Eucalypt MADS-Box Genes Expressed in Developing Flowers

Three MADS-box genes were identified from a cDNA library derived from young flowers of Eucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden. The three egm genes are single-copy genes and are expressed almost exclusively in flowers. The egm1 and egm3 genes shared strongest homology with other plant MADS-box genes, which mediate between the floral meristem and the organ-identity genes. The egm3 gene was also expressed strongly in the receptacle or floral tube, which surrounds the carpels in the eucalypt flower and bears the sepals, petals, and numerous stamens. There appeared to be a group of genes in eucalypts with strong homology with the 3′ region of the egm1 gene. The egm2 gene was expressed in eucalypt petals and stamens and was most homologous to MADS-box genes, which belong to the globosa group of genes, which regulate organogenesis of the second and third floral whorls. The possible role of these three genes in eucalypt floral development is discussed.

Family of MADS-Box Genes Expressed Early in Male and Female Reproductive Structures of Monterey Pine

Three MADS-box genes isolated from Monterey pine (Pinus radiata), PrMADS1, PrMADS2, and PrMADS3, are orthologs to members of the AGL2 and AGL6 gene subfamilies in Arabidopsis. These genes were expressed during early stages of pine shoot development in differentiating seed- and pollen-cone buds. Their transcripts were found within a group of cells that formed ovuliferous scale and microsporophyll primordia. Expression of PrMADS3 was also detected in a group of cells giving rise to needle primordia within differentiated vegetative buds, and in needle primordia.

Identification of dormancy-associated MADS-box genes in apple.

2011

An ancestral MADS-box gene duplication occurred before the divergence of plants and animals

Changes in genes encoding transcriptional regulators can alter development and are important components of the molecular mechanisms of morphological evolution. MADS-box genes encode transcriptional regulators of diverse and important biological functions. In plants, MADS-box genes regulate flower, fruit, leaf, and root development. Recent sequencing efforts in Arabidopsis have allowed a nearly complete sampling of the MADS-box gene family from a single plant, something that was lacking in previous phylogenetic studies. To test the long-suspected parallel between the evolution of the MADS-box gene family and the evolution of plant form, a polarized gene phylogeny is necessary. Here we suggest that a gene duplication ancestral to the divergence of plants and animals gave rise to two main lineages of MADS-box genes: TypeI and TypeII. We locate the root of the eukaryotic MADS-box gene family between these two lineages. A novel monophyletic group of plant MADS domains (AGL34 like) seems to be more closely related to previously identified animal SRF-like MADS domains to form TypeI lineage. Most other plant sequences form a clear monophyletic group with animal MEF2-like domains to form TypeII lineage. Only plant TypeII members have a K domain that is downstream of the MADS domain in most plant members previously identified. This suggests that the K domain evolved after the duplication that gave rise to the two lineages. Finally, a group of intermediate plant sequences could be the result of recombination events. These analyses may guide the search for MADS-box sequences in basal eukaryotes and the phylogenetic placement of new genes from other plant species.

Tomato Flower Abnormalities Induced by Low Temperatures Are Associated with Changes of Expression of MADS-Box Genes1

Flower and fruit development in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) were severely affected when plants were grown at low temperatures, displaying homeotic and meristic transformations and alterations in the fusion pattern of the organs. Most of these homeotic transformations modified the identity of stamens and carpels, giving rise to intermediate organs. Complete homeotic transformations were rarely found and always affected organs of the reproductive whorls. Meristic transformations were also commonly observed in the reproductive whorls, which developed with an excessive number of organs. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that meristic transformations take place very early in the development of the flower and are related to a significant increase in the floral meristem size. However, homeotic transformations should occur later during the development of the organ primordia. Steady-state levels of transcripts corresponding to tomato MADS-box genes TM4, TM5, TM6, and TAG1 were greatly increased by low temperatures and could be related to these flower abnormalities. Moreover, in situ hybridization analyses showed that low temperatures also altered the stage-specific expression of TM4.

The molecular and genetic characterization of the MADS box transcription factor {\it Drosophila\/} MEF2

The myocyte enhancer factor (MEF)-2 family of transcription factors has been implicated in the regulation of muscle transcription in vertebrates, but the precise position of these regulators within the genetic hierarchy leading to myogenesis is unclear. The MEF2 proteins bind to a conserved A/T-rich DNA sequence present in numerous muscle-specific genes, and they are expressed in the cells of the developing somites and in the embryonic heart at the onset of muscle formation in mammals. The MEF2 genes belong to the MADS box family of transcription factors, which control specific programs of gene expression in species ranging from yeast to humans. Each MEF2 family member contains two highly conserved protein motifs, the MADS domain and the MEF2-specific domain, which together provide the MEF2 factors with their unique DNA binding and dimerization properties. In an effort to further define the function of the MEF2 proteins, and to evaluate the degree of conservation shared among these factors and the phylogenetic pathways that they regulate, we sought to identify MEF2 family members in other species. In Drosophila, a homolog of the vertebrate MEF2 genes was identified and termed D-mef2. The D-MEF2 protein binds to the consensus MEF2 element and can activate transcription through tandem copies of that site. During Drosophila embryogenesis, D-MEF2 is specific to the mesoderm germ layer of the developing embryo and becomes expressed in all muscle cell types within the embryo. The role of D-mef2 in Drosophila embryogenesis was examined by generating a loss-of-function mutation in the D-mef2 gene. In embryos homozygous for this mutant allele, somatic, cardiac, and visceral muscles fail to differentiate, but precursors of these myogenic lineages are normally specified and positioned. These results demonstrate that different muscle cell types share a common myogenic differentiation program controlled by MEF2 and suggest that this program has been conserved from Drosophila to mammals. ^

Symbiotic induction of a MADS-box gene during development of alfalfa root nodules.

In response to infection by Rhizobium, highly differentiated organs called nodules form on legume roots. Within these organs, the symbiotic association between the host plant and bacteria is established. A putative plant transcription factor, NMH7, has been identified in alfalfa root nodules. nmh7 contains a MADS-box DNA-binding region and shows homology to flower homeotic genes. This gene is a member of a multigene family in alfalfa and was identified on the basis of nucleic acid homology to plant regulatory protein genes (MADS-box-containing genes) from Antirrhinum and Arabidopsis. RNA analysis and in situ hybridization showed that expression of this class of regulatory genes is limited to the infected cells of alfalfa root nodules and is likely to be involved in the signal transduction pathway initiated by the bacterial symbiont, Rhizobium meliloti. The expression of nmh7 in a root-derived organ is unusual for this class of regulatory genes.

microRNA156-targeted SPL/ SBP box transcription factors regulate tomato ovary and fruit development

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Characterization of MADS homeotic genes in the fern Ceratopteris richardii

The MADS genes encode a family of transcription factors, some of which control the identities of floral organs in flowering plants. To understand the role of MADS genes in the evolution of floral organs, five MADS genes (CMADS1, 2, 3, 4, and 6) were cloned from the fern Ceratopteris richardii, a nonflowering plant. A gene tree of partial amino acid sequences of seed plant and fern MADS genes showed that the fern genes form three subfamilies. All members of one of the fern MADS subfamilies have additional amino-terminal amino acids, which is a synapomorphic character of the AGAMOUS subfamily of the flowering plant MADS genes. Their structural similarity indicates a sister relationship between the two subfamilies. The temporal and spatial patterns of expression of the five fern MADS genes were assessed by Northern blot analyses and in situ hybridizations. CMADS1, 2, 3, and 4 are expressed similarly in the meristematic regions and primordia of sporophyte shoots and roots, as well as in reproductive structures, including sporophylls and sporangial initials, although the amount of expression in each tissue is different in each gene. CMADS6 is expressed in gametophytic tissues but not in sporophytic tissues. The lack of organ-specific expression of MADS genes in the reproductive structures of the fern sporophyte may indicate that the restriction of MADS gene expression to specific reproductive organs and the specialization of MADS gene functions as homeotic selector genes in the flowering plant lineage were important in floral organ evolution.

Combinatorial control of muscle development by basic helix-loop-helix and MADS-box transcription factors.

Members of the MyoD family of muscle-specific basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins function within a genetic pathway to control skeletal muscle development. Mutational analyses of these factors suggested that their DNA binding domains mediated interaction with a coregulator required for activation of muscle-specific transcription. Members of the myocyte enhancer binding factor 2 (MEF2) family of MADS-box proteins are expressed at high levels in muscle and neural cells and at lower levels in several other cell types. MEF2 factors are unable to activate muscle gene expression alone, but they potentiate the transcriptional activity of myogenic bHLH proteins. This potentiation appears to be mediated by direct interactions between the DNA binding domains of these different types of transcription factors. Biochemical and genetic evidence suggests that MEF2 factors are the coregulators for myogenic bHLH proteins. The presence of MEF2 and cell-specific bHLH proteins in other cell types raises the possibility that these proteins may also cooperate to regulate other programs of cell-specific gene expression. We present a model to account for such cooperative interactions.

Mapping the protein regions responsible for the functional specificities of the Arabidopsis MADS domain organ-identity proteins.

The Arabidopsis MADS domain proteins AP1, AP3, PI, and AG specify floral organ identity. All of these proteins contain a MADS domain required for DNA binding and dimerization; a region termed L (linker between MADS domain and K domain), which plays an important role in dimerization specificity; the K domain, named for its similarity to the coiled-coil domain of keratin; and a C-terminal region of unknown function. To determine which regions of these proteins are responsible for their abilities to specify different organs, we have made a number of chimeric MADS box genes. The in vivo function of these chimeric genes was investigated by ectopic expression in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. The four proteins fall into two classes on the basis of regions responsible for their functional specificities. The L region and K domain define the functional specificities of AP3 and PI, while the MADS domain and L region define the functional specificities of AP1 and AG.

Genomic analyses of flowering transition and inflorescence development in grapevine = Análisis genómicos de la transición floral y del desarrollo de la inflorescencia en la vid

The general objective of this work is to analyze the regulatory processes underlying flowering transition and inflorescence and flower development in grapevine. Most of these crucial developmental events take place within buds growing during two seasons in two consecutive years. During the first season, the shoot apical meristem within the bud differentiates all the basic elements of the shoot including flowering transition in lateral primordia and development of inflorescence primordia. These events practically end with bud dormancy. The second season, buds resume shoot growth associated to flower formation and development. In grapevine, the lateral meristems can give rise either to tendril or inflorescence primordia that are homologous organs. With this purpose, we performed global transcriptome analyses along the bud annual cycle and during inflorescence and tendril development. In addition, we approach the genomic analysis of the MIKC type MADS-box gene family in grapevine to identify all its members and assign them putative biological functions. Regarding buds developmental cycle, the results indicate that the main factors explaining the global gene expression differences were the processes of bud dormancy and active growth as well as stress responses. Non dormant buds exhibited up-regulation in functional categories typical of actively proliferating and growing cells (photosynthesis, cell cycle regulation, chromatin assembly) whereas in dormant ones the main functional categories up-regulated were associated to stress response pathways together with transcripts related to starch catabolism. Major transcriptional changes during the dormancy period were associated to the para/endodormancy, endo/ecodormancy and ecodormancy/bud break transitions. Global transcriptional analyses along tendril and inflorescence development suggested that these two homologous organs share a common transcriptional program related to cell proliferation functions. Both structures showed a progressive decrease in the expression of categories such as cell-cycle, auxin metabolism/signaling, DNA metabolism, chromatin assembly and a cluster of five transcripts belonging to the GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR (GRF) transcription factor family, that are known to control cell proliferation in other species and determine the size of lateral organs. However, they also showed organ specific transcriptional programs that can be related to their differential organ structure and function. Tendrils showed higher transcription of genes related to photosynthesis, hormone signaling and secondary metabolism than inflorescences, while inflorescences have higher transcriptional activity for genes encoding transcription factors (especially those belonging to the MADS-box gene family). Further analysis along inflorescence development evidenced the relevance of additional functions likely related to processes of flower development such as fatty acid and lipid metabolism, jasmonate signaling and oxylipin biosynthesis. The transcriptional analyses performed highlighted the relevance of several groups of transcriptional regulators in the developmental processes studied. The expression profiles along bud development revealed significant differences for some MADS-box subfamilies in relation to other plant species, like the members of the FLC and SVP subfamilies suggesting new roles for these groups in grapevine. In this way, it was found that VvFLC2 and VvAGL15.1 could participate, together with some members of the SPL-L family, in dormancy regulation, as was shown for some of them in other woody plants. Similarly, the expression patterns of the VvFLC1, VvFUL, VvSOC1.1 (together with VvFT, VvMFT1 and VFL) genes could indicate that they play a role in flowering transition in grapevine, in parallel to their roles in other plant systems. The expression levels of VFL, the grapevine LEAFY homolog, could be crucial to specify the development of inflorescence and flower meristems instead of tendril meristems. MADS-box genes VvAP3.1 and 2, VvPI, VvAG1 and 3, VvSEP1-4, as well as VvBS1 and 2 are likely associated with the events of flower meristems and flower organs differentiation, while VvAP1 and VvFUL-L (together with VvSOC1.1, VvAGL6.2) could be involved on tendril development given their expression patterns. In addition, the biological function ofVvAP1 and VvTFL1A was analyzed using a gene silencing approach in transgenic grapevine plants. Our preliminary results suggested a possible role for both genes in the initiation and differentiation of tendrils. Finally, the genomic analysis of the MADS-box gene family in grapevine revealed differential features regarding number and expression pattern of genes putatively involved in the flowering transition process as compared to those involved in the specification of flower and fruit organ identity. Altogether, the results obtained allow identifying putative candidate genes and pathways regulating grapevine reproductive developmental processes paving the way to future experiments demonstrating specific gene biological functions. RESUMEN El objetivo general de este trabajo es analizar los procesos regulatorios subyacentes a la inducción floral así como al desarrollo de la inflorescencia y la flor en la vid. La mayor parte de estos eventos cruciales tienen lugar en las yemas a lo largo de dos estaciones de crecimiento consecutivas. Durante la primera estación, el meristemo apical contenido en la yema diferencia los elementos básicos del pámpano, lo cual incluye la inducción de la floración en los meristemos laterales y el subsiguiente desarrollo de primordios de inflorescencia. Estos procesos prácticamente cesan con la entrada en dormición de la yema. En la segunda estación, se reanuda el crecimiento del pámpano acompañado por la formación y desarrollo de las flores. En la vid, los meristemos laterales pueden dar lugar a primordios de inflorescencia o de zarcillo que son considerados órganos homólogos. Con este objetivo llevamos a cabo un estudio a nivel del transcriptoma de la yema a lo largo de su ciclo anual, así como a lo largo del desarrollo de la inflorescencia y del zarcillo. Además realizamos un análisis genómico de la familia MADS de factores transcripcionales (concretamente aquellos del tipo MIKC) para identificar todos sus miembros y tratar de asignarles posibles funciones biológicas. En cuanto al ciclo de desarrollo de la yema, los resultados indican que los principales factores que explican las diferencias globales en la expresión génica fueron los procesos de dormición de la yema y el crecimiento activo junto con las respuestas a diversos tipos de estrés. Las yemas no durmientes mostraron un incremento en la expresión de genes contenidos en categorías funcionales típicas de células en proliferación y crecimiento activo (como fotosíntesis, regulación del ciclo celular, ensamblaje de cromatina), mientras que en las yemas durmientes, las principales categorías funcionales activadas estaban asociadas a respuestas a estrés, así como con el catabolismo de almidón. Los mayores cambios observados a nivel de transcriptoma en la yema coincidieron con las transiciones de para/endodormición, endo/ecodormición y ecodormición/brotación. Los análisis transcripcionales globales a lo largo del desarrollo del zarcillo y de la inflorescencia sugirieron que estos dos órganos homólogos comparten un programa transcripcional común, relacionado con funciones de proliferación celular. Ambas estructuras mostraron un descenso progresivo en la expresión de genes pertenecientes a categorías funcionales como regulación del ciclo celular, metabolismo/señalización por auxinas, metabolismo de ADN, ensamblaje de cromatina y un grupo de cinco tránscritos pertenecientes a la familia de factores transcripcionales GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR (GRF), que han sido asociados con el control de la proliferación celular y en determinar el tamaño de los órganos laterales en otras especies. Sin embargo, también pusieron de manifiesto programas transcripcionales que podrían estar relacionados con la diferente estructura y función de dichos órganos. Los zarcillos mostraron mayor actividad transcripcional de genes relacionados con fotosíntesis, señalización hormonal y metabolismo secundario que las inflorescencias, mientras que éstas presentaron mayor actividad transcripcional de genes codificantes de factores de transcripción (especialmente los pertenecientes a la familia MADS-box). Análisis adicionales a lo largo del desarrollo de la inflorescencia evidenciaron la relevancia de otras funciones posiblemente relacionadas con el desarrollo floral, como el metabolismo de lípidos y ácidos grasos, la señalización mediada por jasmonato y la biosíntesis de oxilipinas. Los análisis transcripcionales llevados a cabo pusieron de manifiesto la relevancia de varios grupos de factores transcripcionales en los procesos estudiados. Los perfiles de expresión estudiados a lo largo del desarrollo de la yema mostraron diferencias significativas en algunas de las subfamilias de genes MADS con respecto a otras especies vegetales, como las observadas en los miembros de las subfamilias FLC y SVP, lo cual sugiere que podrían desempeñar nuevas funciones en la vid. En este sentido, se encontró que los genes VvFLC2 y VvAGL15.1 podrían participar, junto con algunos miembros de la familia SPL-L, en la regulación de la dormición. De un modo similar, los patrones de expresión de los genes VvFLC1, VvFUL, VvSOC1.1 (junto con VvFT, VvMFT1 y VFL) podría indicar que desempeñan un papel en la regulación de la inducción de la floración en la vid, como se ha observado en otros sistemas vegetales. Los niveles de expresión de VFL, el homólogo en vid del gen LEAFY de A. thaliana podrían ser cruciales para la especificación del desarrollo de meristemos de inflorescencia y flor en lugar de meristemos de zarcillo. Los genes VvAP3.1 y 2, VvPI, VvAG1 y 3, VvSEP1-4, así como VvBS1 y 2 parecen estar asociados con los eventos de diferenciación de meristemos y órganos florales, mientras que VvAP1 y VvFUL-L (junto con VvSOC1.1 y VvAGL6.2) podrían estar implicados en el desarrollo del zarcillo dados sus patrones de expresión. Adicionalmente, se analizó la función biológica de los genes VvAP1 y VvTFL1A por medio de una estrategia de silenciamiento génico. Los datos preliminares sugieren un posible papel para ambos genes en la iniciación y diferenciación de los zarcillos. Finalmente, el análisis genómico de la familia MADS en vid evidenció diferencias con respecto a otras especies vegetales en cuanto a número de miembros y patrón de expresión en genes supuestamente implicados en la inducción de la floración, en comparación con aquellos relacionados con la especificación de identidad de órganos florales y desarrollo del fruto. En conjunto, los resultados obtenidos han permitido identificar posibles rutas y genes candidatos a participar en la regulación de los procesos de desarrollo reproductivo de la vid, sentando las bases de futuros experimentos encaminados a conocer la funciones biológicas de genes específicos.

Restriction fragment length polymorphism-coupled domain-directed differential display: a highly efficient technique for expression analysis of multigene families.

In this paper, a reverse-transcriptase PCR-based protocol suitable for efficient expression analysis of multigene families is presented. The method combines restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) technology with a gene family-specific version of mRNA differential display and hence is called "RFLP-coupled domain-directed differential display. "With this method, expression of all members of a multigene family at many different developmental stages, in diverse tissues and even in different organisms, can be displayed on one gel. Moreover, bands of interest, representing gene family members, are directly accessible to sequence analysis, without the need for subcloning. The method thus enables a detailed, high-resolution expression analysis of known gene family members as well as the identification and characterization of new ones. Here the technique was used to analyze differential expression of MADS-box genes in male and female inflorescences of maize (Zea mays ssp. mays). Six different MADS-box genes could be identified, being either specifically expressed in the female sex or preferentially expressed in male or female inflorescences, respectively. Other possible applications of the method are discussed.

Regulation of XMyoDa transcription by the binding of XMEF2A to the TATA box

MEF2 is a $\underline{\rm m}$yocyte-specific $\underline{\rm e}$nhancer-binding $\underline{\rm f}$actor that binds a conserved DNA sequence, CTA(A/T)$\sb4$TAG. A MEF2 binding site in the XMyoDa promoter overlaps with the TATA box and is required for muscle specific expression. To examine the potential role of MEF2 in the regulation of MyoD transcription during early development, the appearance of MEF2 binding activity in developing Xenopus embryos was analyzed with the electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Two genes were isolated from a X. Laevis stage 24 cDNA library that encode factors that bind the XMyoDa TFIID/MEF2 site. Both genes are highly homologous to each other, belong to the MADS ($\underline{\rm M}$CM1-$\underline{\rm A}$rg80-agamous-$\underline{\rm d}$eficiens-$\underline{\rm S}$RF) protein family, and most highly related to the mammalian MEF2A gene, hence they are designated as XMEF2A1 and XMEF2A2. Proteins encoded by both cDNAs form specific complexes with the MEF2 binding site and show the same binding specificity as the endogenous MEF2 binding activity. XMEF2A transcripts accumulate preferentially in developing somites after the appearance of XMyoD transcripts. XMEF2 protein begins to accumulate in somites at tailbud stages. Transcriptional activation of XMyoD promoter by XMEF2A required only the MADS box and MEF2-specific domain when XMEF2A is bound at the TATA box. However, a different downstream transactivation domain was required when XMEF2A activates transcription through binding to multiple upstream sites. These results suggest that different activation mechanisms are involved, depending on where the factor is bound. Mutations in several basic amino acid clusters in the MADS box inhibit DNA binding suggesting these amino acids are essential for DNA binding. Mutation of Thr-20 and Ser-36 to the negatively charged amino acid residue, aspartic acid, abolish DNA binding. XMEF2A activity may be regulated by phosphorylation of these amino acids. A dominant negative mutant was made by mutating one of the basic amino acid clusters and deleting the downstream transactivation domain. In vivo roles of MEF2 in the regulation of MyoD transcription were investigated by overexpression of wild type MEF2 and dominant negative mutant of XMEF2A in animal caps and assaying for the effects on the level of expression of MyoD genes. Overexpression of MEF2 activates the transcription of endogenous MyoD gene family while expression of a dominant negative mutant reduces the level of transcription of XMRF4 and myogenin genes. These results suggest that MEF2 is downstream of MyoD and Myf5 and that MEF2 is involved in maintaining and amplifying expression of MyoD and Myf5. MEF2 is upstream of MRF4 and myogenin and plays a role in activating their expression. ^

Transcriptional regulation of MDR1, a gene involved in antifungal drug resistance in Candida albicans

ABSTRACT Upregulation of the Major Facilitator transporter gene MDR1 (Multi_drug Resistance 1) is one of the mechanisms observed in Candida albicans clinical isolates developing resistance to azole antifungal agents. To better understand this phenomenon, the cis-acting regulatory elements present in a modulatable reporter system under the control of the MDR1 promoter were characterized. In an azole-susceptible strain, transcription of this reporter is transiently upregulated in response to either benomyl or H2O2, whereas its expression is constitutively high in an azole-resistant strain (FR2). Two cis-acting regulatory elements, that are necessary and sufficient to convey the same transcriptional responses to a heterologous promoter (CDR2), were identified within the MDR1promoter. The first element, called BRE (for Benomyl Response Element, -296 to -260 with respect to the ATG start codon), is required for benomyl-dependent MDR1 upregulation and for constitutive high expression of MDR1 in FR2. The second element, termed HRE (for H2O2 Response Element, -561 to -520), is required for H2O2-dependent MDR1 upregulation, but is dispensable for constitutive high expression. Two potential binding sites (TTAG/CTAA) for the blip transcription factor Cap1p lie within the HRE. Moreover, inactivation of CAP1 abolished the transient response to H2O2 and diminished significantly the transient response to benomyl. Cap1p, which has been previously implicated in cellular responses to oxidative stress, may thus play a transacting and positive regulatory role in benomyl- and H2O2-dependent transcription of MDR1. However, it is not the only transcription factor involved in the response of MDR1 to benomyl. A minimal BRE element (-290 to -273) that is sufficient to detect in vitro sequence-specific binding of protein complexes in crude extracts prepared from C. albicans was also delimited. Genome-wide transcript profiling analyses undertaken with a matched pair of clinical isolates, one of which being azole-resistant and upregulating MDR1, and with an azole-susceptible strain exposed to benomyl, revealed that genes specifically upregulated by benomyl harbour in their promoters Cap1p binding site(s). This strengthened the idea that Cap1p plays a role in benomyl-dependent upregulation of MDR1. BRE-like sequences were also identified in several genes co-regulated with MDR1 in both conditions, which was consistent with the involvement of the BRE in both processes. A set of 147 mutants lacking a single transcription factor gene was next screened for loss of MDR1response to benomyl. Unfortunately, none of the tested mutants showed a loss of benomyl-dependent MDR1 upregulation. Nevertheless, a significant diminution of the response was observed in the mutants in which the MADS-box transcription factor Mcm1p and the C2H2 zinc finger transcription factor orf19.13374p were inactivated, suggesting that Mcm1p and orf19.13374p are involved in MDR1response to benomyl. Interestingly, the BRE contains a perfect match to the binding consensus of Mcm1p, raising the possibility that MDR1may be a direct target of this transcriptional activator. In conclusion, while the identity of the trans-acting factors that bind to the BRE and HRE remains to be confirmed, the tools we have developed during characterization of the cis-acting elements of the MDR1promoter should now serve to elucidate the nature of the components that modulate its activity. RESUME La surexpression du gène MDR1 (pour Résistance Multidrogue 1), qui code pour un transporteur de la famille des Major Facilitators, est l'un des mécanismes observés dans les isolats cliniques de la levure Candida albicans développant une résistance aux agents antifongiques appelés azoles. Pour mieux comprendre ce phénomène, les éléments de régulation agissant en cis dans un système rapporteur modulable sous le contrôle du promoteur MDR1 ont été caractérisés. Dans une souche sensible aux azoles, la transcription de ce rapporteur est transitoirement surélevée en réponse soit au bénomyl soit à l'agent oxydant H2O2, alors que son expression est constitutivement élevée dans une souche résistante aux azoles (souche FR2). Deux éléments de régulation agissant en cis, nécessaires et suffisants pour transmettre les mêmes réponses transcriptionnelles à un promoteur hétérologue (CDR2), ont été identifiés dans le promoteur MDR1. Le premier élément, appelé BRE (pour Elément de Réponse au Bénomyl, de -296 à -260 par rapport au codon d'initiation ATG) est requis pour la surexpression de MDR1dépendante du bénomyl et pour l'expression constitutive de MDR1 dans FR2. Le deuxième élément, appelé HRE (pour Elément de Réponse à l'H2O2, de -561 à -520), est requis pour la surexpression de MDR1 dépendante de l'H2O2, mais n'est pas impliqué dans l'expression constitutive du gène MDR1. Deux sites de fixation potentiels (TTAG/CTAA) pour le facteur de transcription Cap1p ont été identifiés dans l'élément HRE. De plus, l'inactivation de CAP1 abolit la réponse transitoire à l'H2O2 et diminua significativement la réponse transitoire au bénomyl. Cap1p, qui est impliqué dans les réponses de la cellule au stress oxydatif, doit donc jouer un rôle positif en trans dans la surexpression de MDR1 dépendante du bénomyl et de l'H2O2. Cependant, ce n'est pas le seul facteur de transcription impliqué dans la réponse au bénomyl. Un élément BRE d'une longueur minimale (de -290 à -273) a également été défini et est suffisant pour détecter une interaction spécifique in vitro avec des protéines provenant d'extraits bruts de C. albicans. L'analyse du profil de transcription d'une paire d'isolats cliniques comprenant une souche résistante aux azoles surexprimant MDR1, et d'une souche sensible aux azoles exposée au bénomyl, a révélé que les gènes spécifiquement surexprimés par le bénomyl contiennent dans leurs promoteurs un ou plusieurs sites de fixation pour Cap1p. Ceci renforce l'idée que Cap1p joue un rôle dans la surexpression de MDR1dépendante du bénomyl. Une ou deux séquences ressemblant à l'élément BRE ont également été identifiées dans la plupart des gènes corégulés avec MDR1 dans ces deux conditions, ce qui était attendu compte-tenu du rôle joué par cet élément dans les deux processus. Une collection de 147 mutants dans lesquels un seul facteur de transcription est inactivé a été testée pour la perte de réponse au bénomyl de MDR1. Malheureusement, la surexpression de MDR1 dépendante du bénomyl n'a été perdue dans aucun des mutants testés. Néanmoins, une diminution significative de la réponse a été observée chez des mutants dans lesquels le facteur de transcription à MADS-box Mcm1p et le facteur de transcription à doigts de zinc de type C2H2 orf19.13374p ont été inactivés, suggérant que Mcm1p et orf19.13374p sont impliqués dans la réponse de MDR1au bénomyl. Il est intéressant de noter que la BRE contient une séquence qui s'aligne parfaitement avec la séquence consensus du site de fixation de Mcm1p, ce qui soulève la possibilité que MDR1 pourrait être une cible directe de cet activateur transcriptionnel. En conclusion, alors que l'identité des facteurs agissant en trans en se fixant à la BRE et à la HRE reste à être confirmée, les outils que nous avons développés au cours de la caractérisation des éléments agissant en cis sur le promoteur MDR1 peut maintenant servir à élucider la nature des composants modulant son activité.