An audit of diagnostic reference levels in interventional cardiology and radiology: are there differences between academic and non-academic centres?

A wide variation in patient exposure has been observed in interventional radiology and cardiology. The purpose of this study was to investigate the patient dose from fluoroscopy-guided procedures performed in non-academic centres when compared with academic centres. Four procedures (coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, angiography of the lower limbs and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the lower limbs) were evaluated. Data on the dose-area product, fluoroscopy time and number of images for 1000 procedures were obtained from 23 non-academic centres and compared with data from 5 academic centres. No differences were found for cardiology procedures performed in non-academic centres versus academic ones. However, significantly lower doses were delivered to patients for procedures of the lower limbs when they were performed in non-academic centres. This may be due to more complex procedures performed in the academic centres. Comparison between the centres showed a great variation in the patient dose for these lower limb procedures.

CT radiation dose in children: a survey to establish age-based diagnostic reference levels in Switzerland

This work aimed at assessing the doses delivered in Switzerland to paediatric patients during computed tomography (CT) examinations of the brain, chest and abdomen, and at establishing diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for various age groups. Forms were sent to the ten centres performing CT on children, addressing the demographics, the indication and the scanning parameters: number of series, kilovoltage, tube current, rotation time, reconstruction slice thickness and pitch, volume CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) and dose length product (DLP). Per age group, the proposed DRLs for brain, chest and abdomen are, respectively, in terms of CTDI(vol): 20, 30, 40, 60 mGy; 5, 8, 10, 12 mGy; 7, 9, 13, 16 mGy; and in terms of DLP: 270, 420, 560, 1,000 mGy cm; 110, 200, 220, 460 mGy cm; 130, 300, 380, 500 mGy cm. An optimisation process should be initiated to reduce the spread in dose recorded in this study. A major element of this process should be the use of DRLs.

Patient doses in CT examinations in Switzerland: implementation of national diagnostic reference levels.

Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) were established for 21 indication-based CT examinations for adults in Switzerland. One hundred and seventy-nine of 225 computed tomography (CT) scanners operated in hospitals and private radiology institutes were audited on-site and patient doses were collected. For each CT scanner, a correction factor was calculated expressing the deviation of the measured weighted computed tomography dose index (CTDI) to the nominal weighted CTDI as displayed on the workstation. Patient doses were corrected by this factor providing a realistic basis for establishing national DRLs. Results showed large variations in doses between different radiology departments in Switzerland, especially for examinations of the petrous bone, pelvis, lower limbs and heart. This indicates that the concept of DRLs has not yet been correctly applied for CT examinations in clinical routine. A close collaboration of all stakeholders is mandatory to assure an effective radiation protection of patients. On-site audits will be intensified to further establish the concept of DRLs in Switzerland.

Diagnostic reference levels for the most frequent radiological examinations carried out in Brazil

Objectives. A large-scale survey of doses to patients undergoing the most frequent radiological examinations was carried out in health services in Sao Paulo (347 radiological examinations per 1 000 inhabitants), the most populous Brazilian state. Methods. A postal dosimetric kit with thermoluminescence dosimeters was used to evaluate the entrance surface dose (ESD) to patients. A stratified sampling technique applied to the national health database furnished important data on the distribution of equipment and the annual number of examinations. Chest, head (skull and sinus), and spine (cervical, thoracic, and lumbar) examinations were included in the trial. A total of 83 rooms and 868 patients were included, and 1 415 values of ESD were measured. Results. The data show large coefficients of variation in tube charge, giving rise to large variations in ESD values. Also, a series of high ESD values associated with unnecessary localizing fluoroscopy were detected. Diagnostic reference levels were determined, based on the 75th percentile (third quartile) of the ESD distributions. For adult patients, the diagnostic reference levels achieved are very similar to those obtained in international surveys. However, the situation is different for pediatric patients: the ESD values found in this survey are twice as large as the international recommendations for chest radiographs of children. Conclusions. Despite the reduced number of ESD values and rooms for the pediatric patient group, it is recommended that practices in chest examinations be revised and that specific national reference doses and image quality be established after a broader survey is carried out.

How to set up and apply reference levels in fluoroscopy at a national level.

A nationwide survey was launched to investigate the use of fluoroscopy and establish national reference levels (RL) for dose-intensive procedures. The 2-year investigation covered five radiology and nine cardiology departments in public hospitals and private clinics, and focused on 12 examination types: 6 diagnostic and 6 interventional. A total of 1,000 examinations was registered. Information including the fluoroscopy time (T), the number of frames (N) and the dose-area product (DAP) was provided. The data set was used to establish the distributions of T, N and the DAP and the associated RL values. The examinations were pooled to improve the statistics. A wide variation in dose and image quality in fixed geometry was observed. As an example, the skin dose rate for abdominal examinations varied in the range of 10 to 45 mGy/min for comparable image quality. A wide variability was found for several types of examinations, mainly complex ones. DAP RLs of 210, 125, 80, 240, 440 and 110 Gy cm2 were established for lower limb and iliac angiography, cerebral angiography, coronary angiography, biliary drainage and stenting, cerebral embolization and PTCA, respectively. The RL values established are compared to the data published in the literature.

Suggestion of a national diagnostic reference level for 18F-FDG/PET scans in adult cancer patients in Brazil

Objective To suggest a national value for the diagnostic reference level (DRL) in terms of activity in MBq.kg–1, for nuclear medicine procedures with fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) in whole body positron emission tomography (PET) scans of adult patients. Materials and Methods A survey on values of 18F-FDG activity administered in Brazilian clinics was undertaken by means of a questionnaire including questions about number and manufacturer of the installed equipment, model and detector type. The suggested DRL value was based on the calculation of the third quartile of the activity values distribution reported by the clinics. Results Among the surveyed Brazilian clinics, 58% responded completely or partially the questionnaire; and the results demonstrated variation of up to 100% in the reported radiopharmaceutical activity. The suggested DRL for 18F-FDG/PET activity was 5.54 MBq.kg–1 (0.149 mCi.kg–1). Conclusion The present study has demonstrated the lack of standardization in administered radiopharmaceutical activities for PET procedures in Brazil, corroborating the necessity of an official DRL value to be adopted in the country. The suggested DLR value demonstrates that there is room for optimization of the procedures and 18F-FDG/PET activities administered in Brazilian clinics to reduce the doses delivered to patients. It is important to highlight that this value should be continually revised and optimized at least every five years.

An environmental uncertainty-based diagnostic reference tool for evaluating the performance of supply chain value streams

This research has responded to the need for diagnostic reference tools explicitly linking the influence of environmental uncertainty and performance within the supply chain. Uncertainty is a key factor influencing performance and an important measure of the operating environment. We develop and demonstrate a novel reference methodology based on data envelopment analysis (DEA) for examining the performance of value streams within the supply chain with specific reference to the level of environmental uncertainty they face. In this paper, using real industrial data, 20 product supply value streams within the European automotive industry sector are evaluated. Two are found to be efficient. The peer reference groups for the underperforming value streams are identified and numerical improvement targets are derived. The paper demonstrates how DEA can be used to guide supply chain improvement efforts through role-model identification and target setting, in a way that recognises the multiple dimensions/outcomes of the supply chain process and the influence of its environmental conditions. We have facilitated the contextualisation of environmental uncertainty and its incorporation into a specific diagnostic reference tool.

Evaluation of exposure parameters in plain radiography: a comparative study with european guidelines

Typical distribution of exposure parameters in plain radiography is unknown in Portugal. This study aims to identify exposure parameters that are being used in plain radiography in the Lisbon area and to compare the collected data with European references [Commission of European Communities (CEC) guidelines]. The results show that in four examinations (skull, chest, lumbar spine and pelvis), there is a strong tendency of using exposure times above the European recommendation. The X-ray tube potential values (in kV) are below the recommended values from CEC guidelines. This study shows that at a local level (Lisbon region), radiographic practice does not comply with CEC guidelines concerning exposure techniques. Further national/local studies are recommended with the objective to improve exposure optimisation and technical procedures in plain radiography. This study also suggests the need to establish national/local diagnostic reference levels and to proceed to effective measurements for exposure optimisation.

Identificação dos parâmetros técnicos de exposição em exames radiológicos convencionais na região de Lisboa: uma comparação com a referência europeia

Em Portugal não são conhecidos estudos publicados que identifiquem com clareza as distribuições típicas dos valores associados aos parâmetros técnicos de exposição utilizados nos exames radiológicos mais comuns. Este estudo tem como objectivos identificar os parâmetros técnicos utilizados em exames radiológicos convencionais na região de Lisboa e comparar os dados com a referência europeia CEC. Os resultados obtidos evidenciam que nas projecções estudadas existe uma predominância para o uso de termos de exposição acima da recomendação CEC e de valores de potencial da ampola (kV) abaixo da recomendação. Esta investigação sugere a necessidade de fixar os NRD nacionais, e/ou locais, e efectuar as respectivas medições, dado que a optimização da exposição é um mecanismo de controlo fundamental para limitar as exposições desnecessárias dos pacientes às radiações ionizantes. Conclui-se que a nível local (região da Grande Lisboa) existe um desconhecimento da prática radiológica enquadrada nos referenciais europeus de boa prática radiológica. Desconhecendo-se a situação a nível nacional, sugerem-se estudos no sentido de identificar os padrões de prática radiológica a nível do País e de promover a optimização dos procedimentos em radiologia convencional. ABSTRACT - Typical distribution of exposure parameters in plain radiography is unknown in Portugal. This study aims to identify exposure parameters that are being used in plain radiography in Lisbon area and to compare collected data with European references (CEC guidelines). Results show that in the four anatomic regions there is a strong tendency of using exposure times above the European recommendation. We also found that x-ray tube potential values (kV) are below the recommended values from CEC guidelines. This study shows that at a local level (Lisbon region) radiographic practice does not fit with CEC guidelines concerning exposure techniques. We suggest continuing national/local studies with the objective to improve exposure optimization and technical procedures in plain radiography. This study also suggests the need to establish national/local DRL’s and to proceed to effective measurements for exposure optimization.

Contributo para o estabelecimento de níveis de referência de diagnóstico em equipamentos de TC multidetectores

Actualmente a Tomografia Computorizada (TC) é um dos métodos de diagnóstico por imagem que tem uma maior contribuição para a dose de radiação X recebida pelos pacientes. Pretende-se com este estudo avaliar as doses praticadas em TC e contribuir para o estabelecimento de Níveis de Referência de Diagnóstico (NRD) na região da Grande Lisboa, Portugal. Foram efectuadas medições de dose em 5 equipamentos de TC multidetectores, considerando o abdómen como área anatómica de interesse. Recorreu-se a uma câmara de ionização e a um fantoma para obter o índice de dose de TC (CTDI) e o produto dose-comprimento (DLP), que permitem determinar os NRD. Estes valores foram comparados com os NRD propostos pela Guideline Europeia e com os estudos desenvolvidos em outros países, como o Reino Unido, Grécia e Taiwan. Os resultados revelaram que os valores de NRD obtidos neste estudo (16,7 mGy para o CTDIvol e 436,5 mGy·cm para o DLP) são discrepantes relativamente à Guideline Europeia (±50%), mas muito próximos relativamente aos NRD estabelecidos nos países considerados. Estes valores podem ser eventualmente explicados pelos equipamentos em análise e pela utilização de protocolos de exame adoptados pelos profissionais de Radiologia nas instituições analisadas. ABSTRACT - Nowadays Computed Tomography (CT) is one of the imaging techniques which have a large contribution to radiation dose received by patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate CT doses and contribute to the establishment of Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRL) in Lisbon, Portugal. Dose measurements on 5 multidetector CT scanners have been performed, considering the abdomen as the anatomic region of interest. All measurements were performed using an ionization chamber and a phantom to obtain the index CT dose (CTDI) and the dose-length product (DLP), which are used to determine DRL. These values were compared not only with European reference dose values but also with DRL studies developed in other countries like United Kingdom, Greece and Taiwan. The results revealed that DRL values obtained in this study (CTDIvol is 16,7 mGy and DLP is 436,5 mGy·cm) have a higher discrepancy to European Guideline (±50%), while the DRL´s of other countries are nearest to values obtained in this study. Those differences may be eventually explained by the type of the evaluated equipments but also by the exam protocols used by the Radiology professionals on the analyzed institutions.

Contributo para o estabelecimento de níveis de referência de diagnóstico locais em tomografia computorizada nos exames de crânio e tórax em adultos

Atualmente a Tomografia Computorizada (TC) é o método de imagem que mais contribui para a dose coletiva resultante de exposições médicas. Este estudo pretende determinar os valores de Índice de Dose de TC (CTDI) e produto dose-comprimento (DLP) para os exames de crânio e tórax em adultos num equipamento de TC multidetetores; e efetuar uma análise objetiva e subjetiva da qualidade da imagem. Determinaram-se os valores de CTDI e DLP utilizando uma câmara de ionização e fantomas de crânio e tórax. Efetuou-se ainda uma análise objetiva e subjetiva da qualidade da imagem com o fantoma Catphan® 500 e observadores, respetivamente. Os resultados obtidos foram superiores relativamente às Guidelines europeias no protocolo de crânio (CTDIvol = 80,13 mGy e DLP = 1209,22 mGy.cm) e inferiores no protocolo de tórax (CTDIvol = 8,37 mGy e DLP = 274,71 mGy.cm). Na análise objetiva da qualidade da imagem, à exceção da resolução de baixo contraste no protocolo de crânio, todos os outros critérios analisados estavam em conformidade com a legislação. Na análise subjetiva da qualidade da imagem existiu uma diferença estatisticamente significativa entre as classificações atribuídas pelos observadores às imagens nos parâmetros avaliados (p = 0,000-0,005).

Níveis de referência em diagnóstico em tomografia computorizada para planeamento em radioterapia

Mestrado em Radiações Aplicadas às Tecnologias da Saúde- Ramo de especialização: Terapia com Radiações