Vom Gatekeeping zum Gatewatching : Modelle der journalistischen Vermittlung im Internet

Traditionelle journalistische Prozeduren der Inhaltserstellung und -vermittlung lassen sich in Presse und Rundfunk in erster Linie durch den Prozess des Gatekeeping charakterisieren. Im Internet findet sich jedoch zunehmend ein anderer Ansatz, der in Analogie zu dem traditionellen Begriff als Gatewatching beschrieben werden kann. In diesem Text werden die Besonderheiten des Gatewatchings herausgearbeitet, vor allem die multiperspektivische Form der Berichterstattung, und die wichtigsten Implikationen einer Bewegung vom Gatekeeping zum Gatewatching im Nachrichtenjournalismus analysiert.

Re-examining 'gatekeeping': How journalists communicate the truth about power to the public

Journalists in the “new media” era confront important questions as to whether, or how, they adapt their professional practices to a new interactive on-line form that allows citizens to become involved in the news-making process. This paper seeks to re-establish the relevance of traditional journalism practices in the modern era and suggests that they will remain very much a part of the “new journalism” beyond the digital divide. It does so through examining how broadcast journalism interviews challenge authorities in the “public interest”, and suggests, in conclusion, that such practices remain undiminished by the technical, and accompanying social, changes that are driving the “new media”.

Gatekeeping, gatewatching, real-time feedback : new challenges for Journalism

How bloggers and other independent online commentators criticise, correct, and otherwise challenge conventional journalism has been known for years, but has yet to be fully accepted by journalists; hostilities between the media establishment and the new generation of citizen journalists continue to flare up from time to time. The old gatekeeping monopoly of the mass media has been challenged by the new practice of gatewatching: by individual bloggers and by communities of commentators which may not report the news first-hand, but curate and evaluate the news and other information provided by official sources, and thus provide an important service. And this now takes place ever more rapidly, almost in real time: using the latest social networks, which disseminate, share, comment, question, and debunk news reports within minutes, and using additional platforms that enable fast and effective ad hoc collaboration between users. When hundreds of volunteers can prove within a few days that a German minister has been guilty of serious plagiarism, when the world first learns of earthquakes and tsunamis via Twitter – how does journalism manage to keep up?

GATEKEEPING, GATEWATCHING, REALIMENTAÇÃO EM TEMPO REAL: novos desafios para o Jornalismo

Faz vários anos que se sabe como os blogueiros e outros comentaristas on-line independentes criticam, corrigem, e de outra maneira desafiam o jornalismo convencional, porém isto ainda não foi plenamente aceito pelos jornalistas; as hostilidades entre as empresas de mídia e a nova geração de jornalistas cidadãos continuam a irromper de vez em quando. O antigo monopólio de gatekeeping mantido pela mídia de massa tem sido desafiado pela nova prática de gatewatching: feita pelos blogueiros individuais e pelas comunidades de comentaristas que podem não fazer reportagem das notícias de primeira mão, porém fazem a curation e avaliam as notícias e outras informações fornecidas pelas fontes oficiais, e assim prestam um serviço importante. E isto ocorre atualmente com cada vez mais rapidez, quase em tempo real: usando as redes sociais mais recentes, que divulgam, compartilham, comentam, questionam e desacreditam as matérias noticiosas dentro de minutos, e usando plataformas adicionais que possibilitam a colaboração ad hoc rápida e eficaz entre os usuários. Quando centenas de voluntários podem provar dentro de alguns poucos dias que um ministro alemão foi culpado de plágio sério, quando o mundo inteiro fica sabendo de terremotos e tsunamis pelo Twitter – como é que o jornalismo consegue acompanhar tudo isto?

Gatekeeping or redressing social exclusion : expectations on social work educators in relation to incarcerated students

Until recently, the author was in Scotland, where professional registration in social work extends to students and involves criminal record checks prior to acceptance into a course of study. She is now teaching at Deakin University in Australia, which places a high priority on making higher education available to persons and groups who have traditionally been excluded, both through the provision of courses through off campus (distance education) study mode and an innovative and culturally sensitive mode of provision for indigenous Australians. One result of our attempts to redress social exclusion is that, on occasion, we discover that some of our students are incarcerated. There are important logistical issues which may emerge as a consequence of accepting prisoners into a program of social work education. However, it would seem that the inclusion of prisoners is symbolic of a fundamental difference in philosophy with programmes of social work education in countries where there is a strong expectation that social work educators act as gatekeepers to the profession, especially in respect of students with criminal convictions. This in tum reflects an expectation among social work educators in Australia that it may be more appropriate for professional associations or registration bodies to determine whether or not a graduate with a criminal record is suitable for employment as a professional social worker. In some settings, a prior criminal record is not a barrier to being an effective service provider, as well as international differences in understandings of the social work role and employment
destinations of social work graduates.

Australian consumers expectations for expanded nursing roles in general practice - choice not gatekeeping

While research has focussed on the current and potential role of the practice nurse (PN) in Australia, the acceptability of this role by consumers has not been investigated. In 2002, two independent studies were carried out into consumer perceptions of PNs. A discussion between the two groups of researchers at the inaugural National Practice Nurse Conference in 2003, identified significant similarities in the findings of these studies. This article reports the combined findings as they relate to consumers' desire for access to the health practitioner of their choice, and their concern that PNs may assume a gatekeeping role. These perceptions may have significant impact on the acceptance of PNs across Australia.

Gatekeeping parenthood : should the state play a role in determining eligibility criteria for assisted reproductive treatment?

The use of assisted reproductive treatment to conceive a child provides the opportunity for the state and/or medical practitioners to play a role in deciding who should or should not become a parent. This article explores the primary criteria used to "screen" people wishing to use assisted reproductive treatment and to exclude them from treatment in some circumstances. It argues that idiosyncratic judgment or general legal presumptions against treatment are not satisfactory, as they are unlikely to predict whether the best interests of a child born as a result of assisted reproductive treatment will be compromised. Rather, such judgments may serve to be discriminatory, and are often misinformed. The author suggests that the law and society should rather serve to support children and parents in need, and to protect existing children from actual suffering or risks of harm.

Civil Liability as an Enforcement Tool of Securities Underwriter Gatekeeping Duty

This book is dedicated to the Law and Economics analysis of civil liability of securities underwriters for the damage caused by material misstatements of corporate information by securities issuers. It seeks to answer a series of important questions. Who the are underwriters and what is their main role in the securities offering? Why there is a need for legal intervention in the underwriting market? What is so special about civil liability as an enforcement tool? How is civil liability used in a real world and does it really reach its goals? Finally, is there a need for a change and, if so, by what means?

Os critérios de gatekeeping que evitam que uma lovebrand se transforme numa hatebrand

A relação marca/consumidor é importante e, atualmente, com a evolução tecnológica e com a disseminação das redes sociais, a sua importância subiu de nível pois o meio online permite que os consumidores estejam mais informados e tenham mais consciência das diversas opções que existem no mercado. Como tal, as marcas aproveitam as redes sociais, tais como o Facebook, para se fazerem notar, para mostrarem o seu lado mais humano e assim estabelecer comunicação com os utilizadores de forma a criar ou manter uma relação mais íntima com o mesmo. Contudo, a liberdade de expressão que existe nas redes sociais nem sempre é favorável às marcas, o que faz com que estas optem por utilizar critérios de gatekeeping para filtrar alguns conteúdos. O que se pretende deste estudo não experimental de tipo exploratório e de método qualitativo, é aferir que critérios de gatekeeping é que são mais suscetíveis de serem utilizados pelas marcas, de forma a evitarem que a relação forte que detêm com o consumidor fique comprometida e manchada pelo ódio e, consequentemente, perceber como é feita a gestão das próprias páginas de Facebook. O objeto do estudo em causa envolve, assim, duas empresas do setor eletrónico que são concorrentes diretas e que têm consumidores muito dedicados e que foram selecionadas através de um método de amostragem não aleatório intencional.

Challenges of recruiting hospice patients with advanced cancer to research : reflections on a delirium screening study

Introduction Delirium research in palliative care, particularly in the dying phase, is possible but is frequently met with ethical and methodological challenges. This paper describes the challenges faced in a previous delirium screening study. Methods Within 72 hours of admission to an acute inpatient specialist palliative care unit one hundred consecutive patients over 18 years of age with advanced cancer were invited to be screened for delirium using validated screening tools. Results Of the 100 consecutive admissions 49 patients were unable to participate including seven who did not meet the inclusion criteria and nine (six families and three patients) who withheld consent. The remaining 33 patients were more unwell and closer to death than those who were recruited. Reasons for non- participation included being too unwell (ten), unresponsive (nine), died (two) or discharged (three) before recruitment and exceeding the 72hour time limit (nine). Conclusion Gate keeping and physical condition of patients were the main obstacles to recruitment and is consistent with barriers faced in previous studies involving palliative care and dying patients. While it is possible and necessary to conduct studies in palliative care, including the terminal phase, as reflective practitioners we must maintain the balance between the demands for evidence-based practice and our compassion and respect for our most vulnerable of patients.

Le processus de travail d'une correspondante: une étude observationnelle

Pro gradu -tutkielman aiheena on kirjeenvaihtajan työprosessi. Tutkielma kuuluu kääntämisen sosiologian piiriin. Tutkimuksen kohteena oli Helsingin Sanomien Pariisin-kirjeenvaihtaja Minna Nalbantoglu, jonka työskentelyä tutkielman tekijä havainnoi Pariisissa viiden päivän ajan syyskuussa 2006. Tutkimuksen päämetodina oli tapaustutkimus, jonka lisäksi tutkimuksessa käytettiin metodina haastattelua ja havainnointia sekä dokumenttien, tallenteiden ja työnäytteiden analysointia. Tutkimuksen aineisto muodostui havaintomuistiinpanoista, kirjeenvaihtajan haastattelusta, ääneenajatteluprotokollista, haastattelunauhoista, kirjeenvaihtajan tuottamista artikkeleista, kirjeenvaihtajan käyttämistä lähteistä ja juttupäiväkirjoista. Tutkielman tarkoituksena oli muodostaa kokonaiskuva kirjeenvaihtajan työprosessista. Tavoitteena oli vastata seuraavin kysymyksiin: 1) Miten ja millä kriteereillä kirjeenvaihtaja valitsee Helsingin Sanomien lukijoille välitettävät uutiset? 2) Miten uutinen tuotetaan? 3) Minkälaista kääntämistä tai käännöseditointia (transediting) kirjeenvaihtajan työssä esiintyy? Tutkimustulokset on analysoitu viiden käsitteen avulla, jotka ovat uutiskriteerit, uutisen tuottamisprosessi, kääntäminen, käännöseditointi ja portinvartiointi (gatekeeping). Ensimmäiseen tutkimuskysymykseen vastattiin analysoimalla kirjeenvaihtajan tutkimusviikon aikana tuottamia artikkeleita Johan Galtungin ja Mari Holmboe Rugen (1965) klassisten uutiskriteerien avulla, joita täydennettiin Judy McGregorin (2002) päivitetyillä uutiskriteereillä. Toiseen tutkimuskysymykseen vastattiin kuvailemalla uutisten tuottamisprosessia. Samalla selvitettiin, mitä lähteitä kirjeenvaihtaja oli käyttänyt jutuissansa. Kolmatta tutkimuskysymystä varten artikkelit analysoitiin Teun A. van Dijkin (1988) uutisen tuottamisprosessin tutkimista varten kehittämällä mallilla. Van Dijkin mallin avulla määriteltiin, mikä tekstinkäsittelystrategia on kääntämistä ja mitkä käännöseditointia. Analyysin perusteella todettiin, että tekstin tuottamisprosessissa esiintyy myös uuden tekstin luomista ja tuotantoa yksikielisen materiaalin pohjalta. Kääntäminen ja käännöseditointi (Karen Stetting 1989) -käsitteitä pohdittiin ennen analyysia työn teoriaosuudessa. Uutisaiheiden analyysin perusteella todettiin, että mitä enemmän tapahtuma täyttää uutiskriteereitä, sitä todennäköisemmin se valitaan uutiseksi. Niin ikään mitä enemmän tapahtuma täyttää McGregorin päivittämiä uutiskriteereitä, sitä todennäköisemmin se valitaan uutiseksi. Analysoitujen uutisten määrä oli kuitenkin pieni, eikä tuloksia voida pitää kuin suuntaa-antavina. Artikkeleiden lähteenä oli käytetty lähinnä haastatteluita, lehtiartikkeleita ja uutistoimistojen sähkeitä. Muiden lähteiden käyttö oli satunnaista. Lähteiden ja käännösstrategioiden välillä ei havaittu korrelaatiota. Eniten käytetty tekstinkäsittelystrategia oli tiivistäminen. Käännöseditoinnin osuus oli yli puolet artikkeleiden tekstistä (keskiarvo 62 %) ja kääntämisen osuus vain kahdeksan prosenttia. Tutkimuksen perusteella käännöseditointi-käsitteen käyttö on perusteltua puhuttaessa kyseisen kirjeenvaihtajan työstä. Tutkimuksen perusteella on kehitetty uusi portinvartiointimalli, joka pohjautuu van Dijkin uutisen tuottamisprosessimalliin. Mallin avulla voidaan analysoida uutisen tuottamisprosessia ja päätellä, minkä verran kääntämistä ja käännöseditointia työssä esiintyy. Mallia ehdotetaan sovellettavaksi paitsi muiden kirjeenvaihtajien niin myös monikielisen materiaalin parissa työskentelevien toimittajien työn sekä uutiskääntämisen analysointiin.

‘It's been hell.’ Italian and British practice educators’ narratives of working with struggling or failing social work students in practice learning settings

Periods of assessed learning in practice settings are common requirements for social work students world wide. The ‘practice learning opportunity’ as it is known in the UK, and ‘tirocinio di servizio sociale’ as it is referred to in Italy, are important sites of gatekeeping in preventing unsuitable people from becoming social workers. The experience of assessing failing students in practice learning settings however, has been found to be particularly stressful and challenging for practice educators. This article documents findings from two qualitative studies that explored field educators’ experiences of working with struggling or failing social work students in Italy and England. The study finds both similarities and differences in the narratives of the assessors from the two countries Similarities include, unpleasant emotional experience of working with a failing student, internalisation of the students failing as the practice educators’ own failing, perceptions that the universities may hide negative information about students and lack of acknowledgement of the gatekeeping function inherent in the practice educator role. Differences include the level of emotionality experienced by educators, the way students are spoken about and the perceived role and responses of the university. Further comparative European research which focuses on practice education is indicated.