Calendar of marriage licenses issued by the Faculty office. 1632-1714.

At head of title: The index library.

Marriage licenses granted within the archdeaconry of Chester in the diocese of Chester ...

Report of the Record society for the year 1907/08 contained in v. 3, 1909/10 in v. 4, 1915/16-1917/18 in v. 7, 1920/21-1922/23 in v. 8.

London marriage licences 1521-1869.

Memoir of Col. Joseph Lemuel Chester ... by John Ward Dean.

Calendar of Sussex marriage licences recorded in the Consistory Court of the Bishop of Chichester for the Archdeaconry of Lewes, August, 1586, to March, 1642-3.

Mode of access: Internet.

Merritton Municipal Records collection

In 1874, Merritton, Ont. was incorporated a village with W.W. Waite as the first reeve. On July 1, 1918, the village was incorporated a town. The first mayor was Thomas F. Hastings. In 1961, Merritton, Grantham and Port Dalhousie amalgamated with St. Catharines, despite the opposition of the town councils and citizens.

Where to write for vital records : births, deaths, marriages, and divorces.

"May 1982."

Vital records of Barre, Massachusetts, to the end of the year 1849.

Mode of access: Internet.

Vital record of Rhode Island : 1636-1850 : first series : births, marriages and deaths : a family register for the people /

(cont.) v. 17. Providence Phenix, Providence patriot, and Columbian Phenix-Marriages-A to R.- v. 18. Providence Phenix, Providence patriot, and Columbian Phenix-Marriages: S to Z; deaths: A to M.- v. 19. Providence Phenix, Providence patriot, and Columbian Phenix-Deaths: N to Z; Rhode Island American-Marriages: A to G.- v. 20. Rhode Island American: Marriages: H to Z. Deaths: A and B.- v. 21. Rhode Island American: Deaths: C to S.

Index of marriages in Massachusetts centennial and Columbian centinel, 1784 to 1840 /

Covers all the entries in two Boston newspapers, including records which they received in exchange from various parts of the country.

‘Live your liberation, don’t lobby for it’ : Australian queer student activists’ perspectives of same-sex marriage

One topic covered in Australian queer university student print media is the legalisation of same-sex marriage. The legalisation of same-sex marriage is currently generating much debate in Western queer communities. Same-sex marriage is legalised in some countries such as, Canada, Spain, the Netherlands and Belgium. It has been outlawed in Australia and most states in the US. Campaigns continue to reverse these restrictions. Other countries, such as the UK and New Zealand allow same-sex civil unions, providing couples with the rights afforded to married couples. There is a range of research documenting queer communities’ attitudes towards this issue (for example Lannutti 2005; Clarke, Burgoyne and Burns 2006; Yep, Lovaas and Elia 2003; Wolfson 1993; Egan and Sherrill 2005). These studies document broad community views as well as those of community sub-sections. For example, Yip (2004) looks at the views of gay and lesbian Christians on same-sex marriage and Lahey and Alderson (2004) document the experiences of same-sex couples who have gotten married or who are waiting to get married. Philosophical analyses consider the legalisation of same-sex marriage in relation to, for example, liberalism, equal rights, liberation, queer theory, citizenship, history, activism, religious discourse and feminism (Ferguson 2007; Jordan 2005; Josephson 2005; Lipton 2006; Sullivan and Chauncey 2005; Riggs 2007). This paper explores Australian queer university student activist media’s representation of same-sex marriage, and the debates surrounding its legalisation. It examines a selection of queer student media from four metropolitan Australian universities, and the 2003 and 2004 editions of national queer student publication, Querelle. This paper uses discourse analysis of queer student activists’ media representations of marriage to investigate this issue in one specific context – metropolitan Australian universities. This paper thus contributes to the history of queer activism, documenting what one group of young people say about the legalisation of same-sex marriage, and furthers research on queer perspectives of marriage and same-sex relationships.

Who benefits from marriage?

The phenomenon that married men earn higher average wages than unmarried men, the so-called marriage premium, is well known. However, the robustness of the marriage premium across the wage distribution and the underlying causes of the marriage premium deserve closer scrutiny. Focusing on the entire wage distribution and employing recently developed semi-nonparametric tests for quantile treatment effects, our findings cast doubt on the robustness of the premium. We find that the premium is explained by selection above the median, whereas a positive premium is obtained only at very low wages. We argue that the causal effect at low wages is probably attributable to employer discrimination.