Lateral epicondylitis: New evidence for work relatedness.

International audience

Comparação entre o dano muscular de flexores do cotovelo e extensores do joelho em idosos= : Muscle damage comparison between elbow flexors and knee extensors in older adults

Universidade Estadual de Campinas . Faculdade de Educação Física

A systematic review with procedural assessments and meta-analysis of Low Level Laser Therapy in lateral elbow tendinopathy (tennis elbow)

Background: Recent reviews have indicated that low level level laser therapy (LLLT) is ineffective in lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) without assessing validity of treatment procedures and doses or the influence of prior steroid injections. Methods: Systematic review with meta-analysis, with primary outcome measures of pain relief and/or global improvement and subgroup analyses of methodological quality, wavelengths and treatment procedures. Results: 18 randomised placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) were identified with 13 RCTs (730 patients) meeting the criteria for meta-analysis. 12 RCTs satisfied half or more of the methodological criteria. Publication bias was detected by Egger's graphical test, which showed a negative direction of bias. Ten of the trials included patients with poor prognosis caused by failed steroid injections or other treatment failures, or long symptom duration or severe baseline pain. The weighted mean difference (WMD) for pain relief was 10.2 mm [95% CI: 3.0 to 17.5] and the RR for global improvement was 1.36 [1.16 to 1.60]. Trials which targeted acupuncture points reported negative results, as did trials with wavelengths 820, 830 and 1064 nm. In a subgroup of five trials with 904 nm lasers and one trial with 632 nm wavelength where the lateral elbow tendon insertions were directly irradiated, WMD for pain relief was 17.2 mm [95% CI: 8.5 to 25.9] and 14.0 mm [95% CI: 7.4 to 20.6] respectively, while RR for global pain improvement was only reported for 904 nm at 1.53 [95% CI: 1.28 to 1.83]. LLLT doses in this subgroup ranged between 0.5 and 7.2 Joules. Secondary outcome measures of painfree grip strength, pain pressure threshold, sick leave and follow-up data from 3 to 8 weeks after the end of treatment, showed consistently significant results in favour of the same LLLT subgroup (p < 0.02). No serious side-effects were reported. Conclusion: LLLT administered with optimal doses of 904 nm and possibly 632 nm wavelengths directly to the lateral elbow tendon insertions, seem to offer short-term pain relief and less disability in LET, both alone and in conjunction with an exercise regimen. This finding contradicts the conclusions of previous reviews which failed to assess treatment procedures, wavelengths and optimal doses.

Effect of eccentric contraction velocity on muscle damage in repeated bouts of elbow flexor exercise

Eccentric exercise induces muscle damage, but controversy exists concerning the effect of contraction velocity on the magnitude of muscle damage, and little is known about the effect of contraction velocity on the repeated-bout effect. This study examined slow (60 degrees.s(-1)) and fast (180 degrees.s(-1)) velocity eccentric exercises for changes in indirect markers of muscle damage following 3 exercise bouts that were performed every 2 weeks. Fifteen young men were divided into 2 groups based on the velocity of eccentric exercise: 7 in the Ecc60 (60 degrees.s(-1)) group, and 8 in the Ecc180 (180 degrees.s(-1)) group. The exercise consisted of 30 maximal eccentric contractions of the elbow flexors at each velocity, in which the elbow joint was forcibly extended from 60 degrees to 180 degrees (full extension) on an isokinetic dynamometer. Changes in maximal voluntary isometric contraction strength, range of motion, muscle soreness, and plasma creatine kinase activity before and for 4 days after the exercise were compared in the 2 groups using a mixed-model analysis (group x bout x time). No significant differences between groups were evident for changes in any variables following exercise bouts; however, the changes were significantly smaller (p < 0.05) after the second and third bouts than after the first bout. These results indicate that the contraction velocity does not influence muscle damage or the repeated-bout effect.

ECAP of Fe. Experiments and simulations of the in-elbow textures

The study of deformation properties of low carbon steels is of particular interest because of their many technological applications. Obtaining fine grained Fe based materials can be approached by one of the several available Severe Plastic Deformation (SPD) techniques. The current paper shows experimental data and simulations of the deformation process of iron samples by Equal Channel Angular Extrusion (ECAE). The samples were extruded in a 120 degrees channel die either by one or a few passes. The heterogeneity and local development of the deformation on the elbow of the channel has been studied by X-ray measuring and simulation of the texture evolution. The Self Consistent models used for simulation allowed the calculation of the spin of the main texture components which agreed pretty well with the experiments.

Changes in inflammatory mediators following eccentric exercise of the elbow flexors

The aims of this study were to examine the plasma concentrations of inflammatory mediators including cytokines induced by a single bout of eccentric exercise and again 4 weeks later by a second bout of eccentric exercise of the same muscle group. Ten untrained male subjects performed two bouts of the eccentric exercise involving the elbow flexors (6 sets of 5 repetitions) separated by four weeks. Changes in muscle soreness, swelling, and function following exercise were compared between the bouts. Blood was sampled before, immediately after, 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 24 h (1 d), 48 h (2 d), 72 h (3 d), 96 h (4 d) following exercise bout to measure plasma creatine kinase (CK) activity, plasma concentrations of myoglobin (Mb), interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p40, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), myeloperoxidase (MPO), prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)), heat shock protein (HSP) 60 and 70. After the first bout, muscle soreness increased significantly, and there was also significant increase in upper arm circumference; muscle function decreased and plasma CK activity and Mb concentration increased significantly. These changes were significantly smaller after the second bout compared to the first bout, indicating muscle adaptation to the repeated bouts of the eccentric exercise. Despite the evidence of greater muscle damage after the first bout, the changes in cytokines and other inflammatory mediators were quite minor, and considerably smaller than that following endurance exercise. These results suggest that eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage is not associated with the significant release of cytokines into the systemic circulation. After the first bout, plasma G-CSF concentration showed a small but significant increase, whereas TNF-alpha and IL-8 showed significant decreases compared to the pre-exercise values. After the second bout, there was a significant increase in IL-10, and a significant decrease in IL-8. In conclusion, although there was evidence of severe muscle damage after the eccentric exercise, this muscle damage was not accompanied by any large changes in plasma cytokine concentrations. The minor changes in systemic cytokine concentration found in this study might reflect more rapid clearance from the circulation, or a lack of any significant metabolic or oxidative demands during this particular mode of exercise. In relation to the adaptation to the muscle damage, the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 might work as one of the underlying mechanisms of action.

PHRENIC NERVE TRANSFER IN THE RESTORATION OF ELBOW FLEXION IN BRACHIAL PLEXUS AVULSION INJURIES: HOW EFFECTIVE AND SAFE IS IT?

OBJECTIVE: Phrenic nerve transfer has been used for treating lesions of the brachial plexus since 1970. Although, today, surgeons are more experienced with the technique, there are still widespread concerns about its effects on pulmonary function. This study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of this procedure. METHODS: Fourteen patients with complete palsy of the upper limb were submitted to phrenic nerve transfer as part of a strategy for surgical reconstruction of their plexuses. Two patients were lost to follow-up, and 2 patients were followed for less than 2 years. Of the remaining 10 patients, 9 (90%) were male. The lesions affected both sides equally. The mean age of the patients was 24.8 years (range, 14-43 years), and the mean interval from injury to surgery was 6 months (range, 3-9 months). The phrenic nerve was always transferred to the musculocutaneous nerve, and a nerve graft (mean length, 8 cm; range, 4.5-12 cm) was necessary in all cases. RESULTS: There was no major complication related to the surgery. Seven patients (70%) recovered functional level biceps strength (Medical Research Council grade >= 3). All of the patients exhibited a transient decrease in pulmonary function tests, but without clinical respiratory problems. CONCLUSION: On the basis of our small series and data from the literature, we conclude that phrenic nerve transfer in well-selected patients is a safe and effective procedure for recovering biceps function.

EVALUATION OF FUNCTIONAL GAIN OF THE ELBOW FOLLOWING STEINDLER SURGERY FOR BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY

Objective: To evaluate the gain in strength and range of motion after modified Steindler surgery of the elbow in patients with lesions of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus. Method: From 1998 to 2007, eleven patients with traumatic closed upper trunk lesion of the brachial plexus were studied. All the patients had development of at least 1 year of injury and degree of strength of elbow flexion ranging from M1 to M3. The patients underwent Steindler surgery with at least 6 months of follow-up. Pre- and post-operative assessments were carried out to determine gain in muscle strength, range of motion of the elbow, and DASH scale score. Results: Of the eleven patients studied, nine (82%) achieved a level of strength equal to or greater than M3 (MRC) with good functional recovery. Two (18%) reached strength level M2 (MRC). We observed that the patients had an average postoperative gain in range of motion of the elbow of 43.45 degrees. The average elbow flexion after surgery was 88 degrees. There was an improvement in elbow function, as demonstrated in the DASH Scale, in 81% of the patients studied. Conclusion: Modified Steindler surgery was effective in the treatment of patients with injuries of the upper trunk of the brachial plexus, with statistically significant gains in range of motion. In all the cases studied, there was some degree of gain in strength and range of elbow flexion, the gain being correlated with the initial muscle strength. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective clinical trial.

Initial effects of elbow taping on pain-free grip strength and pressure pain threshold

Study design: Single-blind, placebo control, randomized, crossover, experimental Study with repeated measures, Objective: To determine the initial effects of a taping technique on grip strength and pain in individuals with lateral epicondylalgia. Background: Taping techniques are advocated for chronic musculoskeletal conditions such as lateral epicondylalgia, a prevalent disorder with significant impact on the individual and community. Little evidence exists supporting the effects of taping techniques on musculoskeletal pain. Methods and Measures: Sixteen participants (mean age +/- SD, 45.8 +/- 10.2 years) with chronic lateral epicondylalgia (rnean duration +/- SD, 13.1 +/- 9.9 months) participated in a placebo control study of an elbow taping technique. Outcome measures were pain-free grip strength and pressure pain threshold taken before, immediately after, and 30 minutes after application of tape. Results: The taping technique significantly improved pain-free grip strength by 24% from baseline (P = .028). The treatment effect was greater than that for placebo and control conditions. Changes in pressure pain threshold (19%), although positive, were not statistically significant. Conclusion: This preliminary study demonstrated an initial ameliorative effect of a taping technique for lateral epicondylalgia and suggests that it should be considered as an adjunct in the management of this condition.

Hypoalgesia induced by elbow manipulation in lateral epicondylalgia does not exhibit tolerance

Previous studies have demonstrated that the initial hypoalgesic effect of spinal manipulative therapy was not antagonized by naloxone and did not exhibit tolerance with repeated applications. The implication is that endogenous opioid mechanisms of pain relief are probably not at play in spinal manipulative therapy. The role of endogenous opioid peptides in manipulation of the peripheral joints has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the initial hypoalgesic effect of a peripheral manipulative technique (mobilization-with-movement treatment for the elbow) demonstrated a tolerance to repeated applications (ie, reduction in magnitude of effect over repeated applications). Twenty-four participants with unilateral chronic lateral epicondylalgia participated in the study. A repeated measures study was conducted to examine the effect of repeated applications of the mobilization-with-movement treatment for the elbow on 6 separate treatment occasions at least 2 days apart. Pain-free grip strength and pressure pain threshold were chosen as the pain-related outcome measures. Changes in the percent maximum possible effect scores of measures of hypoalgesia were evaluated across the 6 treatment sessions by using linear trend analysis. The results showed no significant difference for the hypoalgesic effect of the treatment technique between sessions (P >.05). This peripheral manipulative therapy treatment technique appeared to have a similar effect profile to previously studied spinal manipulative therapy techniques, thereby contributing to the body of knowledge that indicates that manipulative therapy most likely induces a predominant non-opioid form of analgesia.

Open elbow arthrolysis for posttraumatic elbow stiffness

Résumé Introduction et objectif : l'articulation du coude est vulnérable à l'enraidissement, en particulier après un traumatisme. Le but de cette étude est d'évaluer les résultats du traitement chirurgical des raideurs post-traumatiques du coude. Type d'étude : étude rétrospective de cohorte. Les patients : dix-huit patients ont été évalués cliniquement par un observateur indépendant dans un intervalle moyen de 16 mois (6 à 43) après avoir subi une arthrolyse ouverte du coude, avec comme indication opératoire une raideur post traumatique du coude. Les traumatismes subis étaient : 11 fractures isolées, 1 luxation isolée, 6 fracture-luxations complexes. Les prises en charge initiales étaient : non-chirurgicales pour 3 patients, résection de la tête radiale pour 1 patient, réduction ouverte et ostéosynthèse pour 14 patients. Les patients ont présenté des types de raideurs mixtes pour la plupart d'entre eux. Type d'intervention : arthrolyse ouverte du coude. Evaluation : la fonction du coude et la satisfaction des patients furent les principales données récoltées. Lacs de l'évaluation, les scores de SECEC (Société Européenne de Chirurgie d'Epaule et du Coude) ont été calculés. Une analyse radiologique a aussi été effectuée. Résultats : trois patients ont présenté des complications postopératoires mineures : 1 déhiscence de plaie, 1 infection sous-cutanée, 1 sérome. Aucune de ces complications n'a eu de répercussion sur le résultat final. Le gain d'amplitude articulaire moyen était de 40°, avec un gain moyen en flexion du coude de 14° (0°-45°), et de 26° en extension (5°-67°) Aucun patient n'a présenté d'instabilité du coude. Il n'y a pas eu de signe de progression d'arthrose sur les clichés radiographiques à la revue. Nous n'avons pas mis en évidence de rapport entre le type de raideur et la voie d'abord sur les résultats. Les patients ayant présentés les raideurs les plus importantes ont bénéficiés des meilleurs résultats en terme de mobilité (p<0.001). Les meilleurs résultats ont été obtenus pour les patients opérés dans la première année aptes le traumatisme initial (p=0.008). Le score SECEC moyen était de 88 points pour les coudes opérés (52-100), et de 96 points pour les coudes sains (88-100). Conclusion : l'arthrolyse ouverte confère de bons résultats pour les patients présentant une raideur post traumatique du coude. Les meilleurs résultats sont obtenus pour les patients présentant une raideur sévère, prise en charge dans l'année qui suit le traumatisme initial.

Open elbow arthrolysis for posttraumatic elbow stiffness.

OBJECTIVES: The elbow joint is vulnerable to stiffness, especially after trauma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of open arthrolysis for posttraumatic elbow stiffness. DESIGN: Cohort retrospective study. PATIENTS: Eighteen consecutive patients were evaluated by an independent observer at an average of 16 months (6 to 43) after open elbow arthrolysis was performed for posttraumatic stiffness. Initial traumas were: isolated fractures (11) or dislocation (1) and complex fracture-dislocations (6). Initial treatments were: nonoperative (3), radial head resection (1), and ORIF (14). Patients presented predominantly with mixed contractures (combined extrinsic and intrinsic contractures). INTERVENTION: Open elbow arthrolysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Elbow function and patient satisfaction were the principal outcome measures. At follow-up European Society for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (SECEC) elbow scores were calculated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Three patients had minor postoperative complications: 1 partial wound dehiscence, 1 subcutaneous infection, and one seroma. None of these complications influenced the final result clinically. The mean total increase in range of motion was 40 degrees (13 to 112 degrees), with a mean gain in flexion of 14 degrees (0 to 45 degrees) and 26 degrees in extension (5 to 67 degrees). No patient showed signs of elbow instability. There was no radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis progression at follow-up. We did not find any correlations between the type of stiffness, the approaches used, and the results. However, patients with the greatest preoperative stiffness had significantly better improvement of mobility (P<0.001). The best results were obtained in patients who had arthrolysis done within 1 year after the initial trauma (P=0.008). The mean SECEC scores were 88 (52 to 100) for the injured elbows, and 96 (88 to 100) for the contralateral elbows. CONCLUSION: Open elbow arthrolysis for patients with posttraumatic stiffness improves joint function and provides patient satisfaction. The best results, in terms of gain of motion and patient satisfaction, were obtained in patients with severe stiffness who had operations within the first year after initial trauma.

Characteristics and outcome of 27 elbow periprosthetic joint infections: results from a 14-year cohort study of 358 elbow prostheses.

Elbow arthroplasty is increasingly performed in patients with rheumatic and post-traumatic arthritis. Data on elbow periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are limited. We investigated the characteristics and outcome of elbow PJI in a 14-year cohort of total elbow arthroplasties in a single centre. Elbow prosthesis, which were implanted between 1994 and 2007 at Schulthess Clinic in Zurich, were retrospectively screened for infection. PJI was defined as periprosthetic purulence, the presence of sinus tract or microbial growth. A Kaplan-Meier survival method and Cox proportional hazard analysis were performed. Of 358 elbow prostheses, PJI was identified in 27 (7.5%). The median patient age (range) was 61 (39-82) years; 63% were females. Seventeen patients (63%) had a rheumatic disorder and ten (37%) had osteoarthritis. Debridement and implant retention was performed in 78%, followed by exchange or removal of the prosthesis (15%) or no surgery (7%).The relapse-free survival (95% CI) was 79% (63-95%) after 1 year and 65% (45-85%) after 2 years. The outcome after 2 years was significantly better when patients were treated according to the algorithm compared to patients who were not (100% vs. 33%, p &lt;0.05). In 21 patients treated with debridement and retention, the cure rate was also higher when the algorithm was followed (100% vs. 11%, p &lt;0.05). The findings of the present study suggest that the treatment algorithm developed for hip and knee PJI can be applied to elbow PJI. With proper patient selection and antimicrobial therapy, debridement and retention of the elbow prosthesis is associated with good treatment outcome.

Ulnar nerve transposition at the elbow : local anesthesia should be preferred to general anesthesia

Après la compression du nerf médian au niveau du tunnel carpien, la compression du nerf ulnaire au niveau du coude est le deuxième syndrome compressif le plus fréquent des nerfs périphériques. La chirurgie des nerfs périphériques consiste dans une décompression nerveuse et est caractérisée par un suivi post¬opératoire parfois très douloureux avec des douleurs qui peuvent chroniciser si insuffisamment traitées. Le traitement chirurgical de décompression nerveuse se fait traditionnellement sous anesthésie générale ou régionale. Une analgésie post-opératoire plus efficace et durable avec moindre risque de chronicisation avait justifié ce choix jusqu'à ce jour. Grâce au développement de la chirurgie ambulatoire ces dernières années, un grand nombre d'interventions chirurgicales au niveau de la main sont effectués sous anesthésie locale. Au vu d'une meilleure connaissance de cette technique d'anesthésie, son rôle dans la chirurgie des nerfs périphériques a été remis en question. Alors que plusieurs études ont démontré que l'anesthésie locale est aussi efficace que l'anesthésie générale et régionale au sujet de la chirurgie du tunnel carpien, son utilisation pour la chirurgie du nerf ulnaire reste peu connue. La raison de l'hésitation à l'utilisation de l'anesthésie locale pour le traitement du tunnel ulnaire est due au fait que dans plus de la moitié des cas, une simple décompression n'est pas suffisante et qu'il est souvent nécessaire de transposer le nerf ulnaire devant l'épicondyle ulnaire. La seule publication disponible au sujet de l'utilisation de l'anesthésie locale dans le traitement du tunnel ulnaire considère comme irréalisable d'utiliser cette méthode dans le cas d'une transposition. Malgré cette mise en garde, nous avons, depuis plusieurs années, des excellents résultats avec la transposition du nerf ulnaire sous anesthésie locale. Avec le but d'objectiver notre expérience dans ce domaine nous avons souhaité analyser nos résultats de façon rétrospective avec particulière attention aux douleurs post-opératoires et à la satisfaction des patients. Les dossiers de cinquante patients Consécutifs (26F, 24M) opérés par le même chirurgien dans notre service de 2002 à 2012 ont été analysés rétrospectivement. Les critères suivants ont été récoltés: l'âge du patient, la profession, la main dominante, les détails des techniques opératoires utilisées, le type d'anesthésie, l'intensité du suivi ainsi que les complications, le niveau de douleur dans l'immédiat post-opératorie ainsi que à une année de l'intervention. Les patients ont été divisés en 4 groupes: les opérés sous anesthésie générale avec transposition du nerf (n=17) ou sans transposition (n=10) et les opérés sous anesthésie locale avec transposition (n=12) ou sans transposition (n=11). Au premier jour la douleur était comparable dans tous les groupes. A une semaine, elle était deux fois plus importante lorsque la transposition avait été réalisée sous anesthésie générale par rapport à si une anesthésie locale avait été effectuée (p=0.03). La satisfaction s'est révélée plus élevée mais non significative chez les patients opérés sous anesthésie locale. Ces derniers étaient significativement plus enclins à répéter la chirurgie comparé a ceux opérés sous anesthésie générale (p=0.04). En conclusion, les résultats de cette étude suggèrent que l'anesthésie locale est au moins autant efficace que l'anesthésie générale en termes de complications et de douleurs post-opératoires indépendamment du fait qu'une transposition nerveuse soit effectuée ou pas. Un meilleur contrôle des douleurs à une semaine post-opératoire a contribué à une haute satisfaction des patients de notre étude.