998 resultados para MAXILLARY MOLAR DISTALIZATION
Resumo:
Purpose We aimed to use lateral and oblique radiographs to evaluate dental and skeletal changes arising from maxillary molar intrusion with zygomatic anchorage in open bite patients. Methods We conducted a pilot study including nine patients (six females and three males; mean age, 18.7±5.1 years) with skeletal open bite treated with titanium miniplates for posterior dentoalveolar intrusion. Lateral and oblique (right and left, 45°) radiographs were obtained before (T1) and 6 months after intrusion (T2). A paired t test was used for statistical evaluation. Results The maxillary posterior teeth were intruded 2.03± 0.87 mm (p<0.01) with 450×g of force, which resulted in counterclockwise rotation of the mandible (1.57°, p=0.02) and clockwise rotation of the occlusal plane (4.27±2.66°, p=0.01). Anterior facial height decreased by a mean of 1.79±1.51 mm (p<0.01). No significant change in the palatal plane or in anteroposterior molar movement was observed. Conclusion The oblique radiograph at 45° was useful for the assessment of molar intrusion and anteroposterior displacement. The treatment of anterior open bite with skeletal anchorage provided intrusion of molars and counterclockwise rotation of the mandible, resulting in open bite closure.
Resumo:
AIM: To describe a method of carrying out apical surgery of a maxillary molar using ultrasonics to create a lateral sinus window into the maxillary sinus and an endoscope to enhance visibility during surgery. SUMMARY: A 37-year-old female patient presented with tenderness to percussion of the maxillary second right molar. Root canal treatment had been undertaken, and the tooth restored with a metal-ceramic crown. Radiological examination revealed an apical radiolucency in close proximity to the maxillary sinus. Apical surgery of the molar was performed through the maxillary sinus, using ultrasonics for the osteotomy, creating a window in the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus. During surgery, the lining of the sinus was exposed and elevated without perforation. The root-end was resected using a round tungsten carbide drill, and the root-end cavity was prepared with ultrasonic retrotips. Root-end filling was accomplished with MTA(®) . An endoscope was used to examine the cut root face, the prepared cavity and the root-end filling. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. At the 12-month follow-up, the tooth had no clinical signs or symptoms, and the radiograph demonstrated progressing resolution of the radiolucency. KEY LEARNING POINTS: When conventional root canal retreatment cannot be performed or has failed, apical surgery may be considered, even in maxillary molars with roots in close proximity to the maxillary sinus. Ultrasonic sinus window preparation allows more control and can minimize perforation of the sinus membrane when compared with conventional rotary drilling techniques. The endoscope enhances visibility during endodontic surgery, thus improving the quality of the case.
Resumo:
Introduction: In this retrospective study, we compared the cephalometric effects, the dental-arch changes, and the efficiency of Class II treatment with the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, or extraction of 2 maxillary premolars, all associated with fixed appliance therapy. Methods: The sample of 82 patients with Class II malocclusion was divided into 3 groups: group 1 patients (n = 22; treatment time, 3.8 years) were treated with the pendulum appliance and fixed orthodontic appliances. Group 2 patients (n = 30; treatment time, 3.2 years) were treated with cervical headgear followed by fixed appliances; group 3 patients (n = 30; treatment time, 2.1 years) were treated with 2 maxillary premolar extractions and fixed appliances. The average starting ages of the groups ranged from 13.2 to 13.8 years. Data were obtained from serial cephalometric measurements and dental casts. The dental casts were analyzed with the treatment priority index. The treatment efficiency index was also used. Results: The 3 treatment protocols produced similar cephalometric effects, especially skeletally. Comparisons among the 2 distalizing appliances (pendulum and cervical headgear) and extraction of 2 maxillary premolars for Class II treatment showed changes primarily in the maxillary dentoalveolar component and dental relationships. The facial profile was similar after treatment, except for slightly more retrusion of the upper lip in the extraction patients. The treatment priority index demonstrated that occlusal outcomes also were similar among the groups. The treatment efficiency index had higher values for the extraction group. Conclusions: The effects of treatment with the pendulum appliance or cervical headgear and extraction of 2 maxillary premolars associated with fixed appliances were similar from both occlusal and cephalometric standpoints. Class II treatment with extraction of maxillary teeth was more efficient because of the shorter treatment time. Differences in maxillary incisor retraction should be noted, but these differences might have been due to greater maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion in the extraction group before treatment. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:833-42)
Resumo:
This study compared the effects produced by two different molar distalizers, namely cervical headgear (CHG) and the intraoral pendulum appliance, associated with fixed orthodontic appliances. The headgear group comprised 30 patients (19 females, 11 males), with an initial age of 13.07 years [standard deviation (SD) = 1.3], treated with CHG and fixed orthodontic appliances for a mean period of 3.28 years, and the pendulum group 22 patients (15 females, 7 males), with initial age of 13.75 years (SD = 1.86), treated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic appliances for a mean period of 4.12 years. Lateral cephalograms were taken at the start (T1) and on completion (T2) of orthodontic treatment. The pendulum and CHG groups were similar as to initial age, severity of the Class II malocclusion, gender distribution, initial cephalometric characteristics, and initial and final treatment priority index (TPI). Only treatment time was not similar between the groups, with a need for annualization for data for the pendulum group. The data were compared with independent t-tests. There was significantly greater restriction of maxillary forward growth and improvement of the skeletal maxillomandibular relationship in the CHG group (P < 0.05). The maxillary molars were more mesially tipped and extruded and the mandibular molars more uprighted in the CHG group compared with the pendulum group (P < 0.05). There was more labial tipping of the mandibular incisors and greater overbite reduction in the pendulum group. The pendulum appliance produced only dentoalveolar effects, different from the CHG appliance, which restricted maxillary forward displacement, thus improving the skeletal maxillomandibular relationship.
Resumo:
The purpose of this study was to differentiate the dentoalveolar and skeletal effects to better understand orthodontic treatment. We evaluated the treatment changes associated with the bionator and the removable headgear splint (RHS). Methods: The sample comprised 51 consecutively treated Class II patients from 1 office who had all been successfully treated with either a bionator (n = 17) or an RHS appliance (n = 17). Class II patients waiting to start treatment later served as controls (n = 17). A modified version of the Johnston pitchfork analysis was used to quantify the dentoalveolar and skeletal contributions to the anteroposterior correction at the levels of the molars and the incisors. Results: Both appliances significantly improved anteroposterior molar relationships (2.15 mm for the bionator, 2.27 mm for the RHS), primarily by dentoalveolar modifications (1.49 and 2.36 mm for the bionator and the RHS, respectively), with greater maxillary molar distalization in the RHS group. Overjet relationships also improved significantly compared with the controls (3.11 and 2.12 mm for the bionator and the RHS, respectively), due primarily to retroclination of the maxillary incisors (2.2 and 2.38 mm for the bionator and the RHS, respectively). The differences between overall corrections and dentoalveolar modifications for both molar and overjet relationships were explained by skeletal responses, with the bionator group showing significantly greater anterior mandibular displacement than the RHS group. Conclusions: The bionator and the RHS effectively corrected the molar relationships and overjets of Class II patients primarily by dentoalveolar changes. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134: 732-41)
Resumo:
O aparelho Pêndulo é eficaz na correção das más oclusões de Classe II, com comprometimento dentoalveolar superior. No entanto, a perda de ancoragem caracterizada pela mesialização dos pré-molares superiores, e pela vestibularização e protrusão dos incisivos superiores, constitui um grave efeito colateral deste dispositivo. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar as possíveis alterações dentárias e esquelética, sagitais e verticais, decorrentes do uso do Pêndulo modificado, ancorado em mini-implantes. Dez indivíduos foram tratados neste estudo, sendo que telerradiografias em norma lateral foram realizadas no início do tratamento, e imediatamente após a remoção do Pêndulo. Em cada indivíduo foram instalados dois mini-implantes no palato, que receberam carga imediata por meio da ativação do Pêndulo modificado, apoiado nestes dispositivos de ancoragem temporária. Nenhum dos dentes avaliados apresentou alterações verticais estatisticamente significantes; o mesmo ocorreu para as alterações esqueléticas verticais e sagitais, e para o trespasse vertical e horizontal. Com relação às alterações estatisticamente significantes, o primeiro molar superior moveu-se para distal aproximadamente 5,6mm em 6,2 meses, e com inclinação distal média de 7,100. Os segundos pré-molares superiores distalizaram em média 2,7mm e inclinaram 5,550; já os segundos molares superiores moveram-se em média 4,6mm para distal com uma inclinação de 13,700; valores estes também considerados estatisticamente significantes. O sistema de distalização de molares superiores, composto pelo Pêndulo modificado ancorado em mini-implantes, mostrou-se eficaz na correção da má oclusão de Classe II, sem produzir os efeitos de perda de ancoragem. (AU)
Resumo:
O aparelho Pêndulo é eficaz na correção das más oclusões de Classe II, com comprometimento dentoalveolar superior. No entanto, a perda de ancoragem caracterizada pela mesialização dos pré-molares superiores, e pela vestibularização e protrusão dos incisivos superiores, constitui um grave efeito colateral deste dispositivo. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar as possíveis alterações dentárias e esquelética, sagitais e verticais, decorrentes do uso do Pêndulo modificado, ancorado em mini-implantes. Dez indivíduos foram tratados neste estudo, sendo que telerradiografias em norma lateral foram realizadas no início do tratamento, e imediatamente após a remoção do Pêndulo. Em cada indivíduo foram instalados dois mini-implantes no palato, que receberam carga imediata por meio da ativação do Pêndulo modificado, apoiado nestes dispositivos de ancoragem temporária. Nenhum dos dentes avaliados apresentou alterações verticais estatisticamente significantes; o mesmo ocorreu para as alterações esqueléticas verticais e sagitais, e para o trespasse vertical e horizontal. Com relação às alterações estatisticamente significantes, o primeiro molar superior moveu-se para distal aproximadamente 5,6mm em 6,2 meses, e com inclinação distal média de 7,100. Os segundos pré-molares superiores distalizaram em média 2,7mm e inclinaram 5,550; já os segundos molares superiores moveram-se em média 4,6mm para distal com uma inclinação de 13,700; valores estes também considerados estatisticamente significantes. O sistema de distalização de molares superiores, composto pelo Pêndulo modificado ancorado em mini-implantes, mostrou-se eficaz na correção da má oclusão de Classe II, sem produzir os efeitos de perda de ancoragem. (AU)
Resumo:
O aparelho Pêndulo é eficaz na correção das más oclusões de Classe II, com comprometimento dentoalveolar superior. No entanto, a perda de ancoragem caracterizada pela mesialização dos pré-molares superiores, e pela vestibularização e protrusão dos incisivos superiores, constitui um grave efeito colateral deste dispositivo. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar as possíveis alterações dentárias e esquelética, sagitais e verticais, decorrentes do uso do Pêndulo modificado, ancorado em mini-implantes. Dez indivíduos foram tratados neste estudo, sendo que telerradiografias em norma lateral foram realizadas no início do tratamento, e imediatamente após a remoção do Pêndulo. Em cada indivíduo foram instalados dois mini-implantes no palato, que receberam carga imediata por meio da ativação do Pêndulo modificado, apoiado nestes dispositivos de ancoragem temporária. Nenhum dos dentes avaliados apresentou alterações verticais estatisticamente significantes; o mesmo ocorreu para as alterações esqueléticas verticais e sagitais, e para o trespasse vertical e horizontal. Com relação às alterações estatisticamente significantes, o primeiro molar superior moveu-se para distal aproximadamente 5,6mm em 6,2 meses, e com inclinação distal média de 7,100. Os segundos pré-molares superiores distalizaram em média 2,7mm e inclinaram 5,550; já os segundos molares superiores moveram-se em média 4,6mm para distal com uma inclinação de 13,700; valores estes também considerados estatisticamente significantes. O sistema de distalização de molares superiores, composto pelo Pêndulo modificado ancorado em mini-implantes, mostrou-se eficaz na correção da má oclusão de Classe II, sem produzir os efeitos de perda de ancoragem. (AU)
Resumo:
The objective of this study was to compare, on study models and initial cephalograms, the efficiency of Class II malocclusion treatment with the pendulum appliance, and with two maxillary premolar extraction protocol. The sample consisted of 48 treated Class II malocclusion patients: group 1 comprised 22 patients (7 males, 15 females) treated with the pendulum appliance, with an initial mean age of 14.44 years and group 2, 26 patients (14 males, 12 females) treated with two maxillary premolar extractions at an initial mean age of 13.66 years. To compare the efficiency of each treatment protocol, the occlusal outcomes were evaluated on dental casts using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index and the treatment time (TT) of each group was calculated on clinical charts. The degree of treatment efficiency was calculated as the ratio between the percentage of occlusal improvement, evaluated through the PAR index, and TT. Statistical analysis was undertaken by means of t-tests. The findings demonstrated that the two maxillary premolar extraction protocol provided the occlusal outcomes in a shorter time (group 1: 45.7 months, group 2: 23.01 months) and, therefore, demonstrated greater treatment efficiency than the pendulum appliance.
Resumo:
Introduction: In this study, we compared the dentoalveolar changes of Class II patients treated with Jones jig and pendulum appliances. Methods: The experimental group comprised 40 Class II malocclusion subjects, divided into 2 groups: group 1 consisted of 20 patients (11 boys, 9 girls) at a mean pretreatment age of 13.17 years, treated with the Jones jig appliance for 0.91 years; group 2 comprised 20 patients (8 boys, 12 grls) at a mean pretreatment age of 13.98 years, treated with the pendulum appliance for 1.18 years. Only active treatment time of molar distalization was evaluated in the predistalization and postdistalization lateral cephalograms. Molar, second premolar, and incisor angular and linear variables were obtained. The intergroup treatment changes in these variables were compared with independent t tests. Results: The maxillary second premolars showed greater mesial tipping and extrusion in the Jones jig group, indicating more anchorage loss during molar distalization with this appliance. The amounts and the monthly rates of molar distalization were similar in both groups. Conclusions: The Jones jig group showed greater mesial tipping and extrusion of the maxillary second premolars. The mean amounts and the monthly rates of first molar distalization were similar in both groups. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:336-42)
Biometric analysis of the maxillary permanent molar teeth and its relation to furcation involvement.
Resumo:
A high rate of root exposure and consequently the exposure of the furcation area is usually observed in multirooted teeth. In maxillary molar teeth, this fact may endanger the three existent furcations (buccal, mesial and distal), causing serious problems. In this research, distance measures from the buccal furcation to the mesial (F1M) and distal (F1D) surfaces of the mesio-buccal and disto-buccal roots; from the mesial furcation to the buccal (F2B) and palatal (F2P) surfaces of the mesio-buccal and palatal roots and from the distal furcation to the buccal (F3B) and palatal (F3P) surfaces of the disto-buccal and palatal roots, respectively were established. One hundred maxillary first molar teeth were used, 50 of the right and 50 of the left side. Reference marks and demarcations were determined on the furcations and also on the root surfaces involved in the measures. We concluded that these measurements are important because they may effectivelly contribute to diagnosis, prevention and treatment of periodontal problems.
Resumo:
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment success rate of Class II malocclusion without extractions, according to initial severity. Methods: Class II subjects (n = 276) were divided into 2 groups according to the severity of the malocclusion. Group 1 comprised 144 patients with bilateral half Class II malocclusion at the initial mean age of 12.27 years. Group 2 comprised 132 patients who initially had bilateral complete Class II malocclusion at the initial mean age of 12.32 years. The patients` initial and final study models were evaluated with Grainger`s treatment priority index. Chi-square tests were used to test for differences between the 2 groups for categorical variables. Variables regarding occlusal results were compared with independent t tests. Results: Group 1 had a significantly better final occlusal result, a shorter treatment time, and a higher treatment efficiency index. Conclusions: Based on these results, it was concluded that bilateral half Class II malocclusion has a better treatment success rate than bilateral complete Class II malocclusion when treatment is conducted without extractions. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135: 274.e1-274.e8)
Resumo:
Gingival metastases are infrequent and invariably associated with a widespread disease and a poor prognosis. Because of their unremarkable clinical appearance, they can be difficult to distinguish from more common gingival hyperplastic or reactive lesions, such as pyogenic granuloma, peripheral giant cell granuloma, and peripheral ossifying granuloma. We are reporting here an unusual case of a 36-year-old man with a mixed testicular germ cell tumor presenting as a metastatic pure choriocarcinoma involving the maxillary gingiva, extending from the first left premolar to the left second maxillary molar, mimicking a 'benign looking' gingival mass. Gingival metastases may be the first manifestation of a widespread metastatic disease and therefore particular attention must be paid to gingival lesions associated with atypical clinical symptoms and/or signs.
Resumo:
Distalization of maxillary molars is indicated for correction of Class II dental malocclusion and for space gain in cases of space deficiency. The ideal treatment with an intraoral fixed appliance for molar distalization should fulfill the following requirements: patient compliance; acceptable esthetics; comfort; minimum anterior anchor loss (as evidenced by inclination of incisors); bodily movement of the molars to avoid undesirable effects and unstable outcomes; and minimum time required during sessions for placement and activations. The purpose of this paper was to present an alternative treatment for space recovery in the area of the maxillary right second premolar when there has been significant mesial movement of the permanent maxillary right first molar. We used a modified appliance that allows unilateral molar distalization in cases of unilateral tooth/arch size discrepancy using the opposite side as anchor, thus reducing the mesialization of the anterior teeth. (Pediatr Dent 2008;30:334-41) Received August 17, 2006 / Last Revision October 17, 2007 / Revision Accepted October 17, 2007
Resumo:
The purpose of this study was to show anatomical variations in permanent maxillary molars. Two clinical cases of four-rooted maxillary molars and a macroscopic study of an extracted tooth, showing a five-rooted maxillary molar, are presented.