319 resultados para Kivelä, Sirkka


Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Summary: Comparison of pooled faeces samples with a method of individual faecel samples for salmonella investigation in cattle

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Summary: Polypharmacy and the use of psychotropics and analgesic drugs among the community-dwelling elderly

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Kirjallisuusarvostelu

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Kirjallisuusarvostelu

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Kirje 29.3.1957

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

BACKGROUND: The recent availability of genetic analyses has demonstrated the shortcomings of the current phenotypic method of corneal dystrophy classification. Abnormalities in different genes can cause a single phenotype, whereas different defects in a single gene can cause different phenotypes. Some disorders termed corneal dystrophies do not appear to have a genetic basis. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop a new classification system for corneal dystrophies, integrating up-to-date information on phenotypic description, pathologic examination, and genetic analysis. METHODS: The International Committee for Classification of Corneal Dystrophies (IC3D) was created to devise a current and accurate nomenclature. RESULTS: This anatomic classification continues to organize dystrophies according to the level chiefly affected. Each dystrophy has a template summarizing genetic, clinical, and pathologic information. A category number from 1 through 4 is assigned, reflecting the level of evidence supporting the existence of a given dystrophy. The most defined dystrophies belong to category 1 (a well-defined corneal dystrophy in which a gene has been mapped and identified and specific mutations are known) and the least defined belong to category 4 (a suspected dystrophy where the clinical and genetic evidence is not yet convincing). The nomenclature may be updated over time as new information regarding the dystrophies becomes available. CONCLUSIONS: The IC3D Classification of Corneal Dystrophies is a new classification system that incorporates many aspects of the traditional definitions of corneal dystrophies with new genetic, clinical, and pathologic information. Standardized templates provide key information that includes a level of evidence for there being a corneal dystrophy. The system is user-friendly and upgradeable and can be retrieved on the website www.corneasociety.org/ic3d.