Get a GRIP: Should Area Revenue Coverage Be Offered through the Farm Bill or as a Crop Insurance Program? 2007

The successful expansion of the U.S. crop insurance program has not eliminated ad hoc disaster assistance. An alternative currently being explored by members of Congress and others in preparation of the 2007 farm bill is to simply remove the “ad hoc” part of disaster assistance programs by creating a standing program that would automatically funnel aid to hard-hit regions and crops. One form such a program could take can be found in the area yield and area revenue insurance programs currently offered by the U.S. crop insurance program. The Group Risk Plan (GRP) and Group Risk Income Protection (GRIP) programs automatically trigger payments when county yields or revenues, respectively, fall below a producer-elected coverage level. The per-acre taxpayer costs of offering GRIP in Indiana, Illinois, and Iowa for corn and soybeans through the crop insurance program are estimated. These results are used to determine the amount of area revenue coverage that could be offered to farmers as part of a standing farm bill disaster program. Approximately 55% of taxpayer support for GRIP flows to the crop insurance industry. A significant portion of this support comes in the form of net underwriting gains. The expected rate of return on money put at risk by private crop insurance companies under the current Standard Reinsurance Agreement is approximately 100%. Taking this industry support and adding in the taxpayer support for GRIP that flows to producers would fund a county target revenue program at the 93% coverage level.

The 2002 US Farm Bill: what's in it for CAP reform?

The 2002 U.S. Farm Bill (the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act or FSRIA) provides considerably more government subsidies for U.S. agriculture than Congress envisaged when it passed the preceding 1996–2002 FAIR Act. We review the FAIR record, showing how government subsidies increased greatly beyond those originally scheduled. For FSRIA, we outline key commodity, trade, and conservation and environmental provisions. We expect that the commodity programmes will: (a) encourage production when the market calls for less; (b) significantly increase subsidies over FAIR baseline subsidies; (c) press against current WTO and possible Doha Round support limits; and (d) aggravate trading partners. Finally, we suggest two lessons from the U.S. policy experience that might benefit those working on CAP and WTO reform. First, past research shows that farm programmes have little to do with the economic health of rural communities. Second, programme transparency, and especially public disclosure of the level of payments going to individual farmers, by name, influences the farm policy debate. Personalized data show what economists have long maintained—that the bulk of programme benefits go to a relatively few, large, producers—but do so in a way that captures the public and policy-makers' attention

La nueva ley de seguridad agrícola y de inversión rural de los Estados Unidos (Farm Bill). Un análisis de sus implicancias comerciales

Incluye Bibliografía

Preparation for the 1990 farm bill : hearings before the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, United States Senate, One Hundred First Congress, first session, on the administration views concerning the 1990 farm bill.

Hearings held before various Subcommittees of the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, United State Senate, April 19, 1989-

The 1990 farm bill, an outline of selected provisions /

"Order code IB90099."

The 1990 farm bill, resource conservation issues /

"Order code IB90031."

Impacts of the 1985 Farm Bill and its alternatives on rural economies : the case of Terry County, Texas /

"B-1602."

'95 Farm Bill : START coalition proposal : Food Security Act of 1995, START.

Cover title.

Hearing to review U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Development programs and the agency's rural development proposals for the 2007 farm bill : hearing before the Subcommittee on Specialty Crops, Rural Development, and Foreign Agriculture of the Committee on Agriculture, House of Representatives, One Hundred Tenth Congress, first session, March 21, 2007.

"Serial no. 110-6."

A comprehensive review of Farm Bill contributions to wildlife conservation, 1985-2000 /

"December 2000."

Supplemental Coverage Option Expanding as Part of the Farm Safety Net

The 2014 Farm Bill created Supplemental Coverage Option (SCO), a new add-on crop insurance option which provides supplemental coverage on a producer’s underlying crop insurance policy. SCO operates by mimicking a producer’s individual crop insurance coverage and covering a portion of the deductible based on county-level yield or revenue. SCO is available in select Maryland counties for apples, barley, corn, grain sorghum, green peas, oats, peaches, processing beans, soybeans, sweet corn, and winter wheat, as of the 2017 crop year. USDA’s Risk Management Agency (RMA) continues to expand covered counties and crops covered, and begin distinguishing by practices (such as irrigated compared to non-irrigated).

Los Efectos de las Importaciones de Papa de EE.UU. Sobre los Ingresos de los Productores Nacionales

El objetivo del presente trabajo es analizar los efectos del aumento de las importaciones de papa de los Estados Unidos sobre el ingreso de los papicultores de la región cundiboyacense y por tanto las repercusiones sociales y económicas que se generan. Debido a la apertura económica y los nuevos tratados de libre comercio que han entrado en vigencia, varios sub-sectores de la economía colombiana se han visto afectados por la falta de competitividad de los productos nacionales frente a las importaciones. En el caso del sub-sector papicultor, se evidenció que las importaciones de papa procesada provenientes de los Estados Unidos han aumentado significativamente desde que entró en vigor el TLC en el año 2012. Debido a lo anterior el consumo y la venta de la papa nacional disminuyó considerablemente, lo que trajo consigo la preocupación de los campesinos que se dedican al cultivo del tubérculo.

Análisis del Tratado de Libre Comercio entre Colombia y Estados Unidos, enfocado al sector agropecuario

El proyecto estudia el impacto del Tratado de Libre Comercio firmado entre Colombia y Estados Unidos, está enfocado en el sector agropecuario y el efecto que éste pueda tener cuando los productos terminen su proceso de desgravación. La investigación fue descriptiva, documental y correlacional. El TLC fue firmado por Colombia con el fin de beneficiar a los productores y consumidores, reduciendo precios e incrementando la oferta de productos para el consumo interno. Otro argumento usado por Colombia es que un acuerdo de comercio bilateral incrementa los niveles de empleo e ingreso. Sin embargo, las diferencias de administración y estructura del sector agropecuario de los dos países son inmensas, y esto representa una desventaja y riesgo potencial para Colombia en términos de competitividad y desarrollo.