Course of the history of modern philosophy

UANL

Difference and equality: A critical theorist analysis of post-modern philosophy

The following paper is a critical theorist analysis of post-structuralist philosophy. It examines the omission of an economic critique in post-structuralism and describes this omission as the result of a particular flaw in Nietzsche's epistemological work, an error which has persisted all the way down through deconstruction, post-colonialism, and cultural studies. The paper seeks to reintroduce an economic critique of capitalism back into the social critique of post-structuralism, with the promise that the combination of the two will prove stronger than either critical theory or post-structuralism alone. To achieve this it reinterprets Marx' concept of metabolism as a critical economic category that mirrors post-structuralism's concept of differance.

The philosophy of spiritual activity; a modern philosophy of life developed by scientific methods,

"Edited by H. Collison."

A brief history of modern philosophy,

Mode of access: Internet.

The spirit of modern philosophy;

Mode of access: Internet.

Lecture on the nature and objects of the modern philosophy.

Mode of access: Internet.

Christianity and idealism: the Christian ideal of life in its relations to the Greek and Jewish ideals and to modern philosophy,

First edition, 1896; reprinted 1897.

Introduction to the history of modern philosophy /

Includes index.

Course of the history of modern philosophy.

Tr. of: Cours de 'histoire de la philosophie moderne.

The principles of the philosophy of the expansive and contractive forces; or, An inquiry into the principles of modern philosophy, that is, into the several chief rational sciences, which are extant. In seven books.

Mode of access: Internet.

The spirit of modern philosophy; an essay in the form of lectures,

Mode of access: Internet.

Plato's Doctrine Of Forms: Modern Misunderstandings

Among the philosophical ideas of Plato, perhaps the most famous is his doctrine of forms. This doctrine has faced harsh criticism due, in large part, to the interpretations of this position by modern philosophers such as René Descartes, John Locke, and Immanuel Kant. For example, Plato has been interpreted as presenting a ¿two-worlds¿ approach to form and thing and as advancing a rationalist approach to epistemology. His forms have often been interpreted as ideas and as perfect copies of the things of the visible world. In this thesis, I argue that these, along with other interpretations of Plato presented by the moderns, are based on misunderstandings of Plato¿s overall philosophy. In so doing, I attempt to show that the doctrine of forms cannot be directly interpreted into the language of Cartesian, Lockean, and Kantian metaphysics and epistemology, and thus should not be prematurely dismissed because of these modern Platonic interpretations. By analyzing the Platonic dialogues beside the writings of the modern philosophers, I conclude that three of the most prominent modern philosophers, as representatives of their respective philosophical frameworks, have fundamentally misunderstood the nature of Plato¿s famous doctrine of forms. This could have significant implications for the future of metaphysics and epistemology by providing an interpretation of Plato which adds to, instead of contradicts, the developments of modern philosophy.

A history of philosophy /

Vols. 1-2, 3d edition.