Illustrations of tests for evaluating instruction in some phases of consumer-buying. Home economics education.

Mimeographed.

An educational program for household employment : trade and industrial and home economics education.

"November 1936 [i.e. 1935]"

A study of graduates of the University of Minnesota home economics education curriculum.

Mode of access: Internet.

Staff monograph on home economics education in Texas State-supported institutions of higher education.

Bibliography: p. xvii-xviii.

Personal and family living and home economics education,

"A summary of Education for personal and family living and its relation to home economics education, by Esther F. Segner and Ethel L. Cornell."

The teaching of certain aspects of child development in the homemaking program in the secondary school: a complilation of materials from states. Home economics education.

"Prepared by Rua Van Horn."--p. iii.

Home economics education : a device for evaluation in teacher education.

"January, 1949."

State survey of home economics education : final report /

Mode of access: Internet.

Studies and research in home economics education reported by colleges and universities, with ... supplement indicating studies reported in published form. U.S. Department of the interior. Office of education. Washington, D.C.

Multigraphed.

Family values for democratic living : a home economics course designed for high school seniors by the University of the State of New York, the State Education Department, Bureau of Home Economics, Albany.

Mode of access: Internet.

Education's role in economic development and in assisting the poor

Much faith has been put in the increased supply of education as a means to promote national economic development and as a way to assist the poor and the disadvantaged. However, the benefits that nations can obtain by increasing the level of education of their workforce depends on the availability of other forms of capital to complement the use of its educated workforce in production. Generally, less developed nations are lacking in complementary capital compared to more developed ones and it is appropriate for less developed countries to spend relatively less on education. The contribution of education to economic growth depends on a nation’s stage of economic development. It is only when a nation becomes relatively developed that education becomes a major contributor to economic growth. It is possible for less developed nations to retard their economic growth by favouring investment in educational capital rather than other forms of capital. Easy access to education is often portrayed as a powerful force for assisting the poor and the disadvantaged. Several reasons are given here as to why it may not be so effective in assisting the poor and in promoting greater income equality even though the aim is a worthy one. Also, an economic argument is presented in favour of special education for the physically and mentally handicapped. This paper is not intended to belittle the contribution of education to economic development nor to devalue the ideal of making basic education available to all. Instead, it is intended as an antidote to inflated claims about the ability of greater investment in education to promote economic growth and about the ability of more widespread access to education to reduce poverty and decrease income inequality.

Are changes in education important for the wage premium and unemployment?

A generalized rise in unemployment rates for both college and high-schoolgraduates, a widening education wage premium, and a sharp increase incollege education participation are characteristic features of thetransformations of the U.S. labor market between 1970 and 1990. This paperinvestigates the interactions between these changes in the labor marketand in educational attainment. First, it develops an equilibrium searchand matching model of the labor market where education is endogenouslydetermined. Second, calibrated versions of the model are used to studyquantitatively whether either a skill-biased change in technology or amismatch shock can explain the above facts. The skill-biased shock accountsfor a considerable part of the changes but fails to produce the increasein unemployment for the educated labor force. The mismatch shock explainsinstead much of the change in the four variables, including the wage premium.

How different are returns to education? Evidence from German school choices

This study presents estimates of returns to post-secondary educationand wage differentials among graduates fromdifferent secondary schoolsin Germany. I use an empirical model that captures the basic features ofthe German education system. It controls for selection into post-secondaryeducation and treats latter as endogenous in the wage equation. Myresults show that OLS estimates are severely biased. The direction ofthe bias depends on the secondary school type. Annual returns topost-secondary education differ significantly: they are eight timeshigher for graduates from the highest secondary school than for graduatesfrom the lowest secondary school.