OA business models for Finnish scholarly journals?

Presentation given at the Nordic Open Access Forum meeting in Copenhagen, June 24, 2014.

Crowdfunding as a new funding alternative for early stage start-ups

Attracting outside capital is a common problem for start-up companies. Capital markets define the funding options for companies and firms which suffer the most from these capital market imperfections are small start-up companies. Therefore it is important to study any new funding model which can offer a new solution to this inefficiency of capital markets. This study explains the traditional funding models for start-ups such as founders, friends & family, banks, business angels and venture capitalist. After giving background to traditional start-up funding this study delves into crowfunding (CF) and introduces it as a new funding method. The objective of the thesis is to answer one broad research question: Why and how should start-up companies use CF as an alternative funding method? To properly delve into this, this question has the following sub-questions: What kind of funding alternatives do start-up companies have? What are the pros and cons of CF compared to other funding options? How can start-ups benefit from CF? This study gives background on the rise of CF and the reasons why this new model is needed. Author will explain the different components of CF such as platforms, crowdfunders and projects. Also benefits and challenges of the crowdfunding model are investigated. As a new funding model CF has had to clear out many obstacles from its way. These are, for example, legal and regulatory issues as well education of crowd investors to understand this new investment option. . Start-up entrepreneurs can gain valuable insight from this study. The author has attempted to form best practices and guidelines of how to operate in the CF environment. This study was conducted by performing expert interviews, collecting data from previous studies and performing a content analysis of successful crowdfunding cases. Main findings from the study were that CF has huge potential in funding entrepreneurial projects. It is still a niche way for funding but growing rapidly. CF is earning its place among traditional funding options and has potential to fund projects which otherwise would struggle to find funding. With CF entrepreneur can tap into geographically diverse audience. It is a powerful validation tool for products and ideas and has the power to bring democratic elements to entrepreneurial funding.

The contribution model:a school-level funding model

Over a number of years, as the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE)'s funding models became more transparent, Aston University was able to discover how its funding for teaching and research was calculated. This enabled calculations to be made on the funds earned by each school in the University, and Aston Business School (ABS) in turn to develop models to calculate the funds earned by its programmes and academic groups. These models were a 'load' and a 'contribution' model. The 'load' model records the weighting of activities undertaken by individual members of staff; the 'contribution' model is the means by which funds are allocated to academic units. The 'contribution' model is informed by the 'load' model in determining the volume of activity for which each academic unit is to be funded.

O financiamento nas cooperativas

As cooperativas, enquanto entidades pertencentes ao setor da economia social, são organizações com características próprias e distintas das sociedades comerciais, destacando-se o seu escopo mutualístico e o caráter variável do seu capital social, por confronto com o escopo lucrativo e o princípio da conservação do capital social que caraterizam as sociedades. Estas especificidades das cooperativas condicionam a obtenção de meios de financiamento por parte destas. Em virtude do seu caráter variável, o capital social não representa uma garantia para os credores, pelo que serão as reservas, designadamente as reservas obrigatórias, que se apresentarão como o recurso financeiro de melhor qualidade na cooperativa. Nas cooperativas são identificáveis outros instrumentos financeiros, tais como: títulos de investimento e obrigações, os resultados provenientes das operações com terceiros, que são obrigatoriamente afetados a reservas irrepartíveis, os excedentes, os membros investidores, subsídios e benefícios fiscais. Para além da identificação das principais fontes de financiamento, foi ainda objeto de estudo repensar os instrumentos existentes e, eventualmente, a criação de novos instrumentos de financiamento nas cooperativas. Em termos metodológicos, a opção recaiu na conjugação de dois métodos: quantitativo e qualitativo. A técnica da investigação quantitativa selecionada para a recolha de dados, foi a base de dados, e para a investigação qualitativa as técnicas escolhidas foram a análise de conteúdo, a entrevista e o registo áudio. Os resultados da investigação confirmam a indispensabilidade de criação de novos instrumentos de financiamento para as cooperativas. Constatou-se a necessidade de modelos de financiamento que se adaptem à finalidade mutualista da cooperativa. Demonstrou-se que a principal fonte de financiamento são os recursos internos, sob forma de reservas.

Modelos de sistemas de financiamento dos cuidados de saúde: o impacto nos custos

Ao longo das últimas décadas tem-se verificado um crescente aumento dos custos de saúde na generalidade dos países e, em particular, nos países desenvolvidos. Este facto tem suscitado o aumento de estudos sobre os determinantes dos custos de saúde, bem como uma crescente preocupação por parte dos decisores políticos. No cerne da discussão está a importância da organização e do modelo de financiamento dos sistemas de saúde, de forma a promover a eficiência e a assegurar o acesso equitativo aos cuidados de saúde. A presente dissertação procura analisar a evolução dos custos com a saúde dos 15 países mais antigos da União Europeia, da Suíça e dos Estados Unidos da América, entre o período de 2000 e 2013. Os objetivos principais deste trabalho são os de compreender os aspetos gerais dos modelos de financiamento de saúde presentes concentrando-nos na questão das fontes de financiamento para analisar o impacto que estas têm nos custos de saúde dos países, nomeadamente no montante de custos e na sua evolução recente. Os resultados deste estudo sugerem que o crescimento do PIB se encontra associado ao aumento dos gastos de saúde, culminando com as conclusões propostas por estudos anteriores. A evidência sobre o impacto do envelhecimento das populações não é conclusiva. A forma como os sistemas de saúde dos diferentes países são organizados e financiados, também influenciam a evolução dos custos de saúde.

Making it viable - enabling Open Access for Finnish scholarly journals

Poster at the CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), Geneva, June 17-19, 2015.

Open access is possible! On the transition of a business model

Kai Karin Geschun's presentation at Kirjastoverkkopäivät, Helsinki 21.10.2015.

Making it viable : Enabling Open Access for Finnish scholarly journals : Kotilava (Hemvett)

Presentation at Nordic Open Access Forum meeting in Stockholm, April 25, 2016

Requirements analysis for an e-government system to support multi-organisational collaborative groups

We present a conceptual architecture for a Group Support System (GSS) to facilitate Multi-Organisational Collaborative Groups (MOCGs) initiated by local government and including external organisations of various types. Multi-Organisational Collaborative Groups (MOCGs) consist of individuals from several organisations which have agreed to work together to solve a problem. The expectation is that more can be achieved working in harmony than separately. Work is done interdependently, rather than independently in diverse directions. Local government, faced with solving complex social problems, deploy MOCGs to enable solutions across organisational, functional, professional and juridical boundaries, by involving statutory, voluntary, community, not-for-profit and private organisations. This is not a silver bullet as it introduces new pressures. Each member organisation has its own goals, operating context and particular approaches, which can be expressed as their norms and business processes. Organisations working together must find ways of eliminating differences or mitigating their impact in order to reduce the risks of collaborative inertia and conflict. A GSS is an electronic collaboration system that facilitates group working and can offer assistance to MOCGs. Since many existing GSSs have been primarily developed for single organisation collaborative groups, even though there are some common issues, there are some difficulties peculiar to MOCGs, and others that they experience to a greater extent: a diversity of primary organisational goals among members; different funding models and other pressures; more significant differences in other information systems both technologically and in their use than single organisations; greater variation in acceptable approaches to solve problems. In this paper, we analyse the requirements of MOCGs led by local government agencies, leading to a conceptual architecture for an e-government GSS that captures the relationships between 'goal', 'context', 'norm', and 'business process'. Our models capture the dynamics of the circumstances surrounding each individual representing an organisation in a MOCG along with the dynamics of the MOCG itself as a separate community.

Creating High-Impact Workforce Development Programs

As communities across the nation continue to face persistent unemployment, many states are turning to community college workforce development programs to combat joblessness. However, state governments and community colleges alike are often unable to devote significant resources to building new workforce initiatives. This brief examines how community colleges in four states have worked with state governments and other partners to overcome budget constraints and create effective workforce development programs, highlighting funding models and innovative practices to make efficient use of limited resources.

The changing nature of innovation networks in Taiwan: From imitation to innovation?

Taiwan is embarking on a new phase in its approach to building its national innovative capacity, through building the infrastructure for a biotechnology industry. Rather than acting as a “fast follower” of trends developed elsewhere, Taiwan is seeking to evolve the elements of a national innovation system, including upgrading the role of universities in providing fundamental R&D, in providing incubators for new, knowledge-based firms, in developing new funding models, and in establishing new biotech-focused science parks. This paper reviews the progress achieved to date, and the prospects for this new phase in Taiwan’s transition from imitation to innovation

Musings of a private research funder on scholarly journals in Finland

Presentation at the seminar "Publishers and Funders for OA in Finland", Helsinki, May 24, 2016

Towards reliable data - counting the Finnish Open Access publications

Presentation at the CRIS2016 conference in St Andrews, June 10, 2016

Self-archiving publications

This chapter discusses the historical development, current practice and future prospects of the self-archiving of research papers in open-access repositories (so-called 'e-print archives'). It describes how the development of interoperable e-print repositories in a number of subject communities has shown that self-archiving can benefit academic researchers (and potentially others) by enabling quick and easy access to the research literature and therefore maximising the impact potential of papers. Realising that the possible benefits are high and the technical entry barriers low, many organisations such as universities have recently tried to encourage widespread self-archiving by setting up institutional repositories. However, major barriers to self-archiving remain - most of them cultural and managerial. There are concerns about quality control, intellectual property rights, disturbing the publishing status quo, and workload. Ways in which these issues are currently being addressed are discussed in this chapter. A number of self-archiving initiatives in different countries have been set up to address the concerns and to kick-start e-print repository use. However, issues remain which require further investigation; those discussed in this chapter include discipline differences, definitions of 'publication', versioning problems, digital preservation, costing and funding models, and metadata standards. The ways in which these issues are resolved will be important in determining the future of self-archiving. Possible futures are discussed with particular reference to journal publishing and quality control. If widely adopted, self-archiving might come to assume a central place in the scholarly communication process, but a great deal of restructuring of the process needs to take place before this potential can be realised.

Journals and repositories: an evolving relationship?

It is now widely accepted that there are two routes to open access (OA): OA repositories and OA journals. It is often assumed these are distinct alternative parallel tracks. However, it has recently become clear that there is potential for repositories and journals to interact with each other on an ongoing basis and between them to form a coherent OA scholarly communication system. This paper puts forward three possible models of interaction between repositories and journals; services such as arXiv and PubMed Central, and the work carried out by the RIOJA project, are working exemplars and pilot implementations of these models. The key issues associated with the widespread adoption of these models include repository infrastructure development; changing ideas of the ‘journal’, ‘article’, and ‘publication’; version management; quality assurance; business and funding models; developing value-added features; content preservation; policy frameworks; and changing roles and cultures within the research community.