338 resultados para Labor union meetings


Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Lectures give in 1895-96 in Steinway Hall, Chicago, as the "Ryder lectures" and repeated the next year as the E.A. Rand course on applied Christianity, before the students of Iowa College and the citizens of Grinnell, Iowa.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

General note: Title and date provided by Bettye Lane.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

General note: Title and date provided by Bettye Lane.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

General note: Title and date provided by Bettye Lane.

Relevância:

90.00% 90.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"H.R. 7720, a bill to amend section 302(c) of the Labor management relations act, 1947, to permit the participation of retired employees of employers, employees of certain labor organizations, and employees of certain trust funds, as well as certain self-employed persons to participate as beneficiaries of welfare and pension trust funds."

Relevância:

90.00% 90.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

1936-38, 1940- reprinted from the Monthly labor review.

Relevância:

90.00% 90.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Chiefly tables.

Relevância:

90.00% 90.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

General note: Title and date provided by Bettye Lane.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The dissertation analyzes Finnish consensual culture in public discussion and journalism in Helsingin Sanomat (HS). The consensual Finnish political culture has evolved and persisted over a long period of time and it has been affected by historical circumstances as well as the dynamics of political and journalistic structures and actors. A historical chronology is drawn in the study regarding the nature and development of consensus culture in 20th century Finland. This political culture is traced by looking at public discussion on globalization at the turn of the millennium. Globalization as a concept has been contested and various societal actors have given different meanings to it. This research looks at how the globalization discussion in HS during the years 1992-2004 constructs consensus. Helsingin Sanomat (and its predecessor Päivälehti) has been an important actor in Finnish journalism and the public sphere almost since its founding 120 years ago. The history of the paper is tightly connected to Finland s general political history and history of the public sphere. Moreover, the paper s connections to the societal elite have always been close. The central question in this research was to see how the globalization discussion in HS evolved in relation to consensus as well as legitimate controversies. As a result it is stated that the globalization question has clearly divided the Finnish societal actors. The most powerful societal elites (government, most civil servants, corporate sector) had a profile of being pro globalization. They communicated their globalization strategy as a national, unified way of thinking. Other elites which have been losing their influence (the president, labor union, part of members of parliament), as well as civil society actors tried to bring forward conflicting views in relation to globalization. The paper did give some room to these elements, but on the other hand it also tried to keep up the consensual discussion culture especially in the editorial section. In line with its traditions Helsingin Sanomat strived to create national unity. At the same time it did not give adequate attention to the changes brought about by globalization to the positions and roles of various elites and civil society actors. In this discussion HS seemed more like a medium of the state than as a critical and independent actor. Journalism has an important role in upholding and also reviving the Finnish political culture and public discussion. From this point of view it is problematic if the area of so called legitimate controversy in broad societal questions like globalization becomes very limited. As the Finnish elites are small and there is no considerable competition between them, journalism should actively bring up controversial issues. This task becomes complicated, however, if the elite circles are closed up and no initiatives come from their ranks. Political decision making as well as democracy can suffer, if issues are not brought to the public agenda.