Gabe Herrn Rabbiner Dr. Nobel zum 50. Geburtstag

dargebracht von Martin Buber ...

Nachrufe auf Rabbiner N.A. Nobel

hrsg. vom Vorstand der Israelitischen Gemeinde Frankfurt a.M

Die Richtlinien : Predigt gehalten am Sabbat Kodesh P' Toldot 5673/1912 in der Gemeindesynagoge am Börneplatz

von N. A. Nobel

Vor der Vereidigung

von N. A. Nobel

Der Tag des Kampfes

von N. A. Nobel

Worte des Abschieds

gesprochen von Sr. Ehrwürden Herrn Rabbiner Dr. N. A. Nobel am ... 12. November 1910 in der Gemeindesynagoge am Bornplatz zu Hamburg

Nehemias Anton Nobel [Rezension]

Emil Fraenkel

Tomb of Nehemias Dreifus; Hochberg Jewish Cemetery Cemeteries; Tombs

Digital Image

Tomb of Nehemias Dreifus; Hochberg Jewish Cemetery Cemeteries; Tombs

Digital Image

Nehemias [Rezension]

Hugo Bergmann

Esdras et Nehemias /

Mode of access: Internet.

Esdras et Nehemias /

Mode of access: Internet.

Explication des livres des Rois et des Paralipomenes ... : tome VI, contenant les livres d'Edras & de Nehemias

Mode of access: Internet.

A Nobel Prize for governance and institutions : Oliver Williamson and Elinor Ostrom

This paper reviews the 2009 Nobel Prize in Economics jointly awarded to Oliver Williamson for his work on governance in organizations and the boundaries of the firm, and to Elinor Ostrom for her work on the governance of common pool resources. We review the careers and the research contributions of Williamson and Ostrom to the theory and analysis of economic institutions of governance. Both winners of this Prize for 'economic governance' are thoroughly deserved, yet like the Hayek- Myrdal Prize of 1974 their respective approaches, methods and findings are almost diametrically opposed. Williamson offers a top-down contracts-based solution to the incentive problems of opportunism in corporate governance, whereas Ostrom offers a bottom-up communication-based solution to the governance opportunities of community resources. We offer some critical comments on Williamson's analytic work and discussion of the potential for further application of Ostrom's case-study based experimental methodology. We conclude with a suggested third nominee to make better sense of how these two great scholars' works fit together, namely George Richardson'

Econometric fellows and Nobel Laureates in economics

An academic award is method by which peers offer recognition of intellectual efforts. In this paper we take a purely descriptive look at the relationship between becoming a Fellow of the Econometric Society and receiving the Nobel Prize in economics. We discover some interesting aspects: of all 69 Nobel Prize Laureates between 1969 and 2011, only 9 of them were not also Fellows. Moreover, the proportion of future novel winners among the Fellows has been quite high throughout time and a large share of researchers who became Fellows between the 1930s and 1950s became Nobel Laureates at a later stage. On average, researchers became Fellows relatively early in their career (14.9 years after their PhD) and those who were subsequently made Nobel Laureates became Fellows earlier than other researchers. Interestingly, Harvard and MIT have been the dominant PhD granting institutions to generate Fellows and Nobel Laureates in the past.