The improvement of the anti-hyperalgesic effect of ketamine and of its isomers by the administration of ifenprodil

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Efeitos da injeção epidural de cetamina ou da sua associação com ifenprodil na mediação nociceptiva somática e visceral em equinos

Pós-graduação em Cirurgia Veterinária - FCAV

Eficácia anti-hiperalgésica das associações de cetamina e seus isômeros com ifenprodil administradas de forma preventiva e por via subaracnóidea em ratos e cães

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Efeitos cardiorrespiratórios da administração subaracnóide de cetamina ou da associação com ifenprodil em equinos anestesiados com sevofluorano

Pós-graduação em Cirurgia Veterinária - FCAV

The effects of alanine-substituted conantokin-G and ifenprodil on the human spermine-activated N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor

We evaluated the effects of Ala-7-conantokin-G (Con-G(A7)) and ifenprodil on the modulation by spermine of [H-3]MK801 binding to human cortical membranes. Human cortical tissue was obtained at autopsy and stored at -80 degreesC until assay. Both Con-GA7 and ifenprodil inhibited [H-3]MK801 binding, but spermine affected these inhibitions differently. Con-G(A7) IC50 changed little with spermine concentration, indicative of a non-competitive interaction, whereas the rightward shift in ifenprodil IC50 with increasing spermine concentration suggested partial competition. When the two agents were tested against the biphasic activation of [H-3]MK801 binding by spermine, they again differed in their effects. In the activation phase Con-G(A7) was a non-competitive inhibitor of spermine activation, and may even enhance the spermine EC50, while the ifenprodil data indicated a partially competitive interaction. Both agents were non-competitive in the inhibitory phase. Overall, the data suggest that Con-G(A7) and ifenprodil interact differently with the polyamine modulation of the glutamate-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. (C) 2004 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Excitatory synaptic transmission in the lateral and central amygdala

The amygdala plays a major role in the acquisition and expression of fear conditioning. NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity within the basolateral amygdala has been proposed to underlie the acquisition and possible storage of fear memories. Here the properties of fast glutamatergic transmission in the lateral and central nuclei of the amygdala are presented. In the lateral amygdala, two types of neurons, interneurons and projection neurons, could be distinguished by their different firing properties. Glutamatergic inputs to interneurons activated AMPA receptors with inwardly rectifying current-voltage relations (I-Vs), whereas inputs to projection neurons activated receptors that had linear I-Vs, indicating that receptors on interneurons lack GluR2 subunits. Inputs to projection neurons formed dual component synapses with both AMPA and NMDA components, whereas at inputs to interneurons, the contribution of NMDA receptors was very small. Neurons in the central amygdala received dual component glutamatergic inputs that activated AMPA receptors with linear I-Vs. NMDA receptor-mediated EPSCs had slow decay time constants in the central nucleus. Application of NR2B selective blockers ifenprodil or CP-101,606 blocked NMDA EPSCs by 70% in the central nucleus, but only by 30% in the lateral nucleus. These data show that the distribution of glutamatergic receptors on amygdalar neurons is not uniform. In the lateral amygdala, interneurons and pyramidal neurons express AMPA receptors with different subunit compositions. Synapses in the central nucleus activate NMDA receptors that contain NR1 and NR2B subunits, whereas synapses in the lateral nucleus contain receptors with both NR2A and NR2B subunits.

Development and subunit composition of synaptic NMDA receptors in the amygdala: NR2B Synapses in the adult central amygdala

NMDA receptors are well known to play an important role in synaptic development and plasticity. Functional NMDA receptors are heteromultimers thought to contain two NR1 subunits and two or three NR2 subunits. In central neurons, NMDA receptors at immature glutamatergic synapses contain NR2B subunits and are largely replaced by NR2A subunits with development. At mature synapses, NMDA receptors are thought to be multimers that contain either NR1/NR2A or NR1/NR2A/NR2B subunits, whereas receptors that contain only NR1/NR2B subunits are extrasynaptic. Here, we have studied the properties of NMDA receptors at glutamatergic synapses in the lateral and central amygdala. We find that NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic currents in the central amygdala in both immature and mature synapses have slow kinetics and are substantially blocked by the NR2B-selective antagonists (1S, 2S)-1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-(4-hydroxy-4-phenylpiperidino)-1-propano and ifenprodil, indicating that there is no developmental change in subunit composition. In contrast, at synapses on pyramidal neurons in the lateral amygdala, whereas NMDA EPSCs at immature synapses are slow and blocked by NR2B-selective antagonists, at mature synapses their kinetics are faster and markedly less sensitive to NR2B-selective antagonists, consistent with a change from NR2B to NR2A subunits. Using real-time PCR and Western blotting, we show that in adults the ratio of levels of NR2B to NR2A subunits is greater in the central amygdala than in the lateral amygdala. These results show that the subunit composition synaptic NMDA receptors in the lateral and central amygdala undergo distinct developmental changes.

Glutamate exocytosis from astrocytes controls synaptic strength.

The release of transmitters from glia influences synaptic functions. The modalities and physiological functions of glial release are poorly understood. Here we show that glutamate exocytosis from astrocytes of the rat hippocampal dentate molecular layer enhances synaptic strength at excitatory synapses between perforant path afferents and granule cells. The effect is mediated by ifenprodil-sensitive NMDA ionotropic glutamate receptors and involves an increase of transmitter release at the synapse. Correspondingly, we identify NMDA receptor 2B subunits on the extrasynaptic portion of excitatory nerve terminals. The receptor distribution is spatially related to glutamate-containing synaptic-like microvesicles in the apposed astrocytic processes. This glial regulatory pathway is endogenously activated by neuronal activity-dependent stimulation of purinergic P2Y1 receptors on the astrocytes. Thus, we provide the first combined functional and ultrastructural evidence for a physiological control of synaptic activity via exocytosis of glutamate from astrocytes.

Histamina aumenta a consolidação de memórias aversivas através de um mecanismo dependente da ativação de receptores H2

Várias evidências sugerem que a histamina cerebral está envolvida no processo de consolidação de memórias, mas a real participação do sistema histaminérgico neste processo permanece controversa. Aqui nós mostramos que, quando infundida na região CA1 do hipocampo dorsal de ratos imediatamente pós-treino em esquiva inibitória (EI), mas não depois, a histamina produz um efeito pró-mnésico dose-dependente, sem alterar a atividade locomotora, exploratória, o estado de ansiedade ou a expressão da resposta aversiva. O efeito facilitatório da histamina intra-CA1 foi mimetizado pelo inibidor da histamina N-metil-transferase, SKF-91844, e pelo agonista H2, dimaprit, mas foi totalmente bloqueado pelo antagonista H2, ranitidina, mas não pelo antagonista H1 pirilamina, antagonista H3, tioperamida, ou pelo antagonista do sítio das poliaminas do NMDAr, ifenprodil. Nenhum destes antagonistas, ranitidina, pirilamina, tioperamida ou ifenprodil, afetaram a consolidação da memória para EI. Nossos resultados indicam que, quando infundida bilateralmente intra-CA1 dorsal, a histamina aumenta a consolidação de memória para EI através de um mecanismo que envolve a ativação de receptores H2; contudo, a histamina endógena presente na região CA1 do hipocampo dorsal parece não participar da consolidação da memória para EI, pelo menos no intervalo de tempo pós-treino que foi analisado.