Validation interne de la version française du NEO-PI-R et influence de l'âge, du sexe et de la profession

We have examined the internal validity of the French translation of the NEO PI-R personality test which measures the « big five » (Rolland, 1993). The impact of age, gender and professional categories on the NEO PI-R scales was assessed. A large sample (n=731) of subjects of different age, gender and profession and a sample of Swiss students (n=261) responding anonymously were used. Factor analyses confirmed the structure of the instrument (5 domains) and the structures of the domains in terms of facets (six facets within each domain). On the other hand, the age has a significant impact on all the domains of the NEO PI-R; the gender has an impact on the scores on N (neuroticism), O (openness) and A (agreeableness), and the profession has an impact on the domains E (extraversion), O (openness) and A (agreeableness). The scores on several facets are also affected by those three variables. Our study gives the researchers and the practitioner a reference score table according to the studied variables.

The hierarchical structures of the NEO-PI-R and the 16PF5

The present study compares the higher-level dimensions and the hierarchical structures of the fifth edition of the 16 PF with those of the NEO PI-R. Both inventories measure personality according to five higher-level dimensions. These inventories were however constructed according to different methods (bottom-up vs. top-down). 386 participants filled out both questionnaires. Correlations, regressions and canonical correlations made it possible to compare the inventories. As expected they roughly measure the same aspects of personality. There is a coherent association among four of the five dimensions measured in the tests. However Agreeableness, the remaining dimension in the NEO PI-R, is not represented in the 16 PF 5. Our analyses confirmed the hierarchical structures of both instruments, but this confirmation was more complete in the case of the NEO PI-R. Indeed, a parallel analysis indicated that a four-factor solution should be considered in the case of the 16 PF 5. On the other hand, the NEO PI-R's five-factor solution was confirmed. The top-down construction of this instrument seems to make for a more legible structure. Of the two five-dimension constructs, the NEO PI-R thus seems the more reliable. This confirms the relevance of the Five Factor Model of personality.

Comparison of the NEO-FFI, the NEO-FFI-R and an alternative short version of the NEO-PI-R (NEO-60) in Swiss and Spanish samples

Three different short versions of the NEO-PI-R were compared: The NEO-FFI, the NEO-FFI-R, and a new short version developed in the current study (NEO-60). This new version is intended to improve the psychometric characteristics of the original NEO-FFI, specially in regard to the factor structure at the item-level. A French version of the NEO-PI-R was given to 1090 Swiss subjects, whereas the Spanish (Castilian) version of the NEO-PI-R was administered to 1006 Spanish subjects. Results replicate the limitations of the NEO-FFI already found in other countries. Compared to the NEO-FFI, reliability coefficients and factor structure was enhanced by the NEO-FFI-R and the NEO-60 in both samples, although substantial differences were not found. The factor structure of the NEO-60 shows the best fit since only three items do not load mainly on their own factor in both samples. Besides, correlations between items and NEO-PI-R domain scores are also higher for the items included in the NEO-60 version. On the other hand, convergent correlations with the NEO-PI-R dimensions were satisfactory irrespective of the version, and confirmatory factor analyses show slight differences among the different models generated after the three short versions.

The 16PF5 and the NEO-PI-R in Spanish and Swiss samples: A cross-cultural comparison

This study compared the Spanish (Castilian) and French versions of the 16PF5 and of the NEO-PI-R in Spanish and Swiss samples. The five-factor solution for the 16PF5 only seems clear for the Castilian version, but not for the French version. Indeed, the congruence coefficients for the Tough-Mindedness and the Self-Control dimensions are low. On the other hand, the five-factor solutions are highly similar for both countries concerning the NEO-PI-R, and the congruence coefficients are above .95 for all five dimensions. The low cross-cultural replicability for the 16PF5 makes it difficult to analyze the differences at the mean level for this inventory. For the NEO-PI-R, the differences are generally very small and globally account for 2.6% of the total variance. Spaniards seem to have slightly lower scores on Actions and slightly higher scores on Dutifulness. These differences could either be due to translation problems, sample selection, or cultural differences.

Predictions of the MCMI-III personality disorders from NEO-PI-R domains and facets: Comparison between American and Spanish samples

Este estudio ex post facto analiza las relaciones entre las dimensiones y facetas del NEO-PI-R y los 14 trastornos de personalidad del MCMI-III en una muestra no clínica española (N = 674). Se exploran las diferencias y similitudes con los resul- tados de Dyce y O’Connor en una muestra americana con los mismos instrumentos. Como se esperaba, los análisis factoriales de facetas reteniendo cinco factores mostraron un modelo de relaciones muy similar entre ambas muestras, con un coeficiente de la congruencia total de 0,92, y coeficientes de congruencia de factor aceptables, salvo para el factor Apertura (0,68). En consonancia con las predicciones de Widiger y Widiger et al. los porcentajes de correlaciones significativas estaban alrededor de 60% en ambas muestras, y la mayoría coincidían. El análisis de regresión múltiple con dimensiones también reveló un gran parecido entre los resultados americanos y españoles, Neuroticismo fue el predictor más relacionado con los trastornos de personalidad. Se encontraron diferencias en las regresiones por facetas, aunque la varianza explicada fue prácticamente la misma que en las dimensiones. Se discute la validez transcultural y el valor predictivo del NEO-PI-R sobre los trastornos de personalidad del MCMI-III, junto con las ventajas relativas de las facetas sobre las dimensiones.

Validez convergente y estructural del NEO-PI-R : baremos orientativos

El estudio que se presenta se diseñó para estudiar la validez convergen-te y de estructura del NEO-PI-R en una muestra amplia de universitarios y de la población general. Los resultados muestran una robusta estructura de cinco factores y buena validez convergente con los adjetivos bipolares de Goldberg. Se realiza un análisis comparativo de los resultados obtenidos en este estudio con los del estudio original americano y en el estudio normativo realizado en España. Se concluye que las medias de las cinco dimensiones son parecidas al comparar las muestras del estudio actual con el americano, pero muy diferentes respecto al estudio normativo español. Ello es probablemente debido a la naturaleza de las muestras empleadas en el estudio normativo español provenientes de selección de personal, inadecuadas para un estudio normativo. La procedencia de las muestras no afecta la estructura ni la fiabilidad del NEO-PI-R, pero si afecta los baremos obtenidos. A efectos de la interpretación del test en población sana española se proporcionan baremos en percentiles y notas T.

Adaptación para adolescentes de la versión española del NEO PI-R (JS NEO)

Este artículo presenta los primeros datos del desarrollo de la versión española para adolescentes, entre 12 y 17 años, del NEO PI-R (JS NEO). Noventa y dos de los 240 ítems fueron modificados con el fin de adaptar el vocabulario de los mismos a este grupo de edad. Las propiedades psicométricas del JS NEO han sido investigadas en una muestra de 2.505 adolescentes. Los resultados muestran cómo la estructura factorial encontrada con el NEO PI-R para adultos se replica en la versión junior. Las fiabilidades de consistencia interna y estabilidad temporal de las escalas fueron adecuadas en la mayor parte de los casos. Además, la correlación entre las escalas de las versiones para adultos (NEO PI-R) y adolescentes (JS NEO) muestran que la versión para adolescentes presenta una validez de constructo adecuada.

Disfon??a y personalidad : una investigaci??n empleando el Inventario de Personalidad NEO PI-R

Resumen en ingl??s. Resumen basado en el de la publicaci??n

The five and seven factors personality models: differences and similitude between the TCI-R, NEO-FFI-R and ZKPQ-50-CC

The present study tests the relationships between the three frequently used personality models evaluated by the Temperament Character Inventory-Revised (TCI-R), Neuroticism Extraversion Openness Five Factor Inventory – Revised (NEO-FFI-R) and Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire-50- Cross-Cultural (ZKPQ-50-CC). The results were obtained with a sample of 928 volunteer subjects from the general population aged between 17 and 28 years old. Frequency distributions and alpha reliabilities with the three instruments were acceptable. Correlational and factorial analyses showed that several scales in the three instruments share an appreciable amount of common variance. Five factors emerged from principal components analysis. The first factor was integrated by A (Agreeableness), Co (Cooperativeness) and Agg-Host (Aggressiveness-Hostility), with secondary loadings in C (Conscientiousness) and SD (Self-directiveness) from other factors. The second factor was composed by N (Neuroticism), N-Anx (Neuroticism-Anxiety), HA (Harm Avoidance) and SD (Self-directiveness). The third factor was integrated by Sy (Sociability), E (Extraversion), RD (Reward Dependence), ImpSS (Impulsive Sensation Seeking) and NS (novelty Seeking). The fourth factor was integrated by Ps (Persistence), Act (Activity), and C, whereas the fifth and last factor was composed by O (Openness) and ST (Self- Transcendence). Confirmatory factor analyses indicate that the scales in each model are highly interrelated and define the specified latent dimension well. Similarities and differences between these three instruments are further discussed.

Oletko iloinen kuin peipponen? – Persoonallisuusmittari NEO-PI-3:n suomennoksessa, ruotsinnoksessa ja ranskannoksessa käytetyt käännösstrategiat

Yhdysvaltapainotteisen psykologisen tutkimuksen takia psykologiset testit on useimmiten laadittu englanniksi ja amerikkalaiseen kohdekulttuuriin, ja tästä syystä ne pitää kääntää ja adaptoida eurooppalaiseen kohdekulttuuriimme. Tämän pro gradu -tutkielman tarkoituksena oli selvittää, mitä käännösstrategioita Costan ja McCraen (1992) NEO-PI-3-persoonallisuusmittarin suomen-, ruotsin- ja ranskankielisissä käännöksissä on käytetty. Kvalitatiivisessa tarkastelussa eri kieliversioissa esiintyneitä käännösratkaisuja vertailtiin Jan Pedersenin (2007; 2005) käännösstrategialuokitukseen perustuvan luokittelun avulla, jossa strategiat on jaettu lähde- ja kohdetekstiorientoituneisiin ratkaisuihin. Oletin tutkimushypoteesissani, että NEO-PI-3-persoonallisuusmittarin käännöksissä on käytetty enemmän kotouttavia eli kohdetekstiorientoituneita kuin vieraannuttavia eli lähdetekstiorientoituneita strategioita. Oletuksen vastaisesti tutkimustulokset osoittivat, että yleisimmin käytetty strategia oli lähdetekstiuskollinen suora käännös. Suomen- ja ruotsinkielisissä versioissa vieraannuttavia käännösratkaisuja esiintyi myös yhteenlaskettuna kotouttavia ratkaisuja useammin. Hypoteesia tuki kuitenkin tutkimustulos, jonka mukaan persoonallisuusmittarin ranskannoksessa kotouttavia strategioita oli käytetty vieraannuttavia ahkerammin. Yhteenvetona voi sanoa, että käytettyjen strategioiden kirjo oli laaja ja vaihteli tarkasteluun valitsemieni teemojen sisällä sekä kieliversioittain. Monenlaisilla käännösratkaisuilla voidaan saavuttaa käännös, joka on ekvivalentti ja toimiva uudessa kohdekulttuuriympäristössään. Kääntäjät kohdekielen ja -kulttuurin tuntijoina voivat tuoda psykologisten testimetodien kehittelyyn arvokasta asiantuntijuutta tarvittavan psykologisen tietämyksen lisäksi.

Ta ri kh-i H asan, mu allafah- i Pi r Ghula m H asan Khuiha mi .

Added t. p.: Tarikh-i-Hassan.

Personalidade e agressividade : um estudo em militares de protecção e socorro

RESUMO: A protecção e socorro é das missões mais recentes na instituição militar em Portugal, nomeadamente a intervenção em catástrofes. As características têm um papel decisivo, pois podem condicionar de forma determinante o sucesso da missão. O discernimento do indivíduo é imperativo nas situações, não pode haver erros, pois os custos humanos e económicos são demasiado elevados. Foi estudada uma amostra de 535 militares oportugueses de uma força de elite helitransportada que actua em catástrofes, em que a média de idades é de 28 anos (DP=4,4), tendo o militar mais novo 20 anos e o mais velho 49 anos. O escalão etário mais representado é o escalão dos 26-30 anos que compreende 52,7% desta força militar operacional. Para esta investigação utilizámos como medidas de avaliação o Inventário de Personalidade Neo revisto, NEOPI-R (Costa & McCrae 1992), o Questionário de Agressividade, AQ (Buss & Perry, 1992)e a Escala de Desejabilidade Social de Paulhus, PDS (Paulhus, 1998) para aceder à relação entre personalidade, agressividade e desejabilidade social em militares de protecção e socorro. Conclui-se que os militares de protecção e socorro demonstram valores elevados de conscienciosidade e valores mais baixos ao nível do domínio do neuroticismo. Demonstraram resultados mais elevados na dimensão Gestão da imagem e mais baixos na dimensão de Auto apresentação favorável. Apresentam ainda níveis de agressividade física bastante elevados e níveis de irritabilidade mais baixos. ABSTRACT: Rescue and protection is one of the latest missions in the Military Corps in Portugal, namely the Disaster Intervention. It depends directly on individual characteristics such as personality and how the military deal with extreme and tension situations. These characteristics have a decisive role, as they contribute to the success of decisive missions. The discernment of the individual is imperative in situations where there can be mistakes, because the human and economic costs are too high. The studied sample consisted of 535 soldiers of the military Portuguese Protection and Rescue, an elite force heliborne, where the average age is 28 years (DP=4,4 years), having the younger military 20 years and the oldest 49 years. The age group most represented is the level 26-30 years comprising 52.7% of this military operational force. In order to make this investigation we used the following measures : the Neo Personality Inventory Revised, NEOPI-R (costa & McCrae, 1992), the Agression Questionnaire, AQ (Buss & Perry, 1992), and the Paulhus Deception Scale, PDS (Paulhus, 1998) to access the relationship between personality, aggressiveness and social desirability in Rescue and Protection Military. It is concluded that Rescue and Protection military show high values of conscientiousness and lower values of neuroticism. They also show higher scores on the impression management and lower scores on the Self-Deceptive Enhancement dimension. Subjects also present high levels of physical aggression and lower levels of anger.

Psicopatia e traços da personalidade em estudantes universitários

RESUMO: No presente estudo é investigada a existência de relações entre a psicopatia e os traços de personalidade em estudantes universitários. Este estudo tem como objectivo o estabelecimento de correlações entre os traços psicopáticos e as dimensões da personalidade decorrentes do Modelo dos Cinco Factores em estudantes universitários. A amostra é constituída por 400 estudantes universitários, provenientes de várias universidades da zona de Lisboa, de vários cursos universitários e de ambos os sexos, de forma aleatória. As idades dos sujeitos constituintes da amostra estão compreendidas entre os 17 e os 46 anos de idade (M = 24,26 e DP = 4,435). Por forma a atingir o objectivo proposto para este estudo, recorreu-se à aplicação de um questionário sócio-demográfico e de três medidas de avaliação, nomeadamente: a Escala PDS (Paulhus Deception Scale) de Delroy L. Paulhus, Ph.D. (1998), a Escala LSRP (Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale) de Levenson, Kiehl e Fitzpatrick (1995) e o Inventário NEO-PI-R (Inventário de Personalidade NEO Revisto) de Costa e McCrae (1992), sendo que existe a aferição desta medida de avaliação para a população portuguesa dos autores Lima e Simões (1997). De acordo com os resultados obtidos, podemos constatar que existem associações significativas entre as dimensões da Personalidade e as dimensões da Psicopatia. Verificou-se que os indivíduos que possuem índices elevados de Neuroticismo e baixos indíces de Extroversão e Abertura à Experiência possuem uma maior propensão para apresentarem características psicopáticas. Por outro lado, também se constatou que os indivíduos que possuem baixos índices de Amabilidade e Conscienciosidade apresentam também uma maior probabilidade de possuírem características psicopáticas. ABSTRACT: In the present study, it is investigated the existence of relationships between psychopathy and personality traits in university students. The goal of this study is the establishment of correlations between psychopathic traits and the personality dimensions, recurring from the five factor model in university students. The sample is composed by 400 university students, from various universities in the Lisbon area, from different courses and from both genders, randomly picked. The ages of the subjects in the sample are in between 17 and 46 years old (M = 24,26 and SD = 4,435). By means of reaching the goal proposed for this study, there were applied a socio-demographic questionnaire and three evaluation measures, namely the PDS Scale (Paulhus Deception Scale) from Delroy L. Paulhus, Ph.D. (1998), the LSRP Scale (Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale) from Levenson, Kiehl e Fitzpatrick (1995) and the NEO-PI-R Inventory (Revised NEO Personality Inventory) from de Costa e McCrae (1992), as there is an admeasurement from this measure for the portuguese population from authors Lima e Simões (1997). Considering the obtained results, we can state that there exist significant associations between the Personality dimensions and the Psychopathy dimensions. It was verified that the individuals that possess high indexes of Neuroticism and low indexes of Extroversion and Openness, have a higher propensity to present psychopathic characteristics. On the other hand, it was also found that the individuals that possess low indexes of Lovability and Consciousness also present a higher probability of having psychopathic characteristics.