Eigendlicher Abris des heiligen Grabes zu Görlitz : neben einem Kirchlein darbey, deren zwey übereinander sind, und beydes Kirchlein und Grab vom Grunde heraus mit Quatersteinen gebawet von dem edlen Georgio Emerichen, Ritter des heiligen Grabes ...

[Holzschnitt von] Christoff Zippern

Kopie der Kopie

In der Unterkirche San Rocco in Sansepolcro erhebt sich eine Kleinarchitektur, die laut Inschrift als Kopie des Jerusalemer Christusgrabes ausgewiesen ist. Statt sich an die architektonische Gestalt des nahöstlichen Originals anzulehnen orientiert sie sich jedoch an einer älteren Heiliggrabkopie, dem Heiliggrabtempietto von Leon Battista Alberti in San Pancrazio, Florenz. Der Aufsatz untersucht, auf welche Weise die „doppelte Kopie“ ihr Vorbild interpretiert und stellt Überlegungen zu Motivation, Bedeutung und Autorschaft der Heiliggrabkopie von Sansepolcro an.

Food Security and Agri-Foreign Direct Investment in Weak States: Finding the Governance Gap to Avoid ‘Land Grab’

Food security is important. A rising world population coupled with climate change creates growing pressure on global world food supplies. States alleviate this pressure domestically by attracting agri-foreign direct investment (agri-FDI). This is a high-risk strategy for weak states: the state may gain valuable foreign currency, technology and debt-free growth; but equally, investors may fail to deliver on their commitments and exploit weak domestic legal infrastructure to ‘grab’ large areas of prime agricultural land, leaving only marginal land for domestic production. A net loss to local food security and to the national economy results. This is problematic because the state must continue to guarantee its citizens’ right to food and property. Agri-FDI needs close regulation to maximise its benefit. This article maps the multilevel system of governance covering agri-FDI. We show how this system creates asymmetric rights in favour of the investor to the detriment of the host state’s food security and how these problems might be alleviated.

Heilige, Heiliges und Heiligkeit in spätantiken Religionskulturen

Was das Heilige ist und wie man darüber sprechen kann, ist eine offene Frage in der religionswissenschaftlichen und theologischen Forschung. Jenseits der klassischen Entwürfe von Durkheim, Otto oder Eliade kann Heiliges heute nur in multiperspektivischer Betrachtung angemessen untersucht werden. Die Beiträge zu diesem Band analysieren Diskurse über Heiliges in spätantiken Religionskulturen: griechisch-römische Religion, Judentum und Christentum. Terminologien, Handlungen und Reflexionen in Bezug auf Heiliges werden in ihrem jeweiligen religiösen Bezugssystem thematisiert, aber darüber hinaus auch miteinander ins Gespräch gebracht. Hierfür dienen Kategorien wie Zeit, Ort, Individuum und Gruppe der Zuordnung der Befunde. Besonderes Augenmerk liegt zudem auf quellensprachlichen und forschungsinternen Begrifflichkeiten von Heiligem sowie auf der geschichtlichen Dynamik von Heiligkeitsvorstellungen. Dieses interdisziplinäre Vorgehen macht Diskontinuitäten und Kontinuitäten des Diskurses über „das Heilige“ in der Vielfalt seiner Erscheinungsformen präziser als bisher identifizierbar.

Foreign Direct Investment in Agriculture: Land Grab or Food Security Improvement?

“Large-scale acquisition of land by foreign investors” is the correct term for a process where the verdict of guilt is often quicker than the examination. But is there something really new about land grab except in its extent? In comparison with colonial and post-colonial plantation operations, should foreign investors today behave differently? We generally accept coffee and banana exports as pro-growth and pro-development, just as for cars, beef and insurance. What then is wrong with an investment contract allowing the holder to buy a farm and to export wheat to Saudi Arabia, or soybeans and maize as cattle feed to Korea, or to plant and process sugar cane and palm oil into ethanol for Europe and China? Assuming their land acquisition was legal, should foreigners respect more than investment contracts and national legislation? And why would they not take advantage of the legal protection offered by international investment law and treaties, not to speak of concessional finance, infrastructure and technical cooperation by a development bank, or the tax holidays offered by the host state? Remember Milton Friedman’s often-quoted quip: “The business of business is business!” And why would the governments signing those contracts not know whether and which foreign investment projects are best for their country, and how to attract them? This chapter tries to show that land grab, where it occurs, is not only yet another symptom of regulatory failures at the national level and a lack of corporate social responsibility by certain private actors. National governance is clearly the most important factor. Nonetheless, I submit that there is an international dimension involving investor home states in various capacities. The implication is that land grab is not solely a question whether a particular investment contract is legal or not. This chapter deals with legal issues which seem to have largely escaped the attention of both human rights lawyers and, especially, of investment lawyers. I address this fragmentation between different legal disciplines, rules, and policies, by asking two basic questions: (i) Do governments and parliaments in investor home countries have any responsibility in respect of the behaviour of their investors abroad? (ii) What should they and international regulators do, if anything?