Identify disorders in health records using Conditional Random Fields and Metamap: AEHRC at ShARe/CLEF 2013 eHealth Evaluation Lab Task 1

The Australian e-Health Research Centre (AEHRC) recently participated in the ShARe/CLEF eHealth Evaluation Lab Task 1. The goal of this task is to individuate mentions of disorders in free-text electronic health records and map disorders to SNOMED CT concepts in the UMLS metathesaurus. This paper details our participation to this ShARe/CLEF task. Our approaches are based on using the clinical natural language processing tool Metamap and Conditional Random Fields (CRF) to individuate mentions of disorders and then to map those to SNOMED CT concepts. Empirical results obtained on the 2013 ShARe/CLEF task highlight that our instance of Metamap (after ltering irrelevant semantic types), although achieving a high level of precision, is only able to identify a small amount of disorders (about 21% to 28%) from free-text health records. On the other hand, the addition of the CRF models allows for a much higher recall (57% to 79%) of disorders from free-text, without sensible detriment in precision. When evaluating the accuracy of the mapping of disorders to SNOMED CT concepts in the UMLS, we observe that the mapping obtained by our ltered instance of Metamap delivers state-of-the-art e ectiveness if only spans individuated by our system are considered (`relaxed' accuracy).

A method for matching patients to advanced prostate cancer clinical trials

Objective: To illustrate a new method for simplifying patient recruitment for advanced prostate cancer clinical trials using natural language processing techniques. Background: The identification of eligible participants for clinical trials is a critical factor to increase patient recruitment rates and an important issue for discovery of new treatment interventions. The current practice of identifying eligible participants is highly constrained due to manual processing of disparate sources of unstructured patient data. Informatics-based approaches can simplify the complex task of evaluating patient’s eligibility for clinical trials. We show that an ontology-based approach can address the challenge of matching patients to suitable clinical trials. Methods: The free-text descriptions of clinical trial criteria as well as patient data were analysed. A set of common inclusion and exclusion criteria was identified through consultations with expert clinical trial coordinators. A research prototype was developed using Unstructured Information Management Architecture (UIMA) that identified SNOMED CT concepts in the patient data and clinical trial description. The SNOMED CT concepts model the standard clinical terminology that can be used to represent and evaluate patient’s inclusion/exclusion criteria for the clinical trial. Results: Our experimental research prototype describes a semi-automated method for filtering patient records using common clinical trial criteria. Our method simplified the patient recruitment process. The discussion with clinical trial coordinators showed that the efficiency in patient recruitment process measured in terms of information processing time could be improved by 25%. Conclusion: An UIMA-based approach can resolve complexities in patient recruitment for advanced prostate cancer clinical trials.

Concept oriented biomedical information retrieval

Le domaine biomédical est probablement le domaine où il y a les ressources les plus riches. Dans ces ressources, on regroupe les différentes expressions exprimant un concept, et définit des relations entre les concepts. Ces ressources sont construites pour faciliter l’accès aux informations dans le domaine. On pense généralement que ces ressources sont utiles pour la recherche d’information biomédicale. Or, les résultats obtenus jusqu’à présent sont mitigés : dans certaines études, l’utilisation des concepts a pu augmenter la performance de recherche, mais dans d’autres études, on a plutôt observé des baisses de performance. Cependant, ces résultats restent difficilement comparables étant donné qu’ils ont été obtenus sur des collections différentes. Il reste encore une question ouverte si et comment ces ressources peuvent aider à améliorer la recherche d’information biomédicale. Dans ce mémoire, nous comparons les différentes approches basées sur des concepts dans un même cadre, notamment l’approche utilisant les identificateurs de concept comme unité de représentation, et l’approche utilisant des expressions synonymes pour étendre la requête initiale. En comparaison avec l’approche traditionnelle de "sac de mots", nos résultats d’expérimentation montrent que la première approche dégrade toujours la performance, mais la seconde approche peut améliorer la performance. En particulier, en appariant les expressions de concepts comme des syntagmes stricts ou flexibles, certaines méthodes peuvent apporter des améliorations significatives non seulement par rapport à la méthode de "sac de mots" de base, mais aussi par rapport à la méthode de Champ Aléatoire Markov (Markov Random Field) qui est une méthode de l’état de l’art dans le domaine. Ces résultats montrent que quand les concepts sont utilisés de façon appropriée, ils peuvent grandement contribuer à améliorer la performance de recherche d’information biomédicale. Nous avons participé au laboratoire d’évaluation ShARe/CLEF 2014 eHealth. Notre résultat était le meilleur parmi tous les systèmes participants.