Prison foodservice in Australia : systems, menus and inmate attitudes

This paper presents results from three studies in 25 custodial facilities in three Australian states, including nutrient analyses of menus and focus groups exploring inmate attitudes. Both cook-fresh and cook-chill production systems are used. Non-selective cycle menus of 4-6 weeks are common but inmates can supplement meals by purchase of additional food items (‘buy-ups’). Menus included adequate variety and met most nutritional standards, with the possible exception of fruit. The sodium content of menus is above recommended levels. Protein, fibre, vitamins A, C, thiamin, riboflavin, calcium, iron and zinc were more than adequate, and the percentage energy from fat is close to or meets national recommendations. Focus groups identified 16 themes, including meal quality, food available at ‘buy-ups’, cooking facilities, and concerns about possible food safety risks associated with inmates storing food in cells. Many complaints were about factors not under the control of the foodservice manager.

Inmate attitudes about determinate sentencing /

Popular title: Inmate survey.

Six months in a convent, or, The narrative of Rebecca Theresa Reed, who was under the influence of the Roman Catholics about two years, and an inmate of the Ursuline convent on Mount Benedict, Charlestown, Mass., nearly six months, in the years 1831-2.

Microfilm. Ann Arbor, Mich., Xerox University Microfilms, 1972. 35 mm. (American Culture Series, reel 532.6)

Six months in a house of correction, or, The narrative of Dorah Mahony who was under the influence of the Protestants about a year, and an inmate of the house of correction, in Leverett St. Boston, Massachusetts, nearly six months in the year of 18-- : with some preliminary suggestions by the Committee of Publication.

Mode of access: Internet.

The relative influence of social support, rehabilitation program participation, and inmate preincarceration characteristics on incarcerated substance abusers' perceptions of adjustment to community reintegration

This dissertation identifies, examines, and assesses the relative influence of identified empirically and conceptually relevant variables on incarcerated substance abusers' expectations of postrelease adjustment. A purposive sampling procedure was used to recruit 101 male and female substance-abusing offenders participating in prison- and jail-based drug treatment programs in south Florida. A 92-item survey questionnaire was used to collect basic demographic data; measure inmate preincarceration characteristics, social support, and rehabilitation program participation; and record archival data. Regression equations were developed utilizing ten different measures of the participants' expectations of their postrelease adjustment. Two equations yielded statistically significant F ratios; maintaining a stable living and maintaining abstinence. Twenty-two percent of the variance in respondents' expectations of maintaining a stable living was explained by preincarceration characteristics, social support, and rehabilitation program participation (F = 1.89; df = 13,87; p $<$.05). The only significant predictor variable was perception of social support (b = $-$.05; t = $-$3.6; p $<$.001). Twenty-three percent of the variance in respondents' expectations of maintaining abstinence from substances was explained by preincarceration characteristics, social support, and rehabilitation program participation (F = 2; df = 13,87; p $<$.05). Once again, the only significant predictor variable was perception of social support. The results of the analyses indicate that social support was the only important variable for understanding these respondents' efficacy expectations of postrelease abstinence and stable living. The results of this investigation demonstrate the complexity of the social support variable for prisoners, and identify social support as a potential rehabilitative resource for substance-abusing inmates. The results of this investigation underscore the importance of continued, detailed empirical study in order to understand and clarify how social support, efficacy expectations, and actual postrelease performance interrelate for this population of offenders.

AGE DISTRIBUTION OF SCDC TOTAL INMATE POPULATION AS OF JUNE 30, 2016

This statistical sheet gives the age distribution of inmates admitted to correctional institutions as of June 30, 2016.

Average Daily Inmate Population Fiscal Years 1970 - 2016

This gives statistics on the average daily inmate population in SC prisons from 1970 to 2016.

Inmate escapes from South Carolina Department of Corrections facilities by facility security type, FY 1990-2016

This gives statistics on the escapes from South Carolina correctional facilities from 1990 to 2016.

Inmate population summary for July 15, 2016

These papers show the inmate population in South Carolina by male and female prisoners. It is broken down by count, agency high and month count and SCDC space utilization.

Most serious offense distribution of SCDC total inmate population as of June 30, 2016

This is a list of criminal offenses and the number and percentage of SC inmates who have committed these crimes. They are listed by race and sex.

Remaining time to serve before expiration of sentence of SCDC total inmate population as of June 30, 2016

These statistics break down the incarceration time left for inmates of South Carolina prisons. It ranges from 3 months or less to Life/Death as of June 30, 2016.

Sentence length distribution of SCDC total inmate population as of June 30, 2016

The South Carolina Department of Corrections publishes statistical reports on their correctional facilities, including system overviews, inmate populations, admissions, and releases.

Inmate Population Summary for August 15, 2016

These statistics show the inmate population in South Carolina by male and female prisoners. They are broken down by count, agency high and month count and SCDC space utilization.

Inmate population summary for September 15, 2016

These papers show the inmate population in South Carolina by male and female prisoners. It is broken down by count, agency high and month count and SCDC space utilization.