Providing Integrity and Authenticity in DICOM Images: A Novel Approach

The increasing adoption of information systems in healthcare has led to a scenario where patient information security is more and more being regarded as a critical issue. Allowing patient information to be in jeopardy may lead to irreparable damage, physically, morally, and socially to the patient, potentially shaking the credibility of the healthcare institution. Medical images play a crucial role in such context, given their importance in diagnosis, treatment, and research. Therefore, it is vital to take measures in order to prevent tampering and determine their provenance. This demands adoption of security mechanisms to assure information integrity and authenticity. There are a number of works done in this field, based on two major approaches: use of metadata and use of watermarking. However, there still are limitations for both approaches that must be properly addressed. This paper presents a new method using cryptographic means to improve trustworthiness of medical images, providing a stronger link between the image and the information on its integrity and authenticity, without compromising image quality to the end user. Use of Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine structures is also an advantage for ease of development and deployment.

Digital radiology and Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS)

Plain radiography still accounts for the vast majority of imaging studies that are performed at multiple clinical instances. Digital detectors are now prominent in many imaging facilities and they are the main driving force towards filmless environments. There has been a working paradigm shift due to the functional separation of acquisition, visualization, and storage with deep impact in the imaging workflows. Moreover with direct digital detectors images are made available almost immediately. Digital radiology is now completely integrated in Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) environments governed by the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard. In this chapter a brief overview of PACS architectures and components is presented together with a necessarily brief account of the DICOM standard. Special focus is given to the DICOM digital radiology objects and how specific attributes may now be used to improve and increase the metadata repository associated with image data. Regular scrutiny of the metadata repository may serve as a valuable tool for improved, cost-effective, and multidimensional quality control procedures.

Effect of image compression of digital lateral cephalograms on the reproducibility of cephalometric points

Objectives: To evaluate the influence of JPEG quality factors 100, 80 and 60 on the reproducibility of identification of cephalometric points on images of lateral cephalograms, compared with the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format. Methods: The sample was composed of 30 images of digital lateral cephalograms obtained from 30 individuals (15 males and 15 females) on a phosphor plate system in DICOM format. The images were converted to JPEG with quality factors 100, 80 and 60 with the aid of software, adding up to 90 images. The 120 images (DICOM, JPEG 100, 80 and 60) were blinded and 12 cephalometric points were identified on each image by three calibrated orthodontists, using the x-y coordinate system, on a cephalometric software. Results: The results revealed that identification of cephalometric points was highly reproducible, except for the point Orbitale (Or) on the x-axis. The different file formats did not present a statistically significant difference. Conclusions: JPEG images of lateral cephalograms with quality factors 100, 80 and 60 did not present alterations in the reproducibility of identification of cephalometric points compared with the DICOM format. Good reproducibility was achieved for the 12 points, except for point Or on the x-axis. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2009) 38, 393-400. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/40996636

Dublin Hospital. Reports and communications in medicine and surgery, 1818-1830.

Mode of access: Internet.

Reports and Communications in Medicine and Surgery

Mode of access: Internet.

Níveis de referência de diagnóstico em procedimentos pediátricos de medicina nuclear

Introdução: A Medicina Nuclear (MN) é uma modalidade imagiológica em grande expansão na atualidade, tornando-se especialmente importante em pediatria. Considerando a elevada radiosensibilidade das crianças, torna-se crucial otimizar os vários procedimentos dentro desta modalidade. Objetivo: Determinar Níveis de Referência de Diagnóstico (NRD’s) para procedimentos de MN Pediátrica num dos centros de excelência nacional e comparar os valores obtidos com a literatura internacional. Material e Métodos: Foi realizada uma análise retrospetiva dos cabeçalhos Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) de Tomografia por Emissão de Positões (PET-CT) disponíveis no Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS), de modo a recolher os valores de CT Dose Index (CTDIvol-mGy), Dose Length Product (DLP-mGy.cm), atividade administrada, o género, peso, altura e idade foram recolhidos; De modo a obter os valores de dose relativos a outros procedimentos de MN foram analisados documentos em formato papel. Considerando a idade dos doentes foi estabelecida a categorização etária de forma a determinar os NRD’s locais com base no percentil 75 dos valores de dose. Resultados: Os NRD’s para a atividade administrada em recém-nascidos (0 anos) para a Cintigrafia Renal e Cistografia Direta foi de 26MBq (0,70 e 0,69mCi, respetivamente). Na Renocintigrafia, o valor obtido foi 30MBq (0,80mCi). Para o exame de PET-CT corpo inteiro, os NRD’s para a atividade administrada, CTDIvol e DLP, para os 15 anos foi de 296MBq, 3,23mGy e de 396,79mGy.cm, respectivamente. Para a Cintigrafia do esqueleto o valor obtido para os 15 anos foi de 684MBq (17,5mCi). Conclusões: Após a comparação com os resultados publicados em outros estudos verificaram-se algumas diferenças, sendo os valores de NRD locais obtidos acima dos níveis apresentados.

Software livre e de código aberto para avaliação de imagens de angiotomografia de coronárias

FUNDAMENTO: A estandardização do padrão de imagens utilizada dentro da medicina foi realizada em 1993 por meio do padrão DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine). Diversos exames utilizam esse padrão e cada vez mais são necessários softwares capazes de manipular esse tipo de imagem, porém esses softwares geralmente não têm o formato livre e de código aberto, e isso dificulta o seu ajuste para os mais diferentes interesses. OBJETIVO: Desenvolver e validar um software livre e de código aberto capaz de manipular imagens DICOM de exames de angiotomografia de coronárias. MÉTODOS: Desenvolvemos e testamos o software intitulado ImageLab na avaliação de 100 exames selecionados de forma randômica por meio de um banco de dados. Foram realizadas 600 análises divididas por dois observadores utilizando o ImageLab e um outro software comercializado junto a aparelhos de tomografia computadorizada Philips Brilliance, na avaliação da presença de lesões e placas coronarianas nos territórios do Tronco da Coronária Esquerda (TCE) e na Artéria Descendente Anterior (ADA). Para avaliar as concordâncias intraobservador, interobservadores e intersoftware, utilizamos concordância simples e estatística Kappa. RESULTADOS: As concordâncias observadas entre os softwares foram em geral classificadas como substancial ou quase perfeitas na maioria das comparações. CONCLUSÃO: O software ImageLab concordou com o software Philips na avaliação de exames de angiotomografia de coronárias especialmente em pacientes sem lesões, com lesões inferiores a 50% no TCE e inferiores a 70% na ADA. A concordância para lesão >70% na ADA foi menor, porém isso também é observado quando se utiliza o padrão de referência anatômico.

Colonoscopia virtual em cães

Pós-graduação em Medicina Veterinária - FMVZ

Avaliação da distribuição das forças produzidas com arco lingual removível pelo método de elementos finitos

Pós-graduação em Ciências Odontológicas - FOAR

Is the sedimentation sign associated with spinal stenosis surgical treatment effect in SPORT?

STUDY DESIGN Subgroup analysis of the lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) without degenerative spondylolisthesis diagnostic cohort of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial multicenter randomized clinical trial with a concurrent observational cohort. OBJECTIVE To determine if sedimentation sign on magnetic resonance image can help with LSS treatment decisions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA LSS is one of the most common reasons for surgery in the US elderly, but there is a dearth of reliable diagnostic tools that give a clear indication for surgery. Recent studies have suggested that positive sedimentation sign on magnetic resonance image may be a possible prognostic indicator. METHODS All patients with LSS in both the randomized and observational cohorts had imaging-confirmed stenosis, were surgical candidates, and had neurogenic claudication for at least 12 weeks prior to enrollment. Patients were categorized as "mild," "moderate," or "severe" according to stenosis severity. Of the 654 patients with LSS enrolled in Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial, complete T2-weighted axial and sagittal digitized images of 115 patients were available for retrospective review. An independent orthopedic spine surgeon evaluated these deidentified Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine files for the sedimentation sign. RESULTS Sixty-six percent (76/115) of patients were found to have a positive sedimentation sign. Those with a positive sedimentation sign were more likely to have stenosis at L2-L3 (33% vs. 10% P=0.016) or L3-L4 76% vs. 51%, P=0.012), and to have severe (72% vs. 33%, P<0.0001) central stenosis (93% vs. 67% P<0.001) at 2 or more concurrent levels (57% vs. 18%, P=0.01). In multivariate models, the surgical treatment effect was significantly larger in the positive sedimentation sign group for Oswestry Disability Index (-16 vs. -7; P=0.02). CONCLUSION A positive sedimentation sign was associated with a small but significantly greater surgical treatment effect for Oswestry Disability Index in patients with symptomatic LSS, after adjusting for other demographic and imaging features. These findings suggest that positive sedimentation sign may potentially be a useful adjunct to help guide an informed treatment choice regarding surgery for LSS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2.

Comparison between embossed digital imaging and unprocessed film-based radiography in detecting periodontal bone defects: an in vitro study

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Comparison of simulated periodontal bone defect depth measured in digital radiographs in dedicated and non-dedicated software systems

Objectives: To compare simulated periodontal bone defect depth measured in digital radiographs with dedicated and non-dedicated software systems and to compare the depth measurements from each program with the measurements in dry mandibles.Methods: Forty periodontal bone defects were created at the proximal area of the first premolar in dry pig mandibles. Measurements of the defects were performed with a periodontal probe in the dry mandible. Periapical digital radiographs of the defects were recorded using the Schick sensor in a standardized exposure setting. All images were read using a Schick dedicated software system (CDR DICOM for Windows v.3.5), and three commonly available non-dedicated software systems (Vix Win 2000 v.1.2; Adobe Photoshop 7.0 and Image Tool 3.0). The defects were measured three times in each image and a consensus was reached among three examiners using the four software systems. The difference between the radiographic measurements was analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and by comparing the measurements from each software system with the dry mandibles measurements using Student's t-test.Results: the mean values of the bone defects measured in the radiographs were 5.07 rum, 5.06 rum, 5.01 mm and 5.11 mm for CDR Digital Image and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) for Windows, Vix Win, Adobe Photoshop, and Image Tool, respectively, and 6.67 mm for the dry mandible. The means of the measurements performed in the four software systems were not significantly different, ANOVA (P = 0.958). A significant underestimation of defect depth was obtained when we compared the mean depths from each software system with the dry mandible measurements (t-test; P congruent to 0.000).Conclusions: the periodontal bone defect measurements in dedicated and in three non-dedicated software systems were not significantly different, but they all underestimated the measurements when compared with the measurements obtained in the dry mandibles.