoa or EC exerts protective effects through DOR stimulation.

The intrinsic antinociceptive effects of oxycodone appear to be kappa-opioid receptor mediated

Our previous studies in the Sprague-Dawley rat showed that the intrinsic antinociceptive effects of oxycodone are naloxone reversible in a manner analogous to morphine but that in contrast to morphine, oxycodone's antinociceptive effects have a rapid onset of maximum effect (approximate to 5-7 min compared to 30-45 min for morphine), comprise one antinociceptive phase (compared to two phases) and are of relatively short duration (approximate to 90 min compared to approximate to 180 min). In the present study, administration of a range of selective opioid receptor antagonists has shown that the intrinsic antinociceptive effects of oxycodone (171 nmol) are not attenuated by i.c.v. administration of (i) naloxonazine, a mu(1)-selective opioid receptor antagonist, or (ii) naltrindole, a delta-selective opioid receptor antagonist, in doses that completely attenuated the intrinsic antinociceptive effects of equipotent doses of the respective mu- and delta-opioid agonists, morphine and enkephalin-[D-Pen(2,5)] (DPDPE). Although beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FNA) attenuated the antinociceptive effects of oxycodone (171 nmol i.c.v.), it also attenuated the antinociceptive effects of morphine and bremazocine (kappa-opioid agonist) indicative of non-selective antagonism. Importantly, the antinociceptive effects of oxycodone (171 nmol i.c.v.) were markedly attenuated by the prior i.c.v. administration of the selective kappa-opioid receptor antagonist, norbinaltorphimine (nor-BNI), in a dose (0.3 nmol) that did not attenuate the antinociceptive effects of an equipotent dose of i.c.v. morphine (78 nmol). Taken together, these data strongly suggest that the intrinsic antinociceptive effects of oxycodone are mediated by K-opioid receptors, in contrast to morphine which interacts primarily with mu-opioid receptors. (C) 1997 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

15d-prostaglandin J(2) inhibits inflammatory hypernociception: Involvement of peripheral opioid receptor

The 15-deoxy-Delta(12,14)-prostaglandin J(2) (15d-PGJ(2)) is an endogenous ligand of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors gamma (PPAR-gamma) and is now recognized as a potent anti-inflammatory mediator. However, information regarding the influence of 15d-PGJ(2) on inflammatory pain is still unknown. In this study, we evaluated the effect of 15d-PGJ(2) upon inflammatory hypernociception and the mechanisms involved in this effect. We observed that intraplantar administration of 15d-PGJ(2) (30-300 ng/paw) inhibits the mechanical hypernociception induced by both carrageenan (100 mu g/paw) and the directly acting hypernociceptive mediator, prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)). Moreover, 15d-PGJ(2) [100 ng/temporomandibular joint (TMJ)] inhibits formalininduced TMJ hypernociception. On the other hand, the direct administration of 15d-PGJ(2) into the dorsal root ganglion was ineffective in blocking PGE(2)- induced hypernociception. In addition, the 15d-PGJ(2) antinociceptive effect was enhanced by the increase of macrophage population in paw tissue due to local injection of thioglycollate, suggesting the involvement of these cells on the 15d-PGJ(2)-antinociceptive effect. Moreover, the antinociceptive effect of 15d-PGJ(2) was also blocked by naloxone and by the PPAR-gamma antagonist 2-chloro-5-nitro-N-phenylbenzamide (GW9662), suggesting the involvement of peripheral opioids and PPAR-gamma receptor in the process. Similar to opioids, the 15d-PGJ(2) antinociceptive action depends on the nitric oxide/cGMP/protein kinase G (PKG)/K-ATP(+) channel pathway because it was prevented by the pretreatment with the inhibitors of nitric-oxide synthase (N-G-monomethyl-L-arginine acetate), guanylate cyclase] 1H-(1,2,4)-oxadiazolo(4,2-alpha) quinoxalin-1- one[, PKG [indolo[2,3-a]pyrrolo[3,4-c]carbazole aglycone (KT5823)], or with the ATP-sensitive potassium channel blocker glibenclamide. Taken together, these results demonstrate for the first time that 15d-PGJ(2) inhibits inflammatory hypernociception via PPAR-gamma activation. This effect seems to be dependent on endogenous opioids and local macrophages.

Transcriptional modulation of mouse mu-opioid receptor distal promoter activity by Sox18

Previously, we reported the presence of dual promoters, referred to as distal (DP) and proximal, with a negative regulatory element between them in the mouse mu -opioid receptor (mor) gene. Here we have identified a positive regulatory element influencing mor DP transcription, which contains multiple consensus binding motifs for Sox factors (sex-determining Sry-like high mobility group box-containing genes). In gel supershift assays, the Sox family member Sox18 bound directly to the multiple Sox consensus binding motifs of the mor DP enhancer. Overexpression of Sox18 cDNA increased luciferase activity regulated by the mor DP, and did so in a Sox18 concentration-dependent manner. In contrast, overexpression of another Sox member, Sox5, triggered no such trans-activation of mor DP-driven luciferase activity or DNA-protein binding activity. These results suggest that Sox18 directly and specifically stimulates mor gene expression, by trans-activating the mor DP enhancer.

Modulation of [My]-opioid receptor signal transduction and endocytosis by ADP-ribosylation factor proteins

Magdeburg, Univ., Fak. für Naturwiss., Diss., 2010

The Role of Skin Opioid Receptor System in Itch

Opioid receptors are key players in induction of chronic itch. This could be confirmed using opiate receptor knockout mice experiments and clinical studies on patients with chronic itch. We have induced a dry skin dermatitis as a model for chronic itching on -(MOR) and -(KOR) opioid receptor knockout (KO) mice. MOR KO mice scratched significantly less than wild type (WT). Additionally the epidermal hypertrophy caused by chronic dermatitis and the amount of epidermal nerve endings in MOR KO mice were significantly decreased than in WT mice. KOR KO mice showed similar scratching behavior as MOR KO mice; however the changes were less significant. In addition, we performed a double blind, placebo controlled, cross over study using topically applied opioid receptor antagonist, Naltrexone, on patients with pruritus in atopic dermatitis. The results revealed significant effects of the topical application of Naltrexone in patients with chronic pruritus (45% improvement of pruritus by VAS compared to placebo, n=24), but not in patients with acute pruritus (7%, n=15). These studies establish the clinical relevance of MOR system and the peripheral, epidermal nerve endings in chronic pruritus and warrant further research and therapeutic potential for such research.

Attenuation of nicotine-induced antinociception, rewarding effects, and dependence in mu-opioid receptor knock-out mice

The involvement of μ-opioid receptors in different behavioral responses elicited by nicotine was explored by using μ-opioid receptor knock-out mice. The acute antinociceptive responses induced by nicotine in the tail-immersion and hot-plate tests were reduced in the mutant mice, whereas no difference between genotypes was observed in the locomotor responses. The rewarding effects induced by nicotine were then investigated using the conditioning place-preference paradigm. Nicotine produced rewarding responses in wild-type mice but failed to produce place preference in knock-out mice, indicating the inability of this drug to induce rewarding effects in the absence of μ-opioid receptors. Finally, the somatic expression of the nicotine withdrawal syndrome, precipitated in dependent mice by the injection of mecamylamine, was evaluated. Nicotine withdrawal was significantly attenuated in knock-out mutants when compared with wild-type mice. In summary, the present results show that μ-opioid receptors are involved in the rewarding responses induced by nicotine and participate in its antinociceptive responses and the expression of nicotine physical dependence.

Activity of the δ-Opioid Receptor Is Partially Reduced, Whereas Activity of the κ-Receptor Is Maintained in Mice Lacking the μ-Receptor

Previous pharmacological studies have indicated the possible existence of functional interactions between μ-, δ- and κ-opioid receptors in the CNS. We have investigated this issue using a genetic approach. Here we describe in vitro and in vivo functional activity of δ- and κ-opioid receptors in mice lacking the μ-opioid receptor (MOR). Measurements of agonist-induced [35S]GTPγS binding and adenylyl cyclase inhibition showed that functional coupling of δ- and κ-receptors to G-proteins is preserved in the brain of mutant mice. In the mouse vas deferens bioassay, deltorphin II and cyclic[d-penicillamine2,d-penicillamine5] enkephalin exhibited similar potency to inhibit smooth muscle contraction in both wild-type and MOR −/− mice. δ-Analgesia induced by deltorphin II was slightly diminished in mutant mice, when the tail flick test was used. Deltorphin II strongly reduced the respiratory frequency in wild-type mice but not in MOR −/− mice. Analgesic and respiratory responses produced by the selective κ-agonist U-50,488H were unchanged in MOR-deficient mice. In conclusion, the preservation of δ- and κ-receptor signaling properties in mice lacking μ-receptors provides no evidence for opioid receptor cross-talk at the cellular level. Intact antinociceptive and respiratory responses to the κ-agonist further suggest that the κ-receptor mainly acts independently from the μ-receptor in vivo. Reduced δ-analgesia and the absence of δ-respiratory depression in MOR-deficient mice together indicate that functional interactions may take place between μ-receptors and central δ-receptors in specific neuronal pathways.

Motivational effects of cannabinoids are mediated by μ-opioid and k-opioid receptor

Repeated THC administration produces motivational and somaticadaptive changes leading to dependence in rodents. Toinvestigate the molecular basis for cannabinoid dependenceand its possible relationship with the endogenous opioid system,we explored Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) activity in mice lacking μ-, δ- or κ-opioid receptor genes. Acute THCinduced hypothermia, antinociception, and ypolocomotion remained unaffected in these mice, whereas THC tolerance and withdrawal were minimally modified in mutant animals. In contrast, profound phenotypic changes are observed in several place conditioning protocols that reveal both THC rewarding and aversive properties. Absence of μ receptors abolishes THC place preference. Deletion of κ receptors ablates THC place aversion and furthermore unmasks THC place preference. Thus, an opposing activity of μ- and κ-opioid receptors in modulating reward pathways forms the basis for the dual euphoric–dysphoric activity of THC.

Deletion of delta-opioid receptor in mice alters skin differentiation and delays wound healing.

In addition to their well-known antinociceptive action, opioids can modulate non-neuronal functions, such as immune activity and physiology of different cell types. Several findings suggest that the delta-opioid receptor (DOR) and its endogenous ligands (enkephalins) are important players in cell differentiation and proliferation. Here we show the expression of DOR in mouse skin and human skin cultured fibroblasts and keratinocytes using RT-PCR. In DOR knock-out (KO) mice, a phenotype of thinner epidermis and higher expression of cell differentiation marker cytokeratin 10 (CK 10) were observed compared with wild type (WT). Using a burn wound model, significant wound healing delay (about 2 days) and severe epidermal hypertrophy were shown at the wound margin of DOR KO mice. This wound healing delay was further investigated by immunohistochemistry using markers for proliferation, differentiation, re-epithelialization, and dermal repair (CK 6, CK 10, and collagen IV). The levels of all these markers were increased in wounds of KO mice compared with WT. During the wound healing, the epidermal thickness in KO mice augments faster and exceeds that of the WT by day 3. These results suggest an essential role of DOR in skin differentiation, proliferation, and migration, factors that are important for wound healing.

The δ-Opioid Receptor Affects Epidermal Homeostasis via ERK-Dependent Inhibition of Transcription Factor POU2F3.

Neuropeptides and their receptors are present in human skin, and their importance for cutaneous homeostasis and during wound healing is increasingly appreciated. However, there is currently a lack of understanding of the molecular mechanisms by which their signaling modulates keratinocyte function. Here, we show that δ-opioid receptor (DOPr) activation inhibits proliferation of human keratinocytes, resulting in decreased epidermal thickness in an organotypic skin model. DOPr signaling markedly delayed induction of keratin intermediate filament (KRT10) during in vitro differentiation and abolished its induction in the organotypic skin model. This was accompanied by deregulation of involucrin (IVL), loricrin, and filaggrin. Analysis of the transcription factor POU2F3, which is involved in regulation of KRT10, IVL, and profilaggrin expression, revealed a DOPr-mediated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-dependent downregulation of this factor. We propose that DOPr signaling specifically activates the ERK 1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway to regulate keratinocyte functions. Complementing our earlier studies in DOPr-deficient mice, these data suggest that DOPr activation in human keratinocytes profoundly influences epidermal morphogenesis and homeostasis.

The role of the δ-opioid receptor in skin homeostasis and wound healing

Au regard des agressions environnementales constantes que la peau doit endurer, l'équilibre fragile entre l'expression et la répression des gènes épidermiques, nécessaire à la différentiation et la prolifération des kératinocytes, pourrait facilement être perturbé en l'absence des mécanismes de stabilisation robustes. La présence d'un système neuroendocrinien local est donc importante afin de coordonner une réponse aux éventuelles irritations. En effet, l'expression de plusieurs neurohormones, des neurotransmetteurs et des neuropeptides, y compris des dérivés pro-opiomélanocortine comme la ß-endorphine et [Met5]-enképhaline, ainsi que l'expression du récepteur 8-opioïde (DOR) a été démontré dans la peau. Cependant, les mécanismes moléculaires par lesquels ils modulent la fonction des kératinocytes sont mal connus. Le présent travail démontre que la voie de signalisation DOR active spécifiquement la voie ERK 1/2 MAPK dans les lignées cellulaires de kératinocytes humains, inhibant la prolifération des cellules et entraîne une diminution de l'épaisseur épidermique dans un modèle organotypique de peau. De plus, l'expression de DOR retarde nettement l'induction de la kératine 10 (KRT 10) et la kératine 1 (KRT 1) dans une modèle 2D de différentiation in vitro, et supprime l'induction de KRT 10 dans un modèle organotypique de peau. Ceci est accompagné de la dérégulation de l'involucrine (IVL), la loricrine (LOR) et la fïlaggrin (FLG), résultant en une induction nettement réduite de leur expression lors de l'initiation de la différentiation in vitro. De plus, POU2F3 a été identifié comme un facteur de transcription régulant les gènes de différentiation des kératinocytes modulés par DOR. Il a été démontré que la régulation négative de POU2F3 via la voie DOR-ERK affecte les principaux aspects de la fonction des kératinocytes. Toutefois, il est évident que des facteurs supplémentaires influencent la fonctionnalité de la voie DOR elle-même. Le calcium et le contact cellule-cellule augmentent la quantité des récepteurs à la surface cellulaire des kératinocytes. Les kératinocytes dont les récepteurs sont internalisés ne répondent pas de la même manière que ceux possédant des récepteurs fonctionnels localisée à la membrane. Ce travail suggère que lors de signaux intrinsèques ou extrinsèques spécifiques, les kératinocytes sont capable de répondre via le système opioïdergique neuro-epidermique. Cette réponse doit être spatialement et temporairement contrôlée afin d'éviter un déséquilibre de l'homéostasie épidermique et un retard de cicatrisation. La compréhension de ce processus très complexe pourrait permettre à terme le développement de meilleurs traitements des affections cutanées pathologiques. En complément des études précédentes sur des souris DOR-défïcientes, ces données suggèrent que l'activation de DOR dans les kératinocytes humains influence la morphogenèse et l'homéostasie de l'épiderme, et pourrait jouer un rôle lors du processus de cicatrisation. - In view of the constant environmental assaults that the skin must endure, the delicate balance of an eloquent sequence of epidermal gene expression and repression, that is required for appropriate differentiation and proliferation of keratinocytes, might easily become derailed in the absence of robust stabilizing mechanisms. The presence of a local neuroendocrine system is thereby important to coordinate a response towards irritations. In fact, the expression of several neurohormones, neurotransmitters, and neuropeptides, including proopiomelanocortin derivatives, such as ß- endorphin and [Met5]-enkephalin has been shown in skin, as well as expression of the 6-opioid receptor (DOR). However, there is currently a lack of understanding of the molecular mechanisms by which their signalling modulates keratinocyte function. The present work demonstrates that DOR signalling specifically activates the ERK 1/2 MAPK pathway in human keratinocyte cell lines. This activation inhibits cell proliferation, resulting in decreased epidermal thickness in an organotypic skin model. Furthermore, DOR expression markedly delays induction of keratin intermediate filament Keratin 10 (KRT 10) and KRT 1 during in vitro differentiation, and abolishes the induction of KRT 10 in the organotypic skin model. This is accompanied by deregulation of involucrin (IVL), loricrin (LOR), and filaggrin (FLG), illustrated by a markedly reduced induction of their expression upon initiation of differentiation in vitro. Additionally, POU2F3 was identified as a transcription factor mediating the DOR induced regulation of keratinocyte differentiation related genes. It was revealed that DOR-mediated ERK-dependent downregulation of this factor affects key aspects of keratinocyte function. However, it is evident that additional triggers influence the functionality of the DOR itself. Calcium at concentrations above 0.1 mM and cell-cell contact both enhance the presence of receptor molecules on the keratinocytes cell surface. Keratinocytes with internalized receptor do not respond to DOR ligands in the same way as keratinocytes with a functional membrane localized receptor.

Endogenous opioid peptide-mediated neurotransmission in central and pericentral nuclei of the inferior colliculus recruits mu(1)-opioid receptor to modulate post-ictal antinociception

Background: The aim of the present work was to investigate the involvement of the mu(1)-endogenous opioid peptide receptor-mediated system in post-ictal antinociception. Methods: Antinociceptive responses were determined by the tail-flick test after pre-treatment with the selective mu(1)-opioid receptor antagonist naloxonazine, peripherally or centrally administered at different doses. Results: Peripheral subchronic (24 h) pre-treatment with naloxonazine antagonised the antinociception elicited by tonic-clonic seizures. Acute (10 min) pre-treatment, however, did not have the same effect. In addition, microinjections of naloxonazine into the central, dorsal cortical and external cortical nuclei of the inferior colliculus antagonised tonic-clonic seizure-induced antinociception. Neither acute (10-min) peripheral pre-treatment with naloxonazine nor subchronic intramesencephalic blockade of mu(1)-opioid receptors resulted in consistent statistically significant differences in the severity of tonic-clonic seizures shown by Racine's index (1972), although the intracollicular specific antagonism of mu(1)-opioid receptor decreased the duration of seizures. Conclusion: mu(1)-Opioid receptors and the inferior colliculus have been implicated in several endogenous opioid peptide-mediated responses such as antinociception and convulsion. The present findings suggest the involvement of mu(1)-opiate receptors of central and pericentral nuclei of the inferior colliculus in the modulation of tonic-clonic seizures and in the organisation of post-ictal antinociception. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Transcriptional regulation of human mu-opioid receptor gene: functional characterization of activating and inhibitory transcription factors

The organization of the nervous and immune systems is characterized by obvious differences and striking parallels. Both systems need to relay information across very short and very long distances. The nervous system communicates over both long and short ranges primarily by means of more or less hardwired intercellular connections, consisting of axons, dendrites, and synapses. Longrange communication in the immune system occurs mainly via the ordered and guided migration of immune cells and systemically acting soluble factors such as antibodies, cytokines, and chemokines. Its short-range communication either is mediated by locally acting soluble factors or transpires during direct cell–cell contact across specialized areas called “immunological synapses” (Kirschensteiner et al., 2003). These parallels in intercellular communication are complemented by a complex array of factors that induce cell growth and differentiation: these factors in the immune system are called cytokines; in the nervous system, they are called neurotrophic factors. Neither the cytokines nor the neurotrophic factors appear to be completely exclusive to either system (Neumann et al., 2002). In particular, mounting evidence indicates that some of the most potent members of the neurotrophin family, for example, nerve growth factor (NGF) and brainderived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), act on or are produced by immune cells (Kerschensteiner et al., 1999) There are, however, other neurotrophic factors, for example the insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), that can behave similarly (Kermer et al., 2000). These factors may allow the two systems to “cross-talk” and eventually may provide a molecular explanation for the reports that inflammation after central nervous system (CNS) injury has beneficial effects (Moalem et al., 1999). In order to shed some more light on such a cross-talk, therefore, transcription factors modulating mu-opioid receptor (MOPr) expression in neurons and immune cells are here investigated. More precisely, I focused my attention on IGF-I modulation of MOPr in neurons and T-cell receptor induction of MOPr expression in T-lymphocytes. Three different opioid receptors [mu (MOPr), delta (DOPr), and kappa (KOPr)] belonging to the G-protein coupled receptor super-family have been cloned. They are activated by structurallyrelated exogenous opioids or endogenous opioid peptides, and contribute to the regulation of several functions including pain transmission, respiration, cardiac and gastrointestinal functions, and immune response (Zollner and Stein 2007). MOPr is expressed mainly in the central nervous system where it regulates morphine-induced analgesia, tolerance and dependence (Mayer and Hollt 2006). Recently, induction of MOPr expression in different immune cells induced by cytokines has been reported (Kraus et al., 2001; Kraus et al., 2003). The human mu-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) promoter is of the TATA-less type and has clusters of potential binding sites for different transcription factors (Law et al. 2004). Several studies, primarily focused on the upstream region of the OPRM1 promoter, have investigated transcriptional regulation of MOPr expression. Presently, however, it is still not completely clear how positive and negative transcription regulators cooperatively coordinate cellor tissue-specific transcription of the OPRM1 gene, and how specific growth factors influence its expression. IGF-I and its receptors are widely distributed throughout the nervous system during development, and their involvement in neurogenesis has been extensively investigated (Arsenijevic et al. 1998; van Golen and Feldman 2000). As previously mentioned, such neurotrophic factors can be also produced and/or act on immune cells (Kerschenseteiner et al., 2003). Most of the physiologic effects of IGF-I are mediated by the type I IGF surface receptor which, after ligand binding-induced autophosphorylation, associates with specific adaptor proteins and activates different second messengers (Bondy and Cheng 2004). These include: phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, mitogen-activated protein kinase (Vincent and Feldman 2002; Di Toro et al. 2005) and members of the Janus kinase (JAK)/STAT3 signalling pathway (Zong et al. 2000; Yadav et al. 2005). REST plays a complex role in neuronal cells by differentially repressing target gene expression (Lunyak et al. 2004; Coulson 2005; Ballas and Mandel 2005). REST expression decreases during neurogenesis, but has been detected in the adult rat brain (Palm et al. 1998) and is up-regulated in response to global ischemia (Calderone et al. 2003) and induction of epilepsy (Spencer et al. 2006). Thus, the REST concentration seems to influence its function and the expression of neuronal genes, and may have different effects in embryonic and differentiated neurons (Su et al. 2004; Sun et al. 2005). In a previous study, REST was elevated during the early stages of neural induction by IGF-I in neuroblastoma cells. REST may contribute to the down-regulation of genes not yet required by the differentiation program, but its expression decreases after five days of treatment to allow for the acquisition of neural phenotypes. Di Toro et al. proposed a model in which the extent of neurite outgrowth in differentiating neuroblastoma cells was affected by the disappearance of REST (Di Toro et al. 2005). The human mu-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) promoter contains a DNA sequence binding the repressor element 1 silencing transcription factor (REST) that is implicated in transcriptional repression. Therefore, in the fist part of this thesis, I investigated whether insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), which affects various aspects of neuronal induction and maturation, regulates OPRM1 transcription in neuronal cells in the context of the potential influence of REST. A series of OPRM1-luciferase promoter/reporter constructs were transfected into two neuronal cell models, neuroblastoma-derived SH-SY5Y cells and PC12 cells. In the former, endogenous levels of human mu-opioid receptor (hMOPr) mRNA were evaluated by real-time PCR. IGF-I upregulated OPRM1 transcription in: PC12 cells lacking REST, in SH-SY5Y cells transfected with constructs deficient in the REST DNA binding element, or when REST was down-regulated in retinoic acid-differentiated cells. IGF-I activates the signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT3) signaling pathway and this transcription factor, binding to the STAT1/3 DNA element located in the promoter, increases OPRM1 transcription. T-cell receptor (TCR) recognizes peptide antigens displayed in the context of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and gives rise to a potent as well as branched intracellular signalling that convert naïve T-cells in mature effectors, thus significantly contributing to the genesis of a specific immune response. In the second part of my work I exposed wild type Jurkat CD4+ T-cells to a mixture of CD3 and CD28 antigens in order to fully activate TCR and study whether its signalling influence OPRM1 expression. Results were that TCR engagement determined a significant induction of OPRM1 expression through the activation of transcription factors AP-1, NF-kB and NFAT. Eventually, I investigated MOPr turnover once it has been expressed on T-cells outer membrane. It turned out that DAMGO induced MOPr internalisation and recycling, whereas morphine did not. Overall, from the data collected in this thesis we can conclude that that a reduction in REST is a critical switch enabling IGF-I to up-regulate human MOPr, helping these findings clarify how human MOPr expression is regulated in neuronal cells, and that TCR engagement up-regulates OPRM1 transcription in T-cells. My results that neurotrophic factors a and TCR engagement, as well as it is reported for cytokines, seem to up-regulate OPRM1 in both neurons and immune cells suggest an important role for MOPr as a molecular bridge between neurons and immune cells; therefore, MOPr could play a key role in the cross-talk between immune system and nervous system and in particular in the balance between pro-inflammatory and pro-nociceptive stimuli and analgesic and neuroprotective effects.