Distributive education in the high school : a suggested guide for administrators and teachers of distribution and marketing /

Bibliography: p. 60-62.

Evaluative criteria for distributive vocational education.

Mode of access: Internet.

Business/personal services curriculum guide.

Developed and published under contractual agreements between the Illinois State Board of Education, Dept. of Adult, Vocational and Technical Education, Research and Development Section and the Dept. of Vocational Education Studies, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.

Finance & credit curriculum guide /

On cover: Marketing and distributive education curriculum guide to finance and credit.

General marketing curriculum guide /

"Should be used in conjunction with the Marketing and distributive education curriculum planning guide."

Hardware building materials, farm and garden curriculum guide /

Developed under contractual agreements RD3-A9-240 and R-33-X-0442-240 between the Illinois State Board of Education, Dept. of Adult, Vocational and Technical Education, Research and Development Section and the Dept. of Vocational Education Studies, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.

Industrial marketing curriculum guide.

Title on cover: Marketing and distributive education curriculum guide, industrial marketing.

Investigation of Communism in New York City distributive trades. Hearings before a special subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, eightieth Congress, second session, pursuant to H. Res. 11 ...

Includes index.

Developing a culture to support peer review of teaching in higher education

This presentation addresses issues related to leadership, academic development and scholarship of teaching and learning, and highlights research funded by the Australian Office of Learning and Teaching (OLT) designed to embed and sustain peer review of teaching within the culture of 5 Australian universities: Queensland University of Technology, University of Technology, Sydney, University of Adelaide, Curtin University, and Charles Darwin University. Peer review of teaching in higher education will be emphasised as a professional process for providing feedback on teaching and learning practice, which if sustained, can become an effective ongoing strategy for academic development (Barnard et al, 2011; Bell, 2005; Bolt and Atkinson, 2010; McGill & Beaty 2001, 1992; Kemmis & McTaggart, 2000). The research affirms that using developmental peer review models (Barnard et al, 2011; D'Andrea, 2002; Hammersley-Fletcher & Orsmond, 2004) can bring about successful implementation, especially when implemented within a distributive leadership framework (Spillane & Healey, 2010). The project’s aims and objectives were to develop leadership capacity and integrate peer review as a cultural practice in higher education. The research design was a two stage inquiry process over 2 years. The project began in July 2011 and encompassed a development and pilot phase followed by a cascade phase with questionnaire and focus group evaluation processes to support ongoing improvement and measures of outcome. Leadership development activities included locally delivered workshops complemented by the identification and support of champions. To optimise long term sustainability, the project was implemented through existing learning and teaching structures and processes within the respective partner universities. Research outcomes highlight the fundamentals of peer review of teaching and the broader contextual elements of integration, leadership and development, expressed as a conceptual model for embedding peer review of teaching within higher education. The research opens a communicative space about introduction of peer review that goes further than simply espousing its worth and introduction. The conceptual model highlights the importance of development of distributive leadership capacity, integration of policies and processes, and understanding the values, beliefs, assumptions and behaviors embedded in an organizational culture. The presentation overviews empirical findings that demonstrate progress to advance peer review requires an ‘across-the-board’ commitment to embed change, and inherently demands a process that co-creates connection across colleagues, discipline groups, and the university sector. Progress toward peer review of teaching as a cultural phenomenon can be achieved and has advantages for academic staff, scholarship, teaching evaluation and an organisation, if attention is given to strategies that influence the contexts and cultures of teaching practice. Peer review as a strategy to develop excellence in teaching is considered from a holistic perspective that by necessity encompasses all elements of an educational environment and has a focus on scholarship of teaching. The work is ongoing and has implication for policy, research, teaching development and student outcomes, and has potential application world-wide.

Developing a culture of peer review of teaching through a distributive leadership approach

Teaching is a core function of higher education and must be effective if it is to provide students with learning experiences that are stimulating, challenging and rewarding Obtaining feedback on teaching is indispensable to enhancing the quality of learning design, facilitating personal and/or professional development and maximising student learning outcomes. Peer review of teaching has the potential to improve the quality of teaching at tertiary level, by encouraging critical reflection on teaching, innovation in teaching practice and scholarship of teaching at all academic levels. However, embedding peer review within the culture of teaching and learning is a significant challenge that requires sustained commitment from senior leadership as well as those in leadership roles within local contexts.

Financing higher education : the case for a graduate tax

Article

Growth, distributive justice and social policy

Includes bibliography