A scaled-down conference model for courses covering ever-changing fields in computer science undergraduate degree programs

Resumen tomado de la publicación

Teamwork competence and academic motivation in computer science engineering studies.

The present work is focused on studying two issues: the “teamwork” generic competence and the “academic motivation”. Currently the professional profile of engineers has a strong component of teamwork. On the other hand, motivational profile of students determines their tendencies when they come to work in team, as well as their performance at work. In this context we suggest four hypotheses: (H1) students improve their teamwork capacity by specific training and carrying out a set of activities integrated into an active learning process; (H2) students with higher mastery motivation have better attitude towards team working; (H3) students with higher mastery motivation obtain better results in academic performance; and (H4) students show different motivation profiles in different circumstances: type of courses, teaching methodologies, different times of the learning process. This study was carried out with computer science engineering students from two Spanish universities. The first results point to an improvement in teamwork competence of students if they have previously received specific training in facets of that competence. Other results indicate that there is a correlation between the motivational profiles of students and their perception about teamwork competence. Finally, and contrary to the initial hypothesis, these profiles appear to not influence significantly the academic performance of students.

Teamwork, motivational profiles and academic performance in computer science engineering

The present work is aimed at discussing several issues related to the teamwork generic competence, motivational profiles and academic performance. In particular, we study the improvement of teamwork attitude, the predominant types of motivation in different contexts and some correlations among these three components of the learning process. The above-mentioned aspects are of great importance. Currently, the professional profile of engineers has a strong teamwork component and the motivational profile of students determines both their tendencies when they come to work as part of a team, as well as their performance at work. Taking these issues into consideration, we suggest four hypotheses: (H1) students improve their teamwork capacity through specific training and carrying out of a set of activities integrated into an active learning process; (H2) students with higher mastery motivation have a better attitude towards teamwork; (H3) students with different types of motivations reach different levels of academic performance; and (H4) students show different motivation profiles in different circumstances: type of courses, teaching methodologies, different times of the learning process. This study was carried out with Computer Science Engineering students from two Spanish universities. The first results point to an improvement in teamwork competence of students if they have previously received specific training in facets of that competence. Other results indicate that there is a correlation between the motivational profiles of students and their perception of teamwork competence. Finally, results point to a clear relationship between some kind of motivation and academic performance. In particular, four kinds of motivation are analyzed and students are classified into two groups according to them. After analyzing several marks obtained in compulsory courses, we perceive that those students that show higher motivation for avoiding failure obtain, in general, worse academic performance.

Principles versus artifacts in computer science curriculum design

Computer Science is a subject which has difficulty in marketing itself. Further, pinning down a standard curriculum is difficult-there are many preferences which are hard to accommodate. This paper argues the case that part of the problem is the fact that, unlike more established disciplines, the subject does not clearly distinguish the study of principles from the study of artifacts. This point was raised in Curriculum 2001 discussions, and debate needs to start in good time for the next curriculum standard. This paper provides a starting point for debate, by outlining a process by which principles and artifacts may be separated, and presents a sample curriculum to illustrate the possibilities. This sample curriculum has some positive points, though these positive points are incidental to the need to start debating the issue. Other models, with a less rigorous ordering of principles before artifacts, would still gain from making it clearer whether a specific concept was fundamental, or a property of a specific technology. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

An Experience-Driven Pedagogy for the Instruction of Software Testing in Computer Science

In the realm of computer programming, the experience of writing a program is used to reinforce concepts and evaluate ability. This research uses three case studies to evaluate the introduction of testing through Kolb's Experiential Learning Model (ELM). We then analyze the impact of those testing experiences to determine methods for improving future courses. The first testing experience that students encounter are unit test reports in their early courses. This course demonstrates that automating and improving feedback can provide more ELM iterations. The JUnit Generation (JUG) tool also provided a positive experience for the instructor by reducing the overall workload. Later, undergraduate and graduate students have the opportunity to work together in a multi-role Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) course. The interactions use usability analysis techniques with graduate students as usability experts and undergraduate students as design engineers. Students get experience testing the user experience of their product prototypes using methods varying from heuristic analysis to user testing. From this course, we learned the importance of the instructors role in the ELM. As more roles were added to the HCI course, a desire arose to provide more complete, quality assured software. This inspired the addition of unit testing experiences to the course. However, we learned that significant preparations must be made to apply the ELM when students are resistant. The research presented through these courses was driven by the recognition of a need for testing in a Computer Science curriculum. Our understanding of the ELM suggests the need for student experience when being introduced to testing concepts. We learned that experiential learning, when appropriately implemented, can provide benefits to the Computer Science classroom. When examined together, these course-based research projects provided insight into building strong testing practices into a curriculum.

The graduate program in computer science.

Bibliography: p. 7-9.

Syllabus for low level performance for the qualifying examination in computer science /

"April, 1970"

ROBOCAR : educating the layman in computer science /

Originally presented as the author's thesis (M.A.), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Catalogue of the naval and marine engineering collection in the science division of the Victoria and Albert museum, South Kensington.

Mode of access: Internet.

Programming Paradigms in Computer Science Education

Main styles, or paradigms of programming – imperative, functional, logic, and object-oriented – are shortly described and compared, and corresponding programming techniques are outlined. Programming languages are classified in accordance with the main style and techniques supported. It is argued that profound education in computer science should include learning base programming techniques of all main programming paradigms.

Education in Computer Science and the Role of the Teacher in the Environment of Open Educational Resources

Report published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on "Education in the Information Society", Plovdiv, May, 2013

Competencias Profesionales

En el entorno del ejercicio profesional, las destrezas, los valores y actitudes personales, tienen un papel relevante y complementario al de los conocimientos. Este es el motivo de que la enseñanza basada en competencias, como una combinación de saber, ser, hacer y estar con otros, esté en la línea deseada. En este sentido, las universidades han estado elaborando nuevos planes de estudio en los que se desarrollan los nuevos Grados de acuerdo al EEES, incluyendo en estos, las competencias genéricas de cada titulación, que en general, se ciñen a las propuestas presentadas en el proyecto Tuning 2003.La investigación llevada a cabo sobre la competencia comunicativa escrita en el Grado de Ingeniería en Informática, se ha centrado en universidades de toda la geografía española. La información se ha analizado en función de dos marcos de clasificación: el marco curricular (planes de estudio y memorias de verificación de Grado) y el marco de evaluación (rúbricas).La investigación ha corroborado, que la competencia comunicativa escrita, una competencia instrumental genérica que está en el grupo de las destrezas lingüísticas, se trabaja de forma natural en una variedad de asignaturas repartidas a lo largo de los planes de estudio del Grado de Ingeniería en Informática, hecho que favorece la consecución de esta competencia. Aunque solo alrededor de un 20% de los planes de estudio analizados presentan una asignatura, la cual, uno de sus objetivos principales sea la de favorecer la competencia comunicativa escrita, se entiende, además de por la transversalidad de la competencia comunicativa escrita en un plan de estudios TIC, porque esta competencia, como se ha señalado, se puede trabajar de forma eficaz dentro de las metodologías de otras asignaturas.La investigación nos ha llevado a la conclusión, de que un futuro Graduado en Ingeniería Informática de una universidad española, presentará suficiencia en la competencia comunicativa escrita, ya que en esa dirección apuntan las referencias analizadas. El uso de rúbricas se hace necesario para evaluar el aprendizaje de dicha competencia, ya que sin evaluación, no hay posibilidad de constatar si realmente se alcanzan los niveles de calidad deseados.El modelo educativo que propone la UOC, permite que se desarrollen de forma preeminente una serie de competencias transversales, que resultan básicas a la hora de enfrentarse a los retos que nos propone la sociedad, preparando a profesionales, además de con los conocimientos técnicos propios de un Ingeniero en Informática, con las habilidades y competencias transversales necesarias que completan su formación técnica.