Responsabilidade do Auditor no Processo de Insolvência

Dada a conjuntura económica atual que atravessamos, na crescente procura de uma solução económica e financeira viável, muitas entidades tem um único recurso - a apresentação à insolvência. O devedor tem de provar a sua solvabilidade e saber qual o momento oportuno para apresentação à insolvência. Neste estudo foram comparadas quatro empresas solventes com quatro empresas insolventes e verificada aplicação prática dos métodos estudados de previsão de futuras insolvências. Dada a escassa informação que temos relativa às empresas insolventes torna-se difícil efetuar uma comparação em termos equitativos, mas denota-se que as empresas solventes tem muitas mais possibilidades de solicitar financiamentos aos sócios ou até mesmo à banca, enquanto que as insolventes não têm bases sólidas para financiar as suas atividades e normalmente trazem para o mercado produtos obsoletos. A opinião do auditor é imparcial e mesmo que emita a sua opinião quanto à continuidade para o futuro próximo, a decisão vai passar pelos responsáveis da empresa. A estes cabe a decisão de reestruturação da empresa, podendo passar por um Processo Especial de Revitalização, um plano de insolvência ou até mesmo a liquidação. Quanto ao plano de insolvência pode a empresa ser recuperada e é realizado um diagnóstico que poderá passar por saber se a empresa é capaz de ter um desempenho normal do ponto de vista competitivo, fornecer um serviço ou um produto capaz de satisfazer as necessidades do seu mercado e à oferta da concorrência, gerar um cash-flow satisfatório que permita a remuneração dos fatores produtivos e a sua renovação continuada de modo a manter-se competitiva face à concorrência e bem como a analise do valor económico. Caso o diagnóstico se revele positivo, há que determinar quais as medidas de reestruturação necessárias a levar em consideração e verificar se a continuidade da empresa cria mais valor para os credores que a sua liquidação.

Riscos de quebra de continuidade e o papel do auditor

Mestrado em Auditoria

A utilização dos procedimentos analíticos de auditoria em Pequenas e Médias

Numa altura tão conturbada como a que vivemos, onde se assiste por um lado a crises económicas e financeiras, por outra ao relato de variadas situações que configurarão questões de fraude, ressurge indubitavelmente a questão do papel do auditor e o gap de expetativas em relação à auditoria financeira. O interesse por parte dos auditores nos procedimentos analíticos tem crescido significativamente nos últimos anos devido, pelo facto de potenciarem uma melhoria da eficiência e eficácia do trabalho de auditoria. Regra geral, os procedimentos analíticos são utilizados com mais frequência na fase do planeamento e revisão global de auditoria, sendo crescente o seu uso como testes substantivos e como verdadeira evidência de suporte da opinião do auditor. No entanto, quando se realiza auditorias a Pequenas e Médias Empresas (PME), existem vários fatores na essência das PME a ter em conta, tais como, a existência de limitações no controlo interno e na informação disponível e o domínio por parte do proprietário-gerente. Estes fatores derivam da pequena dimensão dessas empresas, o que origina a limitação da utilização dos procedimentos analíticos. A presente investigação tem como principal objetivo analisar de que forma os Revisores Oficiais de Contas (ROC) utilizam os procedimentos analíticos no processo de auditoria a PME, estando conscientes das limitações inerentes à sua utilização. Para o efeito, e como metodologia foi dirigido um inquérito aos ROC portugueses, tendo obtido um total de 44 respostas. Os principais resultados indicam que: os ROC recorrem com mais frequência a procedimentos analíticos simples numa auditoria a PME, em particular na fase de planeamento e são aplicados com maior frequência na área dos gastos com o pessoal (comparativamente com as áreas de vendas, compras e Estado); é frequente a verificação dos resultados dos procedimentos analíticos com outro tipo de procedimentos numa auditoria; e na sequência de resultados satisfatórios os ROC optam por reduzir de forma moderada os testes de detalhe. Os ROC consideram importante alguns fatores próprios das PME na utilização dos procedimentos analíticos, o que origina uma menor utilização desses procedimentos nas PME comparativamente com as grandes empresas.

Fatores determinantes na mudança de auditor: o caso português

Comunicação apresentada no XVII Encuentro AECA, 22-23 de setembro 2016, Bragança, Portugal

Mandatory auditor rotation : Australian evidence

A key part of the auditor independence reforms in Australia, as represented by Corporate Law Economic Reform Program (Audit Reform and Corporate Disclosure) Act 2004 (Cth) (CLERP 9), mandates audit partner rotation. The change was criticised predominantly due to the costs imposed on both the audit firms and the audit clients. This study examines the Australian experience post-CLERP 9 with mandated auditor rotation. Based on data of audit partner rotation over 2003–2009 (on average 1200 listed Australian companies over the sample period), we show that audit partner tenure sat at a median of 2–3 years, but that the maximum audit partner tenure was as high as 20 years in the pre-CLERP 9 period. For around 85% of the market, audit partner rotation occurred voluntarily at between 1–5 years. The interesting result is that for 15% of the market, the mandated audit partner rotation had a significant impact on corporate governance practice. There is also a greater observed impact of mandatory rotation on audit engagements involving the non-global auditing firms. These findings inform the debate as to the ‘costliness’ of the law reform.

Regulatory responses to auditor independence dilemmas – who takes the stronger line?

A key part of corporate governance reforms in Australia, as represented by CLERP 9, addresses concerns over the audit function and the role of independent auditors in monitoring managers and providing useful information to stakeholders about the financial position of the company. In comparing the regulatory responses to auditor independence dilemmas, there have been claims that CLERP 9 is less ‘stringent’ than the reforms imposed by the Sarbanes Oxley Act in the US. This paper looks at three particular situations that have been the subject of recent reform to strengthen independence: the mandatory rotation of auditors, recruitment of former auditors as board members, and provision of non-audit services to clients. In each case, we compare the similarities and differences of the regulatory response between Australia and US, to distil the efficacy of the CLERP 9 approach.

Auditor obligations in an evolving legal landscape

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to look at auditor obligations to their clients and potentially to third parties such as investors, with a focus on the quality of financial disclosure in an evolving legal framework. Design/methodology/approach – The article outlines and compares established and emerging trends relative to information disclosure and contractual performance in parallel contexts where information asymmetry exists. In particular, this article considers the disclosure regime that has evolved in the insurance industry to address the substantial imbalance in the level of knowledge possessed by the insured in comparison to the prospective insurer. Abductive reasoning is used to identify causal constructs that explain the data pattern from which the theorised potential for judicial revision of the interpretation of “true and fair” in line with “good faith” in legal regulation is derived. Findings – The authors conclude that there is little doubt that a duty of good faith in relation to auditor-company contractual dealings and potentially a broader good faith duty to third parties such as investors in companies may be on the horizon. Originality/value – In the context of stated objectives by organisations such as the International Federation of Accountants to reconcile ethical and technical skills in the wake of the global financial crisis, there is an increased need to rebuild public and investor confidence in the underpinning integrity of financial reporting. This paper offers a perspective on one way to achieve this by recognising the similarities in the information asymmetry relationships in the insurance industry and how the notion of “good faith” in that relationship could be useful in the audit situation.

The impact of auditor independence regulations on established and emerging firms.

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to study whether auditor independence reforms introduced in 2004 led to an enhancement in earnings quality in the post-reform era. Design/methodology/approach – This study predicts that as the cost of compliance will vary based on a firm's existing corporate governance regime and the level of external scrutiny (monitoring) it faces, we compare the earnings quality of a sample of “established” (S&P/ASX 100) to a sample of “emerging” (S&P/ASX Small Ordinaries Index) firms. The paper examines the reporting behaviour of the two groups of listed entities, covering the regulatory change period 2003-2006. The paper uses regression modelling to test the associations between increased audit independence, earnings quality and corporate governance mechanisms over the pre- and post-regulatory period. Findings – The paper's results confirm that earnings quality for the established firms was enhanced in the post-reform period; while this was not the case for emerging firms. The evidence also suggests that corporate governance mechanisms of board independence and board financial skill are associated with higher earnings quality; while the higher the concentration of insider firm ownership is associated with lower earnings quality. Practical implications – This study provides policy makers with evidence as to changes in reporting behaviour following law reform aimed at strengthening auditor independence. Originality/value – The studies on earnings quality are informed by the US market practices. Australia provides a unique setting through its auditor independence reforms to examine the impact of reform choices. This study also investigates two specific subsets of the market: established firms and emerging firms.

Auditor communication in an evolving environment : going beyond SAS 600 auditors' reports on financial statements

In 1993 the Auditing Practices Board issued an expanded audit report, SAS 600 Auditors’ Reports on Financial Statements, in an attempt to educate users and to clarify certain matters pertaining to the audit function. This paper investigates the extent to which the new audit report, SAS 600, has been successful in aligning the views of auditors, preparers and users about issues dealt with in the expanded audit report, and the extent to which the three groups considered that it would be useful for additional matters, including corporate governance, to be reported upon by the auditor. Our findings suggest that SAS 600 has been successful in clarifying the purpose of the audit and the respective responsibilities of auditors and directors. However, to meet the expectations of users and to add more value, the audit report needs to provide more information about the findings of the audit.

Auditor independence : an analysis of the adequacy of selected provisions in CLERP 9

Worldwide corporate collapses in the past have highlighted various weaknesses in corporate governance, which included auditor independence. This thesis advocates the use of private interest theory as a framework to evaluate proposals for law reform related to the independence of external company auditors. This study argues that the current regulation of auditor independence falls short of the 'ideal independence' required by the general public. This is because the regulation was developed, in some instances, to serve the private interests of powerful lobby groups rather than the public interest. This research concludes that there is a case for reform of the existing requirements in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in respect of auditor independence.

Enhancing the auditor's report : to what extent is there support for the IAASB's proposed changes?

This article outlines proposed reforms to auditor reporting currently being considered by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), and other key national and transnational standard-setters and regulatory bodies. It adds to recent academic contributions on reforming the auditor’s report by analyzing the 165 stakeholder responses to the IAASB’s 2012 Invitation to Comment: Improving the Auditor’s Report to determine levels of support for the IAASB’s proposed reforms, and the differences, if any, between the views of various respondents based on stakeholder groups (e.g. audit and assurance firms, users, preparers, regulators, etc.) and regional classifications. Guided by insights from communication theory, our results show the levels of stakeholder support for the IAASB’s proposed reforms addressing auditors’ expectations, information and communication gaps are mixed. The strongest overall support was for enhanced auditor reporting on other information attached to, or intended to be read with, the financial statements, and the least supported initiative was including additional information in the auditor’s report about the auditor’s judgements and processes. Whilst overall there is generally consensus across both stakeholder groups and regions concerning the various questions investigated, we highlight where statistically significant differences between groups do exist. Notably, North American respondents were less likely to support a number of the IAASB’s proposed reforms than their counterparts from other regions.

An evaluation of the indicators of threat to auditor independence in an Islamic legal system: The case of Iran

This study aimed to assist in developing a more effective framework for regulating auditor independence practice in Iran, a non-IFRS country with an Islamic legal system. It investigated the following general research question: In order to increase auditor independence in a non-IFRS country with an Islamic legal system, what are the potential indicators of threats to auditor independence, and how should a regulator prioritise addressing these threats?

Como a Câmara dos Deputados deve ser em 2023? : pesquisa de opinião abriu espaço para a sociedade opinar sobre o aperfeiçoamento da Instituição

Entre os dias 27 de outubro e 18 de novembro de 2011, a Câmara dos Deputados realizou uma pesquisa de opinião com cidadãos, deputados, servidores da instituição e especialistas para subsidiar o planejamento do Novo Ciclo de Gestão Estratégica 2012-2023.