Quantification of some nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as reducing agents of Cu(II)/4,4 '-dicarboxy-2,2 '-biquinoline complexes in cationic micellar medium

A simple method was developed for spectrophotometric determination of some nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (meloxicam, piroxicam and tenoxicam) based on the reduction of copper(II) in buffered solution (pH 7.0) and micellar medium containing 4,4'-dicarboxy-2,2'-buffered solution (pH 7.0) and micellar medium containing 4,4'-dicarboxy-2,2'-biquinoline acid. The-biquinoline acid. The absorbance values at 558 nm, characteristic of the formed Cu(I)/4,4'-dicarboxy-2,2'-biquinoline complexes, are linear with the concentrations (5.7-40 mmol L(-1), n = 5) of these oxicams (meloxicam r = 0.998; piroxicam and tenoxicam r = 0.999). The limit of detection values, in mmol L(-1), calculated for meloxicam (2.7), piroxicam (1.2) and tenoxicam (1.3) was obtained with 99% confidence level and the relative standard deviations for meloxicam (3.1%), piroxicam (5.1%) and tenoxicam (1.2%) were calculated using a 25 mmol L(-1) solution (n = 7). Mean recovery values for meloxicam, piroxicam and tenoxicam forms were 100 +/- 6.9, 98.6 +/- 3.6 and 99.4 +/- 2.5%, respectively. The conditional potential of Cu(II)/Cu(I) in complex medium of 7.5 mmol L(-1) BCA was determined to be 629 +/- 11 mV vs. NHE.

Double-blind, Randomized placebo controlled trial of fulvestrant compared with exemestane after prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer: Results from EFECT

Purpose The third-generation nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are increasingly used as adjuvant and first-line advanced therapy for postmenopausal, hormone receptor-positive (HR +) breast cancer. Because many patients subsequently experience progression or relapse, it is important to identify agents with efficacy after AI failure. Materials and Methods Evaluation of Faslodex versus Exemestane Clinical Trial (EFECT) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, multicenter phase III trial of fulvestrant versus exemestane in postmenopausal women with HR + advanced breast cancer (ABC) progressing or recurring after nonsteroidal AI. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP). A fulvestrant loading-dose (LD) regimen was used: 500 mg intramuscularly on day 0, 250 mg on days 14, 28, and 250 mg every 28 days thereafter. Exemestane 25 mg orally was administered once daily. Results A total of 693 women were randomly assigned to fulvestrant (n = 351) or exemestane ( n = 342). Approximately 60% of patients had received at least two prior endocrine therapies. Median TTP was 3.7 months in both groups ( hazard ratio = 0.963; 95% CI, 0.819 to 1.133; P = .6531). The overall response rate ( 7.4% v 6.7%; P = .736) and clinical benefit rate ( 32.2% v 31.5%; P = .853) were similar between fulvestrant and exemestane respectively. Median duration of clinical benefit was 9.3 and 8.3 months, respectively. Both treatments were well tolerated, with no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events or quality of life. Pharmacokinetic data confirm that steady-state was reached within 1 month with the LD schedule of fulvestrant. Conclusion Fulvestrant LD and exemestane are equally active and well-tolerated in a meaningful proportion of postmenopausal women with ABC who have experienced progression or recurrence during treatment with a nonsteroidal AI.

Allergo-immunologie. 2 : Les réactions allergiques aux anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens [Allergic reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs]

Allergy to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is a very common affliction, especially among patients with asthma and chronic urticaria. These reactions are most often of a non-immunological nature but related to pharmacologic intolerance and linked to arachidonic acid metabolism and leukotriene release. Therefore, crossed reactions implying all non-selective and semi-selective NSAIDs constitute the rule, especially during respiratory reactions to NSAIDs and for patients with chronic urticaria. In isolated acute urticaria, crossed reactions are difficult to predict so caution is necessary. Tolerance induction is possible, especially when aspirin has to be administered in small doses as antiplatelet agent. Finally, acetaminophen and selective NSAIDs as celecoxib are well tolerated by most of these patients. L'allergie aux anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens (AINS) est très fréquente, en particulier chez les asthmatiques ou dans l'urticaire chronique. Il s'agit en général de réactions non immunologiques, mais dues à une intolérance pharmacologique liée au métabolisme de l'acide arachidonique et à la formation de leucotriènes. Ainsi, les réactions croisées impliquant tous les AINS non sélectifs et semi-sélectifs sont la règle, surtout lors de réactions respiratoires aux AINS et dans l'urticaire chronique. Lors d'urticaire aiguë isolée, les réactions croisées sont difficiles à prédire, ainsi la prudence s'impose. Une induction de tolérance est possible, en particulier lorsque l'aspirine est nécessaire à dose faible, comme antiagrégant plaquettaire. Enfin, le paracétamol et les AINS sélectifs sont supportés par la grande majorité de ces patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Canakinumab Vs Triamcinolone Acetonide in Patients with Gouty Arthritis Unable to Use Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Colchicine, and On Stable Urate Lowering Therapy (ULT) or Unable to Use ULT

Background/Purpose: The primary treatment goals for gouty arthritis (GA) are rapid relief of pain and inflammation during acute attacks, and long-term hyperuricemia management. A post-hoc analysis of 2 pivotal trials was performed to assess efficacy and safety of canakinumab (CAN), a fully human monoclonal anti-IL-1_ antibody, vs triamcinolone acetonide (TA) in GA patients unable to use NSAIDs and colchicine, and who were on stable urate lowering therapy (ULT) or unable to use ULT. Methods: In these 12-week, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled studies (_-RELIEVED and _-RELIEVED II), patients had to have frequent attacks (_3 attacks in previous year) meeting preliminary GA ACR 1977 criteria, and were unresponsive, intolerant, or contraindicated to NSAIDs and/or colchicine, and if on ULT, ULT was stable. Patients were randomized during an acute attack to single dose CAN 150 mg s.c. or TA 40 mg i.m. and were redosed "on demand" for each new attack. Patients completing the core studies were enrolled into blinded 12-week extension studies to further investigate on-demand use of CAN vs TA for new attacks. The subpopulation selected for this post-hoc analysis was (a) unable to use NSAIDs and colchicine due to contraindication, intolerance or lack of efficacy for these drugs, and (b) currently on ULT, or contraindication or previous failure of ULT, as determined by investigators. Subpopulation comprised 101 patients (51 CAN; 50 TA) out of 454 total. Results: Several co-morbidities, including hypertension (56%), obesity (56%), diabetes (18%), and ischemic heart disease (13%) were reported in 90% of this subpopulation. Pain intensity (VAS 100 mm scale) was comparable between CAN and TA treatment groups at baseline (least-square [LS] mean 74.6 and 74.4 mm, respectively). A significantly lower pain score was reported with CAN vs TA at 72 hours post dose (1st co-primary endpoint on baseline flare; LS mean, 23.5 vs 33.6 mm; difference _10.2 mm; 95% CI, _19.9, _0.4; P_0.0208 [1-sided]). CAN significantly reduced risk for their first new attacks by 61% vs TA (HR 0.39; 95% CI, 0.17-0.91, P_0.0151 [1-sided]) for the first 12 weeks (2nd co-primary endpoint), and by 61% vs TA (HR 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19-0.79, P_0.0047 [1-sided]) over 24 weeks. Serum urate levels increased for CAN vs TA with mean change from baseline reaching a maximum of _0.7 _ 2.0 vs _0.1 _ 1.8 mg/dL at 8 weeks, and _0.3 _ 2.0 vs _0.2 _ 1.4 mg/dL at end of study (all had GA attack at baseline). Adverse Events (AEs) were reported in 33 (66%) CAN and 24 (47.1%) TA patients. Infections and infestations were the most common AEs, reported in 10 (20%) and 5 (10%) patients treated with CAN and TA respectively. Incidence of SAEs was comparable between CAN (gastritis, gastroenteritis, chronic renal failure) and TA (aortic valve incompetence, cardiomyopathy, aortic stenosis, diarrohea, nausea, vomiting, bicuspid aortic valve) groups (2 [4.0%] vs 2 [3.9%]). Conclusion: CAN provided superior pain relief and reduced risk of new attack in highly-comorbid GA patients unable to use NSAIDs and colchicine, and who were currently on stable ULT or unable to use ULT. The safety profile in this post-hoc subpopulation was consistent with the overall _-RELIEVED and _-RELIEVED II population.

Effects of Cytochrome P450 Enzyme Inhibitors on the Pharmacokinetics of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Venlafaxine

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes play a pivotal role in the metabolism of many drugs. Inhibition of CYP enzymes usually increases the plasma concentrations of their substrate drugs and can thus alter the safety and efficacy of these drugs. The metabolism of many widely used nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as well as the metabolism of the antidepressant venlafaxine is nown to be catalyzed by CYP enzymes. In the present studies, the effect of CYP inhibition on the armacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of NSAIDs and venlafaxine was studied in clinical trials with healthy volunteers and with a crossover design, by using different antifungal agents as CYP inhibitors. The results of these studies demonstrate that the inhibition of CYP enzymes leads to increased concentrations of NSAIDs. In most cases, the exposure to ibuprofen, diclofenac, etoricoxib, and meloxicam was increased 1.5to 2 fold when they were used concomitantly with antifungal agents. CYP2D6 inhibitor, terbinafine, substantially increased the concentration of parent venlafaxine, whereas the concentration of active moiety of venlafaxine (parent drug plus active metabolite) was only slightly increased. Voriconazole, an inhibitor of the minor metabolic pathway of venlafaxine, produced only minor changes in the pharmacokinetics of venlafaxine. These studies show that an evident increase in the concentrations of NSAIDs may be expected, if they are used concomitantly with CYP inhibitors. However, as NSAIDs are generally well tolerated, use of single doses of NSAIDs concomitantly with CYP inhibitors is not likely to adversely affect patient safety, whereas clinical relevance of longterm concomitant use of NSAIDs with CYP inhibitors needs further investigation. CYP2D6 inhibitors considerably affect the pharmacokinetics of venlafaxine, but the clinical significance of this interaction remains unclear.

Effect of a selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2 on the small bowel of rats

The pathogenesis of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) enteropathy is a complex process involving the uncoupling of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX). Rofecoxib, a selective inhibitor of COX-2, has shown less gastric damage, but the same beneficial effect is not clear in the case of the small bowel. Fifty-seven male Wistar rats (250-350 g) were divided into three groups (N = 19 each) to evaluate the effect of this NSAID on the rat intestine. The groups received 2.5 mg/kg rofecoxib, 7.5 mg/kg indomethacin or water with 5% DMSO (control) given as a single dose by gavage 24 h before the beginning of the experiment. A macroscopic score was used to quantify intestinal lesions and intestinal permeability was measured using [51Cr]-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid ([51Cr]-EDTA). The extent of intestinal lesion, indicated by a macroscopic score, was significantly lower when rofecoxib was administered compared to indomethacin (rofecoxib = 0.0 vs indomethacin = 63.6 ± 25.9; P < 0.05) and did not differ from control. The intestinal permeability to [51Cr]-EDTA was significantly increased after indomethacin (control = 1.82 ± 0.4 vs indomethacin = 9.12 ± 0.8%; P < 0.0001), but not after rofecoxib, whose effect did not differ significantly from control (control = 1.82 ± 0.4 vs rofecoxib = 2.17 ± 0.4%; ns), but was significantly different from indomethacin (indomethacin = 9.12 ± 0.8 vs rofecoxib = 2.17 ± 0.4%; P < 0.001). In conclusion, the present data show that rofecoxib is safer than indomethacin in rats because it does not induce macroscopic intestinal damage or increased intestinal permeability.

Trypanosoma cruzi infection and/or administration of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory nimesulide increase the number of colonic crypts overexpressing metallothioneins in rat colon carcinogenesis

Trypanosoma cruzi infection and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs inhibit colorectal carcinogenesis by mechanisms not completely known and metallothionein proteins (MTs) may be involved in this process. Sixty-six male Wistar rats weighing 90 to 120 g were randomly divided into seven groups (GI to GVII). GI, GII and GIII animals were subcutaneously infected with 200,000 trypomastigote forms of the Y strain of T. cruzi. After 8 weeks, GI, GII, GIV, and GVI were injected with one weekly subcutaneous dose of 12 mg/kg dimethylhydrazine for 4 weeks. In sequence, GI, GIV and GV were treated with nimesulide (10 mg/kg per dose, five times per week for 8 weeks). Groups I, III, IV, and VI had 12 animals, and each of the other groups had 6 animals. All the animals were euthanized 8 weeks after the last dimethylhydrazine injection. The colons were fixed and processed for MT immunohistochemistry. The index of MT-overexpressing colonic crypts (MTEC) was estimated as the percentage of MT-stained crypts in relation to the total number of crypts scored. Five hundred crypts per animal were scored. Data were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Dunn test. There was an increase in MTEC index in the groups either infected with T. cruzi or treated with nimesulide or both infected and treated when compared to control (401, 809, and 1011%, respectively). We suggest that the increased formation of MTEC may be related to the protection against carcinogenesis provided both by T. cruzi infection and nimesulide.

Prescription channeling of COX-2 inhibitors and traditional nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a population-based case–control study

Affiliation: Faculté de pharmacie, Université de Montréal

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory therapy: changes on renal function of healthy dogs

PURPOSE: To evaluate the renal function in healthy dogs submitted to nonselective and preferential COX-2 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy. METHODS: Twenty four healthy dogs were distributed into four groups (G) (n=6): ketoprofenG - treated with ketoprofen; nimesulideG - treated with nimesulid; meloxicanG - treated with meloxican; and etodolacG - treated with etodolaco. All the dogs received the NSAIDs for 10 days by oral route. Physical examination and renal function (urinalysis, urinary sodium and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), serum urea, creatinine, potassium and sodium, and endogenous creatinine clearance) were evaluated before, after five and ten days (T0, T5 and T10) of the treatment in all groups. RESULTS: Changes were observed in urinalysis, with a significant increase in renal cells in the urine at T5 and T10 in nimesulideG. Significant reduction in urinary sodium in nimesulideG at T5 was observed. The clearance values were lower in ketoprofenG at T10. CONCLUSIONS: Meloxicam and etodolac were the drugs that have proven to be safer for short-term therapy in healthy dogs in relation to renal function. NSAIDs ketoprofen and nimesulide should be used judiciously in dogs with renal dysfunction, since there are promoted changes in renal function.

Pharmacological Evaluation and Preparation of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Containing an N-Acyl Hydrazone Subunit

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Pharmacological evaluation and preparation of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs containing an N-Acyl hydrazone subunit

A series of anti-inflammatory derivatives containing an N-acyl hydrazone subunit (4a–e) were synthesized and characterized. Docking studies were performed that suggest that compounds 4a–e bind to cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and COX-2 isoforms, but with higher affinity for COX-2. The compounds display similar anti-inflammatory activities in vivo, although compound 4c is the most effective compound for inhibiting rat paw edema, with a reduction in the extent of inflammation of 35.9% and 52.8% at 2 and 4 h, respectively. The anti-inflammatory activity of N-acyl hydrazone derivatives was inferior to their respective parent drugs, except for compound 4c after 5 h. Ulcerogenic studies revealed that compounds 4a–e are less gastrotoxic than the respective parent drug. Compounds 4b–e demonstrated mucosal damage comparable to celecoxib. The in vivo analgesic activities of the compounds are higher than the respective parent drug for compounds 4a–b and 4d–e. Compound 4a was more active than dipyrone in reducing acetic-acid-induced abdominal constrictions. Our results indicate that compounds 4a–e are anti-inflammatory and analgesic compounds with reduced gastrotoxicity compared to their respective parent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.