899 resultados para Financing decisions
Resumo:
In this paper we evaluate an indivisible investment project that is carried out in a corporation under very simple premises. In particular, we discuss a one-period model with certainty, the pure domestic case and proportional tax rates. Surprisingly, the decision problem turns out to be rather complex if one has to make allowance for different taxation of the corporation and its owner. Altogether there are more than 10 cases that have to be distinguished if the firm's managers want to make a correct decision, depending on the relation of personal and corporate tax rates.
Resumo:
"B-270347"--P. 1.
Resumo:
Based on four samples of Portuguese family-owned firmsdi) 185 young, low-sized family-owned firms; ii) 167 young, high-sized familyowned firms; iii) 301 old, low-sized family-owned firms; and iv) 353 old, high-sized family-owned firms d we show that age and size are fundamental characteristics in family-owned firms’ financing decisions. The multiple empirical evidence obtained allows us to conclude that the financing decisions of young, low-sized family-owned firms are quite close to the assumptions of Pecking Order Theory, whereas those of old, high-sized family-owned firms are quite close to what is forecast by Trade-Off Theory. The lesser information asymmetry associated with greater age, the lesser likelihood of bankruptcy associated with greater size, as well as the lesser concentration of ownership and management consequence of greater age and size, may be especially important in the financing decisions of family-owned firms. In addition, we find that GDP, interest rate and periods of crisis have a greater effect on the debt of young, low-sized family-owned firms than on that of family-owned firms of the remainder research samples.
Resumo:
This thesis examines the dynamics of firm-level financing and investment decisions for six Southeast Asian countries. The study provides empirical evidence on the impacts of changes in the firm-level financing decisions during the period of financial liberalization by considering the debt and equity financing decisions of a set of non-financial firms. The empirical results show that firms in Indonesia, Pakistan, and South Korea have relatively faster speed of adjustment than other Southeast Asian countries to attain optimal debt and equity ratios in response to banking sector and stock market liberalization. In addition, contrary to widely held belief that firms adjust their financial ratios to industry levels, the results indicate that industry factors do not significantly impact on the speed of capital structure adjustments. This study also shows that non-linear estimation methods are more appropriate than linear estimation methods for capturing changes in capital structure. The empirical results also show that international stock market integration of these countries has significantly reduced the equity risk premium as well as the firm-level cost of equity capital. Thus stock market liberalization is associated with a decrease in the cost of equity capital of the firms. Developments in the securities markets infrastructure have also reduced the cost of equity capital. However, with increased integration there is the possibility of capital outflows from the emerging markets, which might reverse the pattern of decrease in cost of capital in these markets.
Resumo:
Tax planners often choose debt over equity financing. As this has led to increased corporate debt financing, many countries have introduced thin capitalization rules to secure their tax revenues. In a general capital structure model we analyze if thin capitalization rules affect dividend and financing decisions, and whether they can partially explain why corporations receive both debt and equity capital. We model the Belgian, German and Italian rules as examples. We find that the so-called Miller equilibrium and definite financing effects depend significantly on the underlying tax system. Further, our results are useful for the treasury to decide what thin capitalization type to implement.
Resumo:
Many studies have been conducted in corporate finance regarding long-term investment and financing decisions. However, short-term asset investments play a significant role in the balance sheet of companies. Moreover, financial managers dedicate significant amounts of time and effort to the subject of working capital management, balancing current assets and liabilities. This paper provides insights regarding the key factors of working capital management by exploring the internal variables of a number of companies. This study used data from 2,976 Brazilian public companies from 2001 to 2008, and found that debt level, size and growth rate can affect the working capital management of companies.
Resumo:
A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Masters Degree in Finance from the NOVA – School of Business and Economics
Resumo:
The purpose of this research is to study the Return on Equity of Portuguese and Brazilian companies, through the DuPont method. This project analyses whether differences in the ratios depend on specific features of the country, or if it is influenced by the industry where it is located. From the comparisons it is concluded that Brazilian companies pay higher corporate taxes and while the Portuguese companies are more leveraged, it is the Brazilian companies which pay higher interests. It is also noticeable that Portuguese companies take more advantage from the financing decisions and Brazilian on the investing decisions.
Resumo:
Summary Throughout my thesis, I elaborate on how real and financing frictions affect corporate decision making under uncertainty, and I explore how firms time their investment and financing decisions given such frictions. While the macroeconomics literature has focused on the impact of real frictions on investment decisions assuming all equity financed firms, the financial economics literature has mainly focused on the study of financing frictions. My thesis therefore assesses the join interaction of real and financing frictions in firms' dynamic investment and financing decisions. My work provides a rationale for the documented poor empirical performance of neoclassical investment models based on the joint effect of real and financing frictions on investment. A major observation relies in how the infrequency of corporate decisions may affect standard empirical tests. My thesis suggests that the book to market sorts commonly used in the empirical asset pricing literature have economic content, as they control for the lumpiness in firms' optimal investment policies. My work also elaborates on the effects of asymmetric information and strategic interaction on firms' investment and financing decisions. I study how firms time their decision to raise public equity when outside investors lack information about their future investment prospects. I derive areal-options model that predicts either cold or hot markets for new stock issues conditional on adverse selection, and I provide a rational approach to study jointly the market timing of corporate decisions and announcement effects in stock returns. My doctoral dissertation therefore contributes to our understanding of how under real and financing frictions may bias standard empirical tests, elaborates on how adverse selection may induce hot and cold markets in new issues' markets, and suggests how the underlying economic behaviour of firms may induce alternative patterns in stock prices.
Resumo:
The three essays constituting this thesis focus on financing and cash management policy. The first essay aims to shed light on why firms issue debt so conservatively. In particular, it examines the effects of shareholder and creditor protection on capital structure choices. It starts by building a contingent claims model where financing policy results from a trade-off between tax benefits, contracting costs and agency costs. In this setup, controlling shareholders can divert part of the firms' cash ows as private benefits at the expense of minority share- holders. In addition, shareholders as a class can behave strategically at the time of default leading to deviations from the absolute priority rule. The analysis demonstrates that investor protection is a first order determinant of firms' financing choices and that conflicts of interests between firm claimholders may help explain the level and cross-sectional variation of observed leverage ratios. The second essay focuses on the practical relevance of agency conflicts. De- spite the theoretical development of the literature on agency conflicts and firm policy choices, the magnitude of manager-shareholder conflicts is still an open question. This essay proposes a methodology for quantifying these agency conflicts. To do so, it examines the impact of managerial entrenchment on corporate financing decisions. It builds a dynamic contingent claims model in which managers do not act in the best interest of shareholders, but rather pursue private benefits at the expense of shareholders. Managers have discretion over financing and dividend policies. However, shareholders can remove the manager at a cost. The analysis demonstrates that entrenched managers restructure less frequently and issue less debt than optimal for shareholders. I take the model to the data and use observed financing choices to provide firm-specific estimates of the degree of managerial entrenchment. Using structural econometrics, I find costs of control challenges of 2-7% on average (.8-5% at median). The estimates of the agency costs vary with variables that one expects to determine managerial incentives. In addition, these costs are sufficient to resolve the low- and zero-leverage puzzles and explain the time series of observed leverage ratios. Finally, the analysis shows that governance mechanisms significantly affect the value of control and firms' financing decisions. The third essay is concerned with the documented time trend in corporate cash holdings by Bates, Kahle and Stulz (BKS,2003). BKS find that firms' cash holdings double from 10% to 20% over the 1980 to 2005 period. This essay provides an explanation of this phenomenon by examining the effects of product market competition on firms' cash holdings in the presence of financial constraints. It develops a real options model in which cash holdings may be used to cover unexpected operating losses and avoid inefficient closure. The model generates new predictions relating cash holdings to firm and industry characteristics such as the intensity of competition, cash flow volatility, or financing constraints. The empirical examination of the model shows strong support of model's predictions. In addition, it shows that the time trend in cash holdings documented by BKS can be at least partly attributed to a competition effect.
Resumo:
Life science-ala on rahoituksellisesti erittäin haastava, koska tuotekehitysputket ovat 10-15 vuoden pituisia ja voivat vaatia suuria etupainotteisia investointeja. Monet life science-alan yritykset ovat niin Suomessa kuin kansainvälisestikin syntyneet suoraan yliopistosta niin sanottuina spin-off-yrityksinä. Yrityksen perustaminen tutkimustiedon pohjalle on yksi akateemisen yrittäjyyden muodoista. Tässä tutkimuksessa tutkitaan akateemista yrittäjyyttä life science-alalla Suomessa. Suomessa life science-alan osaaminen on kansainvälistä huippua ja alalle on syntynyt useita spin-off-yrityksiä viime vuosina. Aiemmat tutkimukset ovat keskittyneet erityisesti agentti-päämiesongelmiin akateemisessa yrittäjyydessä ja life science alaa puolestaan on käsitelty usein pelkästään yhtenä alana. Tutkimuksessa pyritään analysoimaan life science-alan eri painopiste-alueita tarkemmin rahoitusstrategisesta näkökulmasta, koska ala ei ole homogeeninen. Akateemisen yrittäjyyden agenttiongelmaa pyritään tarkoittamaan Suomen yliopistomaailmassa life science-alalta käsin. Tutkimus toteutetaan kvalitatiivisena haastattelututkimuksena ja sitä tukevana tilinpäätöstietojen analysointina. Tutkimuksen tulokset vahvistavat agentti-päämiesongelmien olemassaolon suomalaisessa yliopistomaailmassa. Ongelmien osapuolina ovat niin akateemikot, yliopiston innovaatiopalvelut kuin TEKES:kin. Yrittäjät kaipaavat kokonaisvaltaisempaa apua, koska kokevat alalla liiketoimintaosaamisen puuttuvan monin paikoin. Alan vaatimien runsaiden tuotekehityspanostusten vuoksi alan yritykset ovat pitkään raskaasti tappiollisia. Yritysten valitsemat rahoitusratkaisut vaihtelevat suuresti. Kaikki tutkitut yritykset pyrkivät kasvamaan nykyisten ydintuotteidensa mukana ja ovat jo jossain määrin hankkineet rahoitusta kasvustrategiaansa varten. Alan pääomaintensiivisyydestä johtuen ovat monet yritykset kuitenkin suunnittelemassa tai jo päätyneet tekemään yhteistyötä integroituen alalla joko vertikaalisesti tai horisontaalisesti. Tutkimuksen tulokset vahvistavat aiemman käsityksen, jonka mukaan life science-alan yrityksiä on vaikea arvioida ulkopuolelta pelkästään tilinpäätöstietojen pohjalta, koska alkuvaiheessa rahoituskierrokset ja tappiolliset vuoden seuraavat toisiaan ja toisaalta yrityksen arvo sitoutuu pitkiin tuotekehitysputkiin, jotka eivät välttämättä näy tilinpäätöksessä. Tulokset tuovat esille merkittäviä yritysten kokemia ongelmia rahoituksen saannissa life science-alalla Suomessa sekä akateemisen yrittäjyyden epäkohtia yritystoiminnan näkökulmasta. Näiden tekijöiden huomioonottaminen ja laajempi kansainvälinen vertailu voivat auttaa suomalaisia yrityksiä tällä vahvalla osaamisalalla eteenpäin.
Resumo:
Este trabalho busca explorar, através de testes empíricos, qual das duas principais teorias de escolha de estrutura ótima de capital das empresas, a Static Trade-off Theory (STT) ou a Pecking Order Theory(POT) melhor explica as decisões de financiamento das companhias brasileiras. Adicionalmente, foi estudado o efeito da assimetria de informações, desempenho e liquidez do mercado acionário nessas decisões. Utilizou-se no presente trabalho métodos econométricos com dados de empresas brasileiras de capital aberto no período abrangendo 1995 a 2005, testando dois modelos representativos da Static Trade-off Theory (STT) e da Pecking Order Theory(POT). Inicialmente, foi testado o grupo amplo de empresas e, posteriormente, realizou-se o teste em subgrupos, controlando os efeitos de desempenho e liquidez do mercado acionário, liquidez das ações das empresas tomadoras e assimetria de informações. Desta forma, os resultados obtidos são indicativos de que a Pecking Order Theory, na sua forma semi-forte, se constitui na melhor teoria explicativa quanto à escolha da estrutura de capital das empresas brasileiras, na qual a geração interna de caixa e o endividamento oneroso e operacional é a fonte prioritária de recursos da companhia, havendo algum nível, embora baixo, da utilização de emissão de ações. Os estudos empíricos para os subgrupos de controle sugerem que a liquidez do mercado e liquidez das ações das empresas são fatores de influência na propensão das empresas emitirem ações, assim como a assimetria de informação. O desempenho do mercado acionário, com base nos dados analisados, aparenta ter pouca influência na captação de recursos via emissões de ações das empresas, não sendo feito no presente estudo distinções entre emissões públicas ou privadas
Resumo:
Diversos estudos de Finanças Corporativas consideram os custos associados aos ajustes da estrutura de capital das empresas irrelevantes tanto na forma quanto em magnitude. Este estudo analisou empiricamente a influência dos custos de ajustamento na dinâmica dos ajustes da estrutura de capital de empresas brasileiras de capital aberto no período de 1999 a 2007. A alavancagem foi abordada sob três diferentes cenários, considerando a presença de custos fixos, custos proporcionais e por uma composição de custos fixos e proporcionais através de simulações utilizando um modelo reduzido da estrutura de capital. Em seguida a análise não paramétrica da amostra revelou que as empresas apresentam um comportamento dinâmico em suas decisões de financiamento para o ajuste da estruturas de capital, mas que não se revelou contínuo. A utilização de um modelo de duration mostrou-se adequado para mensurar o intervalo de tempo entre os ajustes da estrutura de capital das empresas. Os resultados são extremamente relevantes e suportam a teoria de um comportamento de rebalanceamento dinâmico pelas empresas de suas estruturas de capital em torno de um intervalo ótimo. Entretanto os ajustes não ocorrem de forma imediata e a persistência de choques à estrutura de capital deve-se em sua maior parte aos custos associados aos ajustes do que a uma possível indiferença à estrutura de capital. . Este trabalho constitui-se como pioneiro no mercado brasileiro acerca dos custos de ajustamento da estrutura de capital e abre espaço para a discussão do comportamento ótimo em torno da estrutura de capital de empresas nacionais.
Resumo:
Pesquisas recentes nos campos das Finanças e de Economia Industrial vêem mostrando que as decisões de financiamento corporativo são interdependentes de decisões relativas ao mercado de produtos. As teorias apresentadas apóiam-se na responsabilidade limitada dos detentores do capital próprio para construir modelos nos quais a dívida é utilizada estrategicamente. Altos níveis de endividamento tendem a favorecer o acirramento da concorrência e a produzir resultados piores do que numa situação de conluio, provocando a adoção de mecanismos de limitação da alavancagem e da concorrência pelo oligopólio. Evidências indicam que firmas alavancadas suavizam a concorrência enquanto firmas menos ou não alavancadas tornam a concorrência mais acirrada ante a presença de um rival mais alavancado. Dados de corte seccional das firmas participantes do mercado brasileiro de aços planos ao carbono foram tratados pelo método econométrico para verificar o comportamento da variável de endividamento tendo como variáveis explicativas de interesse os preços praticados e as quantidades vendidas pelas firmas e, como variáveis de controle, algumas dentre aquelas sugeridas pela teoria da estrutura de capital. Os resultados mostram evidências de que a variável de concorrência "preço" influencia as decisões de estrutura de capital das firmas siderúrgicas produtoras de aços planos e que a correlação com a alavancagem é positiva. No entanto, nenhuma conclusão pôde ser obtida sobre a variável quantidade. Cálculos adicionais produziram resultados que são indicativos de iniciativas de aumento de concorrência pelas firmas mais alavancadas da indústria, como redução de preço, aumento de lucratividade e maior participação de mercado, sugerindo que as circunstâncias de expansão de demanda favorecem a ruptura do conluio.