Skin permeation and metabolism of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP).

Phthalates are suspected to be endocrine disruptors. Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) is assumed to have low dermal absorption; however, previous in vitro skin permeation studies have shown large permeation differences. Our aims were to determine DEHP permeation parameters and assess extent of skin DEHP metabolism among workers highly exposed to these lipophilic, low volatile substances. Surgically removed skin from patients undergoing abdominoplasty was immediately dermatomed (800 μm) and mounted on flow-through diffusion cells (1.77 cm(2)) operating at 32°C with cell culture media (aqueous solution) as the reservoir liquid. The cells were dosed either with neat DEHP or emulsified in aqueous solution (166 μg/ml). Samples were analysed by HPLC-MS/MS. DEHP permeated human viable skin only as the metabolite MEHP (100%) after 8h of exposure. Human skin was able to further oxidize MEHP to 5-oxo-MEHP. Neat DEHP applied to the skin hardly permeated skin while the aqueous solution readily permeated skin measured in both cases as concentration of MEHP in the receptor liquid. DEHP pass through human skin, detected as MEHP only when emulsified in aqueous solution, and to a far lesser degree when applied neat to the skin. Using results from older in vitro skin permeation studies with non-viable skin may underestimate skin exposures. Our results are in overall agreement with newer phthalate skin permeation studies.

Integrating receptor interactions and dynamics and Interference with endocrine disruptors in the mechanisms of action of PPAR nuclear receptors

Abstract Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (PPARs) form a family of three nuclear receptors regulating important cellular and metabolic functions. PPARs control gene expression by directly binding to target promoters as heterodimers with the Retinoid X Receptor (RXR), and their transcriptional activity is enhanced upon activation by natural or pharmacological ligands. The binding of PPAR/RXR heterodimers on target promoters allows the anchoring of a series of coactivators and corepressors involved in promoter remodeling and the recruitment of the transcription machinery. The transcriptional output finally depends on a complex interplay between (i) the respective expression levels of PPARs, RXRs and of other nuclear receptors competing for DNA binding and RXR recruitment, (ii) the availability and the nature of PPAR and RXR ligands, (iii) the expression levels and the nature of the different coactivators and corepressors and (iv) the sequence and the epigenetic status of the promoter. Understanding how all these factors and signals integrate and fine-tune transcription remains a challenge but is necessary to understand the specificity of the physiological functions regulated by PPARs. The work presented herein focuses on the molecular mechanisms of PPAR action and aims at understanding how the interactions and mobility of the receptor modulate transcription in the physiological context of a living cell: Such observations in vivo rely on the use of engineered fluorescent protein chimeras and require the development and the application of complementary imaging techniques such as Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP), Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) and Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy (FCS). Using such techniques, PPARs are shown to reside solely in the nucleus where they are constitutively associated with RXR but transcriptional activation by ligand binding -does not promote the formation of sub-nuclear structures as observed with other nuclear receptors. In addition, the engagement of unliganded PPARs in large complexes of cofactors in living cells provides a molecular basis for their ligand-independent activity. Ligand binding reduces receptor diffusion by promoting the recruitment of coactivators which further enlarge the size of PPAR complexes to acquire full transcriptional competence. Using these molecular approaches, we deciphered the molecular mechanisms through which phthalates, a class of pollutants from the plastic industry, interfere with PPARγ signaling. Mono-ethyl-hexyl-phthalate (MEHP) binding induces the recruitment of a specific subset of cofactors and translates into the expression of a specific subset of target genes, the transcriptional output being strongly conditioned by the differentiation status of the cell. This selective PPARγ modulation induces limited adipogenic effects in cellular models while exposure to phthalates in animal models leads to protective effects on glucose tolerance and diet-induced obesity. These results demonstrate that phthalates influence lipid and carbohydrate metabolism through complex mechanisms which most likely involve PPARγ but also probably PPARα and PPARß, Altogether, the molecular and physiological demonstration of the interference of pollutants with PPAR action outlines an important role of chemical exposure in metabolic regulations. Résumé Les PPARs (Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors) forment une famille de récepteurs nucléaires qui régulent des fonctions cellulaires et métaboliques importantes. Les PPARs contrôlent l'expression des gènes en se liant directement à leurs promoteurs sous forme d'hétérodimères avec les récepteurs RXR (Retinoid X Receptor), et leur activité transcriptionnelle est stimulée par la liaison de ligands naturels ou pharmacologiques. L'association des hétérodimères PPAR/RXR avec les promoteurs des gènes cibles permet le recrutement de coactivateurs et de corépresseurs qui vont permettre le remodelage de la chromatine et le recrutement de la machinerie transcriptionnelle. Les actions transcriptionnelles du récepteur dépendent toutefois d'interactions complexes qui sont régulées par (i) le niveau d'expression des PPARs, des RXRs et d'autres récepteurs nucléaires entrant en compétition pour la liaison à l'ADN et l'association avec RXR, (ii) la disponibilité et la nature de ligands de PPAR et de RXR, (iii) les niveaux d'expression et la nature des différents coactivateurs et corépresseurs et (iv) la séquence et le marquage épigénétique des promoteurs. La compréhension des mécanismes qui permettent d'intégrer ces aspects pour assurer une régulation fine de l'activité transcriptionnelle est un défi qu'il est nécessaire de relever pour comprendre la spécificité des fonctions physiologiques régulées par les PPARs. Ce travail concerne l'étude des mécanismes d'action moléculaire des PPARs et vise à mieux comprendre comment les interactions du récepteur avec d'autres protéines ainsi que la mobilité de ce dernier régulent son activité transcriptionnelle dans le contexte physiologique des cellules vivantes. De telles observations reposent sur l'emploi de protéines fusionnées à des protéines fluorescentes ainsi que sur le développement et l'utilisation de techniques d'imagerie complémentaires telles que le FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching), le FRET (Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer) ou la FCS (Fluorescence Corrélation Spectroscopy). En appliquant ces méthodes, nous avons pu montrer que les PPARs résident toujours dans le noyau où ils sont associés de manière constitutive à RXR, mais que l'ajout de ligand n'induit pas la formation de structures sub-nucléaires comme cela a pu être décrit pour d'autres récepteurs nucléaires. De plus, les PPARs sont engagés dans de larges complexes protéiques de cofacteurs en absence de ligand, ce qui procure une explication moléculaire à leur activité ligand-indépendante. La liaison du ligand réduit la vitesse de diffusion du récepteur en induisant le recrutement de coactivateurs qui augmente encore plus la taille des complexes afin d'acquérir un potentiel d'activation maximal. En utilisant ces approches moléculaires, nous avons pu caractériser les mécanismes permettant aux phtalates, une classe de polluants provenant de l'industrie plastique, d'interférer avec PPARγ. La liaison du mono-ethyl-hexyl-phtalate (NERF) à PPARγ induit un recrutement sélectif de cofacteurs, se traduisant par l'induction spécifique d'un sous-ensemble de gènes qui varie en fonction du niveau de différentiation cellulaire. La modulation sélective de PPARγ par le MEHP provoque une adipogenèse modérée dans des modèles cellulaires alors que l'exposition de modèles animaux aux phtalates induit des effets bénéfiques sur la tolérance au glucose et sur le développement de l'obésité. Toutefois, les phtalates ont une action complexe sur le métabolisme glucido-lipidique en faisant intervenir PPARγ mais aussi probablement PPARα et PPARß. Cette démonstration moléculaire et physiologique de l'interférence des polluants avec les récepteurs nucléaires PPAR souligne un rôle important de l'exposition à de tels composés dans les régulations métaboliques.

PPAR-mediated activity of phthalates: A link to the obesity epidemic?

The endocrine disruption hypothesis asserts that exposure to small amounts of some chemicals in the environment may interfere with the endocrine system and lead to harmful effects in wildlife and humans. Many of these chemicals may interact with members of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are such candidate members, which interact with many different endogenous and exogenous lipophilic compounds. More particularly, the roles of PPARs in lipid and carbohydrate metabolism raise the question of their activation by a sub-class of pollutants, tentatively named "metabolic disrupters". Phthalates are abundant environmental micro-pollutants in Europe and North America and may belong to this class. Mono-ethyl-hexyl-phthalate (MEHP), a metabolite of the widespread plasticizer di-ethyl-hexyl-phthalate (DEHP), has been found in exposed organisms and interacts with all three PPARs. A thorough analysis of its interactions with PPARgamma identified MEHP as a selective PPARgamma modulator, and thus a possible contributor to the obesity epidemic.

The endocrine disruptor monoethyl-hexyl-phthalate is a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma modulator that promotes adipogenesis.

The ability of pollutants to affect human health is a major concern, justified by the wide demonstration that reproductive functions are altered by endocrine disrupting chemicals. The definition of endocrine disruption is today extended to broader endocrine regulations, and includes activation of metabolic sensors, such as the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs). Toxicology approaches have demonstrated that phthalate plasticizers can directly influence PPAR activity. What is now missing is a detailed molecular understanding of the fundamental basis of endocrine disrupting chemical interference with PPAR signaling. We thus performed structural and functional analyses that demonstrate how monoethyl-hexyl-phthalate (MEHP) directly activates PPARgamma and promotes adipogenesis, albeit to a lower extent than the full agonist rosiglitazone. Importantly, we demonstrate that MEHP induces a selective activation of different PPARgamma target genes. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and fluorescence microscopy in living cells reveal that this selective activity correlates with the recruitment of a specific subset of PPARgamma coregulators that includes Med1 and PGC-1alpha, but not p300 and SRC-1. These results highlight some key mechanisms in metabolic disruption but are also instrumental in the context of selective PPAR modulation, a promising field for new therapeutic development based on PPAR modulation.

PPAR disruption: Cellular mechanisms and physiological consequences

Endocrine disruption is defined as the perturbation of the endocrine system, which includes disruption of nuclear hormone receptor signalling. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) represent a family of nuclear receptors that has not yet been carefully studied with regards to endocrine disruption, despite the fact that PPARs are known to be important targets for xenobiotics. Here we report a first comprehensive approach aimed at defining the mechanistic basis of PPAR disruption focusing on one chemical, the plasticizer monethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP), but using a variety of methodologies and models. We used mammalian cells and a combination of biochemical and live cell imaging techniques to show that MEHP binds to PPAR gamma and selectively regulates interactions with coregulators. Micro-array experiments further showed that this selectivity is translated at the physiological level during adipocyte differentiation. In that context, MEHP functions as a selective PPAR modulator regulating only a subset of PPAR gamma target genes compared to the action of a full agonist. We also explored the action of MEHP on PPARs in an aquatic species, Xenopus laevis, as many xenobiotics are found in aquatic ecosystems. In adult males, micro-array data indicated that MEHP influences liver physiology, possibly through a cross-talk between PPARs and estrogen receptors (ER). In early Xenopus laevis embryos, we showed that PPAR beta/delta exogenous activation by an agonist or by MEHP affects development. Taken together our results widen the concept of endocrine disruption by pinpointing PPARs as key factors in that process.

Combined transcriptomic-(1)H NMR metabonomic study reveals yhat monoethylhexyl phthalate stimulates adipogenesis and glyceroneogenesis in human adipocytes

Adipose tissue is a major storage site for lipophilic environmental contaminants. The environmental metabolic disruptor hypothesis postulates that some pollutants can promote obesity or metabolic disorders by activating nuclear receptors involved in the control of energetic homeostasis. In this context, monoethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP) is of particular concern since it was shown to activate the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) in 3T3-L1 murine preadipocytes. In the present work, we used an untargeted, combined transcriptomic-(1)H NMR-based metabonomic approach to describe the overall effect of MEHP on primary cultures of human subcutaneous adipocytes differentiated in vitro. MEHP stimulated rapidly and selectively the expression of genes involved in glyceroneogenesis, enhanced the expression of the cytosolic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, and reduced fatty acid release. These results demonstrate that MEHP increased glyceroneogenesis and fatty acid reesterification in human adipocytes. A longer treatment with MEHP induced the expression of genes involved in triglycerides uptake, synthesis, and storage; decreased intracellular lactate, glutamine, and other amino acids; increased aspartate and NAD, and resulted in a global increase in triglycerides. Altogether, these results indicate that MEHP promoted the differentiation of human preadipocytes to adipocytes. These mechanisms might contribute to the suspected obesogenic effect of MEHP.

Phthalate exposure among US women, NHANES 1999--2002: Relationship to serum gonadotropin levels

Phthalates are industrial chemicals used primarily as plasticizers though they and are found in a myriad of consumer goods such as children's toys, food packaging, dental sealants, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, perfumes, and building materials. US biomonitoring data show more than 75% of the population have exposure to mono-n-butyl phthalate (MBP), mono-ethyl phthalate (MEP), mono-(2-ethyl) hexyl phthalate (MEHP), and mono-benzyl phthalate (MBZP). Reproductive toxicity from phthalate exposure in animal models has raised concerns about similar effects on fertility in humans. This dissertation research focuses on phthalate exposures in the US population and investigates the plausibility of an exposure-response relationship between phthalates and endocrine hormones essential for ovulation among US women. The objective of this research is to determine the relationship between levels of gonadotropins, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and leutinizing hormone (LH), and urinary phthalate monoester metabolites: MBP, MEP, MEHP, MBZP among National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2002 women aged 35 to 60 years. Using biomarker data from a one-third sub-sample of NHANES participants, log transformed serum FSH and serum LH, respectively were regressed on phthalates controlling for age, body mass index, smoking, and creatinine taking into consideration the complex survey design (n=385). Models were stratified by reproductive status: reproductive (n=185), menopause transition (n=49) and post-menopausal (n=125). A decrease in FSH associated with increasing MBzP (beta=-0.094, p<0.05) was observed for all participants but no statistical association between log FSH and MBP, MEP, or MEHP was seen. A decrease in LH (beta=-0.125, p<0.05) was also observed with increasing MBzP for all participants though there was no relationship between levels of LH and MBP, MEP, or MEHP. The observed associations between FSH, LH and MBzP did not persist when stratified by reproductive status. Thus, the present study shows a change in endocrine hormones related to ovulation with increasing urinary MBzP among a representative sample of US women from 1999-2002 though this observed exposure-response relationship does not remain after stratification by reproductive status. ^