Judicial statistics /

1973 also has calendar year report.

Judicial statistics.

WI docs. no.: COU.1/2:1956-1969.

Criminal statistics, Scotland.

Issues for 1868-1914, 1925- published in the series of parliamentary papers as Papers by command.

State court caseload statistics, annual report.

"Report of work performed by National Court Statistics Project, National Center for State Courts."

A paper on judiciary statistics, read at a meeting of the Birmingham literary and philosophical Society, on the 1st of July, 1839.

Mode of access: Internet.

Domstolarnas och de exekutiva myndigheternas verksamhet.

Mode of access: Internet.

Annual report of the Illinois Courts.

Mode of access: Internet.

Annual report to the Supreme Court of Illinois.

Title varies slightly.

Data sources on probation, conditional discharge, supervision, and periodic imprisonment in Illinois /

Includes bibliographies.

Relatr̤io apresentado ao Presidente da Republica dos Estados Unidos do Brasil /

At head of title: Ministřio da Justiȧ e Negc̤ios Interiores.

Compte général de l'administration de la justice criminelle en France pendant l'année 1880 : et rapport relatif aux années 1826 à 1880 presentés au Président de la République /

Report signed by Gustave Humbert, le garde des Sceaux, ministre de la justice et des cultes.

Report

Mode of access: Internet.

Statistics as a basis for discrimination in the insurance business

The European Court of Justice has held that as from 21 December 2012 insurers may no longer charge men and women differently on the basis of scientific evidence that is statistically linked to their sex, effectively prohibiting the use of sex as a factor in the calculation of premiums and benefits for the purposes of insurance and related financial services throughout the European Union. This ruling marks a sharp turn away from the traditional view that insurers should be allowed to apply just about any risk assessment criterion, so long as it is sustained by the findings of actuarial science. The naïveté behind the assumption that insurers’ recourse to statistical data and probabilistic analysis, given their scientific nature, would suffice to keep them out of harm’s way was exposed. In this article I look at the flaws of this assumption and question whether this judicial decision, whilst constituting a most welcome landmark in the pursuit of equality between men and women, has nonetheless gone too far by saying too little on the million dollar question of what separates admissible criteria of differentiation from inadmissible forms of discrimination.