Reproduction of portrait of sisters Margarethe and Dorothea Levinson.

Digital Image

Reproduction of portrait of Dorothea Levinson.

Sister of Margarethe Rosenberg nee Levinson

Reproduction of portrait of Louis Levinson.

Husband of Aurelie Levinson nee Roos who was deported to Riga 6 December 1941

Reproduction of portrait of Auralie Levinson nee Roos.

Wife of Louis Levinson

Reproduction of portrait of sisters Margarethe and Dorothea Levinson.

Digital Image

Reproduction of portrait of Dorothea Levinson.

Sister of Margarethe Rosenberg nee Levinson

Reproduction of portrait of Louis Levinson.

Husband of Aurelie Levinson nee Roos who was deported to Riga 6 December 1941

A questão da natureza da arte: as teorias históricas de Levinson e Carroll

Levinson’s and Carroll’s historical theories are among the most interesting contemporary answers to the problem of knowing what art is. Although both authors believe that we cannot ignore the relation between art and its own history in order to understand the nature of art, their projects have very different ambitions. Levinson seeks a real definition of art, capable of dealing with every possible case. Carroll, who believes that Levinson’s project faces many difficulties, proposes just a criterion to identify works of art, thus providing a characterization or nominal definition of art. In this paper my aim is to present and discuss, albeit succinctly, these two philosophical theories about the nature of art, and to determine whether they fulfill their own ends

Harry A. Levinson, 9527 Brighton Way, Beverly Hills, California, plaintiff, v. Arthur E. Summerfield, individually and as Postmaster General of the United States, Washington D.C., defendent : points and authorities in support of mottion for preliminary injunction, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Mode of access: Internet.