Federal-provincial relations and the environment : attaining sustainable development through cooperation /

A study of intergovernmental relations in the area of the environment will determine whether the current Canadian federal structure represents a dangerous impediment to the promotion of sustainable development. This paper examines the interjurisdictional quagmire that has developed from the fact that authority over the environment is a functionally concurrent field for the two orders of government. A history of federal-provincial relations in the area of environmental protection is followed by an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages associated with competitive and cooperative federalism. For the purpose of this paper, cooperative federalism is characterized by the presence of a formal institutional system to facilitate interaction between politicians and bureaucrats from both orders of government. Competitive federalism is defined as a system that lacks a formal institutional structure to promote discussion and coordination between federal and provincial officials in a specific field of interest. Last, I examine thirty sustainable development issues following the structure established in Agenda 21 to determine the impact of the present federal system on the development of these objectives. This study concludes that Canadian federalism is not a dangerous impediment to the promotion of sustainable development. Cooperative federalism in a form that does not eliminate the ability of governments to revert to competition promotes the emergence of an institutional system that facilitates information-sharing and discussion between the two orders of government, thus leading to coordinated efforts in the field of the environment. Respect for the current division of powers in this area is also essential to the cohesiveness of Canadian society. Policy-makers and advocates for a sustainable society should focus on working within the present system.

Could European Governance Ideas Improve Federal-provincial Relations in Canada? EDAP 6/2013

Over the past seventeen years Canada has decentralized many social programmes, moving responsibility from the federal government to 13 provinces and territories through bilateral federal-provincial agreements. In contrast, the European Union (EU) has moved in the opposite direction, building pan-European approaches and establishing new processes to facilitate multilateral collaboration among the 28 EU member states. This has been done through a new governance approach called the Open Method of Coordination (OMC). Using a detailed case study − employment policy − this paper explores whether Canada could learn from OMC governance ideas to re-build a pan-Canadian dimension to employment policy and improve the performance of its intergovernmental relations system. Concrete lessons for Canada to improve decentralized governance are suggested: consolidating the different bilateral agreements; using benchmarking instead of controls in fiscal transfers; undertaking research, analysis, and comparisons in order to facilitate mutual learning; revitalizing intergovernmental structures in light of devolution; and engaging social partners, civil society and other stakeholders. Post-devolution Canada is not doing badly in managing employment policy, but could do better. Looking to the EU for ideas on new ways to collaborate provides a chance for setting a forward looking agenda that could ultimately result not only in better labour market outcomes, but also improvements to one small part of Canada’s often fractious federation.

Staff reports on Federal-State relations in New York.

Caption title.

Decisions and interpretations of the Federal Labor Relations Council

Mode of access: Internet.

Negotiability determinations by Federal Labor Relations Council (FLRC) January 1, 1970 to January 1, 1976 /

Mode of access: Internet.

Effect of fiscal year 1982 budget reductions on the Federal Labor Relations Authority.

"B-208172."

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, no. 81-2135, Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization, petitioner v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, respondent, Federal Aviation Administration, intervenor : petition for review of an order of the Federal Labor Relations Authority, argued December 3, 1981, decided June 11, 1982.

Cover title.

Negotiability determinations by Federal Labor Relations Council (FLRC) : January 1, 1970 to June 1, 1978.

"USCSC/OLMR-78/05."

National directory of clearinghouses.

Caption title.

Effects of budget cuts and deregulation on low and moderate-income groups in cities : hearing before the Subcommittee on Housing and Community Development of the Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, House of Representatives, Ninety-seventh Congress, second session, September 13, 1982.

Item 1013-A, 1013-B (microfiche)

A Guide to the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (Foreign Service Labor-Management Relations Program).

Mode of access: Internet.

[Citator of the decisions of the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Labor-Management Relations].

Title on half t.p.: Federal Labor Relations Authority, Assistant Secretary for Labor-Management Relations, decisions and orders, citations.

Supplemental digest and index of published decisions of the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Labor-Management Relations pursuant to Executive Order 11491, as amended.

Mode of access: Internet.