Association of HbA1c and cardiovascular and renal disease in an adult Mediterranean population

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests a mechanistic link between the glycemic environment and renal and cardiovascular events, even below the threshold for diabetes. We aimed to assess the association between HbA1c and chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). METHODS: A cross-sectional study involving a random representative sample of 2270 adults from southern Spain (Malaga) was undertaken. We measured HbA1c, serum creatinine and albuminuria in fasting blood and urine samples. RESULTS: Individuals without diabetes in the upper HbA1c tertile had an unfavorable cardiovascular and renal profile and shared certain clinical characteristics with the patients with diabetes. Overall, a higher HbA1c concentration was strongly associated with CKD or CVD after adjustment for traditional risk factors. The patients with known diabetes had a 2-fold higher odds of CKD or CVD. However, when both parameters were introduced in the same model, the HbA1c concentration was only significantly associated with clinical endpoints (OR: 1.4, 95% CI, 1.1-1.6, P = 0.002). An increase in HbA1c of one percentage point was associated with a 30% to 40% increase in the rate of CKD or CVD. This relationship was apparent in persons with and without known diabetes. ROC curves illustrated that a HbA1c of 37 mmol/mol (5.5%) was the optimal value in terms of sensitivity and specificity for predicting endpoints in this population. CONCLUSION: HbA1c levels were associated with a higher prevalence of CKD and CVD cross-sectionally, regardless of diabetes status. These data support the value of HbA1c as a marker of cardiovascular and renal disease in the general population.

Detection of possible variant forms of hemoglobin in HbA1c measurements by chromatography liquid ion exchange high resolution (HPLC)

Background: The glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is used to help monitor the degree of a diabetic’s hyperglycemia. Security and accuracy of the methods used in its detection are affected by variants forms of Hb or elevations in levels of Fetal Hb (HbF). These interference are the result of a change in the haemoglobin total net charge of the variant due of a substitution of one amino acid in the remaining amino terminal of the beta chain. International Standardization for HbA1c values (NGSP) not include interference assessment as part of the certification program. Therefore, the effect of each variant or the lifting of the HbF on HbA1c result should be examined in each sample depending on the detected variant and the method used for the detection of the same. The objectives were: to describe the possible variants of Hb and their interference in HbA1c measurement by our method, after the implementation of a computer program for their detection. To identify some variants detected by chromatography liquid ion exchange high resolution (HPLC) with DNA molecular sequencing.

Evaluation of two HbA1c point-of-care analyzers.

BACKGROUND Measurement of HbA1c is the most important parameter to assess glycemic control in diabetic patients. Different point-of-care devices for HbA1c are available. The aim of this study was to evaluate two point-of-care testing (POCT) analyzers (DCA Vantage from Siemens and Afinion from Axis-Shield). We studied the bias and precision as well as interference from carbamylated hemoglobin. METHODS Bias of the POCT analyzers was obtained by measuring 53 blood samples from diabetic patients with a wide range of HbA1c, 4%-14% (20-130 mmol/mol), and comparing the results with those obtained by the laboratory method: HPLC HA 8160 Menarini. Precision was performed by 20 successive determinations of two samples with low 4.2% (22 mmol/mol) and high 9.5% (80 mmol/mol) HbA1c values. The possible interference from carbamylated hemoglobin was studied using 25 samples from patients with chronic renal failure. RESULTS The means of the differences between measurements performed by each POCT analyzer and the laboratory method (95% confidence interval) were: 0.28% (p<0.005) (0.10-0.44) for DCA and 0.27% (p<0.001) (0.19-0.35) for Afinion. Correlation coefficients were: r=0.973 for DCA, and r=0.991 for Afinion. The mean bias observed by using samples from chronic renal failure patients were 0.2 (range -0.4, 0.4) for DCA and 0.2 (-0.2, 0.5) for Afinion. Imprecision results were: CV=3.1% (high HbA1c) and 2.97% (low HbA1c) for DCA, CV=1.95% (high HbA1c) and 2.66% (low HbA1c) for Afinion. CONCLUSIONS Both POCT analyzers for HbA1c show good correlation with the laboratory method and acceptable precision.

Relationships between oral infections and blood glucose concentrations or hba1c levels in normal and diabetic rats

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Agreement between HbA1c measured by DCA 2000 and by HPLC: effects of fetal hemoglobin concentrations

In subjects with type 1 diabetes, persisting elevations of fetal hemoglobin (HbF) have been demonstrated. This study evaluated whether HbF levels typically seen in type 1 diabetes (up to 3%) interfere with glycohemoglobin determinations using a common immunologic method (DCA 2000).

[What you always wanted to know about HbA1c]

Irreversible, nonenzymatic glycation of the haemoglobin A beta chain leads to the formation of haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), a stable minor haemoglobin component with enhanced electrophoretic mobility. The rate of formation of HbA1c is directly proportional to the ambient glucose concentration. HbA1c is commonly used to assess long-term blood glucose control in patients with diabetes mellitus, because the HbA1c value has been shown to predict the risk for the development of many of the chronic complications in diabetes. There are currently four principal glycohaemoglobin assay techniques (ion-exchange chromatography, electrophoresis, affinity chromatography and immunoassays) and over 20 methods that measure different glycated products. The ranges indicating good and poor glycaemic control can vary markedly between different assays. At the moment values differ between methodologies and even between different laboratories using the same methodology. Optimal use of HbA1c testing requires standardisation. There is progress towards international standardisation and improved precision of HbA1c which will lead to all assays reporting results in a standardised way. Clinicians ordering HbA1c testing for their patients should be aware of the type of assay method used, the reference interval, potential assay interferences (e.g. haemoglobinopathies, chronic alcohol ingestion, carbamylation products in uraemia) and assay performance. And they should know that a variety of factors have been shown to directly influence HbA1c values, e.g. iron deficiency anaemia, chronic renal failure and shortened red blood cell life span.

[HbA1c revisited (again and again ...)]

The "International Federation of Clinical Chemistry" (IFCC) has developed a new international reference measurement system as anchor for worldwide standardization of HbA1c determinations. The use of IFCC-referenced methods results in "true" HbA1c-values that are 1 - 2% lower compared to traditional methods. This leads to potential risks of clinical misjudgement. For the evaluation of glycaemic control it is, therefore, important to know the method used, its normal range as well as possibilities of mathematical conversion of results. To reduce the risk of wrong interpretation of results the Swiss Society of Endocrinology and Diabetes recommends that reports of HbA1c clearly indicate whether the values are "IFCC-" or "DCCT-traceable". "IFCC"-results should best be reported in mmol/mol. In addition, the normal range has to be indicated properly.

Effective interventions for lowering HbA1C in African Americans with type 2 diabetes: A review

This synthesis of the literature provides descriptive analysis and outlines current self-management interventions for African Americans with type 2 diabetes. Specifically, this study describes and explores the design of those studies whose interventions have been shown to lower HbA1C levels in this population by at least 0.5% points, an improvement that provides approximately 10% reduction in long term complications from this disease.^ Results. In total, 37 articles were reviewed and 17 articles met inclusion criteria for analysis. Analysis of each study's methodology and results was performed and selected studies with interventions that resulted in improvements in HbA1C outcomes equal to 0.5% or greater for both group 1 and 2 were summarized by intervention type in table format. Descriptive analysis, outlining the number and characteristics of proximal and distal mediating components addressed in Group 1 studies, was performed in order to determine whether mediating components may have had some relation to effectiveness of intervention on outcome HbA1C. Descriptive analysis revealed that no particular design is substantially more effective than another among Behavioral studies although, there may be an advantage in using culturally sensitive, group interventions that address greater numbers of distal mediating components. Among Process studies, structured approaches (i.e. algorithm care and scheduled follow up), as well as utilization of specialty and group care are represented as effective for African American populations. ^ Conclusions. It may be summarized that by targeting behavior and addressing provider delivery (i.e. algorithm use, group care, home care, and provider follow up) in this population, a greater yield in outcome improvements may be accomplished. However, many gaps exist in a review process that stratifies results and focuses on identifying group specific intervention successes and failures. Further research in different populations will aid researchers and practitioners in discovering the best evidence, and identifying models that could be utilized in practice to achieve the best diabetes management for at risk groups.^

Performance of HbA1c for classifying diabetes and diagnostic threshold for diabetes among the Mexican American border community

Objective. In 2009, the International Expert Committee recommended the use of HbA1c test for diagnosis of diabetes. Although it has been recommended for the diagnosis of diabetes, its precise test performance among Mexican Americans is uncertain. A strong “gold standard” would rely on repeated blood glucose measurement on different days, which is the recommended method for diagnosing diabetes in clinical practice. Our objective was to assess test performance of HbA1c in detecting diabetes and pre-diabetes against repeated fasting blood glucose measurement for the Mexican American population living in United States-Mexico border. Moreover, we wanted to find out a specific and precise threshold value of HbA1c for Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and pre-diabetes for this high-risk population which might assist in better diagnosis and better management of patient diabetes. ^ Research design and methods. We used CCHC dataset for our study. In 2004, the Cameron County Hispanic Cohort (CCHC), now numbering 2,574, was established drawn from randomly selected households on the basis of 2000 Census tract data. The CCHC study randomly selected a subset of people (aged 18-64 years) in CCHC cohort households to determine the influence of SES on diabetes and obesity. Among the participants in Cohort-2000, 67.15% are female; all are Hispanic. ^ Individuals were defined as having diabetes mellitus (Fasting plasma glucose [FPG] ≥ 126 mg/dL or pre-diabetes (100 ≤ FPG < 126 mg/dL). HbA1c test performance was evaluated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Moreover, change-point models were used to determine HbA1c thresholds compatible with FPG thresholds for diabetes and pre-diabetes. ^ Results. When assessing Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) is used to detect diabetes, the sensitivity and specificity of HbA1c≥ 6.5% was 75% and 87% respectively (area under the curve 0.895). Additionally, when assessing FPG to detect pre-diabetes, the sensitivity and specificity of HbA1c≥ 6.0% (ADA recommended threshold) was 18% and 90% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of HbA1c≥ 5.7% (International Expert Committee recommended threshold) for detecting pre-diabetes was 31% and 78% respectively. ROC analyses suggest HbA1c as a sound predictor of diabetes mellitus (area under the curve 0.895) but a poorer predictor for pre-diabetes (area under the curve 0.632). ^ Conclusions. Our data support the current recommendations for use of HbA1c in the diagnosis of diabetes for the Mexican American population as it has shown reasonable sensitivity, specificity and accuracy against repeated FPG measures. However, use of HbA1c may be premature for detecting pre-diabetes in this specific population because of the poor sensitivity with FPG. It might be the case that HbA1c is differentiating the cases more effectively who are at risk of developing diabetes. Following these pre-diabetic individuals for a longer-term for the detection of incident diabetes may lead to more confirmatory result.^

HbA1c - changing units

Measurement of glycated haemoglobin A (HbA) provides an indication of longer-term glycaemic control. Standardisation of this test between laboratories is difficult to achieve, and most assays are currently calibrated to the values used in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT-aligned). With the availability of more specific reference standards it is now proposed that HbA is expressed as mmol HbA per mol of non-glycated haemoglobin. An HbA of 7% is approximately equal to 53 mmol/mol.

Elevated Micronucleus Frequency In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes, Dyslipidemia And Periodontitis.

The over-production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) can cause oxidative damage to a large number of molecules, including DNA, and has been associated with the pathogenesis of several disorders, such as diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia and periodontitis (PD). We hypothesise that the presence of these diseases could proportionally increase the DNA damage. The aim of this study was to assess the micronucleus frequency (MNF), as a biomarker for DNA damage, in individuals with type 2 DM, dyslipidemia and PD. One hundred and fifty patients were divided into five groups based upon diabetic, dyslipidemic and periodontal status (Group 1 - poor controlled DM with dyslipidemia and PD; Group 2 - well-controlled DM with dyslipidemia and PD; Group 3 - without DM with dyslipidemia and PD; Group 4 - without DM, without dyslipidemia and with PD; and Group 5 - without DM, dyslipidemia and PD). Blood analyses were carried out for fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c and lipid profile. Periodontal examinations were performed, and venous blood was collected and processed for micronucleus (MN) assay. The frequency of micronuclei was evaluated by cell culture cytokinesis-block MN assay. The general characteristics of each group were described by the mean and standard deviation and the data were submitted to the Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, Multiple Logistic Regression and Spearman tests. The Groups 1, 2 and 3 were similarly dyslipidemic presenting increased levels of total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides. Periodontal tissue destruction and local inflammation were significantly more severe in diabetics, particularly in Group 1. Frequency of bi-nucleated cells with MN and MNF, as well as nucleoplasmic bridges, were significantly higher for poor controlled diabetics with dyslipidemia and PD in comparison with those systemically healthy, even after adjusting for age, and considering Bonferroni's correction. Elevated frequency of micronuclei was found in patients affected by type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia and PD. This result suggests that these three pathologies occurring simultaneously promote an additional role to produce DNA impairment. In addition, the micronuclei assay was useful as a biomarker for DNA damage in individuals with chronic degenerative diseases.