Disability employment practices in the Australian retail sector

The persistent low employment rate of people with disability has emerged as a concern for the Australian Government and society in general. The research addressed the gap between the supply and demand sides of disability employment by exploring organisational mechanisms underlying the proactive employment of people with disability. Data was collected from a large Australian retail organisation that currently employs people with disability. The findings revealed how the organisation legitimises disability employment practices, within its internal and external operating environments. The research informs the areas of government policy and organisational practices concerning future employment opportunities for people with disability.

Front-line workers as intermediaries : the changing landscape of disability and employment services in Australia

Recent welfare reform in Australia has been constructed around the now-familiar principle of paid work and willingness to work as the fundamental marker of social citizenship. Beginning with the long-term unemployed in Australia in the mid 1990s, the scope of welfare reform has now extended to include people with a disability – which is a category of income support that has been growing in Australia. From the national government’s point of view this growth is a financial concern as it seeks to move as many people as possible into paid work to support the costs of an ageing population (DEWR, 2005). In doing so, the government has changed the meaning of disability in terms of eligibility for financial support from the state, and at the same time redefined the role of people with a disability with regard to work, and the role of the state with regard to the disabled. This has been a matter of some political contention in Australia.

The Eligibility Definition Used in the Social Security Administration’s Disability Programs Needs to be Changed

In its October 2003 report on the definition of disability used by the Social Security Administration’s (SSA’s) disability programs [i.e., Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) for people with disabilities], the Social Security Advisory Board raises the issue of whether this definition is at odds with the concept of disability embodied in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and, more importantly, with the aspirations of people with disabilities to be full participants in mainstream social activities and lead fulfilling, productive lives. The Board declares that “the Nation must face up to the contradictions created by the existing definition of disability.” I wholeheartedly agree. Further, I have concluded that we have to make fundamental, conceptual changes to both how we define eligibility for economic security benefits, and how we provide those benefits, if we are ever to fulfill the promise of the ADA. To convince you of that proposition, I will begin by relating a number of facts that paint a very bleak picture – a picture of deterioration in the economic security of the population that the disability programs are intended to serve; a picture of programs that purport to provide economic security, but are themselves financially insecure and subject to cycles of expansion and cuts that undermine their purpose; a picture of programs that are facing their biggest expenditure crisis ever; and a picture of an eligibility determination process that is inefficient and inequitable -- one that rations benefits by imposing high application costs on applicants in an arbitrary fashion. I will then argue that the fundamental reason for this bleak picture is the conceptual definition of eligibility that these programs use – one rooted in a disability paradigm that social scientists, people with disabilities, and, to a substantial extent, the public have rejected as being flawed, most emphatically through the passage of the ADA. Current law requires eligibility rules to be based on the premise that disability is medically determinable. That’s wrong because, as the ADA recognizes, a person’s environment matters. I will further argue that programs relying on this eligibility definition must inevitably: reward people if they do not try to help themselves, but not if they do; push the people they serve out of society’s mainstream, fostering a culture of isolation and dependency; relegate many to a lifetime of poverty; and undermine their promise of economic security because of the periodic “reforms” that are necessary to maintain taxpayer support. I conclude by pointing out that to change the conceptual definition for program eligibility, we also must change our whole approach to providing for the economic security of people with disabilities. We need to replace our current “caretaker” approach with one that emphasizes helping people with disabilities help themselves. I will briefly describe features that such a program might require, and point out the most significant challenges we would face in making the transition.

State Estimates of Employment Rates for Persons with Disabilities: Report Summary

Statistics on the states’ employment rates for persons with disabilities relative to their non-disabled peers may be of assistance to providers of employment services for persons with disabilities. Such information can help service providers, policy makers, and disability advocacy leaders to assess whether the employment rate of people with disabilities is improving over time, given policy, regulatory, and service intervention strategies. A recent report from the Cornell University Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (RRTC) for Economic Research on Employment Policy for Persons with Disabilities uses data from the March Current Population Survey to estimate employment rates for persons with and without a disability in the non-institutionalized working-age (aged 25 through 61) civilian population in the United States, and for each state and the District of Columbia for the years 1980 through 1998. The employment rate of persons with a disability relative to that of persons without disabilities are found to vary greatly across states. Over the last 20 years the relative employment rate of those with a disability dramatically declined overall and in most states.

Disability in a Technology-Driven Workplace

New Internet and Web-based technology applications have meant significant cost and time efficiencies to many American businesses. However, many employers have not yet fully grasped the impact of these new information and communication technologies on applicants and employees with certain disabilities such as vision impairments, hearing problems or limited dexterity. Although not all applicants and employees who have a disability may experience IT-access problems, to select groups it can pose a needless barrier. The increasing dominance of IT in the workplace presents both a challenge and an opportunity for workers with disabilities and their employers. It will be up to HR professionals to ensure that Web-based HR processes and workplace technologies are accessible to their employees with disabilities. .

Employment restrictions among persons with ICD-10 anxiety disorders: characteristics from a population survey

Disability, employment, and employment restrictions among persons with ICD-10 anxiety disorders were investigated at a population level in comparison to persons without disability or long-term health conditions. Data were provided by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) collected in a 1998 national survey. Multistage sampling obtained a probability sample of 37,580 individuals in the household component of the survey. Trained lay interviewers using ICD-10 computer-assisted interviews identified household residents with anxiety disorders. Details of employment restrictions are reported and discussed. The four most commonly reported restrictions were: restricted in the type of job (24.0%); need for a support person (23.3%); difficulty changing jobs (18.6%); and restricted in the number of hours (15.4%). The nature and extent of employment restrictions characterizing persons with anxiety disorders indicates a need for strengthened disability and health condition screening at application for Government income support and at gateways to public funded vocational assistance. (c) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Creating and Enabling a Sustainable Livelihood for Persons with Intellectual Disabilities: A Comparative Case Study of Ghana and Canada.

Abstract Despite the plethora of published studies on rights, including employment rights, for persons with intellectual disabilities (Hatton, 2002; Tarulli, et al., 2004; Ward & Stewart, 2008), relatively few have discussed their applicability to individuals with intellectual disabilities to facilitate their full involvement in socio-economic development. This study explored the mechanisms facilitating and inhibiting the full participation of persons with intellectual disabilities in the area of employment through a comparative case analysis of policies and practices in Ontario, Canada (a developed country) and in Ghana (a developing country) both of which are signatories to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD). The study employed targeted recruitment based on the nature of the research which is a combination of policy and practice investigation.

Prevalencia de dolor lumbar en los trabajadores de una planta de fabricación de productos de cerámica de Madrid, Cundinamarca, en el turno de 6 am a 2pm, año 2014.

Objetivo: Establecer la prevalencia, incapacidad y discapacidad de dolor lumbar en los trabajadores de la planta de fabricación de productos de cerámica, de Madrid Cundinamarca, del turno de 6 am a 2 pm año 2014. Metodología: Se realizó un estudio de corte transversal para determinar la prevalencia, incapacidad y discapacidad de dolor lumbar en un grupo de trabajadores que asisten en el turno de 6 am a 2 pm, en una empresa fabricante de productos de cerámica en el municipio de Madrid, departamento de Cundinamarca, Colombia. Se tuvieron en cuenta variables como edad, puesto de trabajo, antigüedad en cargo actual, consumo de cigarrillo, actividad física, presencia o ausencia de dolor lumbar e intensidad del dolor lumbar. Se aplicaron dos escalas para determinar el nivel de incapacidad y discapacidad para el dolor lumbar. Se empleó la escala de Owestry (ODI, OswestryDisabilityIndex) para evaluar la incapacidad de dolor lumbar y la escala de Roland-Morris para discapacidad física. Para le análisis de las variables continuas se determinó el supuesto de normalidad utilizando la prueba de ShapiroWilks.Para determinar la presencia de asociaciones se utilizó la prueba de Ji cuadrado de Pearson o el test exacto de Fischer si el valor esperado es menor a cinco. Para el análisis de la información se utilizó el software EpiInfo versión 7.1.3 (CDC, Atlanta, EE.UU.) Resultados: Se incluyeron 99 trabajadores, rango de edad entre 32 y 46 años y una mediana de 37 años. Más de la mitad de los trabajadores evaluados reportaron un dolor moderado (n=57), tan solo un 10% reportó máximo dolor, la escala de incapacidad de Oswestry78 trabajadores se ubicaron entre 0 y 40% reflejando esto ausencia de incapacidad, y solo 4 pacientes presentaron valores entre 40 y 60% incapacidad moderada. La escala de discapacidad de Roland-Morris mostró que la mayoría de los trabajadores presentan una discapacidad leve (n=97) y tan solo 2 trabajadores presentaron discapacidad moderada.La única asociación positiva encontrada se dio entre la presencia de dolor lumbar y la ejecución de actividad física una vez a la semana (p 0,005). Conclusiones: el dolor lumbar está presente en más del 50% de los trabajadores encuestados; sin embargo solo 4 de los trabajadores encuestados, presenta incapacidad por este dolor. En cuanto a la discapacidad pudimos determinar que solo 2 de los trabajadores la manifiesta.

Grado de pérdida de capacidad laboral asociada a la comorbilidad de los desórdenes músculo esqueléticos en la junta de calificación de invalidez regional Huila, 2009-2012

Resumen: Los desórdenes músculo esqueléticos son entidades que generan un efecto en la salud relacionados con la calidad de vida, dado al impacto global en la condición física, el bienestar psicológico y funcional. Estas entidades generan un gran número de indemnizaciones y en algunas oportunidades según el grado de pérdida de capacidad laboral la invalidez. Objetivo: Determinar la asociación del grado de perdida de la capacidad laboral con la comorbilidad de los desórdenes músculo esqueléticos y otros factores asociados. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio de corte transversal, basado en registros e historias clínicas. Los registros iniciales fueron 1427 casos, de los cuales 513 presentaban diagnóstico de DME y de estos 240 solicitaron la pérdida de capacidad laboral a la junta de invalidez regional Huila en el periodo comprendido del 2009 al 2012. Resultados: La distribución del grado de la pérdida de capacidad laboral generada de los DME por incapacidad permanente parcial fue del 73,3% y por invalidez el 26,7%. Se encontró una asociación significativa con respecto a la edad (p=0,002), donde el rango de 50-65 años presento mayor pérdida de capacidad laboral; con el género (p=0,047), siendo el femenino más prevalente la invalidez (34,7%) que en el masculino (23,2%) y la comorbilidad (p=0,019), donde los desórdenes músculo esqueléticos y los trastornos depresivos generaron mayor pérdida de capacidad laboral. No se encontró asociación significativa con la escolaridad (p=0,167), oficio (p=0,442) y actividad económica (p=0,118). En el análisis multivariado se encontró asociación significativa con el origen común (OR=4.028, IC 95%: 2.010, 8.072), el sexo femenino (OR=2.565, IC 95%: 1.140, 5.771), y el nivel de escolaridad técnico (OR=12.208, IC 95%: 1.372, 108.634). Conclusiones: La comorbilidad generó mayor pérdida de capacidad laboral, aunque los factores que en conjunto mostraron asociación fueron la edad avanzada, el género femenino, el origen común y el menor nivel educativo.

Specialised supported education for Australians with psychotic disorders

Australia has a network of Federally funded disability employment and vocational rehabilitation services, including a proportion of outlets that specialise in providing services for persons with psychiatric disabilities. However, neither Federal nor State Governments currently provide or fund disability-specific education assistance to persons with psychiatric disabilities. To begin considering whether Specialised Supported Education is indicated for persons with psychotic disorders, we examined data collected in a national 'Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers Australia, 1998'. International studies of the effectiveness of overseas Supported Education programs were also examined to identify the forms of assistance most likely to warrant consideration in Australia. U.S.A. evidence indicates that Specialised Supported Education is emerging as an effective career development option for persons with psychotic disorders. An example of an innovative Specialised Supported Education program is provided to illustrate how this type of program can be implemented in Australia.