997 resultados para Lógicas multi-valoradas


Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Suszko’s Thesis is a philosophical claim regarding the nature of many-valuedness. It was formulated by the Polish logician Roman Suszko during the middle 70s and states the existence of “only but two truth values”. The thesis is a reaction against the notion of many-valuedness conceived by Jan Łukasiewicz. Reputed as one of the modern founders of many-valued logics, Łukasiewicz considered a third undetermined value in addition to the traditional Fregean values of Truth and Falsehood. For Łukasiewicz, his third value could be seen as a step beyond the Aristotelian dichotomy of Being and non-Being. According to Suszko, Łukasiewicz’s ideas rested on a confusion between algebraic values (what sentences describe/denote) and logical values (truth and falsity). Thus, Łukasiewicz’s third undetermined value is no more than an algebraic value, a possible denotation for a sentence, but not a genuine logical value. Suszko’s Thesis is endorsed by a formal result baptized as Suszko’s Reduction, a theorem that states every Tarskian logic may be characterized by a two-valued semantics. The present study is intended as a thorough investigation of Suszko’s thesis and its implications. The first part is devoted to the historical roots of many-valuedness and introduce Suszko’s main motivations in formulating the double character of truth-values by drawing the distinction in between algebraic and logical values. The second part explores Suszko’s Reduction and presents the developments achieved from it; the properties of two-valued semantics in comparison to many-valued semantics are also explored and discussed. Last but not least, the third part investigates the notion of logical values in the context of non-Tarskian notions of entailment; the meaning of Suszko’s thesis within such frameworks is also discussed. Moreover, the philosophical foundations for non-Tarskian notions of entailment are explored in the light of recent debates concerning logical pluralism.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

La presente tesis doctoral se centra en la investigación del "estrato arquitectónico", manejando conceptos, lógicas y sinopsis como puntos organizativos, enlazados y superpuestos, que den paso a un marco propositivo que pueda ser simultáneamente articulado e independiente. Una situación que, ante nuevos desafíos, pretende ir más allá de una estricta definición de estrato o de su noción preconcebida descrita desde la superposición de diversos materiales. Todo ello a fin de revelar los diferentes perfiles del estrato y de la estratificación. Para ello, se abre y amplía el campo de estudio proyectual/procesual desdibujando los límites entre disciplinas –geología, filosofía, tecnología, arquitectura–. Y al mismo tiempo, se construye una cartografía del estrato arquitectónico asociada: a una taxonomía descriptora, a nuevas formulaciones, a pensamientos de personajes reconocibles y/o rescatados –como Rowe/Slutzky, Smithson, Parent/Virilio, Koolhaas, MVRDV, etc.–, y, por último, a nuevas lógicas proyectuales y operativas referidas al estrato, que fusionan conocimientos complejos. Unos contenidos que habitualmente no se presentan en investigaciones doctorales tradicionales –lo que permite afrontar nuevos cambios metodológicos, e imprimir un punto de partida para el desarrollo de futuras investigaciones o de otros posibles caminos emergentes–. Así, el discurso se impregna de nuevos referentes teóricos dentro de una misma mitología común (la del estrato). Un tema abordado con claves híbridas, es decir, con estudios selectivos y escritos coleccionados –analizados a partir de antecedentes encontrados y consolidados–, combinados con interpretaciones subyacentes en la arquitectura contemporánea –que pueden todavía encontrarse en fase experimental–. Una investigación que muestra la adaptación, la evolución y el cambio de la definición de "estrato arquitectónico", así como de su apariencia, utilización y aplicación a lo largo del tiempo, consecuencia de las nuevas necesidades y/o de las nuevas bases ideológicas ocasionadas por nuevos descubrimientos. Estratos arquitectónicos que dotan al espacio de profundidad –desde la bidimensionalidad– mediante la superposición de planos paralelos hacia la construcción de una nueva experiencia de estratificación fenomenológica. Estratos que generan estímulos y cambian su materialidad –de opacos a (en)tramados– creando apariencias y produciendo diversos efectos, para posteriormente exfoliarse y convertirse en estratos habitables. Estratos capturadores del espacio-tiempo, o de las dinámicas internas. Llegando incluso, con un último giro, a la era digital, donde el estrato informacional –que continua siendo independiente, autónomo y diverso, y que puede ser modificado, manipulado, suprimido o activable sin alterar el conjunto–, propicia obtener sistemas flexibles, relacionales, capaces de mutar o adaptarse, asociados a distintos niveles de organización dispositiva, que impulsan acciones y hacen emerger lógicas proyectuales. Estratos que surgen de forma elaborada o espontánea en el territorio urbano o natural (ciudad sobre ciudad, suelo sobre suelo), que se aplican extendiendo e hibridando el territorio (paisajes operativos), que son replanteados artificialmente como mecanismos edificatorios según las exigencias existentes (estratos programáticos, capas especializadas), y que se implantan como capas/layers en los programas informáticos utilizados como herramientas de diseño (multicapas, sistemas de intercambio informacional). Un trabajo que se estructura de manera multicapa lo que permite recorrer la tesis como un mapa de secuencias, saltar entre estratos de información, o seleccionar lecturas según intereses de pensamiento o acción arquitectónica. En consecuencia, una investigación sobre el "estrato arquitectónico" que conecta diversas disciplinas, que recopila distintos posicionamientos teórico/prácticos –lo que implica la introducción de parámetros y datos vivos–, y afronta un posicionamiento estratégico que vuelve a poner en valor el estrato arquitectónico –partiendo de estrategias formales que se han transformado en estrategias experimentales/operativas (a medida que el entorno se ha ido complejizando), siguiendo una estrategia conceptual e intelectual contemporánea, propia y específica–. ABSTRACT This PhD thesis is based on the research of "architectural stratum" using concepts, logical and synopsis as organizational, linked and overlapping points, which give way to a proactive framework that can be articulated and independent simultaneously. A situation that, faced with new challenges, aims to go beyond a strict definition of stratum or their preconceived notion described from the superposition of different materials. All this in order to reveal the different profiles of stratum and stratification. To do this, it opens and widens the field of project/process study, blurring the boundaries between disciplines –geology, philosophy, technology, architecture–. And, at the same time, a cartography of the architectural stratum is constructed, that associates with: descriptor taxonomy, new formulations, thoughts of recognizable and/or rescued characters, –as Rowe/Slutzky, Smithson, Parent/Virilio, Koolhaas, MVRDV, etc.–, and finally, a new project and operational logics referred to stratum, which merge complex knowledge. A content not usually presented in traditional doctoral research –which can face new methodological changes, and creates a starting point for future research or other possible emerging paths–. Thus, the work is imbued with new theoretical framework within a common mythology (stratum’s myth). An issue addressed with hybrid keys, that is, with selective studies and collected writings –analyzed starting from found and consolidated backgrounds–, combined with underlying performances on contemporary architecture –which can still be in experimental phase–. A research that shows adaptation, evolution and change of the definition of "architectural stratum", as well as their appearance, use and application throughout time, result of the new requirements and/or the new ideological foundations caused by new discoveries. Architectural strata that give depth to space –from two-dimensionality– by overlapping parallel planes towards the construction of a new experience of phenomenological stratification. Strata that generate stimuli and change their materiality –from opaque to lattice– creating appearances and producing various effects, for later exfoliating and becoming habitable strata. Strata that capture space-time or internal dynamics. Even reaching, with a final twist, the digital age, where the informational stratum –which remains independent, autonomous and diverse, and can be modified, manipulated, deleted or activated without altering the whole–, contribute to obtaining flexible, relational systems, able to mutate or adapt, associated with different levels of regulatory organization, that drive actions and make emerge project logics. Strata that arise elaborately or spontaneously in urban or natural territory (city upon city, floor upon floor), which apply expanding and hybridizing the territory (operational landscapes), which are artificially restated as building mechanisms according to existing requirements (strata program, specialized layers), which are implemented as layers in the software used as design tools (multilayer, systems of informational interchange). A work that is structured in a multi-layered way, which allows explore the thesis as a sequence map, jump between layers of information, or select readings according to an interest in thought or architectural action. Therefore, an investigation into the "architectural stratum" that connects different disciplines, which collects different theoretical/practical positions –which implies the introduction of live parameters and data– and faces a strategic positioning returning to value the architectural stratum –based on formal strategies that have become experimental/operational strategies (as the environment has become more complex), following a conceptual, intellectual, contemporary, own specific strategy–.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Metaphor is a multi-stage programming language extension to an imperative, object-oriented language in the style of C# or Java. This paper discusses some issues we faced when applying multi-stage language design concepts to an imperative base language and run-time environment. The issues range from dealing with pervasive references and open code to garbage collection and implementing cross-stage persistence.